Brenda Chriss, Kim DeLaughder Chris diMuro, Julie Fritz-Rubert August 7, 2014 INTRODUCTION TO STEP-PLUS College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 Discussion of Academic Personnel Topics with CP/EVC Alison Galloway and CAP Chair Christina Ravelo October 2, 2012 Stevenson Event Center.
Advertisements

Renee L. Wallace Associate Vice President Academic Personnel Services August 9, 2013.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
THE ACADEMIC PERSONNEL PROCESS FOR SENATE FACULTY Maureen Stanton Vice-Provost – Academic Affairs September 21, 2012.
BRAVO AWARD PROGRAM October Introduction Purdue University’s Bravo Award Program serves to highlight the excellence that exists in all areas and.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT DAY Brown Bag on Merit Advancement Christine Miaskowski, Shari L. Dworkin & Sally Marshall.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Fixed-Term Faculty Committee Chair Jean DeSaix. Committee Charge (from Resolution ) monitors implementation of policies and recommendations concerning.
Update 11/9. Academic Senate University Appointments and Promotions Committee Policies and Procedures (approved ASLC 10/20/10)
Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.
Streamlined Review Process Using the new Online UCI-AP-25 Form FOR Dean Delegated Merit Actions and Normal Review Actions Seen by CAP.
Academic Promotion Committee Members Briefing Session A/Prof. Tony Masters,| Deputy Chair, Academic Board, University of Sydney.
Policy D 5.0 Grades Phase I: Policy changes apply only to academic year Phase II: Full review of D5 to be completed for semesters.
FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT: Key Issues and Challenges Penn State “Academic Leadership Forum” February 12, 2015 Presented by: Theodore H.
Faculty Affairs presents:.  Conditions of Appointment  Lecturer Evaluation Process  Reappointment  Entitlements  Order of Assignment  Salary  New.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
FACULTY COMPENSATION AND LEAVES Janet Dukerich, Senior Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs Carmen Shockley, Director, Academic Personnel Services August 18,
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
The new, improved Step Plus System!. Step Plus requires immediate department discussion and action Step Plus was implemented effective July 1, 2014 for.
Materials presented are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute official University rules, policies or practices, or interpretations.
Academic Advancement for Clinician-Educators: Secrets from the Dean’s Office 2/26/13 Renee Binder, M.D. Elena Fuentes-Afflick, M.D., M.P.H. SOM Academic.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Regents Professor Policy 4/4/2011. FAC - MSU Regents Professor Policy 4/4/2011 Regents Professor Policy The designation of Regents Professor is the most.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
FACULTY RELATIONS Overview of the Changes to the UBC Faculty Agreement 1 Faculty Relations.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Some New Things & Some Old Things Hires & Personnel 2 in SSHA Econ/Management Collaborating Across Schools Foundational Hires SAFI Hires Cases for Review.
Matthew L. S. Gboku DDG/Research Coordinator Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute Presentation at the SLARI Annual Retreat 26 – 28 October, 2015.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
Dossier Evaluation. Powerpoint by James MacLachlan Vice-Chair, Committee on Academic Personnel – Oversight 2011 Revised by John Hall, 2012 DOSSIER EVALUATION.
Collective Bargaining Contracts with Performance Metrics A “Success Pool” and ”Faculty Excellence Awards” Kent State University NCSCBHEP 39 th Annual National.
Changes to the CALL Spring Quarter 2004 Department Chair Forum May 25, 2004.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Understanding and Implementing the New RTP Policies In Fall 2016
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Planning and Managing your Academic Career: Deciding Where to Go and How to Get There Iain Young MD, CM, FRCPC Professor, Department of Pathology & Molecular.
Professor Salary Incentive Program
2018 UCPEA One-time Performance Awards
UC policy states:  "Superior intellectual attainment, as evidenced both in teaching and in research or other creative achievement, is an indispensable.
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Provost’s Merit Pay Initiative
Elena Fuentes-Afflick, M.D., M.P.H.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop
Lecture Track Faculty Reappointment & Promotion ECAS
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Life of a Dossier Redelegated Merit Non-Redelegated Merit
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
Implementation of Lecturer SOE series policy changes
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
UPI Membership Negotiations: Tentative Agreement (TA)
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
ACADEMIC PERSONNEL REVIEW PROCESS
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Promotion and Tenure.
Presentation transcript:

Brenda Chriss, Kim DeLaughder Chris diMuro, Julie Fritz-Rubert August 7, 2014 INTRODUCTION TO STEP-PLUS College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Overview – Step Plus How did we get here? Three committees – looking at streamlining Academic Taskforce on Simplifying the Academic Merit and Promotion Process (STAPP) Academic Personnel Streamlining Implementation Workgroup (APSIW) Joint Senate-Administrative Workgroup on Step Plus Policies and Procedures (SAWSPPP) Senate voted and approved the Step Plus System in June 2014 Implementation

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Overview – Goal of Step Plus Reduce the number of actions. Reduce workload. Level the playing field -- encourage more reserved faculty to seek accelerations (1.5 Steps or greater).

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences So… What does it all mean? Applies to Senate Faculty in CA&ES. Faculty reviewed on normative time ONLY for merits. 2 years for all Asst Prof’s and Assoc Prof’s thru Step 3 3 years for Assoc Prof’s Step 4 thru Prof 8 4 years for Prof’s 9 and Above Scale Appointments will be made only on whole steps.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences So… What does it all mean? The Exceptions Promotions -- faculty may accelerate in time. Reminder: Advancement from Prof step 5-6 or step 9- Above Scale is a MERIT, therefore must be on normative time. May seek an action immediately following a: Deferral Denial Five-Year Review – unless the review resulted in advancement.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences So…. What is Step Plus? Faculty can be reviewed for more than a 1 step merit (i.e. 1.0 step, 1.5 steps, 2.0 steps, etc.). A new Step Plus salary scale has been created that has steps and half steps. Faculty members who receive more than a 1 step merit will also receive a temporary salary supplement that will remain in effect for the normative time for the step they were awarded. This temporary supplement is to compensate faculty so there is no salary loss due to the elimination of accelerations in time.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Phased Implementation of Step Plus Three year phased implementation from to A faculty member may pursue an “acceleration in time” for their first action only during the three year phased implementation. A faculty member may request an “acceleration in time” in whole step increments only. If a faculty member pursues a 2-year “acceleration in time” in that results in a denial, they are not eligible to pursue a merit again until in normative time.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus – Guidelines for Advancement 1.0 Step Advancement Requires a balanced record, appropriate for rank and step, with evidence of good accomplishments in all areas of review. All Academic Senate faculty can expect to advance at normal rates, unless a major flaw in their performance is evident. Service duties are expected to increase as faculty advance in rank and step.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus – Guidelines for Advancement 1.5 Step Advancement Requires a strong record in all three areas of review, with outstanding achievement in at least one area of review across research or creative work, teaching, and service. Outstanding achievement in one area may not qualify a candidate for a 1.5 step advancement if performance in another area does not meet UC Davis standards. The dossier should articulate the grounds for an acceleration beyond simple numerical tabulations, focusing on impact and significance of work, awards, etc.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus – Guidelines for Advancement 2.0 Step Advancement Requires a strong record in all three areas of review, with outstanding performance in at least two areas. In most cases, one of those areas will be scholarly and creative activity, however, in rare cases exceptional performance in two other areas may warrant this unusual advancement. 2-step advancement should be considered for individuals who would have accelerated every year under the previous system. Reviewed by CAP and the Vice Provost has final decision authority.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus – Guidelines for Advancement Beyond 2-Step Advancements Requires an exceptionally strong and balanced record, highlighted by extraordinary levels of achievement in two areas (including research and creative activity), and excellent contributions in the third area. These advancements will be extremely rare. Reviewed by CAP and the Vice Provost has final decision authority.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus – Guidelines for Advancement Larger than Normal Above-Scale Advancements Requires an exceptionally strong record of excellence in all three areas of review, with exceptional achievement in research and creative work, and outstanding performance in at least one additional area of review. The criteria for merit increases are steep at this high rank. Reviewed by CAP and the Vice Provost has final decision authority.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis Step Plus Salary Scales The UCD Step Plus Salary Tables are the UC System- wide salary scales, with the addition of half-steps between Assistant Professor, Step 2, and Professor, Above Scale. Includes the Step Plus Increment and the Step Plus Temporary Supplement.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis Step Plus Salary Scales Step Plus Increment The Step Plus Increment is a salary component equal to half the difference between full steps which results when an appointee merits or promotes to a half step. The Step Plus Increment is already included in the Adjusted Scale salary on the Step Plus salary table.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UCD Step Plus Salary Scales Step Plus Increment

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis Step Plus Salary Scales The Step Plus Temporary Supplement Compensates for salary lost due to eliminating accelerations in time. Awarded only for advancements of 1.5 steps or greater. For the period of normative time for the step. Above Scale faculty Eligible if their above scale merit is approved as a greater than 5% [default] salary increase.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis Step Plus Salary Scales The Step Plus Temporary Supplement Equal to 25% of the difference between the newly achieved full step and the next lower full step. Is not included in the Adjusted Scale salary on the Step Plus salary table.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus Salary Scales – Temporary Supplement

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis – Step Plus Voting Guidelines General Voting Principles: Candidates should be evaluated for a more than one-step advancement when performance exceeds normal expectations. Step Plus does not supersede departmental voting procedures, nor mandate particular voting methods. Whatever method the department adopts must assure that all candidates are treated consistently. The candidate must select the proposed action set forth in the department recommendation.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis – Step Plus Voting Guidelines Voting Models Options Model 1 Faculty members vote on each of the three options: 1, 1.5 and 2.0 steps. The candidate chooses which votes should be included and discussed in the department letter, and the advancement level to be proposed. This option would require comments to be separated for each vote.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis – Step Plus Voting Guidelines Voting Models Options Model 2 Faculty members vote once to select whichever advancement option (1.0, 1.5, or 2.0) seems most appropriate, given the candidate’s record. The distribution of votes and the faculty comments go forward in the department letter, along with a recommendation for the level of advancement selected by the candidate.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis – Step Plus Voting Guidelines Voting Models Options Model 3 The candidate decides which advancement options should be voted on by his/her peers. Based on those votes, the candidate chooses which votes to include and discuss in the department letter, and the advancement level to be proposed.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences UC Davis – Step Plus Voting Guidelines Voting Models Options Model 4 The department always votes on the regular merit (1.0 step) and presents that vote in the department letter. The candidate decides whether any other advancement options should be voted on by his/her peers. Based on those votes, the candidate chooses which votes (other than the 1.0-step regular merit) should be included and discussed in the department letter, and the advancement level to be proposed.

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Step Plus Scenarios

College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences