League of Women Voters of the Piedmont Triad July 18, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Plan Update Public Meeting Monticello High School September 21, :00 pm.
Advertisements

AACC Compatible Land Use Planning Series Series Includes Presentations from: FAA Airports Division – March 10 AACC Meeting Planning Department, Municipality.
Environmental Assessment in Nova Scotia
Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
NC SWANA FALL 2014 MEETING Presented by Ed Mussler P.E., Wilmington, NC October 2014 DWM Post-Closure Landfill Use Concepts and Considerations.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Facility Lead Corrective Action Approaches Voluntary Agreements RCRA National Meeting August 13, 2003 Jennifer Shoemaker EPA Region 3.
Information Risk Management Key Component for HIPAA Security Compliance Ann Geyer Tunitas Group
Act 381 Amendments John V. Byl and Richard A. Barr February 5 and 6, 2008.
Overview the local, state, and federal regulatory authorities which affect the interim housing mission Identify vital stakeholders with regulatory authority.
Code Comparison Changes 2012 IBC to 2012 NPFA 101 Developed for the Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation Building Codes and Standards.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
Environmental Benchmarks Briefing Nancy Gassman Environmental Protection And Growth Management Department Coordinating Council of Broward, Quality of Life.
Environmental Legislation and Agencies Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
Carbon Capture and Storage State Legislation Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
An Emissions Cap Alternative to New Source Review September 27, 1999.
January Goals: Streamline permitting process for certain solid waste facilities and activities Expand use of 3 rd party inspectors to allow MassDEP.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 3 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 3 Government Regulation and the.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Human Waste Disposal More than 500 pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites can travel from human or animal excrement through water. More than 500 pathogenic.
Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005 Bill Torrey UST/LUST Regional Program Manager US EPA – New England EBCNE April 19, 2006.
Environmental Quality Restricted Account (EQRA) Background Bill Sinclair Acting Executive Director Utah Department of Environmental Quality May 28, 2009.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Changes at IDEM Since EQSC House Environmental Affairs Committee January 28, 2009 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
©2011 Cengage Learning. Chapter 15 ©2011 Cengage Learning REQUIRED GOVERNMENT REPORTS.
CFO and CAFO Regulatory Issues IN Pork Producers January 30, 2007.
Compensation in Czech law Petra Humlickova Utrecht, Water and Oceans Law in Times of Climate Change 2013.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Status of Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory.
Kentucky Growth Readiness for Water Quality Does your water quality matter?
1 Permit Implementation Regulations Defines the phrase “significant change in the design or operation of a solid waste facility that is not authorized.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  Founded by U.S. government (under Richard Nixon) in 1970  William Ruckleshaus was first EPA administrator  a.
December 6, 2004CIWMB P&E Committee Workshop1 Postclosure Maintenance Postclosure Maintenance Beyond the Initial 30 Years and Financial Assurance Demonstrations.
| Excellence. Value. Get There!™ Aboveground Storage Tanks David L. Yaussy, Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section Division of Waste Management
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
Department of Environmental Quality Life-of-Site Permitting Required Changes to Solid Waste Management Rules 15A NCAC 13B March 10, 2016.
Public Scoping Open House Wabash Avenue/Porter Access Area Environmental Assessment Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore June 28, :00-8:00 p.m.
The SWANCC Decision and 2001 WI Act 6 NGA State Wetland’s Workshop October 21, 2002 Michael Cain Staff Attorney- WI DNR.
Event – Points ! Environmental Laws US.
Missouri Waste Control Coalition Environmental Conference July 14, 2015 CCR Rule What Location Restrictions Mean for Missouri.
NCACC Environmental Steering Committee Legislative Update October 2013.
General Operations Limitation on Use of Funds Termination of Assistance Other Program Requirements.
Environmental Quality Board
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
permitting & compliance in hillsborough county
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
2007 EPA Region 4 – Department of Defense – States Environmental Conference June 21, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Waste Management
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Scientific or Engineered Landfilling of Waste
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Presentation transcript:

League of Women Voters of the Piedmont Triad July 18, 2013

Solid Waste Management Reform Act June 19, 2013

Length of permit (§1)  S328 extends permits for landfills and transfer stations to 30 years, with  interim reviews every five years, and 30 year renewals treated as ‘major  modifications’. S328 does not address whether facilities will be  grandfathered under increasingly obsolete rules across the 30 years.

DENR authority to deny permits (§2)  S328 eliminates several grounds on which DENR should be able to deny a  permit, §130A-294(a)(4):  · significant damage to natural and cultural resources, (c)(3)  · impede use of public trust lands or waters, (c)(4)  · practicable alternative available, (c)(6)  · inappropriate cumulative impacts, (c)(7)  · inconsistent with state waste policy, (c)(8)

Environmental justice (§2)  The combination of eliminating cumulative impacts analysis as a ground for  denial, (c)(7), above, and limiting environmental justice analysis to the bare  minimum in federal law (c)(9), strips DENR of any authority or mechanism to  address unjust cumulative impacts to a community.

Transfer of permits (§3)  The newest version of S328 significantly narrows DENR’s discretion to deny a  transfer of a landfill permit, GS §130A-294(a1), not just by restricting  grounds for denial, but by eliminating compliance review, since transfers will  be considered ‘modifications’, which are not subject to § 130A-294(a1). This  could force the agency to allow a transfer to an entity with a poor record or  no record at all.

Franchise requirement (§3)  Current law requires an applicant to have a franchise agreement from every  jurisdiction involved with the site, § 130A- 294(b1)(2). S328 limits that to the  time the application is submitted. Since applicants often line up franchise  agreements before an application is publicly noticed, this change places  communities at a disadvantage in negotiating with applicants.

Environmental review (§3)  S328 replaces current requirements for environmental review with a much  weaker version that does not appear to give DENR the ability to deny a  permit on the basis of environmental or other impacts. What remains of  environmental review applies only to new facilities, not subsequent permits  or major modifications.

Wetlands & streams (§3)  S328 allows landfills to be sited adjacent to wetlands, requires stream  setbacks only along streams with ‘continuous flow’, and even there  eliminates minimum setbacks. These changes all make surface and  groundwater contamination more likely.

Wildlands buffers (§3)  S328 reduces buffers around sensitive protected natural areas to an  arbitrary 1,500 feet, and eliminates them entirely around state gamelands.  Removal of the buffers for a State Park or National Refuge will guarantee  that previously denied mega landfills will be placed near high value public  resources. Millions of tons of out-of-state waste will be placed on or near  North Carolina’s most environmentally sensitive and protected regions.  These areas were previously vetted by state and federal agencies to be  among the state’s most important environmental features.

Endangered species (§3)  S328 eliminates the current prohibition of significant damage to ‘areas that  provide habitat for threatened or endangered species’.

Line cleanout (§3)  S328 eliminates the current requirement in 130A (h)(3) for regular  cleaning. Instead, operators would inspect every five years and clean line ‘as  necessary’, though bill is ambiguous about who decides that. This is bad  policy; regular maintenance is needed to prevent contamination, rather than  relying on much more expensive remediation later.

Alternative daily cover (§3)  Currently, under 15 NCAC 13B.1626 (2)(b), DENR can approve alternative  daily cover materials on a case-by-case basis, following demonstrations of  safety and effectiveness. S328 states that if DENR allows a method  anywhere, it must allow it everywhere. That one- size-fits-all mandate will  either discourage innovation or open the door to abuse.

Financial assurances (§4)  In 2011, the NCGA already reduced the minimum requirement for financial  assurances from $3 million to $2 million, §130A S328 eliminates the  minimum, requiring only assurances sufficient to cover analysis and  corrective action.

Leak-proof vs.leak resistant (§7)  S328 replaces the current, bright line standard that garbage trucks must not  leak, 15A NCAC 13B.0105(c), with a vague and unenforceable standard of  ‘leak-resistance’. Garbage leachate is a threat to public health; the current  leak proof standard is efficient and relatively effective.

Incentivizing mega-landfills (§9)  In allowing local governments to spend revenue from landfill tipping fees on  any purpose – not just landfill operating costs – S328 incentivizes local  governments to turn to mega-landfills as a way to fund basic services, even if  the cumulative impacts undermine regional growth.