Search for LEP Ehud Duchovni Weizmann Institute, Israel On behalf of ~2000 LEP physicists Mumbai Jan 2003 What is the real conclusion of the myriad.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
Advertisements

Gravitino Dark Matter & R-Parity Violation M. Lola MEXT-CT (work with P. Osland and A. Raklev) Prospects for the detection of Dark Matter Spain,
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Flavor and Dark Matter Zackaria Chacko University of Maryland, College Park.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
MSSM in view of PAMELA and Fermi-LAT Ts. Enkhbat 2 nd workshop on LHC physics, CYCU, Chungli Based on: arXiv: B. BajcB. Bajc, Ts. E, D. K. Ghosh,
Other Searches at LEP Sylvie Braibant CERN Moriond QCD week March 2001 RPV-SUSY GMSB Technicolor Excited leptons Leptoquarks.
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.
Physics with Single, Multi- & Di-Photons at LEP HEP2003, Aachen, July HEP2003, Aachen, July Marat Gataullin (Caltech/L3) on behalf of LEP Collaborations.
Little Higgs Dark Matter and Its Implications at the LHC Chuan-Ren Chen (NTNU) XS 2014, 5/6/2014 In collaboration with H-C Tsai, M-C Lee, [hep-ph]
CDF D0 Supersymmetry at the Tevatron R. Demina University of Rochester.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) SM: 28 bosonic d.o.f. & 90 (96) fermionic d.o.f. SUSY: # of fermions = # of bosonsN=1 SUSY: There are no particles.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
Higgs and SUSY at the LHC Alan Barr on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations ICHEP-17 Aug 2004, Beijing ATLAS.
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
Constrained MSSM Unification of the gauge couplings Radiative EW Symmetry Breaking Heavy quark and lepton masses Rare decays (b -> sγ, b->μμ) Anomalous.
What is mSUGRA? Physics in Progress, seminar talk, 11 th Feb 2010 Helmut Eberl.
ROY, D. (2011). Why Large Hadron Collider?. Pramana: Journal Of Physics, 76(5), doi: /s
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Family Symmetry Solution to the SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Plan of talk: I.Family Symmetry II.Solving SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Work with and Michal.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
1 Physics at Hadron Colliders Lecture IV CERN, Summer Student Lectures, July 2010 Beate Heinemann University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley.
SUSY08 Seoul 17 June 081 Daniel Teyssier RWTH Aachen University Searches for non-standard SUSY signatures in CMS on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
SUSY Studies with ATLAS Experiment 2006 Texas Section of the APS Joint Fall Meeting October 5-7, 2006 Arlington, Texas Nurcan Ozturk University of Texas.
Long-lived superpartners in the MSSM Alexey GLADYSHEV (JINR, Dubna / ITEP, Moscow) PROTVINO, December 25, 2008 PHYSICS OF FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS PHYSICS.
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
The Search For Supersymmetry Liam Malone and Matthew French.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 16 Supersymmetry A purely phenomenological perspective. Disclaimer: I am not an expert on SUSY !!! All you get should.
Standard Model - Standard Model prediction (postulated that neutrinos are massless, consistent with observation that individual lepton flavors seemed to.
Dave Toback Texas A&M University HCP 2004 June 17 th Run II Searches for Supersymmetry Dave Toback Texas A&M University June 17 th 2004 HCP2004.
Charged Higgs boson at the LHC 이강영 ( 건국대학교 연세대학교
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Z’production at LHC in an extended.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
ATLAS physics – an introduction Alan Barr, University of Oxford.
Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
DIS2003 A.Tilquin Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at LEP What is the Standard Model Why to go beyond and how Supersymmetry Higgs sector.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
BSM YETI Meeting 10 th Jan SUSY Decays Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham.
Higgs in the Large Hadron Collider Joe Mitchell Advisor: Dr. Chung Kao.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
Search for Anomalous Production of Multi-lepton Events at CDF Alon Attal Outline  Motivation  R p V SUSY  CDF & lepton detection  Analysis  Results.
SESAPS November 11, B. Scurlock, University of Florida1 Bobby Scurlock Darin Acosta Paolo Bartalini Richard Cavanaugh Alexey Drozdetskiy Guenakh.
Search for SUSY in Photonic and Tau Channels with the ATLAS Detector
Charged Higgs boson decay in supersymmetric TeV scale seesaw model
Journées de Prospective
SUSY at LEP2 (third generation and ewinos)
Weak Production SUSY Search In LHC
Search for BSM at LHC Fayet Fest Paris November 9, 2016 Dirk Zerwas
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
mSUGRA SUSY Searches at the LHC
CEPC-Physics Workshop
SUSY Searches with ZEUS
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
& Searches for Squarks and Gluinos at the Tevatron
Status of SUSY searches
Presentation transcript:

Search for LEP Ehud Duchovni Weizmann Institute, Israel On behalf of ~2000 LEP physicists Mumbai Jan 2003 What is the real conclusion of the myriad searches for signatures of susy particles done at LEP by Aleph, Delphi L3 and Opal

Why SUSY? Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Motivated mainly by need to keep the Higgs boson mass at the TeV scale; The only non-trivial extension of the Lorentz symmetry group. Combines internal with external symmetries; May give rise to dark matter; Local SUSY allows for a unification of gravity with the other interactions; Not seen Softly broken >100 free parameters! How can one look for such a thing??????

Particle Spectrum Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 selectron Standard particles SUSY particles electron muon smuon sneutrino stautau neutrino squarks quarks (u,d,s,c) quarks (b,t) SUSY states sbottom,sto p SUSY states Standard particles SUSY particles chargino neutralino gluino SUSY tells us which are the couplings But the symmetry breaking gives rise to an unknown mass hierarchy and mixings

MSSM Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Since things are too complicated – one make some simplifying assumptions and reduce the model to a ‘testeble’ one. Assume that all fermions have a common mass at the planck scale All bosons have common mass at the planck scale All trilinear interactions are equal – A And the Higgs sector parameters: Under these assumptions one gets a well defines model which s easy to check in experiments.

MSSM Searches Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Assume R parity conservation: Pair production Stable Lightest SUSY Particle (LSP) In MSSM the LSP is the neutralino Assuming one know the values of One now knows what to look for and how to look for it. … but computations do not always agree

Background Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Two-photon processes have very big cross sections (~10s nb) but can be easily eliminated by cut. Four-fermion processes are very problematic background sources for LEP>1 physics, because they are irreducible 1pb 0.6pb ~20 pb Radiative multihadronic events (~100 pb) and radiative di-lepton events (~40 pb) where the photon goes into the beam pipe are eliminated by cuts on energy flow in the beam direction or cuts on the missing momentum direction.

Slepton Production Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 The Left handed sleptons were assumed to be beyond the reach of the experiment and the search (and limits) were set on the right handed ones which have lower production cross section (traditional LEP conservative approach). e+e+ e-e- e-e- e+e+

Slepton Searches Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 lepton The dominant decay mode is Which gives rise to two acollinear lepton final state

Comparing Data With Expectations Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Looking for Excess Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Limits on Sleptons Masses Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Sleptons Cross-Section Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Stau Cross-Section Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

In some regions of the parameter space the mode is possible leading to two acollinear leptons and two photons final satate The is also used and gives rise to 6 different search channels with up to 4 leptons and a photon The t-channel exchange in the selectron production can give rise to and one might encounter a situation in which Which gives rise to a single electron final state. More on two leptons

First List Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 So even the simplest possible process of slepton production requires the following searches: Single electron; two acollinear leptons; two leptons and a photon; two leptons and two photons. four leptons four leptons + photon

Absolute Limit on Selectrons Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

The Chargino Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 The charginos are the mixture of the super- partners of the W and the charged Higgs bosons. Whenthe chargino consists of mainly Higgsino and whenmainly of W-ino The lightest chargino ( ) is expected to be one of the lightest SUSY charged particles having mass given by:

Chargino Production and Decay Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 e+e+ e-e- e+e+ e-e- W Destructive interference + the corresponding hadronic modes

Experimental Signatures Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 lepton jet lepton jet

More About Chargino Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 But what does one do when Is very small? This happens naturally in AMSB models and in some corner of MSSM Can lead to stable pair of charged particles or if the decay happens in the detector and the decay products are insufficient to trigger one can use the ISR and look for single photon final state or high p t photon accompanied by some soft activity

Chargino Results Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Chargino Cross-Section Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Stable Chargino Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Second List Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 The search for the chargino includes the following channels: Single photon; A photon + some activity; Two stable particles; two acollinear leptons; two jets a lepton and missing energy; 4 jets + missing energy.

Absolute limit Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Higgsino caseGaugino case

LSP in MSSM (Neutralino) Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Check the existence of a solution (theory); Is the solution consistent with the Z width? Is the solution consistent with the Higgs boson search? Does it give rise to a stable stau which is already excluded? Then compare the predictions with the observations of the following channels: +Had

Neutralino Results Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Mass Limits Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Mu Positive Negative M top = M top =

Squarks Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Lightest are s-top and s-botom Look at stop->charm-neutralino two acollinear jets Similar study is done for

Stop Leptonic Decay Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Search through

Squarks & Gluino Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

GMSB Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Basic idea: SUSY is softly broken somewhere between the Planck and Electroweak scale. The breaking occurs in a ‘hidden’ sector and is mediated down via ordinary gauge bosons. Planck scale Hidden Electroweak scale Phenomenology depends mainly on and

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Basic Phemenology The LSP in GMSB is always the Gravitino which is basically massless. Colored sparticles, due to their extra gauge coupling, are heavier than the non-colored ones. Consequently the NLSP is either the neutralino or the sleptons (stau or all together). The effective coupling of the NLSP to the gravitino depends on an additional free coefficient of the model, ( ). Variations of this coefficient can lead to 3 different cases namely: Quasi stable NLSP 0-lifetime NLSP NLSP with decay distance comparable to the size of the detector.

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Life-times in GMSB Either in the ‘stable’ or in the ‘0-life- time’ situation

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 What Shall One Look For? Very Rich phenomenology:

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 The dominant decay mode of the neutralino is: Such a decay can give rise to di-photons which are not back-to-back due to the gravitinos Expect from SM 404 evts See 387. Neutralino Pair Production

Implications Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Single Photon Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Also in case of a long-lived neutralino one of the neutralinos might decay inside and the other outside of the detector. In such a case one looks for single-photon events. Expect 7676 events observe 7561.

Cross-section Limits Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Interpretation Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 for

And Another List Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 For GMSB studies one looks at: one photon Two photons; two non pointing photons; Two … 4 tau; 2tau + 2 leptons; 4 leptons; 2 kinked leptons (high d 0 ) + 2 others; 6 leptons; 2 kiked leptons (high d 0 ) + 4 others; 2 leptons + 2 photons; Jets + photon ….

General Limit Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

R Parity Violation Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 The most general SUSY super potential contains terms like: where Lepton doublet (1,2,1/2) quark doublet (3,2,1/6) down-type quark singlet (3,1,1/3) up-type quark singlet (3,1,-2/3) down-type lepton singlet (1,1,1) Yukawa couplings generation indices This gives rise to three additional vertices: Due to symmetries ( ) there are ‘only’ 45 (9+27+9) independent Yukawa couplings

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 May give rise to resonant sneutrino production Will affect decay modes This vertex violates L conservation! There are 9 possible corficients The Term

Working Assumptions: Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Only one coupling differ from zero; It is not ‘very’ weak; Look at pair production of sleptons; Assume sleptons to decay the neutralino (LSP) (i.e.assume MSSM!); Assume M(neuralino)>10GeV; Assume M(slepton)-M(LSP)>3GeV; Compute upper limits on the prodction cross- section Derive mass limits in the framework of MSSM

Cross-section Limits Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

More Cross-sections Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Mass Limits Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

More Mass Limits Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

One can produce a pair of charginos/neutralinos in the ‘usual’ way followed by RPV decay. Coupled with an LLE RPV decay 2 leptons 2+2 leptons/ 2 lept + 2 jets/ 2 lept + miss Search for neutralinos Decaying Through the LLE Term

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Similar production processes …and similar LLE decay modes: Lepton + missing energy 2+1 leptons Search for charginos Decaying Through the LLE Term

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai leptons+missing energy+2 jets or: 2+1 leptons + missing energy From chargino pair production: production 2 lept+miss +(4 jets or 2 jets + lept or 1+1 lept) And Both Together

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai leptons + missing energy 2+2 leptons + E miss, or 2+2 leptons + E miss + Z * decay products, or 2+2 leptons _E miss + 2Z * decay products, or 2+2 leptons +E miss + W + & W - decay products, or 2+2 leptons + E miss + Z,W & W decay products,or 2+2 leptons + E miss + 4W decay producs. 1+1 leptons + E miss or leptons + E miss or leptons, or 2+1 leptons + E miss + W decay products, or leptons + E miss + W decay products, or 2+2 leptons + E miss + W + & W - decay products. So What Should One Search for?

Typical Results Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003

Slepton LQD decay: Squarks LQD decay: This vertex violates L conservation! (27 Yukawa couplings) The Term

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 This vertex violates B conservation! (‘only’ 9 Yukawa couplings) Some limits already exist: Double nucleon decay Neutron oscillations LEP 1 Pert. Uni. The Term

Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Quite a few limits on the relevant Yukawa couplings exist. In particular, from proton decay experiments one can deduce that: In addition one gets that: While such limits are well above LEP sensitivity range (O(10 -5 )), very few limits on individual Yukawa couplings exist and they are typically at the level of Existing Limits on Products

More Channels Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 Look at f.s. containing as many as 10 jets! The number of possible signatures exceeds even the number of Yukawa couplings!

Conclusion Ehud Duchovni Mumbai 2003 An incredible amount of work has been invested in the search for every conceivable final state. Nothing has been seen. In the framework of MSSM the lower mass limit on the LSP is 58.6 GeV (SUGRA) Chargino > 91.9 Gev Selectron > 73 GeV It the Framework of GMSB: for N=4 Had there been pair production of SUSY particles with mass below LEP beam energy – we would have seen it!

LSP Mass Limit In the Constrained MSSM Case