 Bylaws subject to reinstatement.  Philosophy.  Factors considered for reinstatement.  Points of contact.  De minimis violations.  Restitution violations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student-Athlete Reinstatement Process Initial Recruitment- evaluation, questionnaire, scholarship offer Initial Recruitment- evaluation, questionnaire,
Advertisements

2010 NCAA Regional Rules Seminars Division I Pre-Enrollment Amateurism Certification Process and Student-Athlete Reinstatement (presented in two separate.
COACHES MEETING Boston College Compliance Office End of Year Meeting April 28, 2009.
Division III Student-Athlete Reinstatement and Hardship Waivers Kelly Groddy Brandy Hataway.
Division III Student-Athlete Reinstatement and Hardship Waivers
Division III Student-Athlete Reinstatement Fundamental Introduction
DIVISION I STUDENT-ATHLETE REINSTATEMENT AND LEGISLATIVE RELIEF Matt Maher and Ryan Allen Hall.
A. Faith English and Kelly Groddy. RSRO REPORTING TRENDS.
Introduction to the NCAA Amateurism Clearinghouse.
NATIONAL LETTER OF INTENT NOVEMBER 2014 WHAT IS THE NATIONAL LETTER OF INTENT? THE NLI IS A BINDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN A PROSPECTIVE STUDENT- ATHLETE.
Overview of NAU Compliance IAC April 10, 2009 Jared Bruggeman, Associate Athletic Director Lynn Newson, Compliance Assistant.
14-15 financial aid figures The tuition and fees were approved by board of Trustees Tuition $39,690 Fees 350 Total $40,040 Room 6,848 per Colin in housing.
 Pre-Enrollment Amateurism  Training and competition-related expenses  Prize money  Professional team involvement  Post-Enrollment Amateurism  Preferential.
NCAA Bylaw 12 (Amateurism) Concepts. Concept No. 1: Establish a uniform definition of "actual and necessary" competition expenses. Rationale: Current.
Review of 2015 NCAA Convention Proposals Southeast Region Compliance Seminar November 2014.
Brevard College Athletics & Representatives of our Athletics Interests.
Andy Cardamone Charnele Kemper
2015 Regional Rules Seminar.  To understand four-year college transfer legislation.  To be able to accurately apply legislation to use best practices.
KELLY BRUMMETT RYAN ALLEN HALL LEGISLATIVE RELIEF WAIVERS.
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
NCAA Division I Interpretations Philosophy
SJSU Compliance Office October 21 & 23, NLI Signing Date For Prospect’s Enrolling in the Academic Year Sport Initial Signing Date Final.
Fundamental Introduction NCAA Division III Bylaw 14
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement – PART II.
DIVISION II AND III INSTITUTIONS WITH DIVISION I SPORTS – FOUNDATIONAL Kristen Matha & Alex Smith 2015 Regional Rules.
NCAA Division I Interpretations Philosophy Brandy Hataway & Charnele Kemper.
NCAA Bylaw Overlap Scenarios Jobrina Marques Eric Mayes.
Agenda NCAA Bylaw 14. Eligibility between terms. Exchange programs and study abroad. Transfers. NCAA Division III Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement.
Coaches Compliance Meeting April Agenda Transportation Handout Education for Secondary Schools on New Eligibility Rules Reminder of High School.
Auburn University Athletics Compliance Program Susan Bazemore Krissy Ellis Bernard Hill Jamie Funk Diana Martin Rich McGlynn David Mines.
Implement Educate Monitor Ask Before You Act! October 2010.
Wednesday, September 18, Scholarship Request Forms are due by the end of October. NLIs cannot be sent to a PSA without a scholarship offer. Compliance.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
Division II Awards and Benefits and Organized Competition Amanda Conklin and Abbie Renaker.
DIVISION I WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF COMPLIANCE 2012 NCAA Regional Rules Seminars.
Spring Semester 2011 M/W/Corec Soccer M/W Basketball Trinity University Intramurals.
2012 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Orientation Session for Advanced Compliance Administrators.
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS Compliance Policies/Procedures Review & New Academic Year Changes Devrance M. Fisher, Compliance Officer.
NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts2014.
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS National Letter of Intent Program & Recruiting-Travel Approval Process Devrance M. Fisher, Asst. Compliance.
Fall Semester 2010 Corec Softball Corec Basketball Trinity University Intramurals.
2014 NCAA Convention Legislative Vote A review of NCAA Legislation from the 108 th NCAA Convention January 15-18, 2014.
NCAA Division I Student- Athlete Reinstatement (Part I) Kelly Groddy Jennifer Henderson.
Implement Educate Monitor Ask Before You Act! Football November 2009.
Preseason Coaches Meeting. When faced with a question or concern regarding NCAA rules and regulations, the following process should be followed: Step.
Understanding New Legislation September A PSA may participate in institutional fundraisers prior to his or her initial collegiate enrollment provided.
Division I Advanced Student-Athlete Reinstatement NCAA Academic and Membership Affairs.
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement: Institutional, NCAA and Media Navigation Advanced Application.
The Interpretations Process Membership Services Training.
University of Louisiana at Lafayette Rules Education Meeting April 28, 2010 Division I – Playing and Practice Seasons –
2011 Regional Rules Seminars NCAA Division II Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement and Secondary Infractions.
UNCW Coaches’ Education Meeting OCTOBER National Letter of Intent  The NLI is a binding agreement between a prospective student- athlete and an.
Division I Enforcement Level III/Secondary Violations and Level IV Incidental Infractions Renee Gomila Kelly Groddy.
Academic Performance Program Michigan State University February 2005 Department of Intercollegiate Athletics & Office of the Faculty Athletics Representative.
Self-Reporting Secondary Violations. This session will review: 1. The definition of a secondary violation; 2. Level I and Level II secondary violations.
Program (05-06)# of SA/ProspectBylawsPenalty VolleyballOne Prospect Contactable Prospect; Practice or Competition Site Not eligible to.
Division III Eligibility – Advanced Anne Rohlman.
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Stephanie Grace | Matt Maher | Brad Rochman.
Division I Academic Misconduct Emily Capehart Andy Cardamone Azure Davey.
DIVISION III REQUESTS/SELF-REPORTS ONLINE: INTERPRETATIONS, WAIVERS AND VIOLATIONS Kristin DiBiase Faith English Kelly Groddy.
Student-Athlete Reinstatement and Enforcement A. Faith English | Stephanie Grace | Brad Rochman.
Secondary/Level III Violations and Online Self-Reporting Process Janet Calandro A. Faith English Kelly Groddy 2016 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar.
NCAA Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Dialogue
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Stephanie Grace | Matt Maher | Brad Rochman
Janet Calandro A. Faith English Kelly Groddy
Division I Waivers Processed by Student-Athlete Reinstatement
Bylaw 16: Awards and Benefits Hot Topics
Janet Calandro Kelly Groddy Cindi Merrill
Division I Bylaws 11/13/17 Modernization
Division III Student-Athlete Reinstatement
Presentation transcript:

 Bylaws subject to reinstatement.  Philosophy.  Factors considered for reinstatement.  Points of contact.  De minimis violations.  Restitution violations.  Preparing a reinstatement request.  Case examples.

 NCAA Bylaw 10 (ethical conduct).  Bylaw 12 (amateurism and athletics eligibility).  Bylaw 13 (recruiting).  Bylaw 14 (academic eligibility).  Bylaw 15 (financial aid).  Bylaw 16 (awards, benefits & expenses).  Bylaw 17 (outside competition).  Bylaw 18 (drug testing).

 Student-athlete reinstatement = SAR  Students-first philosophy.  Put the student-athlete back in the position prior to the violation.

 Student-athlete’s culpability.  Institutional involvement.  Case precedent and SAR guidelines.  Mitigation/totality of circumstances.  Temporary review process.

Student-Athlete Reinstatement AMA (Academic and Membership Affairs) Enforcement Staff Eligibility Center AMA Interpretive Staff Public and Media Relations Governance

 Eligibility not affected.  Reinstatement through RSRO (Requests/Self-Reports Online Case Management System) not necessary.  Report violation to enforcement staff through RSRO.  Institutional violation.

 Violation of value totaling $100 or less.  Reinstatement through RSRO not necessary.  Report violation to enforcement staff through RSRO.  Payment must be made prior to competition.  Document repayment.  Restitution payment to 501(c)(3) charity.

 Is it a violation?  Does the violation affect eligibility?  What is the appropriate action?

 Voice University men’s and women’s basketball programs recently lost two of their starters, Cee-Lo and Shakira.  Men’s basketball student-athlete, Blake, and women’s basketball student-athlete, Christina, are scheduled to take their place as starters on the teams.

 However, over fall break, Blake, Christina and current men’s basketball starter, Adam, were involved in the 1-day Hollywood Holiday basketball tournament in violation of the outside competition rule.  Blake, Christina and Adam are all ineligible under the outside competition rule and must go through reinstatement.

 Compliance officer Carson discovers the violation Wednesday morning and both teams are scheduled to leave for 2 away-from-home competitions that afternoon.  The contests are scheduled for Thursday and Saturday evening.

What should Carson do?

 Defined as pending competition within 10 days.  Prioritized in the following order: › The date of the next contest; › The date the violation was discovered; and › The date the reinstatement request was submitted. 17 \\

 Call the reinstatement staff.  Gather all of the information. › SAR Buckley statement in RSRO. › Statements from involved individuals. › Other documentation.  Indicate the next contest/competition and travel time.  Be available.

Committee Guideline  Starting point: 1-for-1 withholding.  Reinstatement staff should consider the following: › The student-athlete's responsibility; › The level of competition; › Timing of when the competition occurred (e.g., was it during the championship season or during the off season); and › Any other relevant factors.

 Football student-athlete Rick “The Sheriff” Grimes wants to buy supplies for his wife, softball student-athlete, Lori, and their son Carl.  Short on money, he decides to trade his team-issued training shoes to The Terminus Outlet Store for $300.

Committee Guideline  Greater than $100 to $400 = 10 percent withholding condition and repayment.

 Rick “The Sheriff” Grimes is now ineligible and must go through reinstatement.  He is currently in the middle of his final year of competition at Survivor Tech.  Survivor Tech knows Rick can’t afford to repay $300 and wants to set up a repayment plan.

 Good-faith agreement between the institution and the student-athlete.  Approved by SAR prior to competition.  Includes a repayment schedule.  Full repayment fulfilled prior to SA exhausting eligibility during the regular season.  Includes language addressing default.  Repayment to a 501(c)(3) charity. 24

Repayment Plan for The Sheriff I, “The Sheriff”, agree to pay $300 to the Terminus Outlet Mall in order to restore my eligibility per NCAA rules. I agree to make payments of $25 per month in cash to Terminus Outlet Mall as repayment for the loan. If I choose to not make a payment one month, then I will make a payment of $50 the following month. Additionally, I agree to fulfill my repayment of the total $300 by the end of the academic year. The Sheriff10/24/14____ Student-athlete signature Zom Bee 10/24/14____ Institutional Representative

Repayment Plan for Rick Grimes The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has declared that football student-athlete Rick Grimes is required to provide repayment in the amount of $300 as a condition of reinstatement. The dollar amount previously mentioned was impermissibly provided to Rick Grimes. The schedule for repayment is attached and all copies of all repayments will be provided to compliance officer Zom Bee at Survivor Tech.

I, Rick Grimes, agree to repay $300 to a charity of my choice by following the above schedule of repayment. I understand that if I miss a repayment date, I am automatically declared ineligible and if I compete while not current with the repayment plan then I have competed while ineligibility. My eligibility will be restored only after I am on schedule with my repayments. Additionally, I understand that if I fail to repay the full amount and default on the repayment plan, the NCAA will not allow any other student-athletes at Survivor Tech to enter into a repayment plan for a period of four years. Rick Grimes 10/24/14____ Student-athlete signature Zom Bee 10/24/14____ Institutional Representative

 The schedule of repayment for football student-athlete Rick Grimes is as follows: Payment Amount Date Due Amount Paid Date Paid SA Initials Inst. Rep. Initials $7510/24/14 $7510/31/14 $7511/24/14 $7512/1/14

 Include the total repayment amount.  Payment schedule should include amount and date.  Include language regarding eligibility and default.  Keep receipts and submit proof of repayment upon completion of the plan.  Check the repayment plan with the competition schedule.

 Phil, the director of compliance at U-Turn University, needs to submit a reinstatement request for Vienna, a women’s volleyball student-athlete who competed with the volleyball team in a tournament while academically ineligible.

 Phil submits the reinstatement request and responds to each RSRO prompt with “See attached document”.  Phil creates a word document summarizing the violation and uploads the document to the RSRO system.

 Did Phil submit all required information for a reinstatement request?  Does Phil need to submit any additional information and/or statements for the reinstatement request?  What is the best way to communicate with the SAR staff regarding the reinstatement request?

 Vienna competed in 5 contests, including road competitions.  Vienna was unaware she was ineligible.  Institution provided statements from academic advisor, compliance officer, head coach and Vienna.  Guideline withholding condition is 1-for-1.

 Communicate.  Complete information in the text boxes provided.  Include a signed SAR Buckley statement from RSRO.  Upload all required signatures or use the e-signature.  Include all relevant documentation: >Statement from the student-athlete; >Statements from other individuals involved; and >Supporting documentation.  Mitigation. 35

 Vienna receives 1-for-1 withholding condition for violation.  U-Turn University wants to submit an appeal in hopes of receiving a lesser penalty.

 Staff decisions are appealable to the NCAA Division I Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement.  Waiver appeals are reviewed via the written record.  Violation appeals may be reviewed on the written record or via a teleconference appeal.  The Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement is the final authority.

 Be clear and concise in your points.  Offer a potential outcome.  Research guidelines.  Research case precedent.  Distinguish from previous cases.  Search for “totality” when seeking a decision outside of the guidelines.  Focus on mitigation. 38

 Familiarize yourself with the call order.  Prepare the student-athlete for his or her statement.  Designate an institutional presenter.  Focus on the student-athlete and the mitigation.  Be concise.