Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Differentiated Supervision
Evaluating the school librarian using the Danielson Model
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
LOGO Teacher evaluation Dr Kia Karavas Session 5 Evaluation and testing in language education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
PAY FOR PERFORMANCE: GETTING IT RIGHT. A Solution in Search of a Problem? zTeaching salaries too low overall zTeaching is a “flat” profession zSame compensation.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
©2005 Cardinal Consulting Group Woodland Hills School District Leadership for Learning Institute Rigor, Relevance, Respect, Results Every educator engages.
Teacher Evaluation Conversations (#14) Principal Cluster Nov. 30, 2010.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria. Connected to:  Beginning teacher evaluation  Experienced teacher evaluation  Induction / Mentoring  Professional.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Combining Clinical Supervision with Teacher Evaluation
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Integrating Theory into Practice
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Teacher Evaluation Conversations (#14)
Introduction to Core Professionalism
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 2 Purposes of Teacher Evaluation Quality Assurance Professional Learning

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 3 A Flawed System Outdated, limited, evaluative criteria Few shared beliefs about good teaching Inconsistency among evaluators Hierarchical, one-way communication Same procedures for novices and experienced professionals Limited evaluator expertise Based only on classroom observation Requires lots of time Negative culture surrounding evaluation

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 4 What Evaluative Criteria Levels of Performance Weighting Score Combining Standard Setting Teacher Evaluation System How Procedures Instruments Personnel Timelines Due Process Process for Deciding Training for Evaluators Professional Development for Teachers

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 5 A Blueprint for Teacher Evaluation Clear definition of teaching (the “what”) Instruments and procedures that provide evidence of teaching (the “how”) Trained evaluators who can make consistent judgments based on evidence Process for teachers to understand the evaluative criteria Process for making final judgment

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 6 Hallmarks of a Genuine Profession Knowledge base, grounded in research Knowledge shared by a community of professionals Professional knowledge is implemented at the intersection of theory and practice Professionals exercise autonomy and judgment Practice is influenced by both technical and moral judgment

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 7 The Nature of Professional Learning Trust Self-assessment and self-directed inquiry Reflection on practice Collaboration and conversation A community of learners

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 8 Judgment Evidence Accurate and unbiased Relevant Representative of the total Respect and Rapport Questioning and Discussion Interpretation What is the evidence?

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 9 Domain 2:The Classroom Environment 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 10 General Evaluation Procedures Observations of practice Conferences Samples of student work, with analysis Teacher artifacts

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 11 The Evaluation System Track 1: Probationary or non-tenured teachers Track 2: Experienced teachers, with continuing status Track 3: Experienced teachers encountering difficulty

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 12 Track 1: Probationary Teacher Evaluation A critical decision, for both the teacher and the district Should be consistent with, but separate from, the mentoring program

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 13 Probationary Teacher Procedures The same each year, or progressive? Observations of teaching - how many? - announced or unannounced? - conferences before and after observations - consider “extended” observations Examination of artifacts - to provide evidence of skill in non-observed areas Evaluation decision

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 14 Track 2: Experienced Teacher Evaluation Designed as a professional model Teachers demonstrate their skill in all the evaluative criteria

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 15 The Two Presumptions The presumption of competence The presumption of continuing learning

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 16 Experienced Teacher System Multi-year cycle Comprehensive evaluation - every 2-4 years Self-directed professional inquiry in the “other” years

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 17 Experienced Teacher Procedures (Comprehensive Evaluation) Initial conference, if possible Observations of practice Artifact conference Evaluation decision

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 18 Recommended Artifacts for Experienced Teachers Unit plan, including student assessment Instructional artifact or assignment from the unit Samples of student work, with teacher comments Commentary Examples of record-keeping Examples of communication with families Evidence of contributions to school, profession Evidence of professional growth Evidence of student learning

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 19 Experienced Teacher Procedures (Self-directed Professional Inquiry) Conduct self-assessment Set a professional goal, with evaluator, reflecting own learning and application to practice Prepare a professional growth plan Work on plan, in study groups if possible Participate in interim conference with evaluator Participate in reflection/closure conference with evaluator Share findings with colleagues

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 20 The Instruments and Procedures Taken together, they document all the evaluative criteria They represent a “natural harvest” of a teacher’s work The timelines and workload are reasonable, for teachers and evaluators They promote professional learning

Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 21 Track 3: Experienced Teachers: Intensive Assistance Signifies performance below standard: a “heads up” Must determine what “triggers” in and out Flexible duration Designed for support and assistance Customized to the situation Three phases: awareness, assistance, disciplinary