Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University - Distance learning using IP multicast Ólafur Ragnar Helgason Network Systems and Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CST Computer Networks NAT CST 415 4/10/2017 CST Computer Networks.
Advertisements

Computer Networking A Top-Down Approach Chapter 4.7.
L. Alchaal & al. Page Offering a Multicast Delivery Service in a Programmable Secure IP VPN Environment Lina ALCHAAL Netcelo S.A., Echirolles INRIA.
IT’S HERE Bandwidth Technologies. Agenda Technologies for Bandwidth –Single Location DSL/Cable T1/Bonded T1 DS3/OC-N Ethernet Over Copper (EoC, EoFM)
CPSC Network Layer4-1 IP addresses: how to get one? Q: How does a host get IP address? r hard-coded by system admin in a file m Windows: control-panel->network->configuration-
COS 461 Fall 1997 Routing COS 461 Fall 1997 Typical Structure.
IP datagrams Service paradigm, IP datagrams, routing, encapsulation, fragmentation and reassembly.
Interest Management Objectives – –Understand what is meant by the term interest management. –Realise how interest management schemes may be deployed. –Understand.
Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University.
Streaming Video over the Internet: Approaches and Directions Dapeng Wu, Yiwei Thomas Hou et al. Presented by: Abhishek Gupta
COS 420 Day 15. Agenda Assignment 3 Due Assignment 4 Posted Chap Due April 6 Individual Project Presentations Due IEPREP - Jeff MANETS - Donnie.
Application layer (continued) Week 4 – Lecture 2.
Secure Multicast Xun Kang. Content Why need secure Multicast? Secure Group Communications Using Key Graphs Batch Update of Key Trees Reliable Group Rekeying.
School of Information Technologies Internet Multicasting NETS3303/3603 Week 10.
Chapter 4 Network Layer slides are modified from J. Kurose & K. Ross CPE 400 / 600 Computer Communication Networks Lecture 14.
COS 420 Day 18. Agenda Group Project Discussion Program Requirements Rejected Resubmit by Friday Noon Protocol Definition Due April 12 Assignment 3 Due.
VoIP and IP conferencing over satellites Workshop on VoIP Technology: Research and Standards for reliable applications PIMRC 08, Cannes France 15 September.
An Overlay Multicast Infrastructure for Live/Stored Video Streaming Visual Communication Laboratory Department of Computer Science National Tsing Hua University.
1 IP Multicasting. 2 IP Multicasting: Motivation Problem: Want to deliver a packet from a source to multiple receivers Applications: –Streaming of Continuous.
Wolfgang EffelsbergUniversity of Mannheim1 Multicast IP Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim September 2001.
1 Network Layer: Host-to-Host Communication. 2 Network Layer: Motivation Can we built a global network such as Internet by extending LAN segments using.
Multicast Communication
The Future of the Internet Jennifer Rexford ’91 Computer Science Department Princeton University
A Web Services Based Streaming Gateway for Heterogeneous A/V Collaboration Hasan Bulut Computer Science Department Indiana University.
CSE679: Multicast and Multimedia r Basics r Addressing r Routing r Hierarchical multicast r QoS multicast.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1-1 MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts.
Multimedia Communications
Multimedia Communications Student: Blidaru Catalina Elena.
LECTURE 9 CT1303 LAN. LAN DEVICES Network: Nodes: Service units: PC Interface processing Modules: it doesn’t generate data, but just it process it and.
Introduction to Network Layer. Network Layer: Motivation Can we built a global network such as Internet by extending LAN segments using bridges? –No!
Network Layer4-1 Chapter 4: Network Layer Chapter goals: r understand principles behind network layer services: m network layer service models m forwarding.
 Network Segments  NICs  Repeaters  Hubs  Bridges  Switches  Routers and Brouters  Gateways 2.
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
Overlay Network Physical LayerR : router Overlay Layer N R R R R R N.
CS 5565 Network Architecture and Protocols Godmar Back Lecture 22.
Chapter 5: Summary r principles behind data link layer services: m error detection, correction m multiple access protocols m link layer addressing, ARP.
Higashino Lab. Maximizing User Gain in Multi-flow Multicast Streaming on Overlay Networks Y.Nakamura, H.Yamaguchi and T.Higashino Graduate School of Information.
Fast Handoff for Seamless wireless mesh Networks Yair Amir, Clauiu Danilov, Michael Hilsdale Mobisys’ Jeon, Seung-woo.
4: Network Layer4-1 Schedule Today: r Finish Ch3 r Collect 1 st Project r See projects run r Start Ch4 Soon: r HW5 due Monday r Last chance for Qs r First.
What is H.323? H.323 is standard providing a foundation for audio, video, and data communications across IP-based networks, including the Internet.
Multicasting Part I© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS4254 Spring CS4254 Computer Network Architecture and Programming Dr. Ayman A. Abdel-Hamid Computer.
Draft-kellil-sam-mtocp-01.txt – CEA, LIST - 78th IETF Meeting, 29July Multiparty Transport Overlay Control Protocol (MTOCP) draft-kellil-sam-mtocp-01.txt.
© J. Liebeherr, All rights reserved 1 Multicast Routing.
Interdomain multicast routing with IPv6 Stig Venaas University of Southampton Jerome Durand RENATER Mickael Hoerdt University Louis Pasteur - LSIIT.
Interdomain IPv6 multicast Stig Venaas UNINETT. PIM-SM and Rendezvous Points Interdomain multicast routing is usually done with a protocol called PIM-SM.
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 7: IPv6 (ch. 33) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
Björn Landfeldt School of Information Technologies NETS 3303 Networked Systems Multicast.
Yallcast Architecture Overview Paul Francis NTT PF Labs
APPLICATION LAYER MULTICASTING
Chapter2 Networking Fundamentals
IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran.
CIS679: Multicast and Multimedia (more) r Review of Last Lecture r More about Multicast.
1 Spring Semester 2009, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #7 DVMRP.
11 CS716 Advanced Computer Networks By Dr. Amir Qayyum.
D EPT. OF I NFO. & C OMM., GIST AG connect: Toward better connectivity for the AG 19 th APAN Bangkok Meeting ( ) Namgon Kim and JongWon Kim Networked.
INSIGNIA : A QOS ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORK FOR MANETS Course:-Software Architecture & Design Team Members 1.Sameer Agrawal 2.Vivek Shankar Ram.R.
Rehab AlFallaj.  Network:  Nodes: Service units: PC Interface processing Modules: it doesn’t generate data, but just it process it and do specific task.
Challenges in the Next Generation Internet Xin Yuan Department of Computer Science Florida State University
Chapter 6 outline r 6.1 Multimedia Networking Applications r 6.2 Streaming stored audio and video m RTSP r 6.3 Real-time, Interactive Multimedia: Internet.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Chapter 39 How Multicast IP and MBone Work.
1 Internet Telephony: Architecture and Protocols an IETF Perspective Authors:Henning Schulzrinne, Jonathan Rosenberg. Presenter: Sambhrama Mundkur.
Multicasting EECS June Multicast One-to-many, many-to-many communications Applications: – Teleconferencing – Database – Distributed computing.
Communication Networks Recitation 11. Multicast & QoS Routing.
@Yuan Xue A special acknowledge goes to J.F Kurose and K.W. Ross Some of the slides used in this lecture are adapted from their.
Multimedia Communication Systems Techniques, Standards, and Networks Chapter 4 Distributed Multimedia Systems.
Zueyong Zhu† and J. William Atwood‡
Network Layer Goals: Overview:
Design and Implementation of Audio/Video Collaboration System Based on Publish/subscribe Event Middleware CTS04 San Diego 19 January 2004 PTLIU Laboratory.
Optional Read Slides: Network Multicast
Presentation transcript:

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University - Distance learning using IP multicast Ólafur Ragnar Helgason Network Systems and Services Laboratory Department of Computer Science Reykjavík University, Reykjavík, Iceland

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 2 Introduction – IP is everything IP dominates in technology, services and innovation IP – primary benefits –Simple service model –Avoids complexities of telephony standardization, regulatory complexities... –Flexibility –Inexpensive, commodity equipment Need to bring the benefits of IP to group communication

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 3 Distance learning Especially valuable in sparsely populated areas In Iceland predominantly based on ISDN equipment –justified by QoS guarantees of ISDN –expensive and specialized equipment ISDN conferencing is centralized –All data passes through a single conference bridge –Limited scalability, single point of failure H.323 solutions can increasingly use IP as transport –Architecturally the same having a single conference bridge

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 4 IP Multicast Promise: Bring the benefits of IP to group communication Research dates back 20 years MBone been around for 15 years Renewed interest in research on multicast STILL: MULTICAST IS NOWHERE

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 5 IP Multicast today Address allocation problem –reserved address range – global address allocation - limits scalability Multicast specific routing –Complex algorithms - global infrastructure Static Virtual Multicast Network –Complex management - global infrastructure IP multicast doubles the IP infrastructure CAN ONLY AFFORD MCAST IF IT DOES NOT ADD TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE INTERNET

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 6 New Paradigm for IP Multicast Simple Lightweight Internet Multicast - SLIM Primary innovation What is not there!! Role of network: Sending a packet from a single source to one or more receivers Avoid, not solve, the problems of older multicast protocols No multicast specific IP infrastructure –Leverage already existing router facilities

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 7 SLIM Avoids address allocation –Source specific: Channel ID is pair –C is source specific channel identifier, not neccesary a multicast address Avoids Multicast routing –Unicast Join/leave signaling creates ditribution tree –Join creates classifier forwarding state in routers –Flow based forwarding Avoid virtual multicast network –Tunnels constructed dynamically as needed –Ignores non-multicast enabled routers

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 8 SLIM and Distance learning Increased scalability –No centralized bottleneck Can use commodity equipment and desktop applications –reception, encoding and media streaming Multicast groups can be created on-demand –No need for central authorization or coordination –Meetings can be scheduled im-promptu –Number of participants can change over session lifetime –Beyond what can be done in a conventional distance learning system

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 9 Experimentation Experimented with multicast over two years –Interactive conferencing, TV/Radio, Live distribution Design of SLIM makes it possible to experiment over the open internet –Unicast forwarding, general routing facilities –No network admin collaboration –Facilitates organic growth from end-users –Can cope with firewalls and NAT’s to end users

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 10 Distance learning experiments 1.Content distribution Single source distribution to multiple receivers Modest delay can be tolerated 2.Live distribution Real time constraints Feedback via chatroom or messenger application 3.Fully interactive teleconference Multisource multicast – distribution tree per sender Even stronger real time constraints A very small delay can be tolerated

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 11 H.323 Conferencing Use SLIM to implement scalable teleconferencing for H.323 clients –H.323 end systems used unchanged –H.323 conferencing acheives the scalability of multicast Multicast Gateway (MG) interrupts session initiation and media streams –Converts a unicast flow destined for a conferencing bridge to multicast flow –A central multipoint controller used for session control No centralized media bridge

Ólafur Ragnar Helgason – Reykjavik University – 12 Contribution A multicast protocol that avoids the problems that hinder widespread Internet deployment Experiments show that multicast increases flexibility and scalability in distance learning at a reduced cost Prototype of a decentralized H.323 conferencing solution that uses SLIM as a transport Current goals: Extend experiments over RHnet in Iceland and NORDUnet in scandinavia and Europe