Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High School Reading Project Implementation Plan Final Proposal: Key Points The primary goal of the proposed plan is to increase the number of students.
Advertisements

Thinking Ahead about High School Graduation (Elementary Perspective) Created by the Elementary Education Dept.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
The INDIVIDUAL Professional Development PLAN
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
S MARTER B ALANCED A SSESSMENT U PDATES Derek Brown, Director of Assessment Oregon Department of Education.
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
LOGO August The Basics What is the Analysis of Student Work (ASW)? ASW is the process North Carolina has decided to implement in order to obtain.
Next slide End Show Thank You A diverse group of stakeholders: the school’s principal and parents, teachers, support staff, students*, and community.
Florida Association of Science Supervisors Florida Department of Education Update May 5, 2005 Susan McNally Director Office of Curriculum Support.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
PARENT UNIVERSITY SOMERSET NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL FEBRUARY 23, 2015 A Guide to the: Florida Standards Assessment and Promotion Criteria.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
ADEPT Framework
Getting the Data Right! Presenter: Andrew (Andy) C. Binns, Ed.D. (561)
FASPA Conference October, 2010 Implementing a Salary Differential Program.
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Course Scheduling Overview BWSD. STEP ONE.
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
Oregon State Program Review Process February 10-12, 2010 Commission Meeting.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Project Based Assessments School Administrator Overview August >
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: An Introduction for New State Coordinators February /2013.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.
Setting the Context 10/26/2015 page 1. Getting Students READY The central focus of READY is improving student learning... by enabling and ensuring great.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Florida’s Sunshine State Standards Matthew C. Robinson, Summer B 2006.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Project Based Assessments 1 An Alternative Pathway to Proficiency 2013 Field Test.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
February 15, 2006 Highly Qualified Requirements for Exceptional Student Education Teachers What’s New?
Grade Posting Procedures and Timeline SY Quarter One Updated October 13, 2015.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
DOE Language Arts Update Bureau of Instruction and Innovation - Overview Standards Implementation Advisory Group Professional Development Timeline Online.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Analyzing Student Work to Change Teacher Practice.
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
Florida Department of Education’s Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System Student Learning Growth.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
West DeFuniak Elementary School September 22 & 24, 2015.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
Destination: Graduation Class of  Walk-in Appointments (Students) ◦ Students can see their counselor without an appointment before school, during.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
New Teacher Induction.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Release of PARCC Student Results
Overview for School Leaders
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Welcome to High School Class of 2016!!.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Report Card Updates How confident are we that the grades assigned to our students are consistent, accurate, meaningful, and supportive of learning?
Presentation transcript:

Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007

MAP Program Contents MAP Overview Learning Gains Orientation Orientation to the Final Performance Assessment Evaluation Timeline

Merit Award Program Overview

Performance Pay FY08 and FY09 What is MAP? Merit Award Program MAP replaces STAR All Instructional and School-based Administrative Personnel are eligible Provides for an assessment and merit award based on the performance of students

MAP continues No application necessary Remain employed by September 1 the following year 5% award based on average teacher’s salary Cannot be based on experience or length of service or base salary Must be able to administer end of course exams based on SSS.

MAP continues Based on performance of students assigned to teacher’s classroom (or sphere of influence). Based on learning gains, academic proficiency or both as measured by state-wide tests or district- determined instruments based on the Sunshine State Standards. 75% of MAP evaluation is based on learning gains. 25% of MAP evaluation is based on supervisor’s evaluation.

Learning Gains Orientation

Instructional Silos The goal of developing Instructional Silos is to place teachers in sub- groups of similar teaching assignments as equitably and as fairly as possible. For example, World History teachers will be grouped with other World History teachers and not with Language Arts teachers.

Instructional Silos Due to the new district assessment process, teacher silos will be updated this year to reflect current teaching assignments and district assessment categories. “School-Wide Silos” will continue to be used for instructional personnel without students directly scheduled (Guidance Counselor, Media Spec, etc.) Semester 2 student schedules will be utilized when developing district instructional silos Silo development will include consideration of the teacher assignment within the district

Instructional Silos – cont. Instructional personnel will be divided into grade levels: Elementary, Middle, High School Once divided into grade levels, teachers will be sub-divided into instructional groups (silos) based on their primary teaching assignment Prior to the end of the 3rd quarter, Principals and teachers may meet to confirm and/or reconcile silo assignments We appreciate everyone’s effort in making this process work as well as possible.

Learning Gains Plan Policies: Learning gains will make up 75% of final score. FCAT scores will be used where applicable (grades/ subjects tested by FCAT) SAT-10 scores will be used where applicable (grades K-2) Courses/areas not related to FCAT/SAT-10 subjects or grade levels, will utilize District Pre/Post Tests

Learning Gains Plan Policies (continued): Gains for teachers without students assigned will be based on school-wide FCAT scores. Students assigned to teachers at Survey 3 time (February) will be included. Only students enrolled in the same school in October and February will be included. Only students with both pre and post-test scores will be included.

Learning Gains Gains Calculation: Step 1: Achievement level of students on pre and post-test is determined. Step 2: Total points for each teacher are determined by placing student scores in a value table.

Learning Gains Sample Value Table Middle FCAT Reading Prior Year Level Current Year Level Low 1High Low High

Learning Gains Gains Calculation: Step 3: Teachers are ranked by value table points within their silo. Step 4: Ranking within silo is converted to 75 points.

SDLC Final Performance Assessment for MAP

Performance Evaluation based on Ability to maintain appropriate discipline – Learning Environment Knowledge of Subject Matter Assessment Ability to establish and maintain a positive collaborative relationship – Role of Teacher Florida Educator Accomplished Practices

Final Performance Assessment Overview Revised Teacher Assessment Instrument Each Performance Indicator has 5 levels Guidelines have been developed which will help administrators and teachers distinguish among the 5 different performance levels 5 proficiency levels Outstanding High Performing Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory

Web-based Resources supporting MAP Final Performance Assessment Guideline for the Final Performance Assessment MAP Plan MAP FAQs MAP presentation and video tutorials State Performance Pay Web-site

Thank you for your attention For more information please contact: ______________________________