Event shape distributions at LEP Marek Taševský (Physics Institute Prague) for all LEP collaborations 21 April 2006 KEK-Tsukuba, Japan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final State QCD LEP, part 2 Nuno Anjos LIP, Lisbon – DELPHI and L3 Collaborations EPS HEP05 Lisboa, Portugal July 22 nd, a) Single Particle.
Advertisements

Work done in collaboration with Stefano Frixione 1 Leonardo Bertora, 2004 April 14 Jet and Di-jet production in Photon–Photon collisions Leonardo Bertora.
Maria Jose Costa, CERN DIS 2004 April 14 th -18 th 2004, Slovakia b -mass effects in 3 and 4 jets events with the DELPHI detector at LEP b u,d,s.
Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
Electroweak b physics at LEP V. Ciulli INFN Firenze.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
W Mass & Width Measurement at LEP II BEACH 04, IIT Chicago, 08/03/04 Ambreesh Gupta, University of Chicago.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
Higgs Searches at LEP2 E. Kneringer University of Innsbruck / Austria Collaboration LAKE LOUISE WINTER INSTITUTE Electroweak Physics February 1999.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Multijets in e+e- annihilations Hasko Stenzel FRIF workshop e+e- multi-jets H.Stenzel 2 Outline  Jet rates and algorithms  energy evolution.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Single boson production at LEP Guillaume Leibenguth On behalf of the LEP experiments Institut de physique nucléaire Université catholique de Louvain DIS’04,
 s determination at LEP Thorsten Wengler University of Manchester DIS’06, Tsukuba, Japan.
High E T Jet Physics at HERA José Repond Argonne National Laboratory On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Small-x Workshop, Fermilab, March 28-30,
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
Reconstruction of High Transverse Momentum Top Quarks at CMS Gavril Giurgiu (Johns Hopkins University) For the CMS Collaboration 2009 DPF Meeting Wayne.
Measurement of α s at NNLO in e+e- annihilation Hasko Stenzel, JLU Giessen, DIS2008.
Recent QCD results from OPAL Marina Giunta Univ. of California, Riverside OPAL Collaboration DIS 04, Štrbské Pleso April 2004.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Top-partner mass reconstruction by using jets Michihisa Takeuchi ( KEK,YITP ) In collaboration with Mihoko M. Nojiri (KEK), Naotoshi Okamura (KEK)
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.
Study of Direct Photon Pair Production in Hadronic Collisions at √s=14 TeV (Preliminary Results) Sushil Singh Chauhan Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 1 David Milstead Stockholm University.
A Comparison Between Different Jet Algorithms for top mass Reconstruction Chris Tevlin University of Manchester (Supervisor - Mike Seymour) Atlas UK top.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Isolated Prompt Photon Production in Photon-Photon Collisions at  s ee = GeV T. Schörner-Sadenius on behalf of the OPAL Collaboration ICHEP 2002,
Event Shapes, Alexander Savin University of WisconsinDIS 2006, April 21, Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University of Wisconsin.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Parton energy loss Marco van Leeuwen. 2 Hard probes of QCD matter Use ‘quasi-free’ partons from hard scatterings to probe ‘quasi-thermal’ QCD matter Interactions.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
Measurement of b-quark mass effects for multi-jet events at LEP Juan A. Fuster Verdú EPS-2003 Aachen, July 2003.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
R LEP2 Yoram Rozen – Technion, Israel for the OPAL Collab.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Collaboration Meeting, Oct. 21st Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in.
Color Reconnection in W Pair Events Guillaume Leibenguth Université Catholique de Louvain Belgium DIS 2003, St. Petersburg On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
Improved measurements of the b quark mass at LEP María José Costa (IFIC-València) ICHEP 2002 Amsterdam Motivations to measure m b at M Z. Observables sensitive.
Event Shapes, A. Everett, U. WisconsinZEUS Meeting, March 6, Some Slides for Michele There is no subtitle.
Modern Approach to Monte Carlo’s (L1) The role of resolution in Monte Carlo’s (L1) Leading order Monte Carlo’s (L1) Next-to-Leading order Monte Carlo’s.
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Hadron production and QCD coherence at LEP Marco Cuffiani University of Bologna and INFN (Italy) on behalf of the OPAL Collaboration QCD coherence and.
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Quark and Gluon Jet Fragmentation Functions as measured by OPAL
Energy Dependence of the UE
Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Sílvia Bravo i Gallart IFAE, Barcelona Moriond-QCD, 18 March 2002
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Event Shape Variables in DIS Update
Jet fragmentation results at CDF
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Presentation transcript:

Event shape distributions at LEP Marek Taševský (Physics Institute Prague) for all LEP collaborations 21 April 2006 KEK-Tsukuba, Japan

Outline - Data samples and Event selection - Definitions & Properties of Event shape observables - Event shape observables at LEP1 and LEP2 energies The LEP alpha S measurement itself covered by T.Wengler ALEPH: EPJC35 (2004) 457 DELPHI: EPJC37 (2004) 1 L3: Phys.Rep.399 (2004) 71 OPAL: EPJC40 (2005) 287, PN519 (Preliminary)

Data samples and Event selection Typical numbers (ALEPH, ) Main background: ISR for √s > 91 GeV - reduced by requiring -√s - √s, < 10 GeV WW,ZZ->4 fermions for √s > 2m W (2m Z ) E cm LumiN ev BG [GeV][pb -1 ][%] 9141> 10 6 < <

Correction procedure 1.Select hadronic event candidates 2.Construct distributions from tracks and clusters (avoid double counting) 3.Subtract bin-by-bin residual 4f- bg using grc4f and KORALW 4.Correct data bin-by-bin for effects of detector acceptance, resolutions and residual ISR using MC models. Justified by a good description of data and correlation between hadron and det.levels

Properties of event shape observables To make exper.tests of pert.QCD and to measure alpha S, we define physical observables that are sensitive to the HE pert.process but little sensitive to subsequent non-pert. hadronisation and decays. INCLUSIVE: - characterize geometry of event (2-jet or pencil-like, 3-jet or planar, 4+ -jet or spherical) - non-identified particles - only p and E needed to know pQCD ME diverge for process involving soft or collinear gluon emission Hence pQCD applicable only for quantities that are INFRA-RED SAFE: – not affected by soft gluon emission COLLINEAR SAFE: - not affected by replacing a parton by collinear partons with the same total 4-momentum

Properties of event shape observables 3-jet observables: sensitive to non-collinear emission of single hard gluon 4-jet observables: vanish in 3-jet limit All quantities approach 0 in the 2-jet limit. In experiment, pure 0 is never reached due to hadronisation. Measurement of alpha S : Based on fits of pQCD predictions to the corrected distributions of event shape observables. Standard set of observables is {1-T, M H, C, B T, B W, y 23 }. But let’s look at more of them. As theory predictions exist at parton level, they need to be corrected to hadron level by applying hadronisation corrections. For details about the alpha S measurement, see talk by T.Wengler

Thrust Thrust axis n T chosen to maximise the expression 1-T=0: 2-jet event 1-T=1/2: spherical event

Thrust major Thrust major axis n chosen to maximise the expression and to be orthogonal to n T T maj = 0: 2-jet event T maj =1/2: spherical event

Thrust minor T min =0: 2-jet event T min =0: 3-jet event T min =1/2: spherical event - 4-jet observable

Oblateness O=0: 2-jet and spherical event O=T maj for 3-jet events

Sphericity Quadratic momentum tensor: has three eigenvalues ordered such that λ 1 < λ 2 < λ 3. Being quadratic in p α,β, S αβ is not IR safe. Sphericity cannot be predicted reliably in pQCD S=0: 2-jet event S=1: spherical event

Aplanarity Sphericity tensor has three eigenvalues ordered such that λ 1 < λ 2 < λ 3. Being quadratic in p α,β, S αβ is not IR safe. Aplanarity cannot be predicted reliably in pQCD A=0: 2-jet and 3-jet event - 4-jet observable

C- parameter Linearised momentum tensor -linear in p α,β => it is IR safe. -has three eigenvalues ordered such that λ 1 < λ 2 < λ 3. M has unit trace => λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 = 1. We can thus form two indep. combinat.: 2 nd Fox-Wolfram moment C low: planar event (one of λ=0) C=1: isotropic event (λ 1 =λ 2 =λ 3 =1/3)

D- parameter Linearised momentum tensor -linear in p α,β => it is IR safe. -has three eigenvalues ordered such that λ 1 < λ 2 < λ 3. M has unit trace => λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 = 1. We can thus form two indep. combinat.: D=0: 2-jet and 3-jet event D=1: isotropic event (λ 1 =λ 2 =λ 3 =1/3) - 4-jet observable

Hemisphere observables So far, the variables have been constructed as global sums over all particles in the event. From now, let’s split the event into two hemispheres H 1 and H 2, divided by a plane orthogonal to the thrust axis. Invariant mass: Jet broadening:

Heavy jet mass - never zero due to finite masses of individual particles

Light jet mass M L =0: 2-jet and 3-jet events - 4-jet observable - never zero due to finite masses of individual particles

Wide jet broadening B W =0: 2-jet events to O(alpha S ): B W =B T =1/2T maj =1/2O Spherical event: B W =B N = π /16

Total jet broadening B T =0: 2-jet events to O(alpha S ): B W =B T =1/2T maj =1/2O Spherical event: B T = π /8

Jets The aim of jet algorithms is to group particles together such that the directions and momenta of partons are reconstructed. The jet algos include at least one free resolution parameter and N jets depends on its chosen value. Durham (or k T ) algo defines “scaled transverse momentum” for every pair of particles:. The pair with the smallest y ij is then replaced by a pseudoparticle with p ij =pi+pj and E ij =E i +E j (E-recomb.scheme; two other exist: P-scheme: E ij =|p i +p j | and E0-scheme: |p ij |=E i +E j ). This is repeated until all pairs have y ij >y cut (fixed value). Remaining pseudoparticles represent jets. [small y cut => many jets; large y cut ->1.0 => 1 jet]

y 23 – 2 to 3 jet transition Measure of how ‘3-jetlike’ event is. Y 23 : the highest y cut value for which the event is resolved into 3 jets. Events with N jet ≥3 have large y 23 values (max. y 23 =1/3 for 3 identical jets 120° apart), while 2-jet events at LEP have y 23 <

Event shapes in radiative hadronic events Measure event shape observables for a boosted qq system after final-state photon radiation. √s=91 GeV reduces to GeV. Bg from non-rad. events: 5% (√s=78GeV) - 15% (√s=24GeV) - alpha S from radiative events measured by L3 and OPAL – results consistent with that from non-rad. events

Moments Another way to study the event structure – through moments: Y max is the max.kinematic. allowed value of observable Moments always sample all of available phase space: Lower moments are dominated by 2- and 3-jet events Higher moments are dominated by multi-jet events

Summary All LEP collaborations presented final measurements of event shape observables and their moments for all available data (√s = GeV). Satisfactory description of data by Pythia, Herwig and Ariadne achieved. Discrepancies observed for LEP1 data in the extreme 2-jet region and for observables sensitive to 4+ -jet production.