Selective Fracturing of a Series of Perforations in a Horizontal Well Using a Resettable Straddle System SPE 130689 Josh Thompson Weatherford International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exposing formation to Hydraulic Pressure- Technology Advancement for Horseshoe Canyon CBM Stimulation Original Presentation by: Francois Cantaloube – Schlumberger.
Advertisements

Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Permeability Testing WTN Network Meeting April , 2011 ExxonMobil Exploration / Well Testing Team.
Chapter 3 COMPLETION.
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 17 Casing Design.
Trican’s Burst Port System (BPS) (Patent Pending) A Cost Effective Method for Horizontal Well Stimulation Lewis Facca / Scott Sherman October 14, 2010.
1 TIW CORPORATION A PEARCE INDUSTRIES COMPANY P.O. Box Houston, Texas U. S. A.
“ Unusual Interventions ” Jenna Robertson ICOTA Canada Roundtable October 14, 2010.
Petroleum Engineering 406
2012 Williston Basin Petroleum Conference
2010 International Perforating Symposium
Morgan City Rentals Diesel Jet Pump 6 x 6 Peerless Safe Operating Practices and Procedures.
Workshop: Maintenance Work Requests May 3, Project Goals  Implement SAP Plant Maintenance system Provide integration with Finance, HR, and Materials.
Coalbed Methane Extraction in the Sydney Basin Gas and Coal Outburst Seminar November 20, 2002.
HydroPull™ June 2010 All rights reserved. 2 HydroPull ™ Water Hammer Valve Self-piloted flow cycling valve generates water hammer pulses that vibrate.
Terra Slicing Technology Overview.
Lesson 14 Jet Bit Nozzle Size Selection
The Game Plan NADOA North Dakota Seminar April 11, 2012.
Propellant Completions
Should Horizontal Wellbores be Logged? An analytical approach to hydraulic fracturing entry positioning and completion equipment selection.
Granite Wash Casing Profile Texas Panhandle (District 10) Western Oklahoma OKC Granite Wash Conference – March 6, 2008.
Hydraulic Fracturing Best Management Practices Environmentally Friendly Drilling Program John Michael Fernandez Matthew Gunter.
1 An Unconventional Bonanza Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery Copyright TBD America, Inc. All rights reserved. Dr. Barry Stevens President TBD America,
“PRODUCTION” MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
PETE 203 DRILLING ENGINEERING
Inflatable DST Equipment An Overview Presentation.
INFLATABLE DST EQUIPMENT
Optimising Hydraulic Energy to Dramatically Improve Lateral Reach.
RIG PROCESSES  Drilling, Coring, Directional Drilling & Survey.  Tripping, Wash & Ream, Fishing.  E- Logging.  Casing & Cementing.  Perforating &Testing.
Enhanced Oil Recovery using Computerized Hydraulic Lift Systems
Well Testing Initial production tests at surface after wellbore cleanup and fracing. Sometimes called initial potential or IP. IP= Initial Production IPF.
New Fluid Solutions, Inc. NFS-BlackSeal ®. Overview Generally, the types of formations that are prone to lost returns are cavernous and vugular, naturally.
Petroleum Engineering 406 Floating Drilling
Lesson 12 Laminar Flow - Slot Flow
Williston Basin Petroleum Conference Advances in Technology Panel Efficient Fracture Stimulation Rick Ross – Whiting Petroleum Corporation 1.
WELL PROBLEMS.
TT Artificial Lift Utilizing CT as a Hollow Sucker Rod Humberto F. Leniek COIL TUBING AMERICAS Dr. William C. Maurer MAURER ENGINEERING INC.
Fishing Technology.
Well Design PE 413.
Monitoring Well Post-Installation Consideration By: Pierre-Orly Dupont.
Drilling Operations History Drake’s Well was the first commercial oil well drilled in 1859 in Pennsylvania. Cable Tool Drilling technique was used to drill.
Casing Design.
Under-balanced well bore cleanout and production evaluation technology.
Perforating Requirements for Fracture Stimulation
Petroleum Engineering 406 Floating Drilling
Underbalanced Perforating. èEarly tests by Exxon showed that flow patterns and perforation geometry prevent the cleaning out of an appreciable percentage.
Modern Slickline Perforating Applications in the North Sea
WELL FLOW MANAGEMENT TM Agitating Explosives in Extended Reach Wells – A Good Idea? INTERNATIONAL PERFORATING SYMPOSIUM EUROPE 2015 Kerry Daly Global BD.
Kick Submited to :- Submitted by:- Er Akash Rana Devahish Yadav B.Tech IIIrd Year Petroleum Technology 1.
Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking)
The Case History of an Underground Flow Offshore Texas Developed by John Rogers Smith, P.E., Ph.D. Louisiana State University Funded by Minerals Management.
Cost Effective Offset Well Frac-hit Protection Solution
Chapter VIII Packer and Tubing Forces.
Chapter 5 Pressure Transient Testing (I)
Using an Inflatable Element
Cementing How it is Done
SUSTAINABLE DRILLING OF OIL & GAS WELLS
Chapter 2: Casing Design Casing Selection
Oil-Field Hydraulics Chapter 8 Shut-in Procedures
Scope / History Well 25/11-G-18 was drilled nov The well has 7” Bakerweld 140 Screens and swell packers. The well is producing gas from the “heal”
ADVANTAGE BRIDGE/FRAC PLUG S
Design Factors Collapse Corrected
Shell Exploration & Production
Casing Design Workshop
Design Calculations Combination Strings
WELL COMPLETION AND STIMULATION BY BHARAT KUMAR HARANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DAWOOD UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI.
Whipstock. AGENDA DefinitionComponents Operation Sequence 2.
Coal Bed Methane Cementing Best Practices
Industry leading completions execution and service quality
Presentation transcript:

Selective Fracturing of a Series of Perforations in a Horizontal Well Using a Resettable Straddle System SPE 130689 Josh Thompson Weatherford International Ltd

Index Introduction The Jet Pack Straddle System Operational Details Field Location Well Profiles The Jet Pack Straddle System Conventional system Reverse circulation system Operational Details Background Well Schematic BHA Configuration Case History Conclusions Acknowledgments

Field Location Viking Formation Redwater Operations Area Approximately 50 km NE of Edmonton Discovered in 1948 Edmonton, 30 miles (50 km) The Viking formation is found at relatively shallow depths in the Redwater operations area of Central Alberta, Canada, which was discovered in 1948. (For a map of the area see Fig. 1). About 30 miles (50km) NE of Edmonton.

Well Profiles Typically either vertical with the zone being fractured to enhance productivity Horizontal with slotted liner completions Some selective fracturing operations in low deviation wells using cup style straddles With increased deviation they have proved to be unreliable when more than one zone is to be treated on the same run in the well stuck straddle assemblies are not uncommon

The Jet Straddle System Conventional System Used for Acid Stimulations Multiple Set capable No pipe movement required to set Pack of force created by fluid velocity through orifice Ideal for setting in deviated wells Adjustable straddle lengths 5000 psi differential rating Sets with as little as .5 bpm Up to 17 bpm flow rate (CT dependant)

The Jet Straddle System Reverse Circulation System Used for Proppant Stimulations Multiple Set capable Tension set Pack off force created by overpull Suitable for setting in deviated wells Adjustable straddle lengths 5000 psi differential rating Up to 17 bpm flow rate (CT dependant) Allows for reverse circulation (clean-up) Elements Removed

Background New horizontal well drilled early in 2009 cement casing through the productive zone, perforate several intervals and fracture them in an attempt to improve productivity. Research done to find new approach to selective treatment of each set of perfs Desired approach would allow for; Set across the zone fracture, unset, circulate the well clean, move to next interval In a new horizontal well drilled early in 2009 it was decided to cement casing through the productive zone and then perforate several intervals and fracture them in an attempt to improve productivity. Fracturing of horizontal sections in the past has proved problematic with the use of diverters being ineffective and cup packers being unreliable, so a new approach to allow for selective treatment of each set of perforations was researched. As a result a selective “jet pack” straddle system was chosen which allows for setting it across the zone, fracturing, unsetting the straddle, circulating the well clean and providing for the possibility of moving it further uphole to treat the next set of perforations. The well was drilled to a total vertical depth (TVD) of 650 meters (2133 ft.) and a measured depth (MD) of 1481 meters (4859ft.), with a maximum inclination of 91°. A 4-1/2” 11.6lbs/ft casing string was then cemented in place and the well perforated with six sets of perforations each one meter in length with depths ranging from 817-1467 meters (2681-4813 ft.). A straddle system was then deployed on 2-7/8” coiled tubing with the objective of selectively fracturing each interval with some 45 metric tones (99,180 lbs) of sand at pump rates of 12-16 Bbls/min with breakdown pressures ranging from 20-30 MpA (2900-4350 psi).

Operational Details Well Schematic TVD 2,133ft (650m) MD 4,859ft (1,481m) Max inc. 91° 4-1/2” 11.6lb/ft casing Six (6) sets of perfs 1 m in length From 2,681-4,813ft (817-1467m) The well was drilled to a total vertical depth (TVD) of 650 meters (2133 ft.) and a measured depth (MD) of 1481 meters (4859ft.), with a maximum inclination of 91°. A 4-1/2” 11.6lbs/ft casing string was then cemented in place and the well perforated with six sets of perforations each one meter in length with depths ranging from 817-1467 meters (2681-4813 ft.).

Operational Details Areal photographs of location

CT Stretch

Required Setting Loads

Operational Details BHA Configuration Total Length 30ft (9.25m), Distance between element centerline 8ft (2.45m)

Operational Details Case History Run 1 RIH to 705 ft. (215 m), anchor set and a surface load (CT weight plus applied tensile load) of 10.3K lbs (4.6 kdaN) applied to set straddle in blank pipe Successful pressure test to 4,350psi (30MPa) for 5 min Straddle moved to 3,031 ft (924m) Successful blank pipe test was carried out (26,976 lbs (12 kdaN) surface load applied to test in horizontal. POOH to prepare for fracturing operations the next day. RUN # 1 The assembly was run in the hole (RIH) to a depth of 215 meters (705 ft.), the anchor was set and a surface load (CT weight plus applied tensile load) of 4.6 kdaN (10,340 lbs) applied to set the straddle packers in blank pipe – note all setting depths referenced are MCL depths. A pressure test was then carried out down the CT to 30MPa (4350 psi) for 5 minutes to test the straddle pack-off in the vertical. This test was successful and so the anchor and the packers were unset and the assembly moved downhole to a depth of 924 meters (3031 ft.) where a second blank pipe test was carried out, with a surface load of 12 kdaN (26,976 lbs) applied to the assembly, to test the straddle assembly in the horizontal. At this point it was decided to shut down operations and pull out of the hole (POOH) to prepare for fracturing operations the next day.

Operational Details Case History Run 2 Next day, same assembly RIH Objective of fracturing zone 6 Casing collar @ 1467.2 meters (4814 ft.) Pulled up to set at 1462.6meters (4799 ft.) with a surface load of 14 kdaN (31,472lbs). Leak appeared at pressure of 9 MPa (1305 psi) Pumps were shut off and a surface load of 16.8kdaN (37,766lbs) applied leak returns RUN # 2 The next day the same assembly was RIH with the objective of fracturing zone 6, the casing collar was located at 1467.2 meters (4814 ft.) and then the assembly pulled to set at 1462.6meters (4799 ft.) with a surface load of 14 kdaN (31,472lbs). The fracturing process was then started but at a pressure of 9 MPa (1305 psi) a leak appeared, so the pumps were shut off and a surface load of 16.8kdaN (37,766lbs) applied, but once again on starting up the pumps a leak appeared. The straddle was unset and then reset at a depth of 1459.9 meters (4790 ft) and a load of 15kdaN (33,729 lbs) applied but this time, upon starting the pumps, indications were that the safety shear release on the anchor had been activated. It was then necessary to shut down and POOH to inspect the assembly when the packer elements were found to be damaged and the anchor had sheared indicating that the straddle had been set across the perforations.

Operational Details Case History Run 2 (Cont) Straddle unset and then reset at a depth of 1459.9 meters (4790 ft) load of 15kdaN (33,729 lbs) applied Indications were that the safety shear release on the anchor had been activated POOH to inspect the assembly packer elements damaged and the anchor had sheared Conclusion that the straddle had been set across the perforations RUN # 2 The next day the same assembly was RIH with the objective of fracturing zone 6, the casing collar was located at 1467.2 meters (4814 ft.) and then the assembly pulled to set at 1462.6meters (4799 ft.) with a surface load of 14 kdaN (31,472lbs). The fracturing process was then started but at a pressure of 9 MPa (1305 psi) a leak appeared, so the pumps were shut off and a surface load of 16.8kdaN (37,766lbs) applied, but once again on starting up the pumps a leak appeared. The straddle was unset and then reset at a depth of 1459.9 meters (4790 ft) and a load of 15kdaN (33,729 lbs) applied but this time, upon starting the pumps, indications were that the safety shear release on the anchor had been activated. It was then necessary to shut down and POOH to inspect the assembly when the packer elements were found to be damaged and the anchor had sheared indicating that the straddle had been set across the perforations.

Operational Details Case History Run 3 logging run was made with a memory tool on CT Perforations found to be off by 1m (3.3ft). 62cms (2.03 ft.) of spacer added between the packers total length of 10.16m (33.3ft) (longest that could be accommodated in the lubricator) RIH and set at a depth of 1461.5 meters (4795 ft.) with a surface load of 14.5 kdaN (32,596 lbs) Straddle zone 6 RUN # 3 The tools were completely redressed the next day while a logging run was made with a memory tool on CT in order to recheck the location of the perforations which were found to be off by 1m (3.3ft). The BHA was made up again with an additional 62cms (2.03 ft.) of spacer between the packers making a total length of 10.16m (33.3ft) – this represented the longest assembly that could be accommodated in the lubricator. It was then RIH and the assembly set at a depth of 1461.5 meters (4795 ft.) with a surface load of 14.5 kdaN (32,596 lbs) to straddle zone 6 and the zone was successfully fractured with a breakdown pressure of 22 MPa (3190 psi) using a total of 84 m³ of gelled fluid with 45 metric tonnes (99,180 lbs) of sand. RIH to 1464 meters (4803 ft.) to unset the anchor and packers and, after a short wait to allow the packing elements to retract, reverse circulation was established to flush the CT and the surface lines. The BHA was then POOH to be inspected and redressed – the packers were found to be in good condition with no evidence of damage.

Operational Details Case History Run 3 (Cont) Zone successfully fractured breakdown pressure of 22 MPa (3190 psi) total of 84 m³ of gelled fluid 45 metric tonnes (99,180 lbs) of sand RIH to 1464 meters (4803 ft.) to unset the anchor and packers after a short wait to allow the packing elements to retract, reverse circulation was established to flush the CT and the surface lines. POOH to inspect - packers found to be in good condition with no evidence of any damage. RUN # 3 The tools were completely redressed the next day while a logging run was made with a memory tool on CT in order to recheck the location of the perforations which were found to be off by 1m (3.3ft). The BHA was made up again with an additional 62cms (2.03 ft.) of spacer between the packers making a total length of 10.16m (33.3ft) – this represented the longest assembly that could be accommodated in the lubricator. It was then RIH and the assembly set at a depth of 1461.5 meters (4795 ft.) with a surface load of 14.5 kdaN (32,596 lbs) to straddle zone 6 and the zone was successfully fractured with a breakdown pressure of 22 MPa (3190 psi) using a total of 84 m³ of gelled fluid with 45 metric tonnes (99,180 lbs) of sand. RIH to 1464 meters (4803 ft.) to unset the anchor and packers and, after a short wait to allow the packing elements to retract, reverse circulation was established to flush the CT and the surface lines. The BHA was then POOH to be inspected and redressed – the packers were found to be in good condition with no evidence of damage.

Operational Details Case History Run 4 BHA set at 1341 meters (4400 ft.) with a surface load of 9.4kdaN (21,131 lbs) Top packer leak detected BHA unset and reset at 1340.5 meters (4398 ft.) Another leak (upper element was set across the perforations) Good set at 1340 meters (4397 ft.) zone 5 fractured maximum pressure of 37.5 MPa (5437 psi) RUN #4 The redressed BHA was run in to set at 1341 meters (4400 ft.) with a surface load of 9.4kdaN (21,131 lbs) On starting the pumps a top packer leak was detected so the BHA was unset and reset at 1340.5 meters (4398 ft.) and, after another leak (apparently because the upper element was set across the perforations), at 1340 meters (4397 ft.) where a good set was obtained and then zone 5 was fractured according to the program with a maximum pressure of 37.5 MPa (5437 psi). The BHA was then run down to 1348 meters (4423 ft) to unset the anchor and packers and reverse circulation established to flush the CT and surface lines clean. It was then POOH to be reset across zone 4 but without success so it was POOH for inspection and redress. It was found while tripping the BHA to surface that the CT had been perforated by sand. This was due to the frac. breaking down the casing cement and beginning to communicate with Zone 4 (the next zone above) from outside the casing to inside (around the casing annulus).

Operational Details Case History Run 4 (Cont) The BHA run down to 1348 meters (4423 ft) to unset Reverse circulation established to flush the CT and surface lines clean. POOH to be reset across zone 4 but without success POOH for inspection of straddle CT had been perforated by sand Frac. breaking down casing cement establishing communication with Zone 4 (the next zone above) from outside the casing to inside (around the casing annulus). RUN #4 The redressed BHA was run in to set at 1341 meters (4400 ft.) with a surface load of 9.4kdaN (21,131 lbs) On starting the pumps a top packer leak was detected so the BHA was unset and reset at 1340.5 meters (4398 ft.) and, after another leak (apparently because the upper element was set across the perforations), at 1340 meters (4397 ft.) where a good set was obtained and then zone 5 was fractured according to the program with a maximum pressure of 37.5 MPa (5437 psi). The BHA was then run down to 1348 meters (4423 ft) to unset the anchor and packers and reverse circulation established to flush the CT and surface lines clean. It was then POOH to be reset across zone 4 but without success so it was POOH for inspection and redress. It was found while tripping the BHA to surface that the CT had been perforated by sand. This was due to the frac. breaking down the casing cement and beginning to communicate with Zone 4 (the next zone above) from outside the casing to inside (around the casing annulus).

Operational Details Case History Run 5 RIH to be set at a depth of 1230.65 meters (4038 ft.) to straddle zone 4 leak developed (packers maybe set in the perforations) Unset and reset at 1230.2 meters (4036 ft.) Leak detected again (communication with zone 5 below) Zone 4 attempts abandoned BHA was unset reset at 1091.6 meters (3582 ft.) surface load of 13.3 kdaN (29,898 lbs). RUN #5 The same assembly was redressed and then RIH to be set at a depth of 1230.65 meters (4038 ft.) to straddle zone 4 but a leak developed indicating that the packers maybe set in the perforations. It was unset and reset at 1230.2 meters (4036 ft.) but again there was a leak which appeared to indicate communication with zone 5 below. Attempts to treat zone 4 were abandoned and the BHA was unset and POOH to be reset at 1091.6meters (3582 ft.) across zone 3 with a surface load of 13.3 kdaN (29,898 lbs). The zone was then successfully fractured according to program with a maximum pressure of 15 MPa (2175psi), however the job was terminated early due to pressure jacking. As a result, when the BHA was unset and reverse circulation started, no returns were obtained, likewise with direct circulation, and attempts to POOH with a surface load of 13 kdaN (29,224 lbs) were unsuccessful. The BHA was worked down to 1103.5 meters (3621 ft) still without any returns and then down to 1107.9 meters (3635 ft.) where the assembly came free with a surface load of 9 kdaN (20,232 lbs) from where it was POOH with a continuous overpull of 4kdaN (8992 lbs) all the way to surface. When it was retrieved it was found that sand was on top of the BHA, the packing elements were not fully retracted due to sand contamination and the CT was packed with sand. The tools were then shipped to the warehouse in Red Deer and operations were shut down for the Easter holiday.

Operational Details Case History Run 5 (Cont) Zone 3 successfully fractured maximum pressure of 15 MPa (2175psi) Job terminated early due to pressure jacking As a result, when the BHA was unset and reverse circulation started, no returns were obtained Attempts to POOH with a surface load of 13 kdaN (29,224 lbs) were unsuccessful BHA worked down to 1103.5 meters (3621 ft) (no returns) Down to 1107.9 meters (3635 ft.) free with a surface load of 9 kdaN (20,232 lbs) RUN #5 The same assembly was redressed and then RIH to be set at a depth of 1230.65 meters (4038 ft.) to straddle zone 4 but a leak developed indicating that the packers maybe set in the perforations. It was unset and reset at 1230.2 meters (4036 ft.) but again there was a leak which appeared to indicate communication with zone 5 below. Attempts to treat zone 4 were abandoned and the BHA was unset and POOH to be reset at 1091.6meters (3582 ft.) across zone 3 with a surface load of 13.3 kdaN (29,898 lbs). The zone was then successfully fractured according to program with a maximum pressure of 15 MPa (2175psi), however the job was terminated early due to pressure jacking. As a result, when the BHA was unset and reverse circulation started, no returns were obtained, likewise with direct circulation, and attempts to POOH with a surface load of 13 kdaN (29,224 lbs) were unsuccessful. The BHA was worked down to 1103.5 meters (3621 ft) still without any returns and then down to 1107.9 meters (3635 ft.) where the assembly came free with a surface load of 9 kdaN (20,232 lbs) from where it was POOH with a continuous overpull of 4kdaN (8992 lbs) all the way to surface. When it was retrieved it was found that sand was on top of the BHA, the packing elements were not fully retracted due to sand contamination and the CT was packed with sand. The tools were then shipped to the warehouse in Red Deer and operations were shut down for the Easter holiday.

Operational Details Case History Run 5 (Cont) POOH with a continuous overpull of 4kdaN (8992 lbs) Sand on top of the BHA Packing elements not fully retracted CT packed with sand. Tools shipped to Red Deer Ops shut down for Easter RUN #5 The same assembly was redressed and then RIH to be set at a depth of 1230.65 meters (4038 ft.) to straddle zone 4 but a leak developed indicating that the packers maybe set in the perforations. It was unset and reset at 1230.2 meters (4036 ft.) but again there was a leak which appeared to indicate communication with zone 5 below. Attempts to treat zone 4 were abandoned and the BHA was unset and POOH to be reset at 1091.6meters (3582 ft.) across zone 3 with a surface load of 13.3 kdaN (29,898 lbs). The zone was then successfully fractured according to program with a maximum pressure of 15 MPa (2175psi), however the job was terminated early due to pressure jacking. As a result, when the BHA was unset and reverse circulation started, no returns were obtained, likewise with direct circulation, and attempts to POOH with a surface load of 13 kdaN (29,224 lbs) were unsuccessful. The BHA was worked down to 1103.5 meters (3621 ft) still without any returns and then down to 1107.9 meters (3635 ft.) where the assembly came free with a surface load of 9 kdaN (20,232 lbs) from where it was POOH with a continuous overpull of 4kdaN (8992 lbs) all the way to surface. When it was retrieved it was found that sand was on top of the BHA, the packing elements were not fully retracted due to sand contamination and the CT was packed with sand. The tools were then shipped to the warehouse in Red Deer and operations were shut down for the Easter holiday.

Operational Details Case History Run 6 Operations resumed five days later RIH to be set across zone 2 at 940.9 meters (3087 ft) Surface load of 11 kdaN (24728 lbs) Zone successfully fractured maximum pressure of 38 MPa (5510 psi). Return line became plugged preventing bleed off BHA unset and RIH to 962 meters (3156 ft) Operations shut down to allow the well to bleed to the formation overnight. RUN #6 Five days later operations were resumed and the same BHA, fully redressed, was RIH to be set across zone 2 at 940.9 meters (3087 ft) with a surface load of 11 kdaN (24728 lbs) and the zone was successfully fractured according to the program at a maximum pressure of 38 MPa (5510 psi). However attempts to bleed off at surface after the job failed as the return line became plugged. The BHA was unset and RIH to 962 meters (3156 ft), but being unable to circulate in either direction due to the plug, operations were shut down to allow the well to bleed to the formation overnight. The next day operations continued and after cleaning out the surface lines circulation was established with considerable amounts of sand in the returns which plugged the return line twice. The BHA was RIH to 967.5 meters (3174 ft) and with reverse circulation the returns became clean enough to POOH and the BHA was recovered and found to be in good condition.

Operational Details Case History Run 6 (Cont) Next day operations continued After cleaning out the surface lines circulation was established plugged the return line twice The BHA was RIH to 967.5 meters (3174 ft) and with reverse circulation the returns became clean enough to POOH BHA was recovered and found to be in good condition. RUN #6 Five days later operations were resumed and the same BHA, fully redressed, was RIH to be set across zone 2 at 940.9 meters (3087 ft) with a surface load of 11 kdaN (24728 lbs) and the zone was successfully fractured according to the program at a maximum pressure of 38 MPa (5510 psi). However attempts to bleed off at surface after the job failed as the return line became plugged. The BHA was unset and RIH to 962 meters (3156 ft), but being unable to circulate in either direction due to the plug, operations were shut down to allow the well to bleed to the formation overnight. The next day operations continued and after cleaning out the surface lines circulation was established with considerable amounts of sand in the returns which plugged the return line twice. The BHA was RIH to 967.5 meters (3174 ft) and with reverse circulation the returns became clean enough to POOH and the BHA was recovered and found to be in good condition.

Operational Details Case History Summary 4 of the 6 sets of perforations treated Ceased operations to evaluate the results Total of 6 trips Set and unset successfully 12 times Four (4) zones treated total of 180 Metric tonnes (396,720 lbs) of 20-40 sand combined density of 1000kg/m³ (8.4 lbs/gallon) fluid viscosity of approx 400cp, with no indications of any untoward abrasion of the BHA. Summary: With 4 of the 6 sets of perforations having been treated it was decided to cease operations and evaluate the results. The jet pack straddle system was run in the well a total of 6 times and was set and unset successfully 12 times during the program, four zones being treated with a total of 180 Metric tonnes (396,720 lbs) of 20-40 sand in gel fluid with a combined density of 1000kg/m³ (8.4 lbs/gallon) and a fluid viscosity of approx 400cp, with no indications of any untoward abrasion of the BHA. After a lengthy clean up period the well was put on production at a rate of 50bbl/day which represents the highest initial rate for any well in the field and the 4 months of steady production at that rate is also the longest on record.

Operational Details Case History Summary (Cont) After clean up period well was put on production at a rate of 50bbl/day Highest initial rate for any well in the field 4 months of steady production at that rate is also the longest on record. Summary: With 4 of the 6 sets of perforations having been treated it was decided to cease operations and evaluate the results. The jet pack straddle system was run in the well a total of 6 times and was set and unset successfully 12 times during the program, four zones being treated with a total of 180 Metric tonnes (396,720 lbs) of 20-40 sand in gel fluid with a combined density of 1000kg/m³ (8.4 lbs/gallon) and a fluid viscosity of approx 400cp, with no indications of any untoward abrasion of the BHA. After a lengthy clean up period the well was put on production at a rate of 50bbl/day which represents the highest initial rate for any well in the field and the 4 months of steady production at that rate is also the longest on record.

Conclusions Correctly placing the straddle proved difficult Short distance between the element centerlines. Dictated by the maximum assembly length that the lubricator assembly could accommodate. In future operations it would be advisable to make plans for a longer lubricator. Stretch and load characteristics of the CT are critical to the operation and the modeling of them is a very important part of job preparation! Accurate perf depths very important. Properly sized manifold for returns is equally important Quality of the cement bond (communication between sets of perfs) 24 hour operations is a must for optimizing costs. Conclusions This first run of the tandem tension jet pack straddle assembly in a horizontal well proved the viability of the approach and although some difficulties were encountered the tools functioned according to design and the results achieved were very positive. Following is a breakdown of the difficulties encountered and the conclusions reached that should greatly enhance the success of future such operations: Correctly placing the packers to straddle the perforated intervals proved difficult due to the short distance between the packer centerlines. This was dictated by the maximum assembly length that the lubricator assembly could accommodate. In future operations it would be advisable to make plans for a longer lubricator to be available so as to accommodate a longer straddle and make the accurate placement of the BHA less critical. The stretch and load characteristics of the CT in the horizontal are critical to the operation and the modeling of them is a very important part of job preparation. The accuracy of the perforation depths was very important and discrepancies led to several problems. Logging, or another means of obtaining perforating depth accuracy may be advisable in order to achieve accurate placement of the straddle. Plugging of the CT and lines with sand, due to screening out, lead to difficulties in establishing circulation, either direct or reverse, and therefore in cleaning up the well and retrieving the BHA. In reviewing the problem it was concluded that the flow back manifold was inadequately sized and a larger capacity assembly is recommended in the future. The quality of the cement bond in this well was also critical as communication between sets of perforations as happened in Run # 4. In this case sand was jetting behind the casing uphole through the perforations on the next zone resulting in cutting a hole in the CT, causing an emergency shut down. Multi zone horizontal operations should be carried out in 24 hour operations. Some of the shut downs in this series of operations were due to the day being over, thus extending the overall operational time.   If these aspects of the operation are properly addressed it is probable that multiple zone treatments can be made in a single trip as planned.

Looking Forward Our experience has lead us to improvements to optimize performance these improvements include: Increased pressure rating – Up to 54Mpa Improved bottom packer equalization / release – Allowing for quicker movement between zones. Debris barriers designed to “survive screen outs” Improved Operating Procedures

Questions?