Interagency Trail Data Standards USDA Forest Service ▪ Bureau of Land Management National Park Service ▪ US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W ORKING A CROSS A GENCY L INES. P RESENTATION O VERVIEW K EY T ERMS AND C ONCEPTS U PDATE ON THE I NTERAGENCY V ISITOR U SE M ANAGEMENT C OUNCIL ( THE.
Advertisements

Alternative Transportation Case Study: The Maroon Bells of Colorado.
TurnKey Project Management Services Capabilities Briefing.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit One Why, What, How?
An Introduction and Progress Report. An Extraordinary Time growing demand for scientific expertise significant organizational change new need for partnerships.
Welcome! Big Bend Scenic Byway Program. Goals For This Presentation - To Provide An Understanding Of: u The Scenic Highways Program: What it IS Importance.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Office of Valuation Services (OVS) IRWA Federal Agency Update March 26, 2014.
0 1 Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Overview and Status of EMS Projects Road Ecology Meeting February 26, 2009.
FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AQRV WORKGROUP (FLAG): CONSTRUCTING A CONSISTENT PROCESS.
Act 38,§5, Nutrient & Odor Management Programs Subchapter G. Facility Odor Management Regulations Discussion.
1 Planning and Environment Linkages: Case Studies Michael Culp and John Humeston FHWA November 2, 2006.
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program February 18, 2014.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Seven Route Evaluation - Exercise & Documentation.
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
EDMS structure ODOT GIS Steering Committee EDMS Steering Committee EDMS RES/RAZ mapping Workgroup EDMS Data & Tools Workgroups EDMS proposes projects to.
Landscape Classification System & Environmental Macro-Siting GIS Mark Lotts James Madison University Office of the Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative.
1.  Action Item 2.1a: “Improve coordination, effectiveness, and efficiency among federal agencies through establishment of a FICOR”  Key tasks to accomplish.
Comprehensive Review of the Public Safety Communications Center Phase 2 Report County of Dane, WI February 12, 2009.
Standardization of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST) Data Management Kerry Shakarjian University of Denver Department of Geography Masters.
STATE AND FEDERAL POLICIES CONCERNING OUTDOOR RECREATION
NF Visitor Use Monitoring Program To Know & Better Serve our NF visitors.
1 FGDC Cadastral Subcommittee Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee “The National Cadastre” June 5, 2008 Bob Ader and Don Buhler.
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
Planning and Environment Linkages: Overview and Examples TRB Workshop on Environmental Analysis January 13, 2008 Michael Culp and Rob Ritter FHWA Office.
12/04/07FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing for the FGDC Coordination Group December.
Handouts and forms available at: USFS Inventory and Budget.
FHWA Peer Exchange – January 27, 2009 A Green Infrastructure Approach.
Getting It… Developing Interagency Core Trail Data Standards National Park Service - Bureau of Land Management - USDA Forest Service Together.
American Community Survey ACS Content Review Webinar State Data Centers and Census Information Centers James Treat, ACSO Division Chief December 4, 2013.
Mid-Course Adjustment Overview. Flood Map Modernization The Question “The committee understands that the 5-year, $1,000,000,000 program will not update.
1 VLGAA Telling Your Story Measure What You Manage thru Performance Reporting Julie V. Bryant, MBA, CPA, CGFM AGA: Director of Performance Reporting May.
GIS Consortium City of Kirksville, MO Adair County, MO Adair PWSD #1 Local Information Resources Through Local Partnerships Pam Kelrick GIS Coordinator.
7/11/2006FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee Coordination Group Briefing July 11, 2006 Ralph.
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
CIVIL RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Civil Rights Enforcement and Compliance.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
Development of the Indigenous Cultural Landscape Concept in the Chesapeake October 23, 2014 National Park Service Chesapeake Bay.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
Session 161 National Incident Management Systems Session 16 Slide Deck.
Renewable Energy in California: Implementing the Governors Renewable Energy Executive Order California Energy Commission Department of Fish and Game Fish.
In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.
Work(S) in Progress or Trails Theme  ITDS (Interagency Trail Data Standard)  NPS Data Transfer Standard and Implementation Plan  FGDC Trail Data Standard.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
U.S. General Services Administration Office of Governmentwide Policy Center for Policy Compliance and Evaluation.
1 Office of Travel & Tourism Industries, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Organization of American States XXI Inter-American.
Federal Trail Data Standards Overview  Presented to FGDC  April 21, 2011.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Subsistence Management Federal Subsistence Board January 12-13, 2016 Work Session.
POLICY, PLANNING, & MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Goals Objectives Monitoring.
Sustainable Recreation Data Inventory & Mapping Jessica Little, UA MS-GIST.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning.
RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL WELCOME Rushmore Connector Trail Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting June 14, Hill City June 16, Rapid.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Department of Geography Geographic Information Science
USFS Inventory and Budget
Executive Order – The Basics
OVERVIEW OF INTERAGENCY VISITOR CAPACITY AND MONITORING GUIDEBOOKS
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
COLLABORATIVE Alaska Federal Lands Collaborative Long Range Transportation Plan (CLRTP) FLMAs: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Park Service (NPS)
Presentation transcript:

Interagency Trail Data Standards USDA Forest Service ▪ Bureau of Land Management National Park Service ▪ US Fish and Wildlife Service

Getting It… Together  Requested by Interagency Trails Council  Establish a common set of data standards  Applicable to all agency-managed trails Development of the “ITDS”

 Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary?  Develop standardized database?  Develop a core set of common data standards? Interagency Task: Data Dictionary or Database?

 Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary?  Develop standardized database?  Develop a core set of common data standards? Interagency Task: Data Dictionary or Database?

 Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary?  Develop standardized database?  Develop a core set of common data standards? Interagency Task: Data Dictionary or Database?

 Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary?  Develop standardized database?  Develop a core set of common data standards Interagency Task: Data Dictionary or Database? ….that can be incorporated into data dictionaries or databases

Trail… What’s a Trail? A linear route managed for human-powered, stock, or OHV forms of transportation or for historic or heritage values. Interagency Trail Definition:

Factors to Consider  Interagency core data set  Data aren’t cheap!  Standardized terminology  Existing, standardized data attributes  Implementation feasibility & timeframes

ITDS Attribute Review Criteria  Relate to a core interagency question?  Of national, regional or statewide significance?  Provide data needed to meet applicable laws, regulations and/or policies?  Address key congressional, OMB and department-wide reporting requirements?  Currently available or obtainable? Does (or is) the Attribute…

What Do We Want To Know? Interagency Trail Questions  Basic Trail Information (trail name, length, location, etc.)  Management Information (trail uses, accessibility status, condition, cost, etc.)  Additional NST / NHT Questions (trail administrator, certified sites and segments, etc.)

Answering the Questions Interagency Trail Data Standards  Data Attribute  Attribute Definition  List of Values (LOVs)  Data Parameters  ITDS Application Protocols  Crosswalk Translation (if needed)

Is the Trail Accessible? Is the Trail Accessible? Data Standard Example Data Attribute: Accessibility Status Attribute Definition: Accessibility guideline compliance status for the trail or trail segment. List of Values: Accessible Not Accessible Not Evaluated

ITDS Attributes Attribute NameAttribute Definition Attribute Applies To * List of Values (LOV) Attribute Code LOV Definition Reg. Trail NSTNHT 1 NHT 2 NHT 3 Interagency Core Trail Data Attributes and Codes (LOVs) ACCESSIBILITY STATUS Accessibility guideline compliance for the trail segments with a Designed Use of Hiker/Pedestrian. XXXACCESSIBLETrail meets current agency accessibility guidelines. NOT ACCESSIBLETrail determined ineligible to meet current agency accessibility guidelines NOT EVALUATEDTrail not evaluated for accessibility.

ITDS Codes Attribute Name Attribute Definition List of Values (LOV) LOV Definition ACCESSIBILITY STATUS Accessibility guideline compliance status for the trail ACCESSIBLE Trail meets current agency accessibility guidelines. NOT ACCESSIBILE Trail determined ineligible to meet agency accessibility guidelines. NOT EVALUATED Trail not evaluated for Accessibility ADMIN ORG The unit where the trail or trail physically resides The administrative unit where the trail or trail segment physically resides (insert unit codes for USFS, NPS, BLM, & FWS) NA - NOT APPLICABLE Standardized List of Values for each Attribute

ITDS Data Parameters  GIS Item Name  GIS Alternate Name  Data Definition (Type & Width)  Attribute Null / Not Null  Multiple Values Allowed? Defined for Each ITDS Attribute

ITDS Data Parameters

ITDS Attributes

Interagency Benefits Interagency Benefits Additional Benefits of Working Together Interagency Trail Tools  Trail Class  NHT Corridor Concept  Managed Use  NHT Condition Categories  Designed Use

Currently Underway Federal Trail Data Standards Publication of the ITDS by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FY07-FY08) Interagency Trail and GIS representatives currently collaborating on:

Upcoming Tasks?  National Scenic Trail Attributes Identify additionally needed NST attributes  ITDS Implementation Strategy/Schedule For USFS, BLM, NPS, and FWS  Apply ITDS to Long-Distance Trails Provide implementation guidance, suggestions and examples for NST’s and NHT’s  Additional Trail Information Attributes Potential expansion of ITDS to include additional trail use & visitor Information

Where to Find It? Where to Find It?

USDA Forest Service ▪ Bureau of Land Management National Park Service ▪ US Fish and Wildlife Service ITDS

Frequently Asked Questions BLM: Adapting the standards into FAMS NPS: Adapting the standards into FMSS FWS: Adapting the standards into SAMMS USFS: Majority of standards incorporated in Infra Trails. Remaining standards planned for Infra Trails or Infra Heritage (for specific NHT attributes) How are agencies incorporating the Interagency Trail Data Standards?

Frequently Asked Questions County A County B “Trail segment” is used informally to identify the specific portion of trail to which a data attribute refers– or to answer the question being asked… What’s “trail segment” mean?

Frequently Asked Questions County A County B Trail Segment Examples: Trail Length:24.3 miles (segment ) Trail Class: 13.2 miles Trail Class 3; 11.1 miles Trail Class 2 (segment 0.0 – 13.2 and 13.2 – 24.3) County: 5.6 miles County A; 18.7 miles County B (segment 0.0 – 5.6 and 5.6 – 24.3)

Frequently Asked Questions What’s “No Overlap Allowed” Mean? No Overlap Allowed: Only one attribute value can be recorded at any given location along the trail or trail segment. Example: County Mile 0.00 – 17.4: Park CountyMile 17.4 – 28.3: Grove County

Frequently Asked Questions What’s “No Overlap Allowed” Mean? No Overlap Allowed: Only one attribute value can be recorded at any given location along the trail or trail segment. Example: County Mile 0.00 – 17.4: Park CountyMile 17.4 – 28.3: Grove County Overlap Allowed: More than one attribute value can be recorded, if applicable, at any given location along the trail or trail segment. Example: Prohibited Use Mile 0.00 – 28.3: ATVs, Motorcycles, Bicycles

Frequently Asked Questions What about “things along the trail”?   “Things along the trail” include trail structures, amenities, viewpoints, etc.   While potentially valuable data at the trail or agency-specific level, this level of detail was determined to be beyond the scope of the interagency standards.

Frequently Asked Questions For additional questions, answers and clarification:  Appendix G: Interagency Internal Review  Appendix H: Frequently Asked Questions Posted at

Bottom-Line Benefits Interagency Trail Data Standards  Improved communication and efficiency  For our internal and external customers  Through proactive interagency trails coordination and collaboration

USDA Forest Service ▪ Bureau of Land Management National Park Service ▪ US Fish and Wildlife Service ITDS