ESE Data Initiatives District, School and Charter School Leaders Bob Bickerton, Associate Commissioner Jessica Perez-Rosello, CIO May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

September – October, 2012 Maryann Donie
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Purpose of Instruction
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Schools Interoperability Framework (SIF) Project Overview.
SIF Program 2014 MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Executive Office Of Education William A. Holscher – State SIF Program Manager.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Houston Independent School Technology Plan for
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Where Louisiana Medicaid is Today and Where it Will To Be in the Future April 17, 2012.
SIF Program 2014 Executive Office Of Education William A. Holscher – State SIF Program Manager.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Improving Data Migration Across Wyoming Schools Across Wyoming Schools October 2004 Presented By Data System Design Team Sponsored by the Wyoming Dept.
SIF Association Membership – what does it mean for your district?
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
SIF Program 2015 Executive Office Of Education William A. Holscher – State SIF Program Manager.
Kit Goodner Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Data Systems Division of Accountability, Research & Measurement June 2011.
Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, AELAS Program Director Mark Svorinic, AZ-SLDS Program.
Statewide Initiatives & Lane County School Districts A conversation with Lane County Districts on statewide data initiatives and the implications for Lane.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Race To The Top (RttT) MSDE Division of Accountability and Assessment Data Systems (DAADS) Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation Three Years in a Row.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Coordinating ARRA and EDFacts – An Update for PESC Ross Santy Director, EDFacts U. S. Department of Education October 20, 2009.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools
Enterprise GIS Planning and Framework Jennifer Reek GIS Coordinator City of Brookfield, WI.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Gathering Network Requirements Designing and Supporting Computer Networks – Chapter.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
Rolling Out a Data Warehouse Communication, Coordination and Collaboration for Successful Implementation.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
MA Educational Data Warehouse Project MADOE and School District Collaboration Maureen Chew MADOE MA Digital Govt Summit 12/11/2007.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
1 Emerging Lessons From the Race to the Top in Massachusetts Robert Curtin Director, Education Data Services Massachusetts Department of Elementary and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
FY09 Redesign Who has heard of it? What is it? What does it mean to you next year? 1.
An Update on: AVATAR Advisory Committee Education Service Center Region 10 October 9, 2012 M. Jean Keller University.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
Creating a Virtual School Drawing board to Implementation.
Presenters: Pauline Mingram & KG Ouye July 25, 2011 California State Library Public Access Technology Benchmarks Webinar.
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Enabling pK12 Data Identification, Movement and Usage Larry Fruth, Ph.D. Executive Director Schools Interoperability Framework Association April 23, 2007.
1 Statewide Directions for Student Information Systems James A. Kadamus New York State Education Department March, 2004.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Ensuring your data is in the right place at the right time John Chapman Senior Architect: Information Management Diplomas: Learning the lessons of.
ESE Chart of Accounts and Use of Finance Data MASBO Classified Personnel Training Program October 7, 2015 Melissa King, State Aid Coordinator, ESE.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Electronic Clinical Quality Measures – Session #1 ONC Resource Center.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Videoconferencing: Using Blended Technologies to Engage Students Alberta Education Welcome.
Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act Regional and Local Area Designation and Redesignation Local Workforce Investment Board Listening Session February.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Education Management Information System Redesign for Longitudinal Data (EMIS_R) Presented by: Office of Information Policy and Management November 18,
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
ESE Data Initiatives District, School and Charter School Leaders
Presentation transcript:

ESE Data Initiatives District, School and Charter School Leaders Bob Bickerton, Associate Commissioner Jessica Perez-Rosello, CIO May 2009

Agenda Purpose of 2 New Data Initiatives SIMS Expansion SIF (Schools Interoperability Framework) Next Steps

Why? If we are going to continue to improve the education of students in Massachusetts we must have an expanded data set to help districts, educators and policy makers answer critical questions. In meeting this goal, we must find ways to provide efficient systems to collect and report a growing body of student and staff information.

The Missing Data Link SIMS = valuable student information EPIMS = valuable staffing and instructional settings (e.g., “classes”) information What is missing: –ability to better understand what is happening in the classroom at the student level –ability to analyze the impact of investments from educator preparation to student instruction.

National Perspective Title IIA – analysis requires reporting the rate of HQ educators teaching low-income students ARRA Fiscal Stabilization Funds – Governors Assurances 19 States currently have the ability to link student and teacher data and analyze data at the classroom level Massachusetts is one step away from answers to key policy and program evaluation questions

Critical Unanswered Questions Which courses are students enrolled in? What is the effect of class size and teacher student load on student performance? What is the average class size in MA? What is the course completion rate and what grades/marks are awarded to students? How does this success relate to performance on other measures like MCAS, readiness for college and/or for work? Which instructional models (i.e. - curriculum, school schedules) are most successful? Which teacher preparation programs are most effective?

District Data Analysis Some districts are trying to do this level of analysis on their own with local data in the Education Data Warehouse –This can require a substantial effort –Benefits limited to one district at a time –Analysis should be available for all districts to use

Possible Report ABCDF

MathEnglishScienceHistory SchoolAvg. Class Size Taft Jefferson Adams Lincoln Kennedy Johnson

Possible Report

Two Data Collection Initiatives to Support Decision Making SIMS Expansion –collect student course information Schools Interoperability Framework (SIF) – new technology to reduce reporting burden

2009 – 2011 SIMS Expansion Project Add student course level information to the October 2010 SIMS collection Add the capability to also collect student completion and grades/marks in October 2011 Student and educator data will be linked in the Education Data Warehouse for data analysis Standard reports provided for district analysis

SIMS Expansion Project Timeline Hi Level Design Complete 5/30/09 Project Kickoff Regional Information Sessions Data Collection Pilot Release 3/1/10 Collaboration begins with Pilot Districts Statewide Collection 10/01/10 Pilot Data Loaded into DW Application Enhancements Completed Pilot Information Delivery OctSeptAugJulyJuneMayAprMarFebJanDecNovOct SeptAugJulyJuneMayApril Development & Testing Completed 2010

SIMS Expansion Goals Gather student course information in October 2010, course completion and grades/marks in SY Load the information into the Education Warehouse providing valuable analytical tools Align the ESE data collection systems more closely with the LEA data systems –Improve the collection method of HQT status to minimize reporting burden at the local level –Additional EPIMS Collections Improve the coordination of SIMS / EPIMS data collection by establishing the District Data Coordinator role

One Proposed View of SIMS Expansion Project SIMS 52 Student Schedule EPIMS Staff Roster EPIMS Work Assignment Current Version with HQ Proposed EPIMS Work Assignment Modified Version with out HQ OR Modified HQT Information provided based on prior HQT reporting Remains the same New Remains the same New

SIMS Expansion Project Questions?

SIF Implementation

SIF Collection Effort Goals Introduce new technology Schools Interoperability Framework (SIF) –$6M USED Longitudinal Data Systems Grant –Automate the delivery of data from districts to ESE –Move towards a less labor intensive, more transactional data model –Minimize district reporting burden

Long Range Vision to Minimize LEA Data Collection Efforts District systems are upgraded to be SIF compliant Department systems are able to automatically retrieve the required data elements from district (SIF) systems with less LEA staff time More timely data is organized and loaded into EDW for immediate use by teachers, school and district leaders, and ESE

What is the SIF Specification? Not a product, but a technical blueprint for pK-12 software. Document that defines accepted rules Describes the data (what) + infrastructure (how) Provides a complete set of rules from start to finish Manages data within the pK-12 environment Enables diverse applications to interact and share data

SIF Zones Concepts Logical grouping of applications, agents, and ZIS Highly flexible and scalable Library Automation Food Services Student Information System Network Account Transportation Student Information System No predefined size or structure… specific to your implementation District Zone State Zone Grant Funding available for vertical agent development Other agents available for local systems

SIF Resources SIF Association –Non-profit organization –Members include vendors, local school districts and state education organizations – –Schools FAQ –Vendor Information

What are the Benefits of SIF? Student and Parent see improved timeliness of service and accurate school data across all systems. District IT Departments report a reduction in support costs and large cost savings by using existing applications and infrastructure. Schools & DistrictsRegional Service Centers & States Policy Makers gain real time access to data for critical decision making. Reduction in the SIMS/EPIMS reporting burdens placed on districts. Vendors and Consultants Developers recognize a decrease in development time and less “tailored” development. Sales and Marketing identify the formation of partnerships, international opportunities and greater response to the end user community.

Proposed SIF Project Timeline Hi Level Design Complete 9/30/09 Regional Information Sessions SIF Pilot Release – Phase 1 District Grant Announcement Application Enhancements Completed OctSeptAugJulyJuneMayAprMarFebJanDecNovOct SeptAugJulyJuneMayApril Development & Testing Completed 2010 SIF Architecture available SIF Pilot Release – Phase 2

Summary Two Data Collection Initiatives SIMS Expansion –Project underway –Will impact all districts in October 2010 SIF –Project to begin in May 2009 –Grant opportunity for estimated 30 – 40 districts

Next Steps District Surveys –Gather additional SIS and HR system information –SIMS Expansion Pilot district volunteers –Strongly recommend identifying a District Data Coordinator Available soon in Directory Administration ESE begin collaboration with Pilot Districts on SIMS Expansion Project ESE & Districts outreach to SIS and HR vendors

Summary Two Data Collection Initiatives OctSeptAugJulyJuneMayAprMarFebJanDecNovOct SeptAugJulyJuneMayApril 2010 SIMS Expansion Development with Pilot Districts ESE/Vendor Conversations Pilot data to EDWStatewide Collection SIF Technology Grant Process SIF Architecture Collaboration & Pilot w/ Grant Districts Pilot Collection

Contact Information Jessica Perez-Rossello, CIO Helene Bettencourt, Manager of Data Collection Maryann Donie, Data Collection Support Supervisor