2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup Triggers. These outreach strategies recommended, must have a specific date, flow level, index well level, river condition,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ontario Low Water Response (OLWR)

Advertisements

Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.

BC Hydros: Reservoir Archaeology Program CRT facilitated workshop Nov 19, 2013.

Edwards Aquifer Forecasts for 2014 Jim Winterle—EAA modeling supervisor HCP Stakeholder Committee May 28,

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup. Product of approval 1.Approve regional triggers- provide a comprehensive list of conditions, flow levels, and visual.

CITY OF SAN MARCOS/TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY 2015 WORK PLAN BUDGETED CONSERVATION MEASURES.

Recommendations for a Statewide Water Plan By: Ewan Hadgraft Alabama Rivers Alliance Birmingham-Southern College.

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup. On March 20 th the Implementing Committee created the 2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup due to the impending drought and.

Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Regional Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans for the Sacramento River Contractors.

Drought Preparedness with feedback from YOU Julie Kalansky April 8 th, 2015 Sonoma County Adaptation Forum.

WRWSA Water Supply Plan Update Progress Report – (April 1- May 15) >Project Tasks 1.Water Demand Estimates 2.Availability of Ground- and Surface Water.

Climate Change in the Columbia Basin Starting the Dialogue CCRF Workshop Cranbrook BC May 30 th 2007.

31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.

NIDIS-Supported Efforts in the ACF River Basin Puneet Srivastava Associate Professor Department of Biosystems Engineering Auburn University Chris Martinez.

1 September 13, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.

City of New Braunfels Edwards Aquifer and the Habitat Conservation Plan HCP Implementing Committee May 29,

Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.

Region K Water Plan John E. Burke, P.E. Chairman, Lower Colorado Regional Planning Group (Region K) General Manager, Aqua Water Supply Corp.

Environmental Flows Under Texas Senate Bill 3: Did We Leave Enough Water for the Fishes? Kirk Winemiller, Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas.

What does the SALCC do? Mission: Create a shared blueprint for landscape conservation actions that sustain natural and cultural resources.

Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Urban Water Institute 19 th Annual Water Policy Conference August 22-24, 2012 San Diego.

Illinois RC & D Introduction to R esource C onservation & D evelopment Module 3: What makes it run?

North Fork Shenandoah River Results Application For the State Drought Assessment Plan Jennifer L. Krstolic and Donald C. Hayes.

CENTRAL FLORIDA COORDINATION AREA Central Florida Water Initiative Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan Bill Graf Intergovernmental.

Youghiogheny River Lake Storage ReAllocation for Downstream Water Supply by Werner C. Loehlein, P.E.

CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Climate Change Adaptation Across the Landscape Michelle Selmon Regional Climate Change Specialist June.

May I Have Another Helping Of VISPO? Presented at Uvalde, TX October 3, 2014 Rob Hogan Associate Professor & Extension Economist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension.

Senate Enrolled Act No. 369 Update Indiana’s Water Shortage Plan.

IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.

Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – March 12, 2013 HLVRCD.

Analysis of Raleigh’s Drought Triggers May 8, 2013 and.

Comal Springs Mapping Project Texas Parks and Wildlife Department United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

Regional Water Conservation Monitoring Committee.

2015 EAA Work Plans. Science Committee Review: Applied Research and Ecological Model Work Plans on April 8. Biological and Water Quality Monitoring Work.

Eastern Snake River Plain Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan (CAMP) Progress Report ESHMC January 13, 2009.

Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program – Impact to San Antonio October 3, 2011 Green Industry Alliance.

VIA 2040 Plan Needs Assessment Alternative Scenarios Draft High-Capacity Network Draft Transit Network Plan Draft Implementation Plan Final Long Range.

An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup Introduction.

Copyright 2010 STWR L.P. by Rodney T. Smith President, Southwest Texas Water Resources, L.P. Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program Stakeholders.

VISPO. Goal: 40,000 acre-feet of irrigation rights to forbear October 1: Trigger Date if J-17 is at or below 635 ft. January 1: Opt-out becomes available.

Water Supply at Beaver Lake, Arkansas Little Rock District US Army Corps of Engineers ® One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation.

Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.

Proposed Water Availability Study for the San Antonio Groundwater Basin Santa Barbara County Water Agency Santa Barbara County Public Works Dept. Matt.

Edward’s Aquifer Ground-water Flow Model Texas Ground Water 2004 November 19, 2004 George B. Ozuna.

1 Water Resources Management - DEQ’s Role in Water Supply - State Water Commission October 1, 2002.

USACE Managing a Drought  Overview  Timeline  Depletion Scenario Current Status– 17 Oct 07.

Bighorn Long-Term Issues Group Where Are We Going?

Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.

CVPIA §3406(b)(2) Water Operations on the Sacramento River Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2012.

City of San Antonio Water Policy Study John M. Dugan, AICP, Director Department of Planning & Community Development 1 Plan Element Working Group Summit.

Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.

Potential Changes to Sections and 307.9: Standards Applicability and Attainment Gregg Easley TCEQ Water Quality Standards Team September 6, 2007.

Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.

Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.

Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Reservoir Operating Criteria Proposed Modifications Lovell, Wyoming July 29, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.

Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #5 July 15 – September 15.

June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?

REGION H Water Planning Group Freese and Nichols, Inc. | LBG-Guyton Associates | Ekistics Corporation DEVELOPING THE REGION H 2016 REGIONAL WATER PLAN.

Southern California Water Dialogue September 23, 2015.

Communication Tools for Urban Climate Extremes AIR Session 2016 Extension Sustainability Summit, Portland, OR Gregg Garfin and Sarah Leroy, University.

City of New Braunfels Watershed Management Programs

Drought Research and Outreach at CIG

John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision

HYDROLOGIC DATA BRIEF FOR THE EDWARDS AQUIFER October 16, 2013

2018 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment

Report 2 Review of the EAHCP Summary of the National Academy’s 2

Presentation and update on the development of the EAHCP Data Management Program Alicia March 17, 2016.

Hydrologic Update Alicia.

Summary of Chesdin Reservoir Reliability

Presentation transcript:

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup Triggers

These outreach strategies recommended, must have a specific date, flow level, index well level, river condition, or other defined trigger for implementation or distribution.

Purpose of Presentation: To present a draft list of potential specific dates, flow levels, index well levels, river conditions, or other defined visual occurrence to be used by the Implementing Committee to trigger outreach

Next Steps: 1.Workgroup members solicit input from community and others 2.Discuss potential triggers and provide feedback to John Boggess for listing at next meeting 3.At 4/23 meeting, agree to final list of triggers

San Antonio PoolCritical Period Trigger (10-day avg.) Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3Stage 4Stage 5 J-17 level (MSL) <660<650<640<630<625 San Marcos Springs flow (cfs) <96<80N/A Comal Springs flow (cfs) <225<200<150<100<45/40* Withdrawal Reduction 20%30%35%40%44% *San Antonio Pool only. <45 cfs 10-d rolling avg, or <40 cfs 3-d rolling average. Expires >45 cfs for 10-d rolling avg.

Uvalde PoolCritical Period Trigger (10-day avg.) Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3Stage 4Stage 5 J-27 level (MSL) N/A<850<845<842<840 San Marcos Springs flow (cfs) N/A Comal Springs flow (cfs) N/A Withdrawal Reduction N/A5%20%35%44% Uvalde Pool enters Stage 2 based on 10-d rolling avg of J27 index wel water level.

San Marcos Springs Flow Regime:  Long-term average: 140 cfs  Minimum 6-month average: 75 cfs  Minimum 1-month average: 52 cfs  Minimum daily average: 45 cfs Comal Springs Flow Regime:  Long-term average: 225 cfs  Minimum 6-month average: 75 cfs  Minimum 1-month average: 45 cfs  Minimum daily average: 30 cfs

Minimal flows in HCP VISPO Triggers ASR triggers Critical Period Agriculture Operations and Conservation

Recreation Visual decrease in flowing water Loss of cultural or economic opportunity Water Conservation Activities Adaptive Mgmt due to drought

USGS Recharge Estimate (drought of record conditions) Provision M of the ITP Conservation Contracts

Concern/Milestone Trigger for Outreach response (Before) Trigger for Outreach response (After) SpokespersonCommunity AffectedType of MediaKey Elements of Messaging Prepared Response Spring Run 1 going ceases to flow Spring Run 1 < 5 cfs NB- SM- SA- U/M- New Braunfels / Entire Region NB-KNBT (Interview) and Herald Zeitung SA- Express News SM- Social Media Uvalde/Medina- Factsheets and Table Tents 1.HCP is doing … to help… 2.HCP slowed/prevented this from occurring sooner by… 3.Spring Run 1 is not “ideal” habitat; rather Landa Lake is, and it still represents habitat in good condition. 4.Spring Run 1 is the first major spring to go dry in the Comal system and this was planned for and is part of the HCP 5.Definition of terms-Not dry but stops flowing A, C, F……. Minimum SM and NB SSA area in SM Refugia Triggers and at different levels VISPO ASR Comal falls below 100 Sm Falls below 100 CPM Reductions Current and/or Future Proactive Triggers General positive “feel good” messaging at regular intervals 1.Successes of HCP 2.Initiatives by Regional Stakeholders (SAWS ASR, SM/NB) 3.Conservation and education programs… etc.