Tommy Nantung INDOT Research & Development Division July 22, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHMs commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Advertisements

Organisation of transport services in Sub Saharan Africa: Recommendations for reforms in Uganda Mustapha Benmaamar Transport Research Laboratory, UK.
December 10, 2014 Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs WSDOT Can Provide Reliable Long-Term Pavement Estimates, but Accuracy of Bridge Estimates.
Highway 46 in BeresfordHighway 19 North of Humboldt Highway 73 South of Lemmon Interstate 90 East of Wyoming Line.
American Trucking Associations National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors March 2007 Ray Kuntz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Watkins and.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Data Collection & Reporting Office of Highway Policy Information 2012 Highway Information Seminar - Session: 6B Thursday, October.
PaveDAT Pavement Damage Assessment Tool Roger Mingo, P.E.
Impact of Heavy Truck Traffic on Pavement Performance
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
FHWA Update for the Virtis Opis User Group Meeting Thomas Saad, P. E. FHWA Resource Center Phone:
INDOT Challenge: How to Maintain Our Highway Infrastructure Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
AXLE LOAD CONTROL IN TANZANIA Regulations and Operations
Regional Harmonization Can Yield Multiple Benefits Safety ~ Economy ~ Environment Transportation Infrastructure David Cole Commissioner, MaineDOT Truck.
Presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow Cambridge Systematics June 17, 2009 Wisconsin Truck Size and Weight Study.
Regional and Short Line Railroads
Commercial Vehicles and Freight Mobility Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study (HCAS) Patrick Balducci, Battelle February 8, 2010.
1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study Patrick Balducci, Battelle Joe Stowers, Sydec July 27, 2010.
March 2009 Permitting Over Sized Loads In Texas Ray Hutchinson Motor Carrier Division, TxDOT.
USDOT Numbers USDOT 123. What is a USDOT #? The USDOT # is the number that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) assigns to each commercial.
Association of Indiana Counties Community Forum Indiana Road and Highway Funding Neal Carboneau Research Manager Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program.
THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
NDACo Legislative Wrap-up Funding for Non-Oil Producing County Highways and Bridges Jason Benson Cass County Engineer.
The variable cost approach to pricing John Thomas Deputy Director, Economic Regulation Office of Rail Regulation, UK 9 July 2004.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE WEIGHT ENFORCEMENT. CURRENT CHALLENGES Significant Growth in CMV Traffic Increased congestion and delay Demand for larger and.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Kern Motorist Aid Authority Services And Operations.
Infrastructure – Mission to Preserve & Renew. Infrastructure – Transportation funding must be sufficient to both repair and sometimes replace our highway,
Why PS 3150? Gordon Sparks, Ph.D.,P.Eng Gordon Sparks, Ph.D.,P.Eng.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
Mark Nelson, Program Manager for Statewide Planning and Data Analysis TRB International Partnership Meeting January 14, 2015.
Truck Weight Control in Indonesia: A Fresh Perspective PRE-SCOPING STUDY Clell Harral Rustam Rauh Shirley Oroh Jakarta 6 May 2011.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
1 the effect of heavy vehicle composition on design traffic loading calculations (E80s)
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Dane County Department of Public Works, Highway & Transportation Jerry Mandli, P.E. Commissioner/ Director.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
Analyzing Changes to Truck Size and Weight Regulations Methods for States presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow,
RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGESAND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BYTRUCKS RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGES AND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BY TRUCKS Terry Swygert South.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Quantifying the Value of Research in Indiana Tommy Nantung INDOT Research and Development Division AASHTO RAC Annual Meeting July 29, 2015 Portland, Oregon.
Transportation infrastructure: Are bridges an area of concern? Ryan Church and Jason Mumbach September 17, 2008.
The Use of PAVEDAT for the District-wide Truck Enforcement Plan June 20, 2012 Mark Berndt Eulois Cleckley.
City and County of San Francisco Mayor’s Transportation Task Force: Draft Findings and Recommendations Presentation from the San Francisco Controller’s.
1 Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles (GARVEE) Bond Presented to the California Transportation Commission July 25, 2007.
Darrin Roth American Trucking Associations, Inc. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROAD PRICING.
TALKING FREIGHT SEMINAR: Truck Separated Lanes/Truck Tolling MARCH 16, 2005 DARRIN ROTH DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAY OPERATIONS AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
Recommended Citizens Budget for 2016 Presented to Summit County Council December 28, 2015.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
SUPER HEAVY LOADS IN TEXAS 2012 AAMVA CONFERENCE: ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.
Review and Comment on Draft 2009 Ten-Year State Highway Operation and Protection Plan Presented to California Transportation Commission February
Nevada Transportation Conference
MnDOT Budget Overview House Transportation Finance Committee Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer February.
Fuel cost and road damage: evidence from weigh-in-motion data
Transportation Funding
Cheyenne Regional Freight Mobility Plan
AIRLINE TRANSPORTATION AERO 4100 / 5100
Experiences with On-Board Mass Monitoring in Australia Gavin Hill General Manager, Strategic Development Transport Certification Australia.
Presentation transcript:

Tommy Nantung INDOT Research & Development Division July 22, 2014 Costs & Revenues Associated with Overweight Truck Operations in Indiana Tommy Nantung INDOT Research & Development Division July 22, 2014

Study Objectives Main objective: Generate information to assist INDOT in updating or streamlining its permitting process for overweight (OW) trucks Intended to be based on data analysis pertaining to: Cost of asset (pavement & bridge) damage due to OW trucks, Enforcement costs and recommendations, Revenue trends

Background Information On one hand… INDOT needs highway operations policies that retain/attract industry even those that involve haulage of large loads, thereby enhancing economic development On the other hand… INDOT seeks policies that: protect billions of taxpayer $ invested in highway infrastructure do not lead to premature/accelerated deterioration of such assets through excess loading or undue safety hazard

Background Information Facility Damage vs. Repair Expenditure Traffic Load vs. Facility Damage Repair Expenditure vs. Permit/ License Fees

Estimating the Cost of Pavement Damage due to OW Trucks Route Type MPDC ($/ESAL-mile) Load Share (85%) Non-load Share (15%) Total Interstate 0.006 0.001 0.007 NHS Non-IS 0.055 0.010 0.065 Non NHS 0.218 0.038 0.256 Mean 0.093 0.016 0.109

Results for OW Trucks with GVW 80,001 -108,000 lbs

Results for OW Trucks with GVW 108,000 - 150,000 lbs Permit fee at time of the study (60 cents)

Results for OW Trucks with GVW > 150,000 lbs Permit fee at time of the study ($1.00)

Conclusions Pavement asset damage costs herein are derived as a function of: Pavement characteristics (e.g., functional class) Vehicle characteristics (GVW, axle spacing, axle load) Pavement damage cost estimates (average): $0.006/ESAL-mile on Interstates $0.218/ESAL-mile on non-NHS 9

Conclusions Consequences of ignoring reconstruction or maintenance expenditures (as in past studies) Non-consideration of these expenditures can result in underestimation of pavement damage cost by 79% and 83%, respectively. Bridge damage cost estimate Example: a 5-axle truck weighing 80-108 kips, crossing a steel bridge 0-20 yrs of age, assuming 25% load share of damage, the damage cost is $0.007/foot/pass. 10