Wisconsin Retirement System 2000-2002 Experience Study Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company December 11, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New England Pension Consultants Oklahoma State Pension Commission Retirement System Summary of Actuarial Reports December, 2001.
Advertisements

South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
UW Staff Benefits University of Wisconsin- Extension Payroll and Benefits Office.
Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 An electronic presentation by Norman Sunderman Angelo State University An electronic presentation by.
Basic Guidelines for Selection of ORP vs. TRS Elena Gaidouk Michael Sergi Clint T. Skipper.
Georgia Government Finance Officers Association October 1, 2013 How to Read an Actuarial Valuation Report: “It’s Not Just a Sleep Aid”
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 17 Pensions.
Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Slide 17-1 Chapter Seventeen Pensions Pensions.
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 18 Employee Benefit Plans.
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Retirement Income.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits for Financial Planners
Copyright © 2012 GRS – All rights reserved. TMRS Rate Stabilization Part of the Toolkit October 8, 2012 Mark Randall.
PENSION REFORM IN ARMENIA Challenges and Opportunities Astghik Ananyan Yerevan
Covered Employer Training Program Module One Introduction to the Retirement Systems.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Retirement Plan Annual Valuation Board of Curators January 31, 2013.
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
City Rates and Actuarial Issues 2007 Annual Training Seminar 2007, Texas Municipal Retirement System.
Chapter 21: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
Hymans Robertson LLP and Hymans Robertson Financial Services LLP are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Leicestershire County.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
NCCCMA Winter Seminar Michael Williamson Director, North Carolina Retirement Systems.
Covered Employer Training Program Module One Introduction to the Retirement Systems.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Commonwealth of Massachusetts OPEB Commission Meeting April 5, 2012.
© 2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. 3/1/2008 LCN Role of Immediate Annuities in Retirement.
2002 Gain (Loss) Analysis Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Wisconsin Retirement System.
Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association ACTUARIAL AUDIT ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF JUNE 30, 2010 EXPERIENCE STUDY FOR JULY 1, JUNE 30, 2009.
1 Public Pension Risk Dynamics Bob McCrory EFI Actuaries.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Review of Economic Assumptions November 8, 2006 P.
Covered Employer Training Program Introduction to the Retirement Systems FY 2016.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
California State Employees Retiree Healthcare Benefits GASB 45 Projections December 13, 2007.
BUDGET DAY PENSION BRIEFING Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Charles B. Zogby, Secretary of the Budgetwww.budget.state.pa.us Pennsylvania Pension System Reform.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
January 13, 2015 Town of San Anselmo June 30, 2014 OPEB Valuation Review.
Tacoma Employees’ Retirement System August 9, 2012 Board Meeting Presented by: Mark Olleman and Daniel Wade Actuarial Terminology and Funding Principles.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
1 Contributory Pension Scheme Members’ Meeting 26 February 2016.
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
Covered employer training program Introduction to the Retirement Systems FY 2017.
GASB’s OPEB Changes - Will they impact public sector health care benefits? November 7, 2014 Eric Gary, FSA, FCA, MAAA Chief Health Actuary.
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
TLFFRA Educational Conference
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Other Post Employment Benefits
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
Inside a plan experience study
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin Retirement System Experience Study Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company December 11, 2003

2 Introduction Each year the actuarial liabilities of WRS are valued. Each year the actuarial liabilities of WRS are valued. In the valuation, assumptions are made regarding the future experience of the system with regard to various risk areas… In the valuation, assumptions are made regarding the future experience of the system with regard to various risk areas…

3 Risk Areas Active members Active members Rates of withdrawal Rates of disability Patterns of salary increases Rates of retirement Rates of mortality

4 Risk Areas (Continued) Retirees Retirees -Rates of mortality - normal -Rates of mortality - disabled lives Economic Economic -Rates of investment return -Inflation Statutes provide for an in-depth study of assumptions every 3 years.

5 Assumptions should be carefully chosen and continually monitored. Continued use of outdated assumptions can lead to... Introduction

6 Understated costs resulting in either an inability to pay benefits when due, or sharp increases in required contributions at some point in the future. Understated costs resulting in either an inability to pay benefits when due, or sharp increases in required contributions at some point in the future. Introduction

7 Overstated costs resulting in either benefit levels that are kept below the level that could be supported by the computed rate, or Overstated costs resulting in either benefit levels that are kept below the level that could be supported by the computed rate, or An unnecessarily large burden on the current generation of members, employers and taxpayers. An unnecessarily large burden on the current generation of members, employers and taxpayers. Introduction

8 A single set of assumptions will not be suitable indefinitely. A single set of assumptions will not be suitable indefinitely. Things change, and our understanding of things (whether or not they are changing) also changes. Things change, and our understanding of things (whether or not they are changing) also changes. Introduction

9 In recognition of this, assumptions are periodically studied in depth. In recognition of this, assumptions are periodically studied in depth. Assumptions are then adjusted to reflect experience trends -- but not random year to year fluctuations. Assumptions are then adjusted to reflect experience trends -- but not random year to year fluctuations. Introduction

10 Basics of an Experience Study Decrements relate to things that happen to people. Decrements relate to things that happen to people. Start by counting people (easy, right?). Start by counting people (easy, right?). Divide number who actually decremented by number eligible to decrement to get the crude rate. Divide number who actually decremented by number eligible to decrement to get the crude rate.

11 Basics of an Experience Study Examine crude rates for consistency with known human behavior patterns, prior observation, etc. Examine crude rates for consistency with known human behavior patterns, prior observation, etc. Assign a credibility factor to the crude rates based upon the group size and upon whatever external factors may have biased the observations. Assign a credibility factor to the crude rates based upon the group size and upon whatever external factors may have biased the observations.

12 Basics of an Experience Study Develop trial rates, which are a weighted average of crude rates, and prior assumptions, where the weight is the credibility factor. Develop trial rates, which are a weighted average of crude rates, and prior assumptions, where the weight is the credibility factor. Smooth the trial rates and test for reasonableness and consistency with WRS data and other known data sources. Smooth the trial rates and test for reasonableness and consistency with WRS data and other known data sources.

13 Credibility Factors Credibility factors in this study ranged from under 10% to over 90% Credibility factors in this study ranged from under 10% to over 90% Most factors were between 50% and 90% Most factors were between 50% and 90%

– 2002 Experience Study Larger sample size % - 90% credibility factor was often applied to the 2000 – 2002 findings Smaller sample size % - 60% credibility factor was typically applied to the 2000 – 2002 findings More on Credibility

15 Understanding Impact of Changes

16 Summary of Decrement Experience Withdrawal - - General - - Less than 5 – Decreased for Males, Increased for Females - - More than 5 – Approximately same - - Schools - - Less than 5 – Increased for Public Schools, Decreased for University - - More than 5 – Approximately same for Public Schools, Decreased for University - - Protective - - Less than 5 – Decreased - - More than 5 –Approximately same - - Executive & Elected - - Less than 5 – Increased - - More than 5 – Decreased

17 Disability - - Varies by group Retirement Normal Early - - General Decreased Decreased - - Schools Increased Increased - - ProtectiveDecreased N/A - - Executive & Elect.Decreased Decreased Mortality - - Males – Decreased - - Females – Approximately the same Summary of Decrement Experience

18 Male General Participants Comparison of Aggregate Withdrawal Rates

19 Female General Participants Comparison of Aggregate Withdrawal Rates

20 Male General Withdrawal Experience Up to 5 Years of Service at Assumed Termination

21 Male General Withdrawal Experience More than 5 Years of Service at Assumed Termination

22 Male General Participants Rates of Withdrawal with Less than 5 Years of Service

23 Male General Participants Rates of Withdrawal with 5 or More Years of Service

24 Female General Participants Rates of Withdrawal with Less than 5 Years of Service

25 Female General Participants Rates of Withdrawal with 5 or More Years of Service

26 Male General Participants Rates of Normal Retirement

27 Male General Participants Rates of Early Retirement

28 Female General Participants Rates of Normal Retirement

29 Female General Participants Rates of Early Retirement

30 General Members - Merit and Longevity Pay Increase Assumptions Gross Salary Increases - Correlation by Age

31 Gross Salary Increases - Correlation by Service General Members - Merit and Longevity Pay Increase Assumptions

32 General Members - Merit and Longevity Pay Increase Assumptions

33 Summary of Withdrawal Experience

34 # Actual figures based on Adjusted Experience. Summary of Disability Experience

35 Summary of Early Retirement Experience

36 * Includes Early Retirements. ** Figures shown are for people below age 70. Summary of Normal Retirement Experience

37 Summary of Mortality Experience

38 Male Retired Life Mortality Study Normal Retirement, Original Annuitants Only

39 Female Retired Life Mortality Study Normal Retirement, Original Annuitants Only

Economic Assumptions

41 Historical Patterns of Investment Return, Pay Increases and Inflation * Includes Early Retirements. ** Figures shown are for people below age 70. # Actual figures based on Adjusted Experience.

42 Historical Patterns of Investment Return, Pay Increases and Inflation * Includes Early Retirements. ** Figures shown are for people below age 70. # Actual figures based on Adjusted Experience.

43 Historical Patterns of Investment Return, Pay Increases and Inflation

44 Wage Inflation The present assumptions is 4.5%. The present assumptions is 4.5%. WRS has averaged 4.1% a year. WRS has averaged 4.1% a year. Longer term national averages are higher due to excess inflation during the 1970s. Longer term national averages are higher due to excess inflation during the 1970s. Recommendation: 4.1% Recommendation: 4.1%

45 Real Investment Return The present assumption is 3.5%. The present assumption is 3.5%. Markets have produced net real returns for balanced funds in the 4.3% area since Markets have produced net real returns for balanced funds in the 4.3% area since A larger real return assumption would also be in line with contemporary practice among large public systems. A larger real return assumption would also be in line with contemporary practice among large public systems. Recommendation: 3.7% Recommendation: 3.7%

46 Economic Assumptions Nominal Investment Return is the sum of the inflation base plus the net real return. Nominal Investment Return is the sum of the inflation base plus the net real return. Current assumption is 8.0%. Current assumption is 8.0%. Recommendation: 7.8% Recommendation: 7.8%

47 Hypothetical Valuation Results December 31, 2002

48 Hypothetical Valuation Results December 31, 2002

49 Implementation Schedule Active and Inactive Lives Valuation: 12/31/2003 Retired Lives Valuation: 12/31/2003 Option Factors: 10/01/2004