The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 6: Observations and Feedback ___________________
Advertisements

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 4: S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August 2012 I. Welcome (3 minutes)
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 2: Unpacking the Rubric June
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
Educator Evaluation Workshop: Gathering Evidence, Conducting Observations & Providing Feedback MSSAA Summer Institute July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Department.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
Artifacts 101: The Role of Artifacts in Educator Support and Evaluation Spring 2015 Webinar.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Slide 1 is the title slide.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Professional Certification Professional Certification October 11, 2007 Standard: Effective Teaching Criteria 1(b) Using a variety of assessment strategies.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Identifying Assessments
The Use of Artifacts as Evidence in Educator Evaluation Fall 2015.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Presentation transcript:

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August

Module 5: Gathering Evidence  Module 1: Overview  Module 2: Unpacking the Rubric  Module 3: Self-Assessment  Module 4: S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development  Module 5: Gathering Evidence Module 5 focuses on the collection and organization of evidence by Standard and Indicator and engages participants in thinking strategically about gathering high- quality artifacts to demonstrate performance.  Module 6: Observations and Feedback  Module 7: Rating Educator Performance  Module 8: Rating Impact on Students 2 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Agenda  Connecting  Learning  Implementing  Reflecting  Wrap-Up 3 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Connecting 25 minutes 4 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Explain the three types of evidence required by regulations, and identify concrete examples of each.  Create evidence-based statements, and connect these statements to relevant Standards and Indicators.  Identify tools and processes for gathering and organizing evidence. 5 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

6 Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process. Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus. Every educator and evaluator collects evidence and assesses progress Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Artifacts in the Educator Plan  Review the Educator Goal Setting and Educator Plan form for Tom Wilson.  For your assigned action step, on a sticky note, write down two artifacts that could be collected to show progress toward the goal.  Post your sticky note on the section of the chart paper with the same number as your action step. 7 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Learning 1 hour, 30 minutes 8 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Sources of Evidence for Summative Ratings  Three categories of evidence must be collected for each educator: 1.Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement 2.Judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice 3.Additional evidence relevant to standards o This includes evidence collected by the educator and shared with the evaluator relating to fulfilling Standard III: Family and Community Engagement and Standard IV: Professional Culture from the Model System Teacher Rubric 9 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What does this look like? Products of Practice Related to Standards Multiple Measures of Student Learning Other Evidence Related to Standards Artifacts Teacher-developed unit assessments Grade-level meeting notes Parent/teacher communication log PLC meeting notes Observations Notes/feedback from short, frequent observations (inside/outside classrooms) Notes and feedback from announced observations Student work (quizzes, homework, presentations, etc.) Portfolios Performance assessments (including arts, vocational, health and wellness) Interim assessments State or district assessments Student and staff feedback (2013–14 school year) 10 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Implementation Responsibility  Educator responsibilities: o Identifying, collecting, and organizing artifacts/evidence related to goal progress o Documenting action steps completed o Collecting and submitting common artifacts o Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III and IV  Evaluator responsibilities: o Making resources and supports available o Identifying common artifacts/evidence o Observing practice and providing regular and specific feedback on performance o Monitoring progress—including midpoint check-ins o Organizing and analyzing evidence over time 11 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Evidence or Judgment?  Examine Handout 2.  Highlight factual statements.  Underline judgment statements or statements not based on evidence. 12 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Artifact Cover Page Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 13

Running Record of Evidence Form 14 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts OR 15 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts  Artifacts should be a sample that demonstrates educator performance and impact: o Aligned with educator goals, the Model System Teacher Rubric, or school goals  Number of artifacts to collect varies by educator  Artifacts can provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator 16 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Strategies for Collecting Artifacts  Identify common artifacts that all or most educators will be expected to collect (e.g., lesson plans)  Share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings: o Might include showing sample artifacts that provide evidence of more t han one Standard or Indicator 17 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Artifacts From Tom Wilson 18  Five artifacts with partially completed Artifact Cover Pages SetArtifactsLocation AA two-day lesson planHandout 3 BUnit assessment data Team meeting minutes Handouts 4 and 5 CParent communication log exchange Handouts 6 and 7 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Identifying Evidence in Artifacts  Within your school team, divide into pairs.  Each pair will do the following: o Review one set of artifacts. o Complete the Artifact Cover Page for those two artifacts. o Consider these questions: –After reviewing these artifacts, what else might you want to know about Tom’s practice? –What would you want to ask this teacher? 19 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Implementing 50 minutes 20 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

To Recap… Three categories of evidence: 1.Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement 2.Judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice 3.Additional evidence relevant to standards 21 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

1.Support 2.Organize 3.Communicate 22 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

1. Support Set Your School Up for Success  The more concrete the Educator Plan, the easier it is to identify and collect artifacts.  Share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings: o Demonstrate example artifacts that provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator.  Identify common artifacts that all or most educators will be expected to collect (unit assessments, parent-teacher logs, etc.). 23 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

2. Organize  Adopt a process for organizing artifacts and observation notes by Standard or Indicator and/or goals: o Paper-based, -driven, or online “cloud-based” system  Calendar: o Review actions in Educator Plans and make agreed- upon supports and resources available to educator teams and individuals throughout the year. o Identify key points of contact throughout the year (observations and feedback, formative assessment conferences, and summative evaluations). 24 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

3. Communicate Expectations Avoiding the… OR 25 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

3. Communicate Expectations  Artifacts should be a sample that demonstrates educator performance and impact.  Evidence should be clearly tied to educator goals, Standards, or Indicators.  Provide everyone with a clear idea of what, how, and when to share products of practice. 26 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Back at your school… Work with your team to identify how you will: 1.Support, 2.Organize, and 3.Communicate expectations related to the collection of evidence at your school. 27 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Feasibility Work with your team to identify how you will feasibly implement this aspect of the educator evaluation system. How will your school:  Provide necessary assistance and support to educators throughout the year?  Organize evidence collection?  Communicate information and expectations related to this process clearly and effectively? 28 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Reflecting 5 minutes 29 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Reflecting  On the back of your implementation plan, list: o Three next steps for you personally o Two challenges for implementing artifact collection at your school o One question you still have regarding evidence collection 30 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Wrap-Up 5 minutes 31 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What’s Next?  Module 1: Overview  Module 2: Unpacking the Rubric  Module 3: Self-Assessment  Module 4: S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development  Module 5: Gathering Evidence  Module 6: Observations and Feedback The sixth module describes expectations for observations (both inside and outside of classrooms), the collection and organization of observation evidence, as well as the sharing of timely, constructive feedback to educators.  Module 7: Rating Educator Performance  Module 8: Rating Educator Impact on Students Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 32

Homework 33 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Suggested Homework for School Leadership Teams  Review and discuss your district/school improvement plan and compare it with the Standards and Indicators to determine alignment. Begin to identify the type of evidence and data that are currently being collected that could help inform progress toward Educator Plans and goals. 34 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Suggested Homework for All School-Based Educators  Work with a colleague, in a small group or at a faculty meeting, to select a particular Standard from the Model System Teacher Rubric, and identify potential sources of evidence (data) to inform performance decisions. Discuss whether these data are easily accessible and comparable across classrooms. 35 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Feedback and Questions  Please take a moment to complete the feedback form being handed out. We appreciate your feedback!  Questions? o About this training: [FACILITATOR/VENDOR HERE] o About educator evaluation more generally: 36 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education