U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Updated 05-09-2011 1 www.blm.gov/bmp Air Resource BMPs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Everyone appreciates the clean air No one talks of reducing air quality because it is unnecessarily clean The technology for decreasing emissions is available.
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program Optimize Separator Operating Pressures to Reduce Flash Losses SPE Paper B. Boyer -
Oil and Gas Industry Presentation Activities, GHG Emission Sources, and Potential Reductions January 14, 2009.
Methane Losses from Compressors Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Northern Natural Gas Company, INGAA, CECO, Heath Consultants,
Alternative Fuels.
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
“Partner Experiences” Pioneer Natural Resources, USA Presented by James Meier Processors Technology Transfer Workshop September 23, 2004 Dallas, Texas.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Seals Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission Interstate.
Highlights of Colorado’s New Oil and Gas Hydrocarbon Emission Reduction Rules - Adopted February 2014 Presentation to WESTAR May 2014 Will Allison Colorado.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-line Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission,
Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines
Reduced Emission Completions (Green Completions) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural.
WESTAR Oil & Gas Conference October 2008 Lori Bocchino Wyoming Oil & Gas Permitting and New Rule/Policy Revisions.
Methane Emissions Management at TransCanada PipeLines by Hasan Imran (2004 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop, Houston, Texas. Sept. 2004)
Sohail Ghanchi Energy Technology and Policy The University of Texas at Austin.
VOC Emissions Control from Industrial and Commercial Sources Dr. Miriam Lev-On The LEVON Group, LLC SP7: Current Control Strategies for Industrial Emissions.
Economic Best Management Practices for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology.
Natural Gas Dehydration Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program Casper,
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
Processor Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors Association,
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses
Climate-Friendly Actions with Co-Benefits Julie McNamee NPS Air Resources Division July 17, 2007.
New Air Quality Regulation “NSPS OOOO” Oil and Natural Gas Industry Workshop October 24, 2012 Robert Keatley, PE Senior Engineer/Supervisor DEP – Division.
Air Quality Management in Mumbai V.K.Phatak MMRDA.
1 Air Quality: Potential Impacts of Shale Development in Ohio Kevin Crist, PhD Director & Professor, Center for Air Quality Department of Chemical and.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer Workshop Bill Barrett.
Directed Inspection & Maintenance At Compressor and Gate Stations
Greening of Fort Wayne, IN Partners for Pollution Prevention June 6, 2007.
Presentation Overview Alaska air pollution Pollutants Sources What is an emissions inventory?
Company Reported Opportunities Technologies From Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and Pioneer.
Idle Free: You and Me Education About Unnecessary Idling of Your Car.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Partner Reported Opportunities for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
Smart Automation Well Venting Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum.
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina May 15, 2015 Presented to the Mining and Energy Commission Environmental.
EPA Overreach WATERS OF THE U S METHANE REDUCTION PLAN LEGISLATIVE /REGULATORY FORUM SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
EPA Natural Gas Star Annual Meeting © Chevron 2006 Chevron Experience: Methane Emission Mitigation Natural Gas STAR Producers & Processors Technology Transfer.
Global Energy Security Forum Miami, Florida March 26, 2013 Mark K. Boling President HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERATIONS: SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION.
Discovering New Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Producer Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) at Gas Processing Plants Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Processors Technology Transfer Workshop.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners Murphy Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group,
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina July 8, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission.
Replacing Glycol Dehydrators with Desiccant Dehydrators Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
Installing Plunger Lift in Gas Wells Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR from Natural Gas STAR Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs.
Convert Gas Pneumatic Controls to Instrument Air Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources.
Transmission Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation and.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
Britta Groh Physics 106Spring  Almost 85% of the energy used in the US in 2007 was generated by fossil fuels  Fossil fuel technologies are no.
NiSource Natural Gas STAR Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 3, 2003 Merrillville, Indiana.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Hanock Megenta 8 th Hour. What is Alternative Energy?  Alternative Energy is the use of non- conventional energy sources to generate electrical power.
Methane Emission Reductions from Reciprocating Compressors
Processing Sector Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 17, 2003 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Amarillo,
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions F rom Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and.
Best Operating Practices For Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Production Sector Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 19, 2003 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop New.
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Jay Christopher Business Unit Manager, Air & Process Services Trihydro Corporation.
2.15 Clearing the Air – Automobiles and Other Vehicles.
EPA Methane Regulations Details on the Final Rules and Summary of Impacts May 16, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
Concepts for Proposed General Permit for Well Pads and Proposed GP-5 Modifications Citizens Advisory Council March 15, Tom Wolf, Governor John Quigley,
Solar Power Applications
Air Resource BMPs Bureau of Land Management
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Uinta Basin Industry BMPs Stuart Siffring
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Updated Air Resource BMPs

Protection of Air Resources This slide show identifies a range of typical Best Management Practices (BMP) for protecting air resources during oil and gas development and production operations. This is a partial list. For additional Air Resource BMPs and more detailed technical and investment-payback information, please visit the websites listed in this presentation. 2 Nothing in this presentation is an endorsement of a particular company, product, or service.

Using BMPs to Reduce Emissions What types of emissions can be reduced? –Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) – Can Cause Serious Health Problems Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, Formaldehyde –Criteria Pollutants – National Standards to Protect Health and Welfare PM 10 (Dust), PM 2.5, Carbon Monoxide, Sulfur dioxide, Ozone, Nitrogen Oxides –Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – Contribute to Ozone Formation Propane, Butane, Pentane, Hexanes, Octanes, etc. –Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) – Contribute to Climate Change Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), Methane (CH 4 ), Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) 3

Using BMPs to Reduce Emissions Where Do Emissions Come From? –Combustion Emissions: Include Criteria Pollutants, VOCs, GHGs, HAPs. Come from: Vehicle Tailpipe Exhaust Emissions, Dehydrators, Mobile and Stationary Engines, Flaring –Fugitive Emissions: Include Criteria Pollutants, VOCs, HAPs, GHGs Equipment Leaks, Evaporation Ponds and Pits, Condensate Tanks, Storage Tanks, Windblown Dust (from Truck and Construction Activity) –Vented Emissions: Include GHGs, VOCs, HAPs Dehydrator Vents 4

Part 1 Air Resource BMPs Transport Reducing trucking and service traffic can reduce associated dust and tailpipe emissions. 5

Directional Drilling Benefits – Reduces road & pad construction- related dust and emissions. Reduces road network. Reduces truck traffic dust and emissions. Using directional drilling to drill multiple wells from a single well pad, rather than constructing an equal number of separate roads and well pads. Efficiency Drilling Rig Sixteen Wells on this Well Pad 6

Centralized Water Storage and Delivery Using centrally stored water that is piped to the well pads and fracturing facilities through a temporary, plastic, surface line. Benefits – Reduces Water Hauling Truck Trips and Decreases Associated Dust and Tailpipe Emissions  Temporary Water Line vs. Truck Transport  7

Centralized Fracturing Using centralized fracturing pads with hard-line frac pipes, some running over one mile, that can serve many well pads - representing hundreds of wells in all.  Water line  Frac pad Benefits – Reduces Water Hauling Truck Trips and Decreases Associated Dust and Tailpipe Emissions 8

Off Site Centralization of Production and Use of Liquids Gathering Systems Using Liquids Gathering Systems to collect and pipe produced fluids from each remote well location to a Centralized Production and Collection Facility situated more closely to a major county or State highway. Benefits – Centralization creates fewer emissions sources and makes it more efficient to control emissions. Reduces Haul Truck Trips and Decreases Associated Dust and tailpipe emissions. 9

Telemetry & Well Automation Using telemetry to remotely monitor & control production. Benefits – Reduces Service Truck Traffic and Decreases Associated Dust and Tailpipe Emissions

Fugitive Dust Control Reducing Fugitive Dust From Vehicle Traffic Dust affects air quality and creates a health and visibility safety hazard for drivers. 11

 Chip-Seal or Asphalt High or Very High Initial Cost Lasts Several or Many Years More Cost-effective for Roads with Higher Average Daily Traffic Water  Low Initial Cost Recurring Hourly Maintenance Increased Vehicle Emissions Lasts Hours Dust Control Suppression vs. Prevention 12

Dust Control 13 Dust Suppressants  Such as: Magnesium Chloride, Calcium Chloride, Lignin Sulfonate, Asphalt Emulsion Moderate Initial Cost Lasts About 1 Year Good For Low Traffic Roads Check with local authorities regarding allowable use.

Dust Suppressant – good reduction in dust Dust trail still visible where there was no treatment Dust Control - Example 14

Dust Reduction Using Reduced Vehicle Speeds to Decrease Fugitive Dust on Roads with High Traffic and High Dust Potential. 15

Vanpooling Using vans and buses to shuttle employees to the worksite, thereby reducing the number of vehicle trips Benefits – Reduced tailpipe emissions and dust. 16

Part 2 Air Resource BMPs Drilling Phase 17

Cleaner Diesel Power A Tier 2 diesel engine powers an electric motor to drill this well. Moving toward cleaner diesel engines, Tier 2  3  4 (Tier 4 is cleaner than Tier 2.) Tier 4 diesel engine standards are being phased in from 2011 through 2014 by manufacturers of new engines. 18

Natural Gas Power Natural gas powered engines are typically cleaner than diesel engines and are the approximate equivalent of Tier 4 diesel engines. 19 Natural gas fueled engines power electric motors to drill this well.

Venting Releases methane, a greenhouse gas (GHG) that has 25 times more global warming potential than CO 2 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change page 212 Emits Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) which contribute to ozone formation Emits Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) such as Benzene, Toluene, and Xylene in larger quantities than flaring Wastes valuable natural gas resources 20

Flaring Reduces Methane GHG emissions, however… Combustion emissions include NO x, CO, VOCs, and PM 2.5, which can pose visibility and health problems, and CO 2 (a less potent GHG). NOx and VOCs contribute to ozone formation. Wastes valuable natural gas resources More Information at Flaring natural gas is usually a better alternative than venting gas; however, potential fire hazards, impacts to visibility, and citizen concerns may preclude the use of flaring at certain sites. 21

Well Completions – Reduced Emissions Completions More information at A Best Management Practice Using “Green Completions” where there is an existing sales line to recapture a significant portion of product that would have been vented or flared. Benefits – Reduces Methane & VOC emissions Recovers product for sale 22

Part 3 Air Resource BMPs Production Phase 23

Solar Power Using chemical pumps and well monitoring telemetry powered by solar panels. Benefits – Reduces truck trips, engine emissions, and methane emissions from gas pneumatic pumps. 24 More information at transfer/midland6.ppt#288,1,Solar Power Applications for Methane Emission Mitigation

Electrical Power Using electricity from the nation’s power grid is typically cleaner than using onsite diesel or natural gas engines to power drill rigs, compressors, and pumping units. However, overhead power lines may have wildlife or visual impacts.  Electric Drive Pump 25

Fugitive (Leaking) Emissions Releases methane, a greenhouse gas (GHG) that has 25 times more global warming potential than CO 2 Can emit Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) which contribute to ozone formation Can emit Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) such as Benzene, Toluene, and Xylene Wastes valuable natural gas resources 26

Capturing VOCs Using enclosed tanks instead of open pits to reduce fugitive VOC emissions. 27

Vapor Recovery Units Using vapor recovery units on oil, condensate, and produced water storage tanks reduces fugitive VOCs and recovers BTU-rich vapors for sale or use on site. More information at 28  

Vapor Recovery Economics Financial Analysis for a Conventional VRU Project Peak Capacity (Mcf/day) Installation & Capital Costs 1 ($) O&M Costs ($/year) Value of Gas 2 ($/year) Annual Savings ($) Simple Payback (months) Internal Rate of Return 25$35,738$7,367$77,106$69, % 50$46,073$8,419$154,213$145, % 100$55,524$10,103$308,425$298, % 200$74,425$11,787$616,850$605, % 500$103,959$16,839$1,542,125$1,525, % 1 – Unit cost plus estimated installation of 75% of unit cost 2 – $16.90 x ½ peak capacity x 365, Assumed price includes Btu enriched gas (1.289 MMBtu/Mcf) Vapor recovery can capture up to 95% of hydrocarbon vapors from tanks Recovered vapors are more valuable than natural gas and have multiple uses. The table below illustrates several possible scenarios of peak capacity for VRU sizing Source: Natural Gas STAR Program/ IOGCC Workshop, Charleston, West Virginia, “Installing Vapor Recovery Units”, February

Hatches, Seals, and Valves Thief Hatches and Vent sealing valves Using and maintaining proper hatches, seals, and valves to minimize VOC emissions. 30

Optimize Glycol Circulation and Install Flash Tank Separator (FTS) Methane emissions that result from glycol over- circulation in glycol dehydrators can be reduced by optimizing the circulation rate. Methane that flashes from rich glycol in an energy exchange pump can be captured and recycled using an FTS. More information at 31

Economics of Installing FTS and Optimizing Glycol Circulation Two Options for Minimizing Glycol Dehydrator Emissions Option Capital Costs Annual O&M Costs Emissions Savings Payback Period 1 Optimize Circulation Rate Negligible 394 to 39,420 Mcf/year Immediate Install Flash Tank $6,500 to $18,800 Negligible 710 to 10,643 Mcf/year 4 to 11 months 1 – Gas price of $7/Mcf FTS recovers about 90% of methane emissions FTS reduces VOCs by 10 to 90% Source: Natural Gas STAR Program/ IOGCC Workshop, Charleston, West Virginia, “Natural Gas Dehydration”, February

NOx, SOx, CO, and CO 2 Controls for Compressor Engines Using…. Closed Loop Engine Control Controlled Engines Selective Catalytic Reduction System-Installed Power Supply (solar powered, battery powered) Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel 33

Selective Catalytic Reduction Selective Catalytic Reduction works by injecting Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) (water & urea) into exhaust. The DEF works with the heat of the exhaust and a catalytic converter to convert the NOx into nitrogen and water vapor. 34

Replacement of Wet Seals with Dry Seals in Centrifugal Compressors Centrifugal wet seal compressor emissions from the seal oil degassing vent can be reduced by the replacement of wet seals with dry seals that emit less methane and have lower power requirements. More information can be found at 35

Economics of Wet Seal Replacement Economics for 6 inch shaft beam compressor Source: Natural Gas STAR Program Workshop, Gillette and Rock Springs, Wyoming, “Methane Savings from Compressors”, May

Reduce Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Systems Reciprocating compressor rod packing leaks some gas by design. Emissions from rod packing can be reduced by the economic replacement of rod packing at frequent intervals as… Newly installed packing may leak 60 cubic feet/hr 1 Worn packing has been reported to leak up to 900 cubic feet/hour 1 More Information at 1 EPA Lessons Learned Reducing Methane Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Systems,

Economics of Rod Packing Replacement Replace packing when expected leak reduction will pay back cost –“leak reduction expected” is the difference between current leak rate and leak rate with new rings Based on 10% interest rate Mcf = thousand cubic feet Rod and Rings Rings: $1,620 Rod: $9,450 Gas: $7/Mcf Operating: 8,000 hours/year Rings Only Rings: $1,620 Rod: $0 Gas: $7/Mcf Operating: 8,000 hours/year Leak Reduction Expected (cf/hour) Payback (year) Leak Reduction Expected (cf/hour) Payback (year) Source: Natural Gas STAR Program Technology Transfer Workshop, Midland, Texas, “Reciprocating Compressor Rod Packing”, February

Pneumatic Devices for Emissions Control For Methane and VOC Reduction: Replace high-bleed devices with low-bleed Retrofit bleed reduction kits on high-bleed devices More information at Low Bleed Pneumatic Controller As part of normal operations, pneumatic devices release natural gas into the atmosphere (liquid level controllers, pressure regulators, and valve controllers) 39

Installing Plunger Lift Systems and Automated Systems in Gas Wells Methane emissions from well blowdowns can be reduced by installing plunger lifts and smart automation systems which monitor well production parameters. More info at Source: Etopsi 40

EPA Natural Gas STAR Partner Experience – BP Example Pilot installations and testing in 2000 –Installed plunger lifts with automated control systems on ~2,200 wells –~US$15,000 per well Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) installment cost –US$50,000 -US$750,000 host system installment cost Achieved roughly 50% reduction in venting from 2000 to 2004 In mid 2006, “smarter” automation was applied to wells –1,412 Mcf reported annual savings per well –Total of US$6,2 million/year savings Emissions reduced from 4.0+ bcf/yr down to less than 0.8 bcf/yr Source: BP Natural Gas STAR Workshop 2006, “Plunger Well Vent Reduction Project”, 41

Part 4 Air Resource BMPs Monitoring & Maintenance 42

Directed Inspection & Maintenance and Infrared Leak Detection (DI&M) Fugitive gas leaks can be reduced by implementing a DI&M Program which identifies and cost effectively fixes fugitive gas leaks using Leak Detection –Infrared Camera –Organic Vapor Analyzer –Soap Solution –Ultrasonic Leak Detectors Measurement –Calibrated Bagging –Rotameters –High Volume Sampler More information can be found at

EPA Natural Gas STAR Partner Experience – Chevron Corp. Scanned gas facility using GasfindIR TM Camera –112 total leaks recorded (60 from gas plants) Quantified leaks using Hi-Flow Sampler® Estimated leak volume: 100,000 Mcf/yr Estimated annual revenue lost due to natural gas, propane and condensate losses: $2.1 million Source: Natural Gas STAR Workshop, Midland, Texas 2008, “Chevron Experience: Methane Emission Mitigation”, Demonstration Study - IR Camera 44

Air Quality Monitoring 1.Monitoring current and modeling future air quality conditions. 2.Designing emission control strategies. 3.Reviewing monitoring data and adapting to findings: Adjusting development rates, timing, and places of development. Refining mitigation measures (BMPs). Using Monitoring for… 45

EPA Natural Gas STAR Program California Air Resources Board’s Clearinghouse clearinghouse.htm Four Corners Air Quality Group Part 5 For More Information & BMPs 46