Linda S. Gottfredson University of Delaware Newark, DE Creativity on the Brain (and its psychometrics) Discussion of Rex E. Jung’s presentation, “Neuroimaging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test Development.
Advertisements

Agenda Levels of measurement Measurement reliability Measurement validity Some examples Need for Cognition Horn-honking.
Chapter 8 Flashcards.
Give Intelligence Its Due, But Put it In Its Place Linda S. Gottfredson University of Delaware Newark, DE New Voices in Intelligence & Creativity Conference.
Confidence Intervals Objectives: Students should know how to calculate a standard error, given a sample mean, standard deviation, and sample size Students.
Psychometric Aspects of Linking Tests to the CEF Norman Verhelst National Institute for Educational Measurement (Cito) Arnhem – The Netherlands.
Chapter 9: Intelligence and Psychological Testing
Chapter 4 – Reliability Observed Scores and True Scores Error
Reliability & Validity.  Limits all inferences that can be drawn from later tests  If reliable and valid scale, can have confidence in findings  If.
General Information --- What is the purpose of the test? For what population is the designed? Is this population relevant to the people who will take your.
1 Chapter 7 Assessment of Intelligence. 2 Defining and Purpose of Intelligence Testing Type of aptitude test that measures a range of intellectual ability.
Correlation Mechanics. Covariance The variance shared by two variables When X and Y move in the same direction (i.e. their deviations from the mean are.
Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II February 1, 2011.
Why is g so deeply insinuated in social inequality? Linda S. Gottfredson, PhD School of Education University of Delaware, USA International Society for.
Topics: Inferential Statistics
Lecture 5 Outline – Tues., Jan. 27 Miscellanea from Lecture 4 Case Study Chapter 2.2 –Probability model for random sampling (see also chapter 1.4.1)
Statistical Concepts (continued) Concepts to cover or review today: –Population parameter –Sample statistics –Mean –Standard deviation –Coefficient of.
Psychometrics & Statistical Concepts PSYC 101 Dr. Gregg Fall, 2006.
PSY 1950 Confidence and Power December, Requisite Quote “The picturing of data allows us to be sensitive not only to the multiple hypotheses that.
Meta-analysis & psychotherapy outcome research
CONFIDENCE INTERVALS What is the Purpose of a Confidence Interval?
Wednesday, October 3 Variability. nominal ordinal interval.
The of Maximal Performance Linda S. Gottfredson School of Education University of Delaware September 16, 2008 Conference: “How can we improve our brains?”
7-3 Estimating a Population Mean
Stanford-Binet IV Description: –Point-scale (contrast with age-scale of previous editions) –Test composite (M=100, SD=16) –4 areas & scores (M=100, SD=16)
INTELLIGENCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING. KEY CONCEPTS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING Psychological test: a standardized measure of a sample of a person’s behavior.
General Mental Ability aka (GMA) aka (g factor) aka (g)
Interpretation of the WISC-IV
Confidence Intervals. Estimating the difference due to error that we can expect between sample statistics and the population parameter.
Technical Adequacy Session One Part Three.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Test item analysis: When are statistics a good thing? Andrew Martin Purdue Pesticide Programs.
Confidence Intervals Nancy D. Barker, M.S.. Statistical Inference.
Chapter 7 Statistical Inference: Confidence Intervals
IQ Testing & Brain Damage. Full Scale IQ Person’s relative standing in comparison w/ age- related peers and global estimate of overall mental abilities.
CHAPTER 6, INDEXES, SCALES, AND TYPOLOGIES
Education Research 250:205 Writing Chapter 3. Objectives Subjects Instrumentation Procedures Experimental Design Statistical Analysis  Displaying data.
1 Diagnostic Measurement and Reporting on Concept Inventories Lou DiBello and Jim Pellegrino DRK-12 PI Meeting Washington, DC December 3, 2010.
Author(s): Brenda Gunderson, Ph.D., 2011 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–Non-commercial–Share.
Chapter 9: Intelligence and Psychological Testing
Validity Is the Test Appropriate, Useful, and Meaningful?
Tests and Measurements Intersession 2006.
Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of psychometric abilities.
Measurement Validity.
Intelligence and Psychological Testing
Estimating a Population Mean
Flynn Effect 1: Empirical Puzzle Linda S. Gottfredson, PhD School of Education University of Delaware Newark, DE Schelling Symposium, “What is Intelligence?,”
Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson
Measurement MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Research planning. Planning v. evaluating research To a large extent, the same thing Plan a study so that it is capable of yielding data that could possibly.
Leiter International Performance Scale – Revised
INTELLIGENCE. Intelligence Intelligence involves the application of cognitive skills and knowledge to: –Learn –Solve problems –Obtain ends valued by the.
Reliability a measure is reliable if it gives the same information every time it is used. reliability is assessed by a number – typically a correlation.
Intelligence sample IQ questions sample IQ questions What makes us smart? Or not so smart?
What makes us smart? Or not so smart?
Monday, September 27 More basics.. _ “Life is a series of samples, you can infer the truth from the samples but you never see the truth.”
Assessing Intelligence. Test Construction Standardization – defining the meaning of scores by comparing to a pretested “standard group”. Reliability –
Design and Data Analysis in Psychology I English group (A) Salvador Chacón Moscoso Susana Sanduvete Chaves Milagrosa Sánchez Martín School of Psychology.
Chapter 9 Intelligence. Objectives 9.1 The Nature of Intelligence Define intelligence from an adaptation perspective. Compare and contrast theories of.
SPSS Homework Practice The Neuroticism Measure = S = 6.24 n = 54 How many people likely have a neuroticism score between 29 and 34?
Inference: Conclusion with Confidence
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Fall 2016 Room 150 Harvill Building 10: :50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
ESTIMATION.
Assessing Intelligence
Effect Size 10/15.
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)
Effect Size.
Reliability & Validity
Developing HDFS Learning Goals
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Presentation transcript:

Linda S. Gottfredson University of Delaware Newark, DE Creativity on the Brain (and its psychometrics) Discussion of Rex E. Jung’s presentation, “Neuroimaging of Creativity and Intelligence” New Voices in Creativity and Intelligence Conference University of Kansas Lawrence, KS, November 2, 2009

Exciting interdisciplinary research Big advances, quickly: More imaging methods Lower cost Larger samples More collaboration More theory testing More psychometric traits Etc.

Psychometric (Interpretive) Challenges Construct validity IQ = score g = theoretical construct Restriction in range Reliability of measurement Sampling error 3 statistical artifacts misled personnel selection psychology for many decades Treating scores as constructs badly muddled intelligence debates Your assessment of your field’s needs? Questions of experts here today?

Constructs vs. Measurements Construct (empirical phenomenon) Measurement (score) “Intelligence”g—general proficiency at learning, reasoning (“catching on)” IQ score “Creativity”??

Hierarchical model of cognitive abilities— The empirical relatedness of differences across individuals g VQSMOthers MOST GENERAL Domain general More heritable Psychometrically unitary Physiologically distributed NARROW = Specific variance, unrelated to g Where is “intelligence”? It’s just a label that can be applied to different layers of traits in—or outside—the hierarchical model (factor analyses of scores)

Hierarchical model of cognitive abilities— The empirical relatedness of differences across individuals g VQSMOthers MOST GENERAL Domain general More heritable Psychometrically unitary Physiologically distributed NARROW IQ ≈ IQ ≈ = Specific variance, unrelated to g Family of Constructs (factor analyses of scores)

A closer look at constructs vs. measures Gf GcGm Gv Gm etc g Constructs

An often misunderstood point Gf GcGm Gv Ga etc g Constructs g is core ingredient of all more specific abilities

Scores ≠ Constructs FSIQ WMIPSI ds ln cd ss VCI PRI si vo bd pc mr co Gf GcGm GvGa etc g ConstructsTest Scores g is core ingredient of all more specific abilities

Note: IQ is just sum of scores, not of constructs FSIQ WMIPSI ds ln cd ss VCI PRI si vo bd pc mr co Gf GcGm Gv Ga etc g ConstructsTest Scores g is core ingredient of all more specific abilities IQ is sum of subtest scores

IQ (score) is a good estimate of g (construct) FSIQ WMIPSI ds ln cd ss VCI PRI si vo bd pc mr co Gf GcGm Gv Ga etc g ConstructsTest Scores g is core ingredient of all more specific abilities IQ is sum of subtest scores

FSIQ WMIPSI ds ln cd ss VCI PRI si vo bd pc mr co Gf GcGm Gv Ga etc g ConstructsTest Scores g is core ingredient of all more specific abilities IQ is sum of subtest scores Took 100 years to get here. Lots of conceptual development

“IQ” scores differ in tilt & precision FSIQ WMIPSI ds ln cd ss VCI PRI si vo bd pc mr co Gf Gc Gm Gv Ga etc g ConstructsTest Scores g is core ingredient of all more specific abilities IQ is sum of subtest scores ⇝ ? Jung & Haier (2007) note a serious theoretical problem: IQ scores in (imaging) studies often not measuring same construct(s) Different studies use different “intelligence” tests.

So, not same processes tapped Gv g g, if battery broad Gv, if battery has mostly verbal tests

We Need Parallel Conceptual Effort for Creativity CIQ CartoonsMUTGMT Constructs??Test Scores What is the structure? Is there a single c? Domain coverage? Common factors? CAQRAT Jung’s example today

Intersection of 2 domains? Often used to measure creativity

Artifact #1 Restriction in Range in Scores (whole range not sampled)

Restricted

100

22 Mean IQs by occupation level & years education Unskilled Semiskilled Skilled Manager, Cler, Sales Professional & Tech Occupation: Years education: WAIS-R IQ (mean + 1 SD), US adults ages IQ ~%ile: Mean + 1 SD range Imaging Sample 1 Mean + 1 SD Openness Sample

The missing top third Mean + 1 SD

What kind of creativity? Cox estimates: Cultural-level creativity HaydnMozartBeethoven JQ AdamsJefferson Jackson LincolnMadisonGrantWashington Divergent thinking Mean + 1 SD

Artifact #2 Reliability of Measurement

Reliability of Creativity Measures? Subjective ratings (self vs. other)

Reliability of Brain Measurements? Lower reliability will lower correlations. Differential reliability will change patterns of correlations.

Artifact #3 Sampling Error (chance errors in reflecting full population)

Small samples = Big confusion Small sample Ns = large confidence intervals (CI) Different sample sizes = different confidence intervals Leads to:  Unstable parameter estimates  Unstable patterns of significance

All 3 Artifacts = Chaos Small sample Ns plus Unreliability plus Restriction in range equals:  “Complex” pattern of results  “Specificity” theories False inferences!! Point? Knowing amount & type of artifacts helps unmuddy the picture, as it did in personnel selection psychology. Clockwork-like patterns emerged.

Questions?

Thank you.