Iterative reconstruction for metal artifact reduction in CT 1 the problem projection completion polychromatic ML model for CT local models, bowtie,… examples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARTIFACTS IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
Advertisements

Computers and Computed Tomography
Image Reconstruction.
Sezione di Napoli Univ. “Federico II” Experimental study of beam hardening artefacts in photon counting breast computed tomography M.G. Bisogni a, A. Del.
Herhaling titel van presentatie Simultaneous estimation of the attenuation and emission in TOF-PET Joint work VUB (M Defrise), KULeuven (J. Nuyts,
1 Low-Dose Dual-Energy CT for PET Attenuation Correction with Statistical Sinogram Restoration Joonki Noh, Jeffrey A. Fessler EECS Department, The University.
 Nuclear Medicine Effect of Overlapping Projections on Reconstruction Image Quality in Multipinhole SPECT Kathleen Vunckx Johan Nuyts Nuclear Medicine,
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Dr. Azza Helal A. Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Lecture 6 Basic physical principles of.
Image Artifacts Chapter 8 Bushong.
Computed Tomography II
SCANCOMEDICAL Computed Tomography SCANCO User Meeting 2005 Dr. Bruno Koller SCANCO Medical AG
Advanced Biomedical Imaging
Completion of a Truncated Attenuation Image from the Attenuated PET Emission Data Johan Nuyts, Christian Michel, Matthias Fenchel, Girish Bal, Charles.
IMAGE QUALITY NOISE LINEARITY CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY IMAGE ARTIFACTS.
Module I Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging.
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Computed Tomography III
Statistical image reconstruction
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods X-ray Imaging Part 1.
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
An algorithm for metal streaking artifact reduction in cone beam CT M. Bazalova 1,2, G. Landry 1, L. Beaulieu 3, F. Verhaegen 1,4 1-McGill University,
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
Tissue inhomogeneities in Monte Carlo treatment planning for proton therapy L. Beaulieu 1, M. Bazalova 2,3, C. Furstoss 4, F. Verhaegen 2,5 (1) Centre.
Computed Tomography
Maurizio Conti, Siemens Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
Demetrios J. Halazonetis Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Limitations and future directions.
X-Ray Medical Imaging Physics – IB Objectives
A-LEVEL PHYSICS 15/09/ :49 Medical Physics.
Resident Physics Lectures
Design and simulation of micro-SPECT: A small animal imaging system Freek Beekman and Brendan Vastenhouw Section tomographic reconstruction and instrumentation.
DTU Medical Visionday May 27, 2009 Generative models for automated brain MRI segmentation Koen Van Leemput Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical.
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction and Preprocessing Methods Veselin Dikov Moscow-Bavarian Joint.
Computed Tomography Q & A
Medical Image Analysis Image Reconstruction Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, by Atam P. Dhawan, IEEE Press, 2003.
Factors affecting CT image RAD
Image Reconstruction from Projections Antti Tuomas Jalava Jaime Garrido Ceca.
Introduction Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is recognised as offering potential benefits in the delineation of target volumes for radiotherapy (RT). For.
Professor Brian F Hutton Institute of Nuclear Medicine University College London Emission Tomography Principles and Reconstruction.
High resolution X-ray analysis of a proximal human femur with synchrotron radiation and an innovative linear detector M.Bettuzzi, R. Brancaccio, F.Casali,
Computed Tomography Diego Dreossi Silvia Pani University of Trieste and INFN, Trieste section.
Nuclear Medicine: Tomographic Imaging – SPECT, SPECT-CT and PET-CT Katrina Cockburn Nuclear Medicine Physicist.
The production of X-Rays X-Rays are produced whenever charged particles are slowed down or stopped. X-rays are generated via interactions of the accelerated.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
An Algorithm to Compute Independent Sets of Voxels for Parallelization of ICD-based Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Sungsoo Ha and Klaus Mueller Department.
Introduction In positron emission tomography (PET), each line of response (LOR) has a different sensitivity due to the scanner's geometry and detector.
CT Chapter 4: Principles of Computed Tomography. Radiography vs. CT Both based on differential attenuation of x-rays passing through body Radiography.
Quality Assurance.
Impact of Axial Compression for the mMR Simultaneous PET-MR Scanner Martin A Belzunce, Jim O’Doherty and Andrew J Reader King's College London, Division.
Statistical Methods for Image Reconstruction
1 Nuclear Medicine SPECT and PET. 2 a good book! SR Cherry, JA Sorenson, ME Phelps Physics in Nuclear Medicine Saunders, 2012.
Interaction of x-ray photons (and gamma ray photons) with matter.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Photograph of a single detector module. X-rays are incident from the top of.
Introduction to Medical Imaging Week 3: Introduction to Medical Imaging Week 3: CT – Reconstruction and uses Guy Gilboa Course
Computed Tomography Computed Tomography is the most significant development in radiology in the past 40 years. MRI and Ultrasound are also significant.
Introduction to Medical Imaging Week 2: X-ray and CT
Computed tomography. Formation of a CT image Data acquisitionImage reconstruction Image display, manipulation Storage, communication And recording.
New Hybrid Monochromatic CT Images Achieve High Suppression of Metallic Artifacts While Preserving Soft Tissue and Iodine Contrast Michal Kulon, Peter.
Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction
Tianfang Li Quantitative Reconstruction for Brain SPECT with Fan-Beam Collimators Nov. 24th, 2003 SPECT system: * Non-uniform attenuation Detector.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم ..
Applications of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma  Reza Forghani, MD, PhD, Hillary R. Kelly,
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Sample photon-counting detector images of low- and high-energy bins of a 70-year-old woman (section thickness, 2 mm; increment, 2 mm; window center, 45.
Prepared by Nuhu Abdulhaqq Isa
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Dual-Energy Computed Tomography
Thursday Case of the Day
Improving Image Accuracy of ROI in CT Using Prior Image
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Presentation transcript:

Iterative reconstruction for metal artifact reduction in CT 1 the problem projection completion polychromatic ML model for CT local models, bowtie,… examples the problem projection completion polychromatic ML model for CT local models, bowtie,… examples Katrien Van Slambrouck, Johan Nuyts Nuclear Medicine, KU Leuven

the problem 2 y y CT ln(b/y) iron

the problem Double hip prosthesis Double knee prosthesisDental fillings Cause of metal artifacts: Beam hardening Nonlinear partial volume effects Noise Scatter resolution (crosstalk, afterglow) (Motion) Mouse bone and titanium screw (microCT) 3

I.Beam hardening Polychromatic spectrum, beam hardens when going through the object Low energy photons are more likely absorbed Artifacts in CT Energy (keV) 10 cm water Energy (keV) Normalized intensity (%) Typical artifact appearance: dark streaks in between metals, dark shades around metals (and cupping) Iron in waterAmalgam in PMMA

II.(Non)-linear partial volume effects Linear: voxels only partly filled with particular substance Non-linear: averaging over beam width, focal spot, … I0I0 I µ1µ1 µ2µ2 Artifacts in CT Typical artifact appearance: dark and white streaks connecting edges Iron in waterAmalgam in PMMA

III. Scatter Compton scatter: deviation form original trajectory Scatter grids? Artifacts in CT I0I0 Iron in waterAmalgam in PMMA Typical artifact appearance: dark streaks in between metals, dark shades around metals (and cupping)

IV. Noise Quantum nature: ± Poisson distribution Artifacts in CT Iron in waterAmalgam in PMMA Typical artifact appearance: streaks around and in between metals

projection completion  Initial FBP reconstruction  Segment the metals and project  Remove metal projections for sinogram  Interpolate (e.g. linear, polynomial, …)  Reconstruct (FBP) and paste metal parts 8 Kalender W. et aI. "Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic impants." Radiology, 1987 Glover G. and Pelc N. "An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions." Med. Phys., 1981 Mahnken A. et al, "A new algoritbm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomogrpaby, In vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement." Investigative Radiology, 2003

projection completion 9 window 600 HU Fe PMMA H2OH2O

projection completion 10 true object FBP projection completion window 600 HU

1 projection completion 11 2 Muller I., Buzug T.M., "Spurious structures created by interpolation-based Ct metal artifact reduction." Proc. of SPIE, 2009 Meyer E. et al, "Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography." Med. Phys., 2010 zeroed metal trace linear interpolation

NMAR 12 Muller I., Buzug T.M., "Spurious structures created by interpolation-based Ct metal artifact reduction." Proc. of SPIE, 2009 Meyer E. et al, "Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography." Med. Phys., 2010 sinograminterpolatedsinogram of segmentation normalized sinogram window 600 HU

NMAR sinogram, metals erased sinogram, metals erased sinogram of the segmented reconstruction sinogram of the segmented reconstruction

NMAR normalized sinogram, metals erased normalized sinogram, metals erased interpolated sinogram interpolated sinogram

NMAR 15 unnormalized interpolated sinogram unnormalized interpolated sinogram

proj.completion and NMAR 16 true object FBP projection completion projection completion window 300 HU NMAR

17 CT Maximum Likelihood for CT

18 CT datarecon

computing p(recon | data)difficult inverse problem computing p(data | recon)“easy” forward problem one wishes to find recon that maximizes p(recon | data) Bayes: p(recon | data) = p(data | recon) p(recon) p(data) datarecon ~ Maximum Likelihood for CT 19 MAP ML

Maximum Likelihood for CT p(recon | data) ~ p(data | recon) projectionPoisson jj j = 1..J i = 1..I ln ( p(data | recon) ) = L(data | recon) = ~ p(data | recon) recon data 20

Maximum Likelihood for CT L(data | recon) 21 iterative maximisation of L:

22 MLTR convex algorithm [1] [1] Lange, Fessler, “Globally convergent algorithms for maximum a posteriori transmission tomography”, IEEE Trans Image Proc, 1995 [2] JA Fessler et al, "Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithm for penalized likelihood transmission image reconstruction." IEEE Trans Med Imaging [3] Fessler, Donghwan, "Axial block coordinate descent (ABCD) algorithm for X-ray CT image reconstruction.“ Fully 3D 2011 patchwork: local update [2,3]

MLTR MEASUREMENT REPROJECTION COMPARE UPDATE RECON 23

MLTR 24 validation Siemens Sensation 16 SiemensMLTR

models for iterative reconstruction 25 Poisson Likelihood: measured data data computed from current reconstruction image Projection model: monochromatic: bibi

models for iterative reconstruction Poisson Likelihood: Projection model: monochromatic: 1 material polychromatic: 26 energy k intensity b ik measured data data computed from current reconstruction image energy “water correction” MLTR_C

models for iterative reconstruction 27 Full Polychromatic Model – IMPACT Poisson Likelihood: energy k intensity b ik Projection model:

 jk =  j ∙ photo k +  j ∙ Compton k models for iterative reconstruction 28 Full Polychromatic Model – IMPACT water Compton photo-electric attenuation al  jk = photo-electric + Compton at energy k Compton k = Klein-Nishina (energy) Photo k ≈ 1 / energy 3

models for iterative reconstruction 29 Full Polychromatic Model – IMPACT  and  (1/cm)  mono (1/cm)    jk =  j ∙ photo k +  j ∙ Compton k  jk =  j  ∙ photo k +  j  ∙ Compton k

   and  (1/cm)  mono (1/cm) models for iterative reconstruction 30  

patches, local models 31 MLTR convex algorithm [1] [1] Lange, Fessler, “Globally convergent algorithms for maximum a posteriori transmission tomography”, IEEE Trans Image Proc, 1995 [2] JA Fessler et al, "Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithm for penalized likelihood transmission image reconstruction." IEEE Trans Med Imaging [3] Fessler, Donghwan, "Axial block coordinate descent (ABCD) algorithm for X-ray CT image reconstruction.“ Fully 3D 2011 patchwork: local update [2,3]

bowtie, BHC 32 e-e- energy k intensity b ik raw CT data not corrected for beam hardening send spectrum through filter and bowtie b ik = spectrum(k) x bowtie(i)

patches, local models IMPACT is complex and slow, MLTR and MLTR_C are simpler and faster Find the metals PATCH 3 PATCH 2 PATCH 1 Define patches IMPACT in metals MLTR_C elsewhere IMPACT in metals MLTR_C elsewhere 33 PATCH 4

clinical CT (Siemens Sensation 16) Body shaped phantom 34

sequential CT (Siemens Sensation 16) Body shaped phantom 35 FBP Regular PCPC NMAR IMPACT PATCHMLTR_C + IMPACTIMPACT 20 iter x 116 subsets

sequential CT (Siemens Sensation 16) Body shaped phantom 36 Black = FBP Blue = PC-NMAR Red = IMPACT PATCH wateraluminumCoCr..Ti Al VPMMAwater

helical CT 37 sequential 2 x 1mmhelical 16 x 0.75mm

helical CT 38 MIP IMPACT FBP NMAR metal patches, uniform init. metal patches, uniform init. no patches, NMAR init. no patches, NMAR init. metal patches, NMAR init. metal patches, NMAR init. 5 iter x 116 subsets

helical CT 39 IMPACT FBP NMAR metal patches, uniform init. metal patches, uniform init. no patches, NMAR init. no patches, NMAR init. metal patches, NMAR init. metal patches, NMAR init. MIP

helical CT 40 FBP NMAR 5 it 10 it IMPACT

helical CT 41 We give patches same x-y sampling but increased z-sampling: z-sampling x 3 impact, regular z

to do 42 after x 100 iterations with patches still incomplete convergence persistent artifacts near flat edges of metal implants we currently think it is not o scatter o non-linear partial volume effect o crosstalk, afterglow o detector dead space

43 thanks better physical model better reconstruction Katrien Van Slambrouck Bruno De Man Karl Stierstorfer, David Faul, Siemens

sequential CT (Siemens Sensation 16) 44 no energy corr. IMPACT no energy corr. IMPACT no energy, no bowtie corr. IMPACT + blank adjusted for bowtie no energy, no bowtie corr. IMPACT + blank adjusted for bowtie clinical scan IMPACT clinical scan IMPACT clinical scan, uncorrected IMPACT + bowtie clinical scan, uncorrected IMPACT + bowtie

microCT: soft tissue, cartilage, Ti FDKIMPACT SKYSCAN SPECTRUM Black = without filter Blue = 0.5 mm Al and mm Cu Ti-cage, culture of soft tissue and cartilage 45