2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluations Lessons from UK Dairy evaluations Marco Winters.
Advertisements

2001 PLACE, DATE (1) Cow Fertility and Effect on Longevity PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
Breed composition of the United States dairy cattle herd R. L. Powell,* H. D. Norman, and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Dairy Cattle. Ayrshire Pictures from Originated in Scotland Red and white only recognized color Mature cattle.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
2003 Paul VanRaden, Melvin Tooker,* Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
December 2014 Proof Changes
2002 Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Selection of dairy.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Breed Composition Codes for Crossbred Dairy Cattle in the United States John B. Cole,* Melvin E. Tooker, Paul M. VanRaden, and Joel H. Megonigal, Jr. Animal.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
Paul VanRaden USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Choice of Scales for Delivery of Genetic Evaluations.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Genetic Base and Trait Definition Update.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansInner.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
2006 Paul VanRaden, John Cole, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
2007 Paul VanRaden and Jan Wright Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD 2013 Measuring genomic pre-selection in theory.
2001 NAAB DSEC, April 2002 (1) Revision and Use of Termination Codes PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
P. M. VanRaden and T. A. Cooper * Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
2002 Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Longevity and Fertility.
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 NAAB Update : Base Change, Udder Health, Longevity,
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
2002 Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Extreme Inbreeding.
2005 Paul VanRaden and Mel Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Predicting Genetic.
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Contributions.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
2001 NAAB / S-284 Meeting, Baltimore, 2001 (1) Implications of Crossbreeding on Dairy Cattle Improvement Paul VanRaden and Ashley Sanders Animal Improvement.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
Dairy Cattle Breeds. Ayrshire Scotland; known for vigor and health; average milk production Only 18,000 in the U.S.
Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Presentation transcript:

2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Economic Merit of Crossbred and Purebred US Dairy Cattle

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (2)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Objectives  Document the number and type of crossbred cows in the US.  Estimate heterosis and breed differences using cows of different breed composition competing in the same herd.  Compare the economic merit of crossbred and purebred cows.

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (3)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Traits Considered  Milk, fat, and protein yields  Somatic cell score (SCS)  Productive life (PL)  Linear type composites not available Body size estimates obtained from literature Udder and leg trait estimates assumed zero  Net merit, cheese merit, fluid merit calculated Adjusted to Holstein scale  Fertility, mortality, and calving ease not available

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (4)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Breeds Are Evaluated Separately  Separate data sets reduce bias in evaluations within breeds, but provide: No evaluations for crossbreds No method to compare cows across breeds  New Zealand, Australia, and the Netherlands include crossbreds and account for heterosis in evaluations.  USDA-DHIA evaluations exclude crossbred cows unless identified as part of a “grading- up” program.

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (5)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Yield Traits & SCS Data  Data were from the national test-day database available May, herds each with at least 5 crossbred cows 10,442 crossbred cows born since ,421 purebred herdmates (80% were Holstein)  Crossbreds defined by sire breed and maternal grandparent breeds. Sires were purebred, dam breed used for unknown maternal grandparent breed XX (crossbred) not accepted for maternal grandparents Holstein and Red & White considered one breed

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (6)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Number of F 1 & Purebred Cows Number of F 1 & Purebred Cows In Mixed Breed Contemporary Groups Sire Breed Dam Breed Ayrshire Brown SwissGuernseyJersey Milking Shorthorn Holstein Ayrshire 933— Brown Swiss — Guernsey Jersey M. Shorthorn —111— Holstein ,836

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (7)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Number of F 1 & Backcross Cows Number of F 1 & Backcross Cows With Holstein Sire or Grandparent Holstein Genes Second Breed 25% 25% 50% 50% 75% 75% Ayrshire Brown Swiss Guernsey Jersey M. Shorthorn

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (8)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Results  Estimated breed means  Estimates of heterosis  Economic comparisons  Rank other breeds on Holstein base  Some new crossbreeding theory

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (9)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Crossbreeding Theory Holstein  Brown Swiss Protein Yield Protein kg/d % Holstein genes 0.86 — Holstein mean — A+Dominance (D) max heterosis (H) max heterosis (H) — A+D min H — A+D+A  A max H — A+D+A  A min H — Additive (A) only

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (10)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Breed Differences & Heterosis for Economic Merit BreedNet Merit ($) Cheese Merit ($) Merit ($)Fluid Ayrshire Brown Swiss Guernsey Jersey M. Shorthorn Holstein——— Heterosis$197$207$163

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (11)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Merit of F 1 Holstein Crossbreds Second Breed Net Merit ($) Cheese Fluid Ayrshire Brown Swiss Guernsey Jersey M. Shorthorn Compared to 2000 genetic base for Holstein

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (12)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Mates for Holstein Cows Brown SwissJersey Top US SireRansomFan Club NM$ (breed scale) $519 $467 Breed Difference (from HOL) - $178- $153 Heterosis (NM$) + $197 Adjusted NM$ (HOL scale) $538 $511 NM$ Rank (HOL scale) CM$ Rank (HOL scale) 13 12

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (13)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Conclusions

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (14)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Conclusions  Currently < 0.5% of DHI cows are crossbred.  Heterosis was about 4% for yield traits, < 1% (unfavorable) for SCS, and 1% for PL.  Profit from Jersey  Holstein and Brown Swiss  Holstein crosses is higher than from Holsteins.  Fewer extreme bulls are found in minor breeds.  Backcross yields were higher than expected.

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (15)P.M. VanRaden 2002 From , M.H. Fohrman studied 113 Guernsey, Jersey, Holstein, and Red Danes crosses at Beltsville. Another study of 137 Ayrshire, Brown Swiss and Holstein crosses was conducted from (McDowell and McDaniel, 1968). USDA Yearbook of Agriculture 1947 Holstein  Guernsey

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (16)P.M. VanRaden 2002 USDA Yearbook of Agriculture 1947 Holstein  Jersey Cow #Pounds of Milk% Butterfat Pounds of Butterfat X-513, X-1112, X-2012, X-3011, X-3811, X-4013, X-5113, All cows sired by Beltsville Holstein No. 966

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (17)P.M. VanRaden 2002 USDA Yearbook of Agriculture 1947 Jersey  Holstein Cow #Pounds of Milk% Butterfat Pounds of Butterfat X-1 9, X-313, X-1713, X-3213, X-4112, X-42 9, X-4712, X-1 and X-47 were sired by an unidentified Jersey sire. All others sired by Beltsville Jersey No. 1114

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission - Crossbreeding (18)P.M. VanRaden 2002 Butterfat yield of three breed crosses was greater than from their F 1 crossbred dams. Three breed crosses averaged 14,927 pounds of milk and 641 pounds of butterfat as 2-year-olds in USDA Yearbook of Agriculture 1947 Three-Breed Crosses