The Holographic Universe: From Beginning to End NCHU Workshop, U of M, Oct 18- 21, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Current State of Cosmology
Advertisements

The Nuts and Bolts of Inflation Richard Barrett. Dark Energy SeminarGlasgow 29/11/2003 Inflation What is inflation? What is dark energy? Why was inflation.
Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
ICHEP conference, Paris, 22/07/10. Emergence Current Paradigm FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: carried by elementary particles.
Theories of gravity in 5D brane-world scenarios
Effective Theory of Cosmological SUSY Breaking Principles of CSB: 1.C.C. Discrete Input Controlling No. Physical States in de Sitter Space-Time 2. SUSY.
Quantum Gravity and the Cosmological Constant Enikő Regős Enikő Regős.
Dark Energy and Quantum Gravity Dark Energy and Quantum Gravity Enikő Regős Enikő Regős.
Astronomy and Cosmologies Spring 2013, Zita Crisis in Cosmology Planck Time Candidate solutions.
A theorist’s view of dark energy Andreas Albrecht (UC Davis) UCSC Colloquium Jan
String Cosmology: A Brief Overview Bin Chen Dep. of Phys., Peking Univ. 28th. June, 2008.
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL 10. Inflation.
Dark Energy and Void Evolution Dark Energy and Void Evolution Enikő Regős Enikő Regős.
General Relativity is Not a Field Theory Cauchy-Kowalevskaya – Field Theory Has Finite # DOF per Space Point Cauchy-Kowalevskaya – Field Theory Has Finite.
Cosmic challenges for fundamental physics Diederik Roest December 9, 2009 Symposium “The Quantum Universe”
Observables in Quantum Gravity Observables in QM are Measured by Semi-classical Machines Current Understanding: Pointer Variables are Averages of Local.
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) SM: 28 bosonic d.o.f. & 90 (96) fermionic d.o.f. SUSY: # of fermions = # of bosonsN=1 SUSY: There are no particles.
Holographic Dark Energy Preety Sidhu 5 May Black Holes and Entropy Black holes are “maximal entropy objects” Entropy of a black hole proportional.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
The Cosmological Constant and Technical Naturalness Sunny Itzhaki hep-th/ work to appear.
Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter from dilatation symmetry.
HOLOGRAPHIC SPACE TIME AND SUPERSYMMETRY MBG-60 Conference Cambridge, UK April 2006.
Galileo Galilei Colloquium, Pisa, March 3, 2006 Gerard ’t Hooft Utrecht University.
CERN Colloquium, 28/04/11. Matter and Forces Current Paradigm FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: carried by elementary particles.
The Quantum Space-Time Juan Maldacena Institute for Advanced Study 25 th Solvay Conference October 2011.
THE GRACEFUL EXIT FROM INFLATION AND DARK ENERGY By Tomislav Prokopec Publications: Tomas Janssen and T. Prokopec, arXiv: ; Tomas Janssen, Shun-Pei.
Entropy bounds Introduction Black hole entropy Entropy bounds Holography.
Entropy localization and distribution in the Hawking radiation Horacio Casini CONICET-Intituto Balseiro – Centro Atómico Bariloche.
Strings: Theory of Everything, Something, or Nothing? Robert N. Oerter.
Konstantinos Dimopoulos Lancaster University Contemporary Physics 50 (2009) arXiv: [hep-ph] Invited contribution to 50 th Anniversary.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
Cosmology, Inflation & Compact Extra Dimensions Chad A. Middleton Mesa State College March 1, 2007 Keith Andrew and Brett Bolen, Western Kentucky University.
Announcements The final exam will be at Noon on Monday, December 13 in Van Allen Hall LR1. The final exam will be cumulative. The final will be 40 questions,
Dilaton quantum gravity and cosmology. Dilaton quantum gravity Functional renormalization flow, with truncation :
Geometry of the Universe
Standard Cosmology.
DARK ENERGY PARTICLE PHYSICS PROBLEMS STEEN HANNESTAD UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS NBI, 27 AUGUST 2007.
Big bang or freeze ?. conclusions Big bang singularity is artefact Big bang singularity is artefact of inappropriate choice of field variables – of inappropriate.
Les Houches Lectures on Cosmic Inflation Four Parts 1)Introductory material 2)Entropy, Tuning and Equilibrium in Cosmology 3)Classical and quantum probabilities.
A Metric Theory of Gravity with Torsion in Extra-dimension Kameshwar C. Wali (Syracuse University) Miami 2013 [Co-authors: Shankar K. Karthik and Anand.
PHY th century cosmology 1920s – 1990s (from Friedmann to Freedman)  theoretical technology available, but no data  20 th century: birth of observational.
The fast life of holographic mesons Aninda Sinha Perimeter Institute, Canada. with Robert Myers arXiv:0802.nnnn Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur, India.
Emergent Space-Time and and Induced Gravity Erik Verlinde University of Amsterdam Madrid, November 17 th, 2006 Some (Speculative) Ideas on “Strings versus.
Big bang or freeze ?. conclusions Big bang singularity is artefact Big bang singularity is artefact of inappropriate choice of field variables – of inappropriate.
Inflationary Theory of Primordial Cosmological Perturbation Project for General Relativity (Instructor: Prof.Whiting) Sohyun Park.
Inflation Sean Carroll, Caltech SSI The state of the universe appears finely-tuned 2.Inflation can make things smooth and flat 3.Primordial perturbations.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 10; May
Can observations look back to the beginning of inflation ?
H. Quarks – “the building blocks of the Universe” The number of quarks increased with discoveries of new particles and have reached 6 For unknown reasons.
GRAVITON BACKREACTION & COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT
Low scale gravity black holes at LHC Enikő Regős ( CERN )
Utrecht University Gerard ’t Hooft and Isaac Newton Institute, December 15, 2004.
“Planck 2009” conference Padova May 2009 Facing Dark Energy in SUGRA Collaboration with C. van de Bruck, A. Davis and J. Martin.
Holography, de Sitter space and SUSY breaking Lindefest, Stanford, Mar 7, 2008.
1 Bhupendra Nath Tiwari IIT Kanpur in collaboration with T. Sarkar & G. Sengupta. Thermodynamic Geometry and BTZ black holes This talk is mainly based.
The Fate of the Universe. The fate depends on the rate of expansion and the density Density greater than critical value – gravity will halt expansion.
A Holographic Framework for Eternal Inflation Yasuhiro Sekino (Okayama Institute for Quantum Physics) Collaboration with Ben Freivogel (UC Berkeley), Leonard.
Machian General Relativity A possible solution to the Dark Energy problem and an alternative to Big Bang cosmology ? Robin Booth Theoretical Physics Imperial.
New Insights into Quantum Gravity from Holography Gary Horowitz UC Santa Barbara with N. Engelhardt ( , and in progress)
Causality Problem in Holographic Dark Energy Hyeong-Chan Kim Korea National University of Transportation, with Jungjai Lee (Daejin U.) and Jae-Weon Lee.
Scale vs Conformal invariance from holographic approach
Could loop quantum gravity corrections
Solutions of black hole interior, information paradox and the shape of singularities Haolin Lu.
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
The Cosmological Constant Problem & Self-tuning Mechanism
The case for emergent gravity
A Swampland Update Cumrun Vafa Harvard University PASCOS 2019
Presentation transcript:

The Holographic Universe: From Beginning to End NCHU Workshop, U of M, Oct , 2010

Why did the universe begin its life with low entropy? Question goes back to Boltzmann. Emphasized in 1960s by Penrose. Question goes back to Boltzmann. Emphasized in 1960s by Penrose. Subsumes questions about fine tuning: homogeneity, isotropy, flatness. Subsumes questions about fine tuning: homogeneity, isotropy, flatness. Covariant Entropy Bound (Fischler-Susskind- Bousso) provides new insight Covariant Entropy Bound (Fischler-Susskind- Bousso) provides new insight INFLATION DOES NOT SOLVE THIS PROBLEM (and therefore doesn’t explain FRW) INFLATION DOES NOT SOLVE THIS PROBLEM (and therefore doesn’t explain FRW) I’ll propose a solution based on holographic cosmology I’ll propose a solution based on holographic cosmology Based on work with Fischler and Mannelli Based on work with Fischler and Mannelli

Holographic Screen of a Causal Diamond Maximal area d-2 surface on the null boundary

Holographic Space-time Area = 4 ln dim H plus overlaps define conformal factor and causal structure Area = 4 ln dim H plus overlaps define conformal factor and causal structure Jacobson: Thermodynamics of such a system  Einstein eqns for large diamonds Jacobson: Thermodynamics of such a system  Einstein eqns for large diamonds Space-time is NOT a fluctuating quantum variable, it’s defined by the structure of the QM Hilbert space Space-time is NOT a fluctuating quantum variable, it’s defined by the structure of the QM Hilbert space

Degrees of Freedom of Quantum Gravity        = 0   (  S a )        = 0   (  S a ) S a (y) Real Components of d – 2 Spinor Determines Orientation of Holoscreen at y via S T g m1 … mk S 1<k<d -2 (Cartan – Penrose) S a (y) Real Components of d – 2 Spinor Determines Orientation of Holoscreen at y via S T g m1 … mk S 1<k<d -2 (Cartan – Penrose) S a I (m) S b J (n ) + S b J (n) S a I (m) = d ab d mn M IJ S a I (m) S b J (n ) + S b J (n) S a I (m) = d ab d mn M IJ m,n pixelation of holoscreen. I,J refer to compact dimensions m,n pixelation of holoscreen. I,J refer to compact dimensions DOF of Supersymmetric Massless Particles Penetrating Pixels of Holoscreen DOF of Supersymmetric Massless Particles Penetrating Pixels of Holoscreen 16 Real Components per pixel implies graviton and gravitino in spectrum 16 Real Components per pixel implies graviton and gravitino in spectrum

Holographic Cosmology Introduce a lattice with the topology of flat 3 space on the Big Bang hypersurface Introduce a lattice with the topology of flat 3 space on the Big Bang hypersurface At each lattice point x define a nested sequence of Hilbert spaces H (n, x) = P n At each lattice point x define a nested sequence of Hilbert spaces H (n, x) = P n Define a sequence of unitary operators in H (n max, x) : U k = V k X W k where V k acts in H (k, x) & W k in its tensor complement Define a sequence of unitary operators in H (n max, x) : U k = V k X W k where V k acts in H (k, x) & W k in its tensor complement Define an overlap H (n, x) = O (n, x,y) X N (n,x), H (n, y) = O (n, x,y) X N (n,y) Define an overlap H (n, x) = O (n, x,y) X N (n,x), H (n, y) = O (n, x,y) X N (n,y)

For lattice nearest neighbors O = P Consistency conditions for dynamics: density matrices on all overlaps given by each observer’s dynamics must be unitarily equivalent. The D(ense) B(lack) H(ole) F(luid) is a solution: V k (x) = e H(k) all x, O (n,x,y) = P n-d(x,y) d = minimal # of lattice steps. Homogeneous (consistency), isotropic (large k: locus of equal d ~ a sphere). H(k) =  S(m) A(m,n,k) S(n) + P : A = randomly chosen anti-symmetric

For large k, approaches free massless fermion. P(k) randomly chosen irrelevant perturbation of this. Define energy density to be 1+1 energy density. Random Hamiltonian sweeps out entire Hilbert space  entropy = that of CFT  p =  and covariant entropy bound saturated. Absence of scale implies FRW is flat. Space-time geometry emergent from QM. Rotation invariance emergent from overlap rules in large k limit.

The real universe TB & Fischler: heuristic picture as small normal “percolating fractal” in DBHF. Today’s lecture, a new attempt: Large k DBHF : Time avg State at large k is maximally uncertain  in V k New overlap rules allow transition to N copies of thy. of stable dS space (see later) with entropy k ln dim P, which gives same time avg density matrix. Entropy of this system the same as that of dS space with “final” c.c. (determines N, which is a cosmological initial condition)*. This quantum theory gives a universe that resembles N horizon volumes of dS space with entropy k: eternal inflation, but with only a fixed number of horizons Hard to understand in low energy effective field theory.

Heuristically, in an as yet unconstructed model in which inflation ends, will have to put together these different spherical horizon volumes in a single 3 space  that 3 space cannot be flat. Interstices between spheres (>~ ¾ volume) must carry conformal factor that reduces their volume to Planck size. Induces random scalar curvature fluctation. If we attribute this to a random energy density then Einstein eqns. Imply  ~ 1 (up to factors of 2  etc.). Match to a slow roll model, where red tilt allows smaller fluctuations in CMB Constraints: no self reproduction, enough e- foldings to make CMB causal, enough tilt to get to 10 -5

Stable dS Space Two Hamiltonians, H random finite dim (e S ) bounded by ~ 1/R. P commutes with H for low eigenvalues [P, H] = M P 2 f(P / R M P 2 ) Empty dS is infinite temp ensemble for H P describes localized excitations. Subspace with eigenvalue E has degeneracy e S – 2  RE (fits black hole formula). This model explains qualitative “exptl” features of dS space. In cosmology. High entropy state is “empty” : may explain Penrose’s conundrum. We see physics of P

Asymptotically Flat Space Super- Poincare Invariant? Superstring/M-theory Provides Ample Evidence This is True Superstring/M-theory Provides Ample Evidence This is True Multi-parameter Web of Supersymmetric Theories in SpaceTime d = 4 … 11 Multi-parameter Web of Supersymmetric Theories in SpaceTime d = 4 … 11 No Consistent AF Space-time w/o SUSY No Consistent AF Space-time w/o SUSY Holographic formalism provides basis for this: pixel variables approach degrees of freedom of massless superparticles as holoscreen approaches Lorentz invariant two sphere (TB, Fiol, Morisse) Holographic formalism provides basis for this: pixel variables approach degrees of freedom of massless superparticles as holoscreen approaches Lorentz invariant two sphere (TB, Fiol, Morisse)

The Real World Has(?) Positive L Evidence From Distant Supernovae, Ages of Globular Clusters/Universe, Large Scale Structure, Cosmic Microwave Background Evidence From Distant Supernovae, Ages of Globular Clusters/Universe, Large Scale Structure, Cosmic Microwave Background If True: Holographic Principle Implies Finite Number (ln N = ) of Quantum States (TB – Fischler) If True: Holographic Principle Implies Finite Number (ln N = ) of Quantum States (TB – Fischler) (1 – 2c d M/r d-3 -(r/R) 2 ) = 0 (1 – 2c d M/r d-3 -(r/R) 2 ) = 0 No Exact Scattering Theory as in Conventional String Theory No Exact Scattering Theory as in Conventional String Theory

Quantum Theory of de Sitter Space TB, Fischler, Fiol, Morisse TB, Fischler, Fiol, Morisse C.c. input parameter, determines number of S a I (n) Variables (Max holoscreen = cosmological horizon w/ finite area) C.c. input parameter, determines number of S a I (n) Variables (Max holoscreen = cosmological horizon w/ finite area) C.c.  0 limiting theory must be isolated Superpoincare invariant theory – no known examples – non-generic in low energy SUGRA C.c.  0 limiting theory must be isolated Superpoincare invariant theory – no known examples – non-generic in low energy SUGRA TB’s scaling law: gravitino mass: m 3/2 ~ L 1/4 (only handwaving derivations but implies superpartners in TeV regime (LHC)) TB’s scaling law: gravitino mass: m 3/2 ~ L 1/4 (only handwaving derivations but implies superpartners in TeV regime (LHC))

Implications for Particle Physics Low scale of SUSY breaking implies Very Low Energy Gauge Mediation – no SUSY wimp dark matter. Low scale of SUSY breaking implies Very Low Energy Gauge Mediation – no SUSY wimp dark matter. Axions also problematic because saxion ruins nucleosynthesis (Carpenter, Dine, Festuccia) Axions also problematic because saxion ruins nucleosynthesis (Carpenter, Dine, Festuccia) Only plausible dark matter candidate: Hidden sector neutral baryon with primordial asymmetry Only plausible dark matter candidate: Hidden sector neutral baryon with primordial asymmetry This particle has a magnetic moment (electric?) because hidden sector constituents charged. This particle has a magnetic moment (electric?) because hidden sector constituents charged. Dark matter dipoles have interesting signals (TB, Fortin, Thomas) and might have effects on galactic field. Dark matter dipoles have interesting signals (TB, Fortin, Thomas) and might have effects on galactic field.

Conclusions Holographic cosmology derives homogeneity isotropy and flatness from high entropy initial conditions Holographic cosmology derives homogeneity isotropy and flatness from high entropy initial conditions Real World might be highest entropy state that escapes DBHF phase. Real World might be highest entropy state that escapes DBHF phase. H.C. implies asymptotic dS universe with c.c. determined by initial conditions (# DOF in low entropy state). Small c.c. anthropically determined. H.C. implies asymptotic dS universe with c.c. determined by initial conditions (# DOF in low entropy state). Small c.c. anthropically determined.

Theory of small c.c. dS becomes SUSic, with m 3/2 ~ 10  1/4. Maybe fairly unique for fixed c.c. Low scale of SUSY breaking puts strong constraints on Terascale physics (Pyramid Scheme) and dark matter is almost certainly a neutral hidden sector baryon, with a magnetic moment, in this model.