September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing for the edTPA: Making and Supporting Claims about Your Teaching and Student Learning Christine M. Dawson, Ph.D. Director of Student Teaching, Skidmore.
Advertisements

Welcome to: The Power of Assessment in Guiding Student Learning Warm up: In groups of 3 or 4, please use the blank chart paper to brainstorm these questions:
Kentucky Teacher Internship Program: Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA) Career and Technical Education Session November 18, :00 – 6:00 pm.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 5: Reflecting and Adjusting.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model
EngageNY.org Making Sense of Classroom Data: “Trackers” and The Atlas Protocol Session 1, December 2014 NTI.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Checking For Understanding
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Skills & Ladders (with more variations) Welcome! 1.
The Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback January 8 th, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Professional Development to Practice Supplies needed: -Index Cards -Chart Paper (one per table group) -Colored Markers -3 Column sheet labeled: “Here’s.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
RAD Training Grade 6 and New Grade 1-5 ELA Teachers September 19, 2013.
Questioning Strategies District Learning Day Location goes here Session time goes here Date goes here.
WELCOME! 1. PLEASE GET A DOT – AND PLACE IT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF ELP STANDARDS CONTINUUM 2. HAVE A SEAT AT THE APPROPRIATE TABLE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 3. TURN.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 5: Engaging Students in Rigorous Learning Winter, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback.
WELCOME! DATA TEAM COACH TRAINING  Review the PLC Process, Roles and Expectations  Provide an opportunity for questions and possible responses.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Session 2, Modified Jigsaw
Presentation transcript:

September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives

 Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric  Module 2: Student Learning Objectives This second module engages participants in the student learning objective (SLO) development process. Through multiple activities, participants will increase their understanding of the SLO process and have time to begin drafting their SLO for the 2013–14 school year.  Module 3: Observation and Feedback  Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting  Module 5: Learner Perception  Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year 2

Agenda  Welcome and Overview (15 minutes) Intended outcomes Overview of module structures and norms  Connecting (20 minutes) Artifact boxes  Learning (1 hour, 25 minutes) Introduction to SLOs Review an SLO SLO feedback carousel  Implementing (50 minutes) Writing your SLO  Reflecting (10 minutes) Feedback on the SLO 3

Intended Outcomes  At the end of this session, participants will know and be able to Understand the SLO process and explain their role in it Use the SLO template checklist to review an SLO Draft an SLO specific to their content area 4

The Four-Step Evaluation Cycle in Action 55

Core Propositions and Standard Indicators  Core Proposition 1: Teachers are committed to students and their learning. 1-a—Understanding of Students: The teacher recognizes individual differences and knows the backgrounds, abilities, and interests of his or her students and adjusts practice accordingly. 1-b—Application of Learning Theory: The teacher demonstrates an understanding of how students develop and learn.  Core Proposition 2: Teachers know the subjects they teach and how to teach those subjects to students. 2c—The teacher plans instruction rich in higher order thinking to meet clearly identified goals and objectives for student learning. 6

Core Propositions and Standard Indicators  Core Proposition 3: Teachers are responsible for managing and monitoring student learning. 3-d—Assessment of Student Progress: The teacher employs multiple methods to regularly measure student growth and progress and uses this information to inform instruction.  Core Proposition 4: Teachers think systematically about their practice and learn from experience. 4-a—The teacher continually reflects on his or her instructional decision making and modifies instructional approaches and interactions, making decisions based on student learning needs and best practices. 7

Core Propositions and Standard Indicators  Core Proposition 5: Teachers think systematically about their practices and learn from their experience. 5-a—The teacher contributes to school effectiveness by collaborating with other professionals on activities related to the strategic priorities of the school and district. 8

Connecting Activity 20 minutes 9

Artifact Boxes  Objective Activate prior knowledge of two types of goals—S.M.A.R.T. professional growth goals and SLOs—through the creation of artifact boxes.  Directions View the sample artifact box. Form groups of three. Select an index card identifying the type of goal for which you will create an artifact box. Create an artifact box for that goal type. Include items, drawings, or words in the artifact box. 10

Wrap-Up: Artifact Boxes  Partner with another group with the other type of box. Compare the contents of the two boxes.  Discuss similarities and differences between the two types of goals. 11

Learning 1 hour, 25 minutes 12

SLO Cycle 13 Developing the SLO Approving the SLO Monitoring Progress Scoring the SLO

 Objectives Begin thinking like an SLO writer. Connect SLOs to other initiatives, efforts, and goal-setting.  Directions, Part 1 Take eight index cards. Listen to my prompts and record your answers. Use a separate index card for each answer. Review the SLO template. Organize your index cards to match the SLO template. In other words, where does each index card fit within the SLO template? Introduction to SLOs 14

 Directions, Part 2 Use the checklist to review what you wrote on your cards. Could you check off anything on the checklist? Introduction to SLOs 15

 At your tables, discuss Which components of the SLO template seem the most straightforward? Which components will require the most thought or learning? Introduction to SLOs: Wrap-Up 16

 Objectives Increase understanding of how a completed SLO looks. Generate questions about components of the SLO.  Directions In pairs, review the sample SLO with the SLO Approval Checklist. As you read, identify where in the text the SLO meets each criterion in the SLO Approval Checklist. Jot down any questions you have about the SLO components. Review a Complete SLO 17

 Post your question on the chart paper.  As you post your question, see whether you can answer a question that has already been posted. Attach a sticky note with the answer underneath the question. Wrap-Up: Asked and Answered 18

Objectives Increase familiarity with the SLO Approval Checklist. Practice providing feedback to a peer. Directions Review the SLO with the SLO Approval Checklist. Note areas that should be improved. Stand up. Divide into eight groups. Each group should stand in front of a piece of chart paper where on SLO component is written. Each group should have the SLO, the checklist, a marker, and stickers. Provide feedback on that SLO component. Be specific. When directed, move to the next component. Review the feedback that has been written and add to it. If you agree with the feedback, put a green dot next to it. If you disagree with it, put a red dot next to it. If you are unsure, put a yellow dot. SLO Feedback Carousel 19

 With a partner, identify 2 things you learned about SLOs from this activity 1 piece of feedback that you will remember when you are writing your own SLO 2 questions that you still have about SLOs SLO Feedback Carousel:

Implementing 50 minutes 21

 Key considerations In order for your SLO to be approved, your administrator must be able to check off all boxes in the approval checklist when she or he reviews it. Use the SLO Approval Checklist, the sample SLO, and the [DISTRICT] SLO Handbook as resources. Remember that you must submit your SLO for approval by [DATE]. Implementing: Writing Your SLO 22

Objectives Write a draft of your SLO. Directions Sit with colleagues who teach the same subjects or grades as you, if possible. Use the data and information that you brought with you to begin writing your SLO. Refer to the SLO Handbook as needed. Whenever possible, collaborate! Consider analyzing data together or discussing what information you will include in various components of the SLO. After 25–30 minutes, swap SLOs with a colleague. Implementing: Writing Your SLO 23

 Provide constructive feedback on the SLO of a colleague.  Brainstorm ways to address challenges you encountered. Wrap-Up: Feedback 24

Reflecting 10 minutes 25

 At your table, divide a piece of chart paper into four quadrants. Label the quadrants 1–4, then respond to these questions in their corresponding quadrants. 1.How did you apply something from today when writing your SLO? 2.What surprised you about the SLO writing process? 3.What challenges are you facing as you begin to write your SLO? 4.How will you use today’s training to inform next steps for writing your SLO? Reflecting: Quadrant Responses 26

Wrap-Up 5 minutes 27

 The third module describes expectations for observations (both inside and outside classrooms), the collection and organization of observation evidence, and the sharing of timely, constructive feedback. All participants will participate in peer observation, and this module will provide information about how to make the process meaningful, collaborative, and constructive. What’s Next 28

 Complete and share your SLOs with your evaluator for review and refinement.  Bring evidence from a classroom observation to the next module. Assignment 29

Presenter Name XXX-XXX-XXXX 1234 Street Address City, State