1 HIT STANDARDS COMMITTEE DRAFT: S&I Framework Principles and Processes 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards & Interoperability Kickoff HHS – ONC September 20, 2010 Office of Standards and Interoperability 1.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2006 Data Access Technologies, Inc. Open Source eGovernment Reference Architecture Approach to Semantic Interoperability Cory Casanave, President.
Leverage MarkITS for agile solutions delivery that balances strategic thinking with tactical execution for “Business & Technology Convergence” MarkITS.
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative esMD Work Group October 19, 2011.
NIEM Healthcare Domain FHIM/S&I Framework Strategy 4/7/2011.
Threat Modeling and Sharing. Summary Proposal to kick off Threat Modeling project – Multi-phase approach – Initially: create Cyber Domain PIM and STIX.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
L4-1-S1 UML Overview © M.E. Fayad SJSU -- CmpE Software Architectures Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor Computer Engineering Department, Room #283I.
1/31 CS 426 Senior Projects Chapter 1: What is UML? Chapter 2: What is UP? [Arlow and Neustadt, 2005] January 22, 2009.
Interoperability Framework Overview March 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting Director, Office of Interoperability & Standards ONC HIT.
S&I Framework Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD Director, Office of Standards and Interoperability, ONC Fall 2011 Face-to-Face.
Enterprise Architecture
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
Technical Introduction to NIEM
UML - Development Process 1 Software Development Process Using UML (2)
TDT4252/DT8802 Exam 2013 Guidelines to answers
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
THE GITB TESTING FRAMEWORK Jacques Durand, Fujitsu America | December 1, 2011 GITB |
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
Public Health Informatics and Technology Program Office Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Public Health and Meaningful Use.
NIEM Domain Awareness June 2011 Establishing a Domain within NIEM.
1 NHIN Direct + Interoperability Framework = Focused Collaboration Bottom up use case development within a top-down coordination framework CORE PRINCIPLES.
EHR System (EHR-S) Functional Requirements Implementation Guide: Laboratory Results Interface (LRI) Kickoff March 3 rd,
Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.
C W3C Government Linked Data Working Group Cory Casanave 06/30/2011 Cory Casanave Cory-c at modeldriven dot com CEO, Model Driven Solutions Founder,
Draft – discussion only Content Standards WG (Documents and Data) Proposed HITSC Workgroup Evolution 1 Architecture, Services & APIs WG Transport and Security.
1 Chapter 5 Software Engineering Practice. 2 What is “Practice”? Practice is a broad array of concepts, principles, methods, and tools that you must consider.
Role-Based Guide to the RUP Architect. 2 Mission of an Architect A software architect leads and coordinates technical activities and artifacts throughout.
1561 INITIATIVE Lessons Learned and Future Considerations
Standards & Interoperability Framework Overview Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD Director, Office of Interoperability & Standards ONC IHE North American Connectathon.
What is NIEM? 1 NIEM is a national program supported by the federal government to increase information sharing between organizations who share a common.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Interoperability Framework Overview Health Information Technology (HIT) Standards Committee June 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
National Information Exchange Model Update for the Global Advisory Committee Spring 2008 Meeting April 10, 2008 NIEM Technical Architecture Committee (NTAC)
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Notes of Rational Related cyt. 2 Outline 3 Capturing business requirements using use cases Practical principles  Find the right boundaries for your.
Unified Modeling Language* Keng Siau University of Nebraska-Lincoln *Adapted from “Software Architecture and the UML” by Grady Booch.
NIEM Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD) Mini Kanwal NIEM Technical Advisor Department of Homeland Security September, 7 th 2006.
L6-S1 UML Overview 2003 SJSU -- CmpE Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis & Design Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor Computer Engineering Department, Room #283I College.
S&I Integration with NIEM (DRAFT) Standards Development Support June 8, 2011.
S&I PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTING INITIATIVE: DEVELOPING OF A TEAMING APPROACH S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, Co-Lead September,
HIT Standards Committee Identifying Implementation Specifications & Gaps LeRoy Jones – Program Manager Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel.
National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) Executive Introduction November 29, 2006 Thomas O’Reilly NIEM Program Management Office.
Standards and Interoperability Framework Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions.
NATIONWIDE HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK GOVERNANCE Doug Fridsma Director, Office of Interoperability and Standards.
Seeking SC Feedback on Draft Technology Strategy and Roadmap for EarthCube Draft of 3 November 2015 The Technology and Architecture Committee (TAC) Chairs:
Health Information Exchange Roadmap: The Landscape and a Path Forward Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration Program Grantee.
Mariann Yeager, NHIN Policy and Governance Lead (Contractor) Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT David Riley, CONNECT Lead (Contractor) Federal.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.
S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.
Lab Results Interface Validation Suite Workgroup and Pilots Workgroup Vision, Charter, NIST Collaboration, July 8,
Standards and Interoperability Framework esMD Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions S&I F2F Thursday, April 12 th, :00 AM.
Page 1 Hitachi Ltd. – FhI FOKUS TTCN-3 User Conference, June 2005 MDA based approach for generation of TTCN-3 test specifications Hideto Ogawa, Hitachi.
Establish the NIEM Health Domain by focusing on high value data exchanges that can be modeled within NIEM in the context of the existing NIEM framework.
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Contents Playbook Objectives Playbook Value Details Playbook Design
Implementing the Surface Transportation Domain
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
Process Improvement With Roles and Responsibilities explained
TSMO Program Plan Development
Connecting for Health Preliminary Terminology Consensus Statements
Bird of Feather Session
HLN Consulting, LLC® November 8, 2006
Presentation transcript:

1 HIT STANDARDS COMMITTEE DRAFT: S&I Framework Principles and Processes 1

2 KICK-OFF S&I Framework

3 S&I Mission »Promote a sustainable ecosystem that drives increasing interoperability and standards adoption »Create a collaborative, coordinated, incremental standards process that is led by the industry in solving real world problems »Leverage “government as a platform” – provide tools, coordination, and harmonization that will support interested parties as they develop solutions to interoperability and standards adoption.

4 ONC Standards and Interoperability Framework Tools and Services (Use Case Development, Harmonization Tools, Vocabulary Browser, Value Set Repository, Testing Scripts, etc) (Stanley) Tools and Services (Use Case Development, Harmonization Tools, Vocabulary Browser, Value Set Repository, Testing Scripts, etc) (Stanley) Use Case Development and Functional Requirements (Accenture) Use Case Development and Functional Requirements (Accenture) Standards Development (TBD) Standards Development (TBD) Certification and Testing (Stanley/Deloitte) Certification and Testing (Stanley/Deloitte) Harmonization of Core Concepts (Deloitte) Harmonization of Core Concepts (Deloitte) Implementation Specifications (Deloitte) Implementation Specifications (Deloitte) Pilot Demonstration Projects (Lockheed Martin) Pilot Demonstration Projects (Lockheed Martin) Reference Implementation (Lockheed Martin) Reference Implementation (Lockheed Martin)

5 Standards and Interoperability Organizational Structure Standards and Interoperability Standards National Health Information Network Certification and Testing FHA Standards Teams NHIN Teams Certification Team FHA Teams Use Cases (Accenture) Use Cases (Accenture) Standards Development (TBD) Standards Development (TBD) Harmonization (Deloitte) Harmonization (Deloitte) Spec Factory (Deloitte) Spec Factory (Deloitte) Architecture Reference Implementations (Lockheed Martin) Reference Implementations (Lockheed Martin) Emergent Pilots (Lockheed Martin) Emergent Pilots (Lockheed Martin) Tools (Stanley) Tools (Stanley) Operations (Stanley) Operations (Stanley) Certification (Stanley/Deloitte) Certification (Stanley/Deloitte) Test Infrastructure (Stanley/Deloitte) Test Infrastructure (Stanley/Deloitte) CONNECT (TBD) CONNECT (TBD)

6 What is an IEPD? »An Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD) is a collection of artifacts that describe the construction and content of an information exchange Developed to provide the business, functional, and technical details of the information exchange through predefined artifacts Created with a core set of artifacts in a prescribed format and organizational structure to allow for consistency Designed to be shared and reused in the development of new information exchanges through publication in IEPD repositories IEPDs contain design specifications for an information exchange but may not include supplementary information such as implementation decisions.

7 The IEPD Artifacts IEPDs contain both required and recommended artifacts Required : Bold Recommended : Italic Note: Best practices for most organizations include many of the optional artifacts listed here Business Process Use Cases Sequence Diagrams Business RulesBusiness Requirements Exchange Content Model Mapping Document Subset Schema Exchange Schema XML Wantlist Constraint Schema Extension Schema Main Document IEPD Catalog IEPD Metadata Sample XML Instances XML Stylesheets Scenario Planning Analyze Requirements Map & Model Build & Validate Assemble & Document Publish & Implement No required artifacts. Publish the IEPD to a repository and implement the exchange

8 S&I NIEM Harmonization Strategy »ONC’s Office of Interoperability and Standards is building a Health Information Exchange Model (NIEM Health) that is harmonized with NIEM »Health and Human Services petal to serve as bridge between NIEM and NIEM Health Human Services

9 Capability Elaboration Capability Formulation Construction Release & Publication Use Case Development Spec Development Harmonization Reference Impl Cert &Testing S&I Development Phases S&I Governance Health Community Participants Scenario Planning Analyze Requirements Map & Model Build & Validate Assemble & Document Pub. & Impl. NIEM Lifecycle S&I NIEM Process Harmonized

10 Addressing Challenges for the Health Information Exchange Model ChallengeApproach Existence of disparate health information exchange standards and specifications and implementation approaches Map exchange requirements to existing standards & specifications and address any gaps, duplications, or overlaps Harmonization and management of several well-established, large vocabularies for semantic interoperability Leverage existing vocabulary repositories (e.g. PHIN VADS), coordinate with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), and collaborate with standards development organizations Usability of existing HIT exchange protocols and specifications Use NIEM processes and adapt supporting tools to create computable, useable implementation specifications NIEM only addresses data content, but transaction behavior and security provisions are necessary for health information exchange Adapt structure and content of S&I IEPD to incorporate transport and security aspects of exchange Compatibility of S&I IEPDs with existing NIEM infrastructure and tools, as well as existing health information exchange protocols Develop and adapt NIEM and health information technology tools and framework to support NHIN goals

11 Requirements for a Model Centric Approach »The modeling approach used by the S&I Framework must Provide traceability from Use Case and Requirements through to one or more implementations Provide semantic and syntactic modeling constructs to support defining the information and behavior that are part of exchanges Support the need to harmonize with existing standards defined at different levels of abstraction Be adoptable by different organizations Be able to integrate into NIEM process

12 Model-Centric Solution - MDA »Base S&I Framework modeling on the 3 OMG/MDA model abstractions. Computational Independent Model (CIM) Platform Independent Model (PIM) Platform Specific Model (PSM) »Define a mechanism to show traceability from Use Cases and Functional Requirements through to technical bindings defined in a PSM. »Define a flexible modeling foundation by which different types of specifications can be defined. »Provides ability for multiple technology bindings for the same set of logical specifications (multiple PSMs)

13 Specification Models NIEM Processes and Artifacts S&I Activities Harmonization of Core Concepts Implementation Specifications Reference Implementation and Pilots Business Processes, Use Cases Business Rules, Business Requirements Exchange Content Model, Mapping Document Exchange Schema, Subset/Constraint Schema, Main Document, IEPD Catalog, IEPD Metadata, Sample XML Vision Document, Process Model Use Case Model, Interaction Model, Domain Model Behavior Model Domain Model Web Services Schema and WSDL Use Case Development and Functional Requirements Certification and Testing CIM PIM PSM Scenario Planning Analyze Requirements Map and Model Publish and Implement Build and Validate Assemble and Document Model Centric Solution - NIEM

14 Prioritization and Backlog Lists Strategic Priorities Strategic Priorities Operational Priorities “Day to Day” Priorities within each functional team

15 What’s Next »Create a NIEM Health standards harmonization process and governance framework »Establish roadmap for existing NHIN standards, MU harmonization, and non-MU health information exchange specifications »Establishes a repeatable, iterative process for developing widely reusable, computable implementation specifications »Establishing the tooling and repositories needed »Establishing the practices and guidelines for modeling »Enables semantic traceability so that useable code can be traced back to original requirements and definitions »Promotes transparency and collaboration from broad range of health stakeholders Scenario Planning Map & Model Analyze Requirements Build & Validate Assemble & Document Publish & Implement Use Case Development and Functional Requirements Standards Development Certification and Testing Harmonization of Core Concepts (NIEM framework) Implementation Specifications Pilot Demonstration Projects Reference Implementation NIEM IEPD Lifecycle

16 CURRENT LESSONS S&I Framework

17 Lessons Learned: NHIN Direct Focused Collaboration A Thousand Flowers Bloom Command and Control LowHigh Participation Classic Trade-Off Low High Focus »Consensus Driven Process »Open Collaboration »Established core guiding principles »Driven by business needs and elaborated use cases »Real world pilot implementation »Establish executive sponsorship and workgroup leads

18 Lessons Learned: Eligibility and Enrollment Focused Collaboration A Thousand Flowers Bloom Command and Control LowHigh Participation Classic Trade-Off Low High Focus »Dedicated resource(s) to drive project and decision making »Clearly defined problem statement at project initiation »Define expectations for desired artifacts »Promote community enthusiasm »Leverage tools to increase efficiencies

19 ISSUES TO DISCUSS S&I Framework

20 Coordination Priority Setting Evaluating Artifacts S&I Framework Issues and Challenges (1) Issues and Challenges »How and when do we get input from other stakeholders including those outside of meaningful use? »VLER »Federal partners »Other stakeholders »How do we foster multiple working groups and create a unified view of priorities? HITSC HITPC Sustainable Operations Shared Infrastructure

21 How do we create simple, easy to implement specifications that will drive adoption? S&I Framework Challenges (2) »How do we facilitate access to SDO standards for providers and support sustainable business models? Engaging the SDO community Developing a “one stop shop” for implementation specifications »How do we foster community and industrial participation to support balanced representation and diverse priorities? Identifying champions for S&I lifecycle initiatives Engage communities throughout S&I Framework Identifying demonstrable pilot programs Engaging and incentivizing volunteers from existing community

22 S&I Framework Open Questions cont. »What are the appropriate interface points with HITSC through S&I Framework lifecycle? Establish priorities, approve implementation specifications, Identifying appropriate decision makers at S&I control points Identifying appropriate roles and participants in the governance of S&I Framework »How do we identify and select tools as shared resources that foster collaboration? Establishing and adhering to agreed upon modeling conventions Tools to support artifact lifecycle management and dissemination »How do we extend NIEM to accommodate needs of health care domain?

23 S&I Framework Priorities »What should our priorities be for the next six months, twelve months, twenty-four months? From among… Meaningful Use Stage 1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 & 3 NHIN Exchange NHIN Direct Health Care Reform VLER New use cases (lab, pharmacy, content specifications) Prioritization needs to accommodate broad stakeholder needs, account for breadth and depth of available expertise, and support a long term growth strategy