Www.evl.uic.edu How to Write Grants Version 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outreach Social & participatory practices that support knowing & understanding (National Research Council) Serves both the beneficiaries & purveyors –
Advertisements

Criterion 1: intellectual merit How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
NSF Merit Review Process NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
Broader Impact Project Evaluation Chris Parsons Word Craft.
Federal Research Funding Agencies The Holy Grail of Academics.
NSF Proposal and Merit Review Process. Outline Proposal review process –Submission –Administrative Review –Merit Review –Decisions.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Cedric L. Williams, Ph. D. Professor Dept. of Psychology and Graduate Program in Neuroscience University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA Council on Undergraduate.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
Preparation/Content of an NSF proposal NSF proposals are uploaded to the Fastlane website prior to submission (NIH uses Grants.gov): 1.Cover sheet (basic.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
NSF on the web- An indispensable resource
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
EAS 299 Writing research papers
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
A guide for Principal Investigators at Tulane University.
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
Proposals & Getting Funded Richelle M. Allen-King University at Buffalo (SUNY) June ‘10 version updated June ‘12 incorporating thoughts from Michael Wysession.
Tracey Nally Office of Sponsored Research Programs (OSR) Karen Nordell Pearson Assoc. Dean for Research and Scholarship David Cunningham Center for Writing.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Grant Research Basics. Asking the Question  Before you start, you must have both clearly stated research question and primary outcome measure.  What.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Program Director, Directorate of Education and Human Resources NSF CAREER Program.
10/5/2015 Applying for an NSF grant: Tips for success Melanie Roberts, Ph.D. University of Colorado, Boulder TIGER presentation, April 9, 2009 Visiting.
Biomedical Science and Engineering Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science Foundation.
OCN 750 Class #3: January 23 Housekeeping/Announcements “Broader Impacts” Review Criteria C-MORE Outreach Box activities Outreach presentations Upcoming.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
Making USDA grant submission more successful: A panelist’s perspective Brian S. Baldwin Dept. of Plant & Soil Sciences
Session B – Broader Impacts: What’s the big idea? J. Britt HolbrookSharon Franks Center for the Study of InterdisciplinarityResearch Proposal Development.
NSF: Proposal and Merit Review Process Muriel Poston, Ph.D. National Science Foundation 2005.
Tips and Strategies for NSF GRF Applicants Matt Williams NSF Graduate Research Fellow October 12, 2009.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation JUAN CARLOS MORALES Division of Environmental Biology
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
Parts of an NSF full grant proposal
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
NSF’s Broader Impacts Criteria Bev Watford, Sue Kemnitzer, Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Session T4B, Thursday.
Tackling the Broader Impacts Challenge: Advice and Resources Nathan Meier Director of Research Strategy Office of Research and Economic Development October.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program September 2007 Major Research Instrumentation QEM Workshop 2007 September 28,
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
1 Grant Applications Rachel Croson, PhD Dean, College of Business UT Arlington (formerly DD SES/SBE NSF)
Improving Research Proposals: Writing Proposals and the Proposal Review Process Heather Macdonald (based on material from Richelle Allen-King, Cathy Manduca,
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Nancy Lutz, Program Director Economics NSF Day Conference SUNY Albany, October 2011.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
Marie desJardins CMSC 691B March 16, 2004
FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

How to Write Grants Version 2009

Read the solicitation carefully and paste the most important points into a mindmap. Pay attention to estimated budget size, duration (how many years), and what the $ can be used for. Some grants have restrictions- like hardware only, or students only, or staff only. Use budget to constrain how much you can do. Don’t forget overhead (indirect) costs. Pay attention to grant format guidelines. You can’t just invent your own. You grant will get rejected immediately. Your proposal is generally first submitted to the university for approval before uploading to the grant agency’s web site for submission. This takes time so a grant needs to be done preferably a week before the due date.

Body of the Proposal 1-page project summary Introduction (introduce the problem and the approach) State of the Art (describe how your work is different) Proposed Work (describe what are the research questions and how you will address them) Prior Funded Work that is relevant to current grant Project timeline (show a management plan) Intellectual Merit Broader Impact References Budget Biography Current & Pending Grants Letters of Support

The Review Process Reviewers often have a dozen proposals to review. So when you write a proposal, organize it so that you HELP the reviewer get through it as quickly and effortlessly as possible. Most reviewers skim proposals. There is simply too much detail to read and too little time. Jamming more detail into it just frustrates them. Reviewers are not always experts in the area so you need to be able to appeal to multiple audiences. Reviewers generally meet in a one or two day meeting to discuss the proposals and to rank them. For NSF they categorize proposals as: Highly Competitive, Competitive and Non Competitive. Reviewers give you reviews that are: Excellent, V. Good, Good, Fair and Poor. To get funded you need Excellents and V. Good.

Review criteria for NSF Intellectual Merit How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources? Broader Impact How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?

When You Get The Grant NSF usually cuts your budget and asks you to come up with a new scope of work. Each year NSF expects a report 3 months before the next year of the project. Only after you have filed the report and it has been approved will you get the next year of funds. Exceptions are with hardware grants which typically give you money all at once. You may be expected to give presentations at NSF workshops. If your grant is very big you will likely get a site visit. In addition to working diligently on the research you need to aggressively publicize it (demos at conferences, papers, press releases). This enables NSF to show Congress that they are getting their money’s worth.

Success is often determined by 1.Technical merit & Broad Impact (as above) 2.Politics – What are major US priorities? Water, Energy, Jobs, etc. – What are major NSF priorities? – What are hot topics today? – Sometimes you need to run workshops and produce workshop reports to demonstrate to NSF that there is an important problem that needs to be addressed before you can write a proposal for it.