Submission on Clause 6 of the Employment Equity Amendment Bill of 2012 and its compliance with ILO Convention 111 of 1958 By Prof D du Toit on behalf of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Religious – Belief Discrimination Awareness Training Steve Baldwin.
Advertisements

WORKSHOP UNIVERSITY COUNCILS Higher Education Policy and the Legislative Framework 1 August 2014 Prof Chris de Beer.
Presentation to The Portfolio Committee on Labour on the Basic Conditions of Employment Amendment Bill Amendment Bill by the Board of Healthcare Funders.
Business Studies Grade 12
Equality and Non- discrimination at Work Basics of International Labour Standards.
LABOUR LAW – ARR224 Lecture 11 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.
THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE RIGHTS AND DIGNITY OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Gaps in Irish Equality Law where the.
EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL LAW AND RELIGIOUS SYMPOSIUM 3 October 2011 Vic van Vuuren.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
THE NEW LABOUR LEGISLATION Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 Labour Instiutions Act No. 12 of 2007 Labour Relations Act No. 14 of 2007 Work Injury Benefits.
Wrongful Termination and Employment Discrimination OBE 118 Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Illegal discrimination in the firing, firing, promoting of employees.
Major EEO Laws (1960s- 1970s) Major EEO Laws (1990s- Current) TERMS The Legal Environment TERMS The Legal Environment and Sexual Harassment TERMS The.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment.
Human Rights in Ontario. Human Rights Activity- let’s do a Human Rights Quiz… Individuals should be treated fairly as human beings regardless of the age.
Legal and Ethical Aspects of Personnel Management Advanced Marketing.
CHAPTER 12 Unfair dismissal (1): Exclusions and the meaning of dismissal.
Employment Law. The Employment Relationship Twofold: contractual framework with statutory overlay The basic contract: services in exchange for reward.
Line Managers Date: updated March 2011
Chapter 3 The Legal and Ethical Environment Nature of employment laws Key equal employment opportunity laws Employment-at-will Fair Labor Standards Act.
Challenges for Civil Liberties
Lecture 2.  “We try to take a different look at stories and events around us. I think that South Africans enjoy this – they like to laugh at themselves.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR EMPLOYMENT EQUITY AMENDMENT BILL, 2012.
© 2005 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 1 Employment Discrimination and Employment Equity.
When elephant retire- EE These notes are insufficient for study purposes.
Lecture 1 and 2. When elephant retire- EE These notes are insufficient for study purposes.
. South African Airways South African Airways Applications for vacant position required: POSITION:Flight attendant DUTIES:Serve passengers; Ensure flight.
STEREOTYPING and DISCRIMINATION STEREOTYPING can lead to PREJUDICE can lead to DISCRIMINATION.
South Africa UN Convention of the Rights of People with Disabilities: Signed and ratified: December 2007.
Discrimination Decisions made on the basis of characteristics which are not relevant to the position, which result in harm suffered by persons –on the.
THE NEW LEGAL FRAMEWORK KEY CONCEPTS UNDERLYING THE EU DIRECTIVES AND PROGRESS TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION.
1 Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.Schwind 7th Canadian Edition. 4 F O U R Meeting Legal Requirements C H A P T.
JáN KIMÁK LEGAL CONCEPT OF EQUALITY IN INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL LAW
*Dr Emma Fergus Institute for Development and Labour Law, University of Cape Town.
What You Need to Know About Workplace. The Kyrene School District has a no-tolerance policy for any form of discrimination, harassment or other offensive.
What is the Concept of Unjustified Discrimination?
Employment Equity Act No 55 of 1998 (81). Purpose of EE Act (81) Redress past discrimination –Eliminate unfair discrimination [applies to all employers]
1 Employment Equity Amendment Bill, 2012 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR 12 March 2013.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Canada Inc. The Changing Legal Emphasis: From Compliance to Valuing Diversity Dessler & Cole Human Resources Management in Canada.
1 HR Business Partners Date: updated March 2011 Equality Act 2010.
CURRENT LABOUR LAW 2009 HALTON CHEADLE. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION HALTON CHEADLE.
Commission for Gender Equality Submission to Parliament on Electoral Amendment Bill [B ] 10 September 2014 Women’s substantive equality: A case for.
THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 Impact to date, key areas for consideration Paul McGowan 6 October 2011 COLLINGWOOD LEGAL Direct.
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 9 Group 2 Josh, Angelique, Gary, Jessica, & Roni Chapter 9 Group 2 Josh, Angelique, Gary, Jessica, & Roni.
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Civil Rights Act of 1964  Statutes that outlawed employment discrimination against certain classes  Providing.
Chapter 19 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.19-2 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Labour Law – ARR224 Lecture 11 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
The Ubuntu Centre Submission to: The Department of Home Affairs Portfolio Committee Comment on Electoral Amendment Bill B Date: 10 September 2013.
Convention 111 Discrimination (Employment and Occupation), 1958 Fundamental principle Design and implement policies to promote equality of opportunity.
LABOUR LEGISLATION PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 02 September 2009.
Discrimination and Equal Opportunity
The principles of equal treatment in Estonia. The Constitution of the Republic of Estonia: Everyone is equal before the law. No one shall be discriminated.
“ Welcome to Seminar 8: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.
Lecture 2.  NDF  NIA  SA Secret Service  SA National Academy of Intelligence  Staff and directors of COMSEC. (COMSEC (formally Electronic Communications.
Chapter 19.  Equal opportunity in employment: The rights of all employees and job applicants  To be treated without discrimination  To be able to sue.
 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level TheUbuntuCentre Submission to: The Department of Home Affairs Portfolio.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR RESPONSE TO EMPLOYMENT EQUITY AMENDMENT BILL, 2012.
STUDY UNIT 4: Employment Equity 1Saterdag - SU 4 Employment Equity.
The anti-discrimination legislation in Albania Presentation of the corresponding EU Directives and of their approximation.
PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON ENERGY
EU law against Disability Discrimination
Employment Equity Act No 55 of 1998 (81)
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT, No 55, 1998 (EEA)
PORTFOLIO COMMITTTE ON WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY MEETING 22 AUGUST
PROGRESS MADE REGARDING LEGISLATION PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR
Chapter 24 Discrimination in Employment
Amendments to Legislation
THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment
Presentation transcript:

Submission on Clause 6 of the Employment Equity Amendment Bill of 2012 and its compliance with ILO Convention 111 of 1958 By Prof D du Toit on behalf of Bradley Conradie Attorneys

The Employment Equity Act (EEA) was enacted to give effect to ILO Convention 111of 1958 and must be interpreted “in compliance with” the Convention. The EE Amendment Bill of 2012 sets out to “ The Employment Equity Act (EEA) was enacted to give effect to ILO Convention 111of 1958 and must be interpreted “in compliance with” the Convention. The EE Amendment Bill of 2012 sets out to “give effect to obligations incurred by the Republic as a member state of the International Labour Organisation” 1-3

What does convention 111 require? 1-3

Convention 111 requires member states to eliminate ALL discrimination based on prohibited grounds (listed or unlisted) “D Convention 111 requires member states to eliminate ALL discrimination based on prohibited grounds (listed or unlisted) “Discrimination” means “any distinction, exclusion or preference” based on a prohibited ground “which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation” 4 - 6

Convention 111 lists three form of differentiation which are “not discrimination”: These are the only exceptions permitted to accommodate employers’ and state needs to exclude/prefer employees on listed grounds Convention 111 lists three form of differentiation which are “not discrimination”:  measures based on “inherent requirements of a particular job”;  measures in interests of state security;  affirmative action measures These are the only exceptions permitted to accommodate employers’ and state needs to exclude/prefer employees on listed grounds 7 - 8

How does the EEA give effect to Convention 111? 7 - 8

Section 6 of the EEA states: “No person may unfairly discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an employee, in any employment policy or practice, on one or more grounds, including race, gender (etc)…” This complies with the Convention by creating an open-ended list of “grounds” on which discrimination is “unfair”, and therefore prohibited

In some cases the term “unfair” has been interpreted as meaning that Parliament intended to create scope for “fair” discrimination on prohibited grounds. This interpretation is clearly in conflict with the Convention and also in conflict with section 3(d) of the EEA. 11

Section 6(2) states : “It is not unfair discrimination to— (a)take affirmative action measures consistent with the purpose of this Act; or (b)distinguish, exclude or prefer any person on the basis of an inherent requirement of a job.” This is in compliance with the Convention

The EEA does not define “discrimination”. The EEA does not define “discrimination”. The courts have in some cases interpreted it as meaning the same as “mere differentiation”, and in other cases as “treating one employee worse than another”. The latter interpretation is in compliance with Convention

What is the effect of the amendments to section 11 of the EEA proposed by clause 6 of the Bill? 14

The proposed new section 11(1)(a) is in compliance with Convention 111. The proposed new section 11(1)(a) is in compliance with Convention 111. Since discrimination on a prohibited ground is prohibited in terms of the Convention, the employer’s only defence can be that the alleged discrimination was not on a prohibited ground. (If it was based on affirmative action or an inherent requirement of the job, it would not be “discrimination”.)

The proposed new section 11(1)(b) is in conflict with the Convention. The proposed new section 11(1)(b) is in conflict with the Convention. It would allow discrimination on a prohibited ground to be justified of grounds of “rationality” and “fairness” or an open-ended notion of “justifiability”. This would give judges or CCMA commissioners an open-ended discretion to allow discrimination on prohibited grounds

What is the rationale for the proposed new section 11(1)(b)?

The reason for the amendment to s 11 is that it “should be consistent with the approach in respect of this issue in section 13 of the Equality Act” The reason for the amendment to s 11 is that it “should be consistent with the approach in respect of this issue in section 13 of the Equality Act” This is inappropriate, because – (1) legally, it creates a conflict between the EEA and Convention 111, and (2) practically, the EEA and the Equality Act apply in different spheres

The courts have in some cases (incorrectly) applied the broad constitutional test in employment discrimination matters. The courts have in some cases (incorrectly) applied the broad constitutional test in employment discrimination matters. This is inappropriate because it this test is about the exercise of state power, not the conduct of private employers. It is also inappropriate because it means that the EEA (interpreted in compliance with Convention 111) is being bypassed – which is impermissable

The courts have in some cases (incorrectly) applied the broad constitutional test in employment discrimination matters. The courts have in some cases (incorrectly) applied the broad constitutional test in employment discrimination matters. This is inappropriate because it this test is about the exercise of state power, not the conduct of private employers. It is also inappropriate because it means that the EEA (interpreted in compliance with Convention 111) is being bypassed – which is impermissable

What would be the consequences of enacting the proposed section 11(1)(b) in its present form?

It would subvert the purposes of Convention 111 and the EEA by allowing employers to persuade commissioners or judges that it is permissible to discriminate against employees on prohibited grounds It would subvert the purposes of Convention 111 and the EEA by allowing employers to persuade commissioners or judges that it is permissible to discriminate against employees on prohibited grounds - e.g., future pregnancy, sexual harassment… The poorest complainants are likely to face the greatest risk

It would create the prospect of inconsistent decisions, based on decision-makers’ personal perceptions of “justifiability”, thus creating legal uncertainty. It could further narrow the scope for affirmative action. Section 6(2)(b) of the EEA is likely to become redundant

What is the rationale for the term “unfair” discrimination?

South Africa is the only country to use the term “unfair” discrimination. It was introduced under apartheid to distinguish between measures justified or not justified by apartheid laws. In 1993 it was used in the new Constitution to distinguish “negative discrimination” from “mere differentiation”

“Unfair” thus serves to describe all prohibited grounds of discrimination (listed and unlisted) This is consistent with “automatically unfair dismissal” in terms of s 187 of the LRA Convention 111 means that discrimination on a prohibited ground can never be ‘fair’

Conclusion

The new section 11(1) of the EEA can be brought in line with Convention 111 by requiring the employer against whom the allegation is made to prove that - The new section 11(1) of the EEA can be brought in line with Convention 111 by requiring the employer against whom the allegation is made to prove that - “(a) such discrimination did not take place as alleged; or “(b) such alleged discrimination is justifiable in terms of section 6(2) of this Act.” 39

It is also submitted the meaning of “discrimination” can be brought in line with Convention 111 by defining it as “ It is also submitted the meaning of “discrimination” can be brought in line with Convention 111 by defining it as “any distinction, exclusion or preference which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation, excluding any measures taken in terms of section 6(2) of the Act” 40

It is submitted that such amendments would also be in compliance with the Constitution. Legislation is unconstitutional if it gives a basic right less than the minimum protection required by the Constitution. The proposed amendments would increase existing protection against discrimination