Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Welcome! RGRTA Title VI & Public Participation Plans.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
Abstract The SEPTA Regional Rail system serves as an important network for the Philadelphia region, moving many commuters during the peak hours on suburb-to-city.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program Joanne Haracz, AICP responsive client solutions since 1976 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association April.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Demand for bus and Rail Analyzing a corridor with a similar Level Of Service 5 th Israeli-British/Irish Workshop in Regional Science April, 2007.
Transit Improvements on East-West Routes in Downtown Minneapolis Michael Mechtenberg Planner Metro Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN.
Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) CMT4Austin.org. SOLUTION: Cellular Mass Transit Circulator Routes would converge on each Transit Center.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Rail Capacity Unit 3: Measuring & Maximizing Capacity.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Network and Dynamic Segmentation Chapter 16. Introduction A network consists of connected linear features. Dynamic segmentation is a data model that is.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Chapter 10 1 Chapter 10. Public Mass Transportation 1. Design rail service in a corridor with respect to station spacing and vehicle capabilities 2. Calculate.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
I-35W and 46 th Street Final Service Restructuring Plan.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Communicating with Travelers Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Vehicle & Crew Scheduling Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
1 Challenge the future Feed forward mechanisms in public transport Data driven optimisation dr. ir. N. van Oort Assistant professor public transport EMTA.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Airport and Airline Access Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Course Overview Unit 1: Introduction.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
12/08/ J/ESD.204J1 Real-Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Outline: Problem Description and Motivation Model Formulation Model Application.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan 1.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
AGENDA PROJECT OVERVIEW PAST AND PRESENT YOUR VALUES FOR TRANSIT NETWORK CONCEPTS.
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Presentation transcript:

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning Steps Crew scheduling Vehicle scheduling Timetabling Frequency determination Route design and stop layout Network design Adapted from Mark Hickman

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Agenda Connections Route Design Basics Stop Spacing

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TRANSFERS CONNECTIONS

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Simple City

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Simple City

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Simple City

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Direct Service Option

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Connective Option

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Reasons to connect Geometrically required Politically required Technologically required

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Requirements for easy connections Station design Station amenities Schedule coordination Joint fares Excellent information

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Types of connections Origin / DestinationShort HeadwayLong Headway Short HeadwayCase A Always short, convenient Case C Varies greatly Info required Long HeadwayCase B Always short, convenient Case D Variable depending on headways: 1.Equal and simultaneous 2.Equal but not simultaneous 3.Different

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timed Transfer System Transit arrives simultaneously Three keys 1.Schedules prepared with network design 2.Reliable operations 3.Information and education

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Pulse Headways Ideally repeat every hour Two choices – 15 minutes (7.5, 30, 45, 60) – 20 minutes (10, 40, 60)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Source: Vuchic

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Adjusting T Lengthen terminal times Increase operating speed through preferential treatment Change line length Change number of vehicles (TU)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Multifocal Network Source: Vuchic

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood In-class: Graphic representation of synchronized schedules

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood ROUTE DESIGN BASICS

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Trade-offs in Route Design Stop density – passenger access vs. route speed Route length and circuitousness – direct service vs. service reliability Trip generators – frequency vs. coverage

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Length vs Access Source: Human Transit: How Clearer Thinking about Public Transit Can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives by Jarrett Walker

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency vs Coverage Source: Human Transit: How Clearer Thinking about Public Transit Can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives by Jarrett Walker

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Types of Routes Line haul - high frequency / capacity Loops - coverage for lower-density or circulation Short turn routes – shorter segment Branching routes – split a route Feeder routes – connect to line haul Limited and express routes - improve travel times, balance loads Zonal service - some sections

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood STOP SPACING

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Stop Density Generally higher stop densities at higher land use density (downtown) Lack of stops = deter ridership

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Station Planning Objectives Serve major centers and transfers Minimum passenger travel time Maximum area coverage Maximum passenger attraction Minimum system cost  model for optimum spacing

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Optimum Station Density

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Coverage vs Speed Source: Human Transit: How Clearer Thinking about Public Transit Can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives by Jarrett Walker

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Coverage vs Speed

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Impact of Stop Spacing on Speed

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Express Rapid Local Skip-stop Service

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Source: Impact of Street Network

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Rail Stop Spacing EnvironmentSpacing RangeTypical Spacing Urban Metro600 m – 1200 m900 m Regional Rail1400 m – 1800 m1600 m LRT1000 m – 1500 m1250 m Rail with P&R1600 m – 4000 m2000 m Vuchic, 2005, Table 5.2

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Bus Stop Spacing EnvironmentSpacing Range Typical Spacing CBD300’ – 1000’600’ Urban500’ – 1200’750’ Suburban600’ – 2500’1000’ Rural650’ – 2640’1250’ TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Stop Location Close to supportive land uses Near intersections Remember “Near-side” vs “Far-side”

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Conclusion Connections allow agencies to build a more extensive network Route design involves trade-offs in stop density, route length and circuitousness, and trip generators

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Reference Materials in this lecture were taken from: Jarrett Walker, “Human Transit” (2012) Vukan Vuchic, “Urban Transit Operations, Planning and Economics” (2005) Mark Hickman, Fundamentals of Transportation wikibook, “Network Design & Frequency”, ransportation/Network_Design_and_Frequency ransportation/Network_Design_and_Frequency TCQSM TTI, “TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops” (1996)