The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS)
Advertisements

Human Factors Analysis and Classification System
Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)
The Safety Analysis Methodology EHEST Conference 13 October 2008 Cascais, Portugal.
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
Map of Human Computer Interaction
USMC Rotary Wing, 1997 CAPT James Fraser MC USN CAPT James Fraser MC USN Naval Safety Center HUMAN FACTORS COUNCILS AND BOARDS in Naval Aviation.
POV Safety MISSION FIRST…PEOPLE ALWAYS…ONE TEAM. AGENDA POV / Motorcycle Safety Quiz POV Accident Statistics Standards Six Point POV Safety Program Washington.
Protect the Force Through Risk Management AC1 ACCIDENT CAUSATION.
Accident Investigation for Supervisors
Leading Teams.
“Human beings by their very nature make mistakes; therefore, it is unreasonable to expect error-free human performance.” Shappell & Wiegmann, 1997.
1 JHSAT - May 2007 JHSAT SMS Briefing May 2007 AHS Forum 63 – Virginia Beach, VA Jack Drake, HAI Mark Liptak, FAA.
Industrial Health & Safety
P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.
Analysis / Intervention Workshop Analysis / Intervention Workshop Maintenance Error Naval Safety Center School Of Aviation Safety.
Event Review Using HFACS (Template)
Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering
Accident Investigations
Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)
ACCIDENT IN WORKPLACE Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine, UNPAD.
Understanding what it means to be PIC Some ways to teach it.
24 October 2002 ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM RUNWAY SAFETY/INCURSION CONFERENCE 1 Retrospective Human Factors Analysis of US Runway Incursions (Focus: Air Traffic.
Performance Appraisal
 Students will be able to:  List items in a AI plan  List items to include in an AI kit  Explain why human error could be a cause or a symptom of.
Objectives  Understand what a Loss Incident is.  Know the real cost of a Loss Incident.  Understand the Causes of a Loss Incident.  Understand what.
RM/ORM Risk Management in the ANG
Office of Aviation Safety Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Aviation Operations Jeff Guzzetti Deputy Director for Regional Operations.
Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)
Topic 5 Understanding and learning from error. LEARNING OBJECTIVE Understand the nature of error and how health care can learn from error to improve patient.
Top Aircrew Human Factor Errors in Navy/Marine Corps Aviation: A Helo Perspective LCDR Deborah White Human Factor Analyst (757) x 7231 (DSN)
Health and Safety What is health and safety Who is responsible
Intro to Threat & Error Management
1 Human Factors Theory Update 1 July This can only happen with the human element present – The question is why ????
Accident Investigation. Accident Investigation Goals Preparing the investigation team Conducting the investigation Quiz.
By: FAA Safety Team Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness Human Factors R1 Human Error = System Failure.
Mr. Bob Hahn Associate Director, School of Aviation Safety Naval Aviation Schools Command NAS Pensacola MISHAP PREVENTION EDUCATION IN NAVAL AVIATION.
CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Shappell and Wiegmann, 1997 A FAILURE ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.
Why Do We Have Accidents?
Presented to: Orlando Florida Flying Community By: The FAASTeam - Dr. Karen D. Dunbar Date: December 7th, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam.
Chapter 8 Management, Leadership, and Internal Organization Learning Goals Define management and the skills necessary for managerial success. Explain the.
Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology Gerhard Ohrband 11 th lecture Safety at work.
Airbus Flight Seminar – Kuala-Lumpur March 2007 Human Factors Model.
Human Factors An Overview
Mr. Bob Hahn Associate Director, School of Aviation Safety Naval Aviation Schools Command NAS Pensacola MISHAP PREVENTION EDUCATION IN NAVAL AVIATION.
EFFECTIVE ACCIDENT/INCIDENT INVESTIGATION 15 FEBRUARY 2013 PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF SAFETY ENGINEERS -QATAR- -QATAR- COMMITTEE ON SAFETY EDUCATION 2013.
Human Performance Improvement
Introduction to Human Factors For Instructors SAC INSTRUCTOR COURSE If viewing please read speaker notes with slides.
Vertical Differentiation: Distribution of Authority & Control: Why and How.
Safety Management Systems Session Three Safety Assurance
Human Error Reduction – A Systems Approach.
Karon Cormack Head of Clinical Risk.  “the scientific study of the relationship between man and his working environment” (Murell, 1965)  “the study.
PST Human Factors Jan Shaw Manchester Royal Infirmary CMFT.
Situational Awareness Airport Safety Week Case Study Situational Awareness – Case Study Location: Ramp Area Scenario  A staff member walked behind.
ACCIDENT CAUSATION.
Human Factors in Aircraft Accident Investigation
Event Review Using HFACS (Template)
Accident Prevention Principles
General Safety & Health Knowledge
Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents: Application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) Douglas A. Wiegmann,
Human factors Forensic investigation
Industrial Health & Safety
11/13/2018.
Reporting Incidents and Hazards Accident Prevention
Operational Risk Management (ORM) and the Driving Task
Accident Investigation
Event Review Using HFACS (Template)
Loss control leadership 101
Map of Human Computer Interaction
Presentation transcript:

The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) LCDR Jeff Alton Human Factors Analyst Naval Safety Center Adapted from Shappell & Wiegmann, 2003

COSTS OF NAVAL ACCIDENTS Direct Cost (FY 98 – 08) $5.14 Billion and 1113 Lives Indirect Cost Loss of Manpower Delay in Doing Business Corporate Reputation Investigation Costs Litigation Thru 15 Apr 08 Source: U.S. Naval Safety Center

Origins of (DOD) HFACS Starts with Reason’s “Swiss Cheese” model Based on Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) by Doug Weigmann & Scott Shappell Categorization of system failure in complex systems Latent Failures Active Failures Brings together human factors, Operations, Human systems, Systems safety and Engineering Issues Man, Machine, Medium, Mission, Management Philosophy of mishap analysis that focuses on the system instead of the individual Original version used by USN as mishap analysis tool DoD-HFACS is the follow-on product

Reason’s “Swiss-cheese” Model of Human Error Organizational Factors Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts Failed or Absent Defenses Accident & Injury Adapted from Reason (1990)

Resource/Acquisition Management Organizational Climate Process INFLUENCES Inadequate Supervision Planned Inappropriate Operations Failed to Correct Known Problem Supervisory Violations SUPERVISION Condition of Individuals Cognitive Factors Technological Environment Physical Environment Self-Imposed Stress Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Personnel Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Environmental Factors PRECONDITIONS Perceptual Factors Physical/ Mental Limitations Adverse Physiological States Errors ACTS Perception Skill-Based Judgment and Decision-Making Violations

Goal – More solid cheese - or countermeasures to avoid the holes Think decision tree Analysis starts with end result Traces back through the “decisions” and conditions Layers of Swiss Cheese are conditions at each level Some cheese has more holes than others… Poor command climate, no rules enforcement Personnel fatigued, or poorly trained Some environments more challenging Goal – More solid cheese - or countermeasures to avoid the holes

Typical decision tree AKA “fish bones”

Navy F/A-18 Class A Flight Mishaps Why? To reduce mishap rate, efforts must be focused on identifying the primary causes, which in most cases is the human. Navy F/A-18 Class A Flight Mishaps

ACTS Errors Violations Judgment and Decision Errors Skill-Based Errors Misperception Errors Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts

DECISION ERRORS ACTS Errors Violations Judgment and Decision Errors Skill-Based Errors Misperception Errors DECISION ERRORS Risk Assessment – During Operation Task Misprioritization Necessary Action – Rushed Necessary Action – Delayed Caution/Warning – Ignored Wrong choice of action Unsafe Acts

SKILL-BASED ERRORS ACTS Violations Errors Misperception Judgment and Decision Skill-Based SKILL-BASED ERRORS Inadvertent Operation Checklist Error Procedural Error Overcontrol/Undercontrol Breakdown in Visual Scan Inadequate Anti-G Straining Maneuver Unsafe Acts

MISPERCEPTION ERRORS (due to) ACTS Errors Violations Judgment and Decision Errors Skill-Based Errors Misperception Errors MISPERCEPTION ERRORS (due to) Unsafe Acts Misjudge Distance, Altitude, Airspeed Spatial Disorientation Visual Illusions

(Willful disregard for rules and instructions!) ACTS Errors Violations Judgment and Decision Errors Skill-Based Errors Misperception Errors VIOLATIONS (Willful disregard for rules and instructions!) Violation – Work-around Violation – Routine/Widespread Violation – Extreme Unsafe Acts

Environmental Factors Personnel Factors PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts

Acts The act is the end result Acts The act is the end result. It answers the question of, “what happened?” Skill-based Errors: errors in regularly- performed tasks Decision Errors: selection of an incorrect course of action for a particular situation Perception Errors: perception of an illusion leads to an incorrect course of action Violation: intentionally acting against written policy or procedures.

Preconditions Preconditions are the things that allow the unsafe acts to occur, and they answer the question of, “Why did it happen?” Broad categories are: Physical environment: the working environment. Rain, darkness, cold, hot, etc. Technological Environment: the tools used in the mission. Vehicle design and usability of associated systems Self-imposed stress: things we do to ourselves – alcohol, lack of sleep, fitness level

Preconditions (cont.) Coordination, communication, planning: team interaction, mission planning (CRM) Cognitive factors: situational awareness Physical/mental limitations: operator size incompatible with workspace, trouble retaining information

Preconditions (cont.) Perceptual factors: visual or proprioceptive illusions Psycho-behavioral factors: personality problems, overconfidence, aggressiveness, etc. Adverse Physiological States: fatigue, effects of medications, breathing difficulties There may be more than one precondition for each act!

PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Icing/Fog/Etc. on windows PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Icing/Fog/Etc. on windows Meteorological Conditions Dust/Smoke/Etc. in Workspace Brownout/Whiteout Thermal Stress: Cold/Hot Maneuvering Forces In-Flight Noise Interference Unsafe Acts

TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Seating and Restraints Instrument and Sensory Feedback Visibility Restrictions Controls and Switches Automation Personal Equipment Interference Communications - Equipment

COORD/COMM/PLAN Crew/Team Leadership Cross-Monitoring Performance PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts COORD/COMM/PLAN Crew/Team Leadership Cross-Monitoring Performance Task Delegation Rank/Position Authority Gradient Communicating Critical Info Standard/Proper Terminology Mission Planning/Briefing Miscommunication

SELF-IMPOSED STRESS Alcohol Physical Fitness PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts SELF-IMPOSED STRESS Alcohol Physical Fitness Drugs/Supplements/Self Medication Nutrition Inadequate Rest Unreported Disqualifying Medical Condition

COGNITIVE FACTORS Inattention Channelized Attention PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts COGNITIVE FACTORS Inattention Channelized Attention Cognitive Task Oversaturation Confusion Negative Transfer Distraction Geographic Misorientation (Lost) Checklist Interference

PSYCHO-BEHAVIORAL Personality Style Pre-Existing Personality Disorder PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts PSYCHO-BEHAVIORAL Personality Style Pre-Existing Personality Disorder Pre-Existing Psychological Disorder Emotional State Overconfidence Complacency Get-Home-Itis/Get-There-Itis Overaggressive

ADVERSE PHYSIOLOGICAL PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts ADVERSE PHYSIOLOGICAL Effects of G Forces (G-LOC, etc) Physical Fatigue (Overexertion) Fatigue – Physiological/Mental Hypoxia Motion Sickness Circadian Rhythm Desynchrony Pre-Existing Physical Illness/Injury Prescribed Meds for Injury/Illness

PHYSICAL/MENTAL LIMITS PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts PHYSICAL/MENTAL LIMITS Learning Ability/Rate Memory Ability/Lapses Anthropometric/Biomechanical Limits Motor Skill/Coordination or Timing Deficiency Technical/Procedural Knowledge

PERCEPTUAL FACTORS Illusions: Kinesthetic/Vestibular/Visual PRECONDITIONS Environmental Factors Personnel Factors Physical Environment Technological Environment Condition of Individuals Coordination/ Communication/ Planning Factors Self-Imposed Stress Cognitive Factors Psycho-Behavioral Factors Adverse Physiological States Physical/ Mental Limitations Perceptual Factors Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts PERCEPTUAL FACTORS Illusions: Kinesthetic/Vestibular/Visual Misperception of Operational Conditions Misinterpreted/Misread Instrument Expectancy Auditory Cues Spatial Disorientation: 1, 2, & 3 Temporal Distortion

Supervisors are ultimately responsible for the conduct of their units. Supervision Supervisors are ultimately responsible for the conduct of their units. Inadequate supervision: lack of guidance, written policy, or training opportunities Failure to correct known problem: problems with personnel or operations Inappropriate Operations: lack of proper risk assessment or assigned inappropriate personnel to task Violations: unnecessarily allows operations outside of SOP

Inadequate Supervision Planned Inappropriate Operations Failed to Correct Known Problem Supervisory Violations SUPERVISION Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts

INADEQUATE SUPERVISION Planned Inappropriate Operations Failed to Correct Known Problem Inadequate Supervision Supervisory Violations Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts INADEQUATE SUPERVISION Leadership/Supervision/Oversight Inadequate Supervision – Modeling Local Training Issues/Programs Supervision – Policy Supervision – Personality Conflict Supervision – Lack of Feedback

PLANNED INAPPROPRIATE Inadequate Supervision Planned Inappropriate Operations Failed to Correct Known Problem Supervisory Violations SUPERVISION Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts PLANNED INAPPROPRIATE OPERATIONS Ordered/Led Mission Beyond Capability Crew/Team/Flight Makeup/Composition Limited Recent Experience Limited Total Experience Proficiency Risk Assessment – Formal Authorized Unnecessary Hazard

FAILED TO CORRECT A KNOWN PROBLEM Inadequate Supervision Planned Inappropriate Operations Failed to Correct Known Problem Supervisory Violations SUPERVISION Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts FAILED TO CORRECT A KNOWN PROBLEM Personnel Management Operations Management

SUPERVISORY VIOLATIONS Inadequate Supervision Planned Inappropriate Operations Failed to Correct Known Problem Supervisory Violations SUPERVISION SUPERVISORY VIOLATIONS Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts Supervision – Discipline Enforcement Supervision – Unwritten Policy Directed Violation Assigned Unqualified Individuals

Organizational Factors The Organization is responsible for overall policy, doctrine, and allocation of resources to the subordinate units Resource/Acquisition Management: the ways in which equipment is allocated Organizational Climate: affects morale in a unit Process: policies and procedures that drive the concept of operations

Resource/Acquisition ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES Organizational Climate Resource/Acquisition Management Process Organizational Influences RESOURCE/ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT Unsafe Supervision Air Traffic Control Resources Airfield Resources Operator Support Acquisition Policies/Design Processes Attrition Policies Accession/Selection Policies Personnel Resources Information Resources/Support Financial Resources/Support Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Unsafe Acts

Resource/Acquisition ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES Resource/Acquisition Management Organizational Climate Organizational Climate Organizational Process ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE Organizational Influences Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts Unit/Organizational Values/Culture Evaluation/Promotion/Upgrade Perceptions of Equipment Unit Mission/Aircraft Change Unit Deactivation Organizational Structure

Resource/Acquisition ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES Resource/Acquisition Management Organizational Climate Organizational Process Operational Process Organizational Influences Unsafe Supervision Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Acts ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS Ops Tempo/Workload Program and Policy Risk Assessment Procedural Guidance/Publications Organizational Training Issues/Programs Doctrine Program Oversight/Program Management

HFACS Example H-60 enters out of control flight after loss of tail rotor authority. Aircraft becomes uncontrollable resulting in a hard landing and rollover. Engineering investigation reveals improperly installed tail-rotor mechanism pin.

DoD HFACS Coding Act: Procedure performed incorrectly (AE103). Tail rotor cotter pin not correctly installed Preconditions: warning systems (PE202). Lack of written warning for improperly installed pin Supervisory: inadequate oversight (SI001). QA missed improper pin placement Organizational: Informational resources (OR008). Lack of O-level diagram showing pin placement in relation to all other holes. Flawed Doctrine (OP005). Army had solved the problem several years before. Info not made part of Navy maintenance

Questions?