Open repository of semantic linkages at Socionet CRIS Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia euroCRIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Organizational Environment for Knowledge Management
Advertisements

©euroCRIS/Keith G JefferyOA Workshop May 2010 CNR Roma The euroCRIS view of the Rome OA Workshop Keith G Jeffery President, euroCRIS
Open repositories: value added services The Socionet example Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS and euroCRIS.
Usage statistics in context - panel discussion on understanding usage, measuring success Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER AAP/PSP 9 February 2005.
Russian Research e-Infrastructure: focus on a quality of research assessments Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, SU-HSE Moscow, Russia.
An application of semantic linkage technique within a CRIS Sergey Parinov, Central Economics an Mathematics Institute of RAS, Moscow.
Management, Population and Marketing of institutional repositories / open access journals Iryna Kuchma, eIFL Open Access program manager, eIFL.net Presented.
DRIS/BP Task Group Report, Madrid, Sergey Parinov, TG leader Barbara Ebert, deputy TG leader.
OpenAIRE: the European Scholarly Communication Infrastructure OCLC Research Workshop Libraries and Research: Supporting Change/Changing Support June 10.
Funding Networks Abdullah Sevincer University of Nevada, Reno Department of Computer Science & Engineering.
CRIS/CERIF based model of research results granularity, circulation and usage in Socionet Sergey Parinov, Prof., Leading Researcher of Central Economics.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Publishing Research Papers Charles E. Dunlap, Ph.D. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation Arlington, Virginia
EuroCRIS Best Practice Task Group: a concept and workplan Sergey Parinov TG leader Best Practice.
University of St Andrews ©University of St Andrews/Anna Clements ©euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery ©Brigitte Jörg UKSG, Harrogate, April 2011 Anna Clements Data.
Natural Research Assessment: ability and new requirements for CRIS Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, Russia, Moscow.
CRIS-ARGOS working out to approach CERIF model 05 th November 2012 Núria Cuní CRIS Project Manager José Luis Poy COO.
New Task Group CRIS Architecture & Development Maximilian Stempfhuber RWTH Aachen University Library
EuroCRIS Best Practice Task Group: a concept and workplan Sergey Parinov TG leader Best Practice.
PLANNING YOUR RESEARCH CAREER CULTURAL RESEARCH NETWORK ECR WORKSHOP University of South Australia June 2006 Vera Mackie, University of Melbourne.
©euroCRIS/Keith G JefferyCRIS Seminar Brussels Discussion Topics Keith G Jeffery President, euroCRIS
University of St Andrews ©euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery ©Brigitte Jörg ©University of St Andrews/Anna Clements WRN/ARMA May 2010 An Ideal CRIS? Anna Clements.
A CRIS driven by research community: benefits and perspectives Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia euroCRIS DRIS-BP Task Group Leader.
LIS 506 (Fall 2006) LIS 506 Information Technology Week 11: Digital Libraries & Institutional Repositories.
Integrating aspects of interoperability, policy and governance FRIS: a research information infrastructure in Flanders euroCRIS Strategic Members meeting.
BOARD MEETING: DRIS/BP TG Report Barbara Ebert and Sergey Parinov euroCRIS Meetings in Bath, UK, February 11th, 2012.
T HE SK CRIS - INFORMATION SYSTEM ON RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION Zendulkova Danica.
THOMSON SCIENTIFIC Patricia Brennan Thomson Scientific January 10, 2008.
CERIF Common European Research Information Format Jan Dvořák, Jiří Souček, Tomáš Chudlarský  Institute of Information Studies & Librarianship Faculty.
BP/DRIS TG Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS membership meeting, St. Andrews, November 2009.
© Brigitte Jörg June 2nd, 2010 Aalborg, Denmark 1 euroCRIS Members Meeting CERIF TG Report Brigitte Jörg, M.A. (Information Science) Language Technology.
Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS membership meeting, St. Andrews, November 2009 BP/DRIS TG.
The current state and future perspectives of research information infrastructure in Croatia PubMET 2015, September 2015, Zadar, Croatia dr. sc. Bojan.
Open Access in Russia (a view from inside Russian Academy of Sciences) Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, principal researcher euroCRIS, Board member.
Scholarly communications Discussion group Linked Data Workshop May 2010.
DRIS/CERIF/SharePoint Sergey Parinov BP TG September 2009.
©Keith G Jeffery/ Anne AssersonSupporting the Research Process with a CRIS CRIS Supporting the Research Process with a CRIS Keith G Jeffery Director.
© Brigitte Jörg November 11th, 2009 St. Andrews, Scottland 1 euroCRIS Members Meeting CERIF TG Report Brigitte Jörg, M.A. (Information Science) Language.
© Brigitte Jörg euroCRIS Membership Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, November 7th, CERIF – The Common European Research Information Format Brigitte.
Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS Board meeting, Antwerp, February 2010 BP/DRIS TG progress report.
DRIS/BP Task Group Report, Madrid, Sergey Parinov, TG leader Barbara Ebert, deputy TG leader.
A Challenge of Research Outputs in GL Circuit: From Open Access to Open Use Sergey Parinov, Central Economics an Mathematics Institute of RAS (Moscow);
CRIS for the Russian Academy of Sciences status / project plan, budget, expected euroCRIS involvement Sergey Parinov.
© euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery 1 euroCRIS and e-Infrastructure Keith G Jeffery President, euroCRIS Premium Members.
CRIS: Russian achievements and new projects initiatives Sergey Parinov, Main researcher of CEMI RAS Professor of SU-HSE.
Date, location Open Access policy guidelines for research funders Name Logo area.
Digital repositories and scientific communication challenge Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
euroCRIS-SEE cooperation Keith G Jeffery euroCRIS
Research Information Management: Continuity, Change and Impact Michael Jubb Research Information Network UUK Workshop 5 December 2007.
DRIS–BP TG report, Brussels, Sergey Parinov.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Title of the presentation | Date |1 Nikos Houssos National Documentation Centre (EKT/NHRF) CRIS for research information management.
Date, location Open Access policy guidelines for research institutions Name Logo area.
Carla Basili - Luisa De Biagi Carla Basili * - Luisa De Biagi * * IRCrES Institute, Rome (IT) *CNR –IRCrES Institute, Rome (IT) Central Library ‘G. Marconi’,
© Brigitte Jörg Strategic Seminar September 2009, Brussels 1 Metadata for all Research Information - CERIF Metadata for all Research Information CERIF.
Using Open Access Publishing for the Effective Dissemination of African Research PKP PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE PROJECT Ensuring a Journal’s Economic Sustainability,
Open Science (publishing) as-a-Service Paolo Manghi (OpenAIRE infrastructure) Institute of Information Science and Technologies Italian Research Council.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.
INTRODUCTION TO BIBLIOMETRICS 1. History Terminology Uses 2.
CERIF for research evaluation including REF Keith G Jeffery STFC / euroCRIS 20/04/20111Ready 4 Ref End of Project Workshop
Role of librarians in improving the research impact and academic profiling of Indian universities J. K. Vijayakumar Ph. D Manager, Collections & Information.
Measuring Scholarly and Public Impact: Let’s Talk Metrics
The OpenAIRE Catalogue of Services
OpenAIRE in 8 Minutes Tony Ross-Hellauer State and University Library,
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
Quantifying the value of our libraries. Are our systems ready?
OpenAIRE Services for Open Science
The Scientific Method Section 2.1.
OpenAIRE Open Science Publishing for Research Infrastructures: the EPOS use-case Paolo Manghi, Michele Manunta, Miriam Baglioni, Alessia Bardi, Francesco.
Presentation transcript:

Open repository of semantic linkages at Socionet CRIS Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia euroCRIS

Challenges To provide funders with better data for research evaluation we have to: ① increase a quality of basic research assessment data ② measure a qualitative characteristics of research usage and impact ③ visualize forms and characteristics of research usage and impact ④ provide tools and services to allow scientists to use research outputs in this new style

Research usage = making relationships A fact: Using research outputs scientists create different relationships between objects of research data and information space (DIS) Some of these relationships are visible (e.g. citations), the most of them are not observable and exist in mental form only If we can visualize relationships, we get: –a new dimension for public scientific creativity –a new approach to measure research impact –new basic research assessment data –better research evaluation procedures, etc.

Specification of relationships 1.Within virtual research environment the relationships exist as semantic linkages 2.Scientists can create linkages with assigned semantic value between any DIS objects 3.Semantic linkages belong to DIS as information objects of ‘linkage’ data type and semantic vocabularies as ‘metrics’ data type 4.A set of linkages organized within DIS as discipline- thematic collections 5.Collections of linkages establish a multilayer network structure over DIS objects 6.The multilayer structure is defined by existed in research practice scientific relationships types

Scientific creativity within virtual research environment Research outputs (RO) creation = new objects + new relationships between objects –New research objects are materials deposited at DIS, including non-traditional (artifacts, citations) –New research relationships are semantic linkages of different types between objects of DIS Semantic linkages are created by researchers to visualize their opinion on impact and to make observable many types of scientific relationships

Research objects types at Socionet DIS RO: paper, article, book, chapter, thesis, artifact, citation Research players: person, institution Research relationships: linkage Semantic vocabularies: metrics Non-traditional objects: artifact, citation, linkage, metrics

CERIF Base, Result and 2nd Level Entities Citation CV Prize Qualification ExpertiseAndSkills Equipment Facility Funding Service ElectronicAddresse PostalAddress Country Currency LanguageEvent Metrics Source: Brigitte Jorg. CERIF 2008 – 1.2 Release,

Non-traditional RO Fragmentation of traditional research paper/article is a way –to make visual more relationships of different types –to improve scientific circulation of RO –to create better conditions for measuring of RO usage –to allow researchers working in incremental style

Artifact and citation objects

Matrix of relationship types PersOrgUnitResPubProjectLinkage Pers SubordinationOrganizational role Professional opinion Project roleProfessional opinion OrgUnit PositionSubordination ResPub Sci. inference Sci. usage Hierar., assoc. Components Project Linkage

Initial relationship types 1.Scientific inference: if output is wrong, related outputs should be revised (ResPub-ResPub) 2.Scientific usage/impact, but not inference (ResPub-ResPub) 3.Hierarchical and associative relationships (ResPub-ResPub) 4.Relationships between components of scientific composition (ResPub-ResPub) 5.Professional opinions (Pers-ResPub) 6.Personal-organizational relationships (Pers- OrgUnit-ResPub)

Metrics objects

ResPub-ResPub relationships 1.Inference (CiTO) obtain background from, updates, used as evidence, confirms, qualifies 2.Impact/usage (CiTO) contains assertion from, uses data from, uses method from, corrects, refutes 3.Hierarchical and associative (SKOS, SWAN) broader, narrower, related, alternative to 4.Components of scientific composition (DoCo) duplicate, revised, so on

Pers-{ResPub,OrgUnit,Pers} relationships 5. Professional opinions (SWAN) –responds negatively to, responds positively to, responds neutrally to 6.1. Person-organization (CERIF) –employee, head, member, director, so on 6.2. Person-person (CERIF) –manager, supervisor, mentor 6.3. Person-ResPub (CERIF) –author, editor, reviewer, translator

OrgUnit-ResPub relationships 6.4. Organization – ResPub (CERIF) –intellectual property rights claim –publisher –organizational author

Linkage objects

Socionet CRIS technology of semantic linkages repository Tools for scientific creativity –depositing of all RO types as objects of DIS –creating, managing of relationships (as semantic linkages) between DIS objects An infrastructure to manage relationships –managing metrics, vocabularies and linkage properties –an open repository of of semantic linkages, including personalized tools to create and to change linkages Monitoring and visualization of linkages within DIS, collect statistics about its changes Notification and confirmation services Scientometrics services (basic research assessment data)

Linkages between Socionet objects

Socionet scientometrics

Development program 1.Open global repository of semantic linkages –using euroCRIS help to initiate a EU level project to build the repository –collaboration with CERIF TG to add into the data model multilayer networks of semantic linkages between objects of different types

Development program 2. Open library of utilities to use data of repository of semantic linkages and to add new services to it 3. Initial visualization of linkages within a scientific DIS 4. Initial public services: monitoring of linkages, notifications, scientometrics, basic research assessment data 5. RO life cycle concept/model development

Challenges for researchers A paper gets a network form, researchers can work in incremental style Public statistical portrait of a RO, a researcher, an organization –views/downloads data –ingoing/outgoing linkages –a distribution of qualitative characteristics assigned with linkages Researchers become public figures

Challenges: new research practice An author registers RO as a ready for testing scientific object-for-reuse (OfR) by –specifying which research materials were used as roots/basements for his/her output (citation links) –specifying materials/scientist where/by whom the output could be used/reviewed (links to possible users) A researcher make semantic linkages between RO Authors of linked materials receive a notification about created links, and –they can protest on how the materials were used –they can use suggested OfR and link it with their materials, or can review it, or can ignore it

Challenges: new scientific communication On a producer side –specify used OfR with quality characteristics –request on using- reviewing own OfR by linking it with other OfR or scientists On a consumer side –protest against usage characteristics and/or provide comments on it, or do nothing –ban requests from some authors, or specify personal reviewing rate, or rewrite own OfR by using/citing suggested OfR

Challenges: open science business model Open Science paradigm is based on: 1.open access to research outputs/results, and we propose a way to overcome a veto of commercial publishers 2.open access to research outputs/results usage data, and we provide a way how to make visual such data and collect it in a computer-readable form 3.open access to basic research assessment data, and we provide a mechanism of natural research assessment Three types of openness create Open Science as a new research practice and new scientific communications

Scientometrics challenges Scientometric services collect data: –usual quantitative characteristics of researchers/organizations and results of their activity; –quantitative data about all existed relationships between information objects, e.g. number of persons linked with organization, number of publications linked with a person, number of citation/usage linked with a publication, and so on; –qualitative data about all existed relationships between information objects, as a graph with semantic values assigned to each edge of the graph, e.g. a set of relations with the semantic value "member of staff" between an organization and persons; a set of relations with the semantic value "basement" between a publication and citations; and so on; –data about views/downloads aggregated for each information objects according linkages, e.g. numbers of views/downloads for all publications related with a person or a sum of these numbers for all persons related with an organization and so on

Funders opportunities Funders can use existed basic research assessment data, including qualitative impact characteristics or They can provide their own types of relationships between RO, including vocabularies of linkage properties, and mandate researchers to use it

Expected basic research assessment data Accumulated data about a researcher-producer activity –total number of produced RO for certain period of time –numbers of produced RO that were used for certain period of time, including its quality characteristics distribution –numbers of produced RO that were reviewed for certain period of time, including its quality characteristics distribution Accumulated data about a researcher-consumer activity –numbers of requests to use/review RO from other researchers –numbers of used RO by the person, including its quality characteristics distribution –number of made reviews by the person, including its quality characteristics distribution –number of banned authors, queue length of requests compare with personal rate, number of rejections

Expected qualitative impact characteristics Researcher/ Metrics Scientific inference metrics (obtain background from, updates, used as evidence, confirms, qualifies) Research usage metrics (contains assertion from, uses data from, uses method from, corrects, refutes) Hierarchical and associative metrics (broader, narrower, related, alternative to) Professional opinion metrics (responds negatively to, responds positively to, responds neutrally to) Researcher’s portrait by outgoing linkages Which RO a researcher used as a basement for own RO What RO a researcher used to produce own RO How a researcher impacts on science corpus What RO a researcher evaluated and how Researcher’s portrait by ingoing linkages Who/where/ how used researcher’s RO as a basement Who/where/ how used researcher’s RO to produce RO How researcher’s RO are assigned with science corpus What/whom researcher’s RO are evaluated and how