1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap National Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting Language and Literacy in the Early Years David K. Dickinson Lynch School of Education Boston College New York State.
Advertisements

1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
1 The California Preschool Curriculum Framework, Volume 1.
DELAWARE EARLY LITERACY INITIATIVE Dr. Jim J
National Reading Panel. Formation Congress requested its formation in Asked to assess the status of research-based knowledge about reading and the.
Developmentally Appropriate Practice
A DAY IN PRE-K CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Clarke County School District’s Vision Our vision is for all students to graduate as life-long learners.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
3 High expectations for every child
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
Research-Based Instruction in Reading Dr. Bonnie B. Armbruster University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Archived Information.
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
Regional Trainings, Fall 2003
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Beginning Oral Language and Vocabulary Development
Literacy Across the Lifespan: What Works Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago.
Report of the National Reading Panel TEACHING CHILDREN TO READ: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its.
Early Literacy T/TAC at VCU. Goals for Today We will provide an overview of the components of a quality early childhood program We will provide an overview.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
Core Child Development Knowledge: What Early Childhood Educators Need to Know Abigail M. Jewkes University of Michigan October 1, 2004.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 17 Facilitating Pre-Academic and Cognitive Learning.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
SUCCESSFUL PHONEMIC AWARENESS IN A KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM.
1 Promoting Third Grade Reading Proficiency National Governor’s Association Policy Institute May, 2012 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Professor of Education.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
The Importance of the Early Years Sandra Hogg & Tracey Roden RDG 692/EDCI 690 Spring 2013.
Assessment in the early years © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.
Language Arts Summit October 13, 2012 Literacy Across The Curriculum Presented by TLI Teacher Specialists TLI Teacher Specialists Leonila Garcia Margaret.
Article Summary – EDU 215 Dr. Megan J. Scranton 1.
ELIZABETH BURKE BRYANT MAY 9, 2012 Building a Solid Foundation for Governors’ Education Reform Agendas through Strong Birth-to-3 rd Grade Policies.
Coaching for School Readiness
Child Development H. Glaeser * From the Albert Shanker Institute’s Research Summary 2009.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Early Math Matters! October 14, 2010 Laurie Sjolund.
Issues with Classroom Pedagogy
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 11 Learning and Cognition in the Content Areas.
Copyright © 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd.
Some Missing Links? Charles L. Mifsud Literacy for All Seminar, 15 th November 2012.
Introduction to the Framework Unit 1 - Getting Ready for the Unit
Creating a jigsaw for early learning: developing high quality teaching and learning programs for K-3 classrooms Jean Rice September 2008.
Marie Murray Spring  Learning to read is a complex, multi-faceted process.  Children must understand comprehension is the main goal.  Children.
Early Reading First. The ultimate goal of Early Reading First is to close the achievement gap by preventing reading difficulties.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Standards in Mathematics EDN 322. Standards in Mathematics What do you think about when you hear the term “standards?” What do you think about when you.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Key Messages and Implication.
Language & Literacy Practicum in Child Development 1.
RDG 568 Practicum in Reading Class 2 Foundations of Literacy.
CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN READING COMPREHENSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION AUTHORS: SUZANNE M. ADLOF, CHARLES A. PERFETTI, AND.
Theories of Reading.
Technology and Interactive media as Tools in Early childhood Programs Serving Children from birth through Age8
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Principles of Effective Teaching of Reading (and Writing and Oral Language)
Applying What We Know Presenter: Whit Hayslip Early Childhood: Contra Costa County Office of Education California Conditions of Learning Symposium: Engage,
Literacy Secretariat Literacy is everyone’s business Effective Early Years Literacy Teaching Practices Margaret Sankey, Manager Andrea Barker, Project.
8-1 Chapter 8: Recommended Early Literacy Practices ©2014 California Department of Education (CDE) with the WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies. (06/2014)
By: Derrien Robinson.  What strategies can be taught to support early primary students with literacy deficits?
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. Vukelich, Helping Young Children Learn Language and Literacy: Birth Through Kindergarten 3/e Chapter 1 Foundations of.
IMPLEMENTING RTI Critical Features: Practices & System Components.
Ten Things You Should Know About Reading
Emergent Literacy ECSE 604 Huennekens Why Is It Important?
Big Day for Pre-K Angela Wells ECYD Curriculum Planning September 23, 2018.
What’s in a name? The Power of K Summer ‘09 Vanessa Osborne.
TEACHING TO ENHANCE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Astor family services education committee
Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ
Presentation transcript:

1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap National Association for the Education of Young Children, 2008 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ

2 Key Challenges for Early Childhood Educators Today What it means to be literate has changed. Expectations for student performance have increased. Expectations for teacher performance have changed. Accountability for student achievement is at the center of school reform. The demographics of the student population have changed, There is increased concern for children considered to be “at risk” for failure.

3 Two Key Reports on Early Literacy #1. “National Early Literacy Panel. (in press). Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel A Scientific Synthesis of Early Literacy Development and Implications for Intervention.” Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy

4 Two Key Reports on Early Literacy #2. “Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8” – Draft, Proposed Revision, 2008, NAEYC

5 Highlights from Report #1 “The National Early Literacy Panel”

6 Some Research Evidence from the National Early Literacy Panel Research Question #1 What are the skills and abilities that are linked to later outcomes in reading, writing and spelling?

7 Findings for RQ 1 from the National Early Literacy Panel Strong to Moderate Predictors of Success in Reading and Writing: Alphabet Knowledge Concepts About Print Phonological Awareness Oral Language Writing Name/Writing RAN (Rapid Automatic Naming/Lexical Access)

8 Some Research Evidence from the National Early Literacy Panel Research Question #2 What programs and interventions contribute to or inhibit gains in children’s skills and abilities and are linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling?

9 Findings RQ2 from the National Early Literacy Panel Efforts to teach code-related skills are highly successful Most studies involved teaching phonological awareness Most effective programs combined this training with (concepts about) print training These effects result in better reading outcomes

10 Findings for RQ2 from the National Early Literacy Panel Shared –book reading helps promote oral language skills The type of shared-book reading impacts the size of this effect Interactive, dialogic reading is more effective

11 Findings for RQ2 from the National Early Literacy Panel There is evidence of a moderate impact of parent and home programs for the promotion of oral language skills and cognitive abilities. Relatively weak evidence for the effectiveness of undifferentiated preschool programs on oral language, alphabet knowledge, cognitive ability, or reading

12 Findings for RQ2 from the National Early Literacy Panel There is evidence for effects of preschool and kindergarten programs on readiness for spelling. Language interventions have a moderate (significant) impact on oral language skills.

13 Highlights from Report #2 “Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8” --- NAEYC

14 Critical Issues in Current Context - - NAEYC #1 Reducing learning gaps to enable all children to succeed Critical learning gaps include: language development – oral and written (concepts about print) background knowledge

15 Critical Issues in Current Context - - NAEYC #2 Bringing pre-kindergarten and elementary education together Not to push curriculum down, but, to articulate goals across levels and build a sense of coherence and consistency

16 Critical Issues in Current Context - - NAEYC #3 Recognizing teacher decision making as vital to educational effectiveness A good curriculum is vitally important. Effective teaching involves constant interaction and real-time decision making Teachers require ongoing support

17 Making Connections & Making Sense #1 Reducing learning gaps to enable all children to succeed DAP focuses heavily on what is known about how children learn and how we best teach them. NELP offers evidence for current best practices for learning and teaching

18 Making Connections & Making Sense #2 Bringing pre-kindergarten and elementary education together DAP stresses the importance of a continuous, coherent instructional framework from pre- kindergarten through the primary grades NELP offers evidence about programs and interventions that contribute to children’s skills and abilities and are linked to later outcomes in reading, writing and spelling.

19 Making Connections & Making Sense #3 Recognizing teacher decision making as vital to educational effectiveness DAP stresses the knowledge base that teachers need to make competent decisions (NELP is cited) NELP provides a rich, evidence-based source of information for practitioners to make purposeful and thoughtful decisions as they work with children and families

20 Classroom Application - NAME GAMES Activities (in order of difficulty)* 1. Recognize name with graphic (photo) 2. Recognize name without graphic 3. Apply name recognition purposefully 4. Differentiate between and among names 5. Reconstruct own name 6. Visually match specific letters in names Show three names – find the two names that begin with the same letter; end with the same letter Show letter – find the name that has this letter at the beginning; at the end; somewhere in the middle)

21 Name Games Other, more advanced activities* 8. Show letter and give its name – Find a name with the letter (say name) in it. 9. Children identify letter then find a name with that letter in it. 10. Give name or “sound” – Find a name that begins with the same sound as (give name); or sound (utter sound) 11. Encourage children to write their names on their work or just for pleasure *Note: All activities are modeled with whole group; followed up with small group and individuals as needed.

22 Making Connections and Making Sense focus on the GAP “Name Games” Support the Predictors of Reading and Writing Alphabet Knowledge Concepts About Print Phonological Awareness Oral Language Writing Name/Writing RAN (Rapid Automatic Naming/Lexical Access)

23 Making Connections & Making Sense focus on DAP “Name Games” activities support the principles of Developmental Appropriate Practice (grounded in knowledge of child development) 1. Engaging (of interest and importance to children) 2. Scaffolded (1) teacher models; (2) teacher collaborates with children; (3) children work independently) 3. Differentiated (includes - whole group, small group, one-to-one) 4. Explicit with opportunities for Indirect Follow- up (both are focused and engaging)

24 Making Connections & Making Sense Implications for – Standards/Instruction/Assessment Standards - shared vision of what children should know and be able to do Instruction - engaging, intentional, differentiated, Assessment - formative; linked to differentiated instruction Professional Development – Knowing what to do and why ; intentional teaching of specific skills and strategies within an integrated whole Home/School Connections – meaningful links to home that build understanding and support Young children need and deserve professionals who are both caring and informed.

25 Example: Developmentally Appropriate and Inappropriate Instructional Practices Typical Standard (state & local) Kgn - Listening (Children will) Listen attentively for different purposes Instruction: Developmentally Appropriate Instruction: Developmentally Inappropriate (Contrasting Practice) Assessment

26 Example: Developmentally Appropriate and Inappropriate Instructional Practices

27 Example: Developmentally Appropriate and Inappropriate Instructional Practices

28 Example: Developmentally Appropriate and Inappropriate Instructional Practices

29 Example: Developmentally Appropriate and Inappropriate Instructional Practices

30 Example: Developmentally Appropriate and Inappropriate Instructional Practices