Chapter 21 - Population genetics (part 2): Forces that change gene frequencies Balance between mutation, drift, selection, and migration Mutation-Drift.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS
Advertisements

Discover Biology FIFTH EDITION
Modeling Populations forces that act on allelic frequencies.
Chapter 17 Population Genetics and Evolution, part 2 Jones and Bartlett Publishers © 2005.
Chapter 23: Population Genetics (Microevolution)
Microevolution Chapter 18 contined. Microevolution  Generation to generation  Changes in allele frequencies within a population  Causes: Nonrandom.
Essentials of Biology Sylvia S. Mader
THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS
Population Genetics I. Evolution: process of change in allele
Population Genetics (Ch. 16)
14 Molecular Evolution and Population Genetics
13-1 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Evolution The process of change in the genetic makeup.
Population Genetics: Populations change in genetic characteristics over time Ways to measure change: Allele frequency change (B and b) Genotype frequency.
Population Genetics What is population genetics?
One-way migration. Migration There are two populations (x and y), each with a different frequency of A alleles (px and py). Assume migrants are from population.
Population Genetics Packet #29. Population Genetics The study of genetic variability within the population and of the forces that act on it.
Evolution of Populations
KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
Process of Evolution Chapter 18 Mader: Biology 8th Ed.
BIOLOGY 30 POPULATION GENETICS. CHAPTER OUTCOMES Define a gene pool. Describe the gene pool of a population at genetic equilibrium. Summarize the five.
1 1 Population Genetics. 2 2 The Gene Pool Members of a species can interbreed & produce fertile offspring Species have a shared gene pool Gene pool –
Population Genetics youtube. com/watch
14 Population Genetics and Evolution. Population Genetics Population genetics involves the application of genetic principles to entire populations of.
The Evolution of Populations.  Emphasizes the extensive genetic variation within populations and recognizes the importance of quantitative characteristics.
DEFINITIONS: ● POPULATION: a localized group of individuals belonging to the same species ● SPECIES: a group of populations whose individuals have the.
Genes Within Populations
POPULATION GENETICS 1. Outcomes 4. Discuss the application of population genetics to the study of evolution. 4.1 Describe the concepts of the deme and.
Genetics and Speciation
The Evolution of Populations Chapter 21. Microevolution Evolutionary changes within a population  Changes in allele frequencies in a population over.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint ® Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings Chapter 23 The Evolution of Populations.
The plant of the day Bristlecone pine - Two species Pinus aristata (CO, NM, AZ), Pinus longaeva (UT, NV, CA) Thought to reach an age far greater than any.
1 Population Genetics Definitions of Important Terms Population: group of individuals of one species, living in a prescribed geographical area Subpopulation:
Evolution and Population GENETICS
Chapter 21 The Mechanics of Evolution Biology 101 Tri-County Technical College Pendleton, SC.
Biology 3201 Chapters The Essentials. Micro vs. Macro Evolution Micro Evolution Evolution on a smaller scale. This is evolution within a particular.
Remainder of Chapter 23 Read the remaining materials; they address information specific to understanding evolution (e.g., variation and nature of changes)
Chapter 21 - Population genetics (part 2): Forces that change gene frequencies Balance between mutation, drift, selection, and migration Mutation-Drift.
Evolution of Populations. The Smallest Unit of Evolution Natural selection acts on individuals, but only populations evolve – Genetic variations contribute.
Objective: Chapter 23. Population geneticists measure polymorphisms in a population by determining the amount of heterozygosity at the gene and molecular.
The plant of the day Pinus longaevaPinus aristata.
In populations of finite size, sampling of gametes from the gene pool can cause evolution. Incorporating Genetic Drift.
Raven - Johnson - Biology: 6th Ed. - All Rights Reserved - McGraw Hill Companies Genes Within Populations Chapter 15 Copyright © McGraw-Hill Companies.
Mader Evolution of Poplulations Chapter 23.
(23) Evolution of Populations- Microevolution Natural selection acts on individuals, but only populations evolve. Consider, for example, a population of.
Chapter 23 Evolutionary Change in Populations. Population Genetics Evolution occurs in populations, not individuals Darwin recognized that evolution occurs.
Evolution of Populations Chapter : Genes and Variation Population: group of individuals in the same species that interbreed; share a common gene.
Evolution of populations Ch 21. I. Background  Individuals do not adapt or evolve  Populations adapt and evolve  Microevolution = change in allele.
Evolution of Populations. Individual organisms do not evolve. This is a misconception. While natural selection acts on individuals, evolution is only.
Evolution of Populations
8 and 11 April, 2005 Chapter 17 Population Genetics Genes in natural populations.
Population bottlenecks often result in reduced or no genetic variation.
15.3 Shaping Evolutionary Theory 7(E) Analyze and evaluate the relationship of natural selection to adaptation and to the development of diversity in and.
Evolution of Populations Population- group of individuals of the same species that live in the same area and interbreed. Gene Pool- populations genetic.
Topics How to track evolution – allele frequencies
Gene350 Animal Genetics Lecture August 2009.
The Evolution of Populations
Section 3: Shaping Evolutionary Theory
Evolution as Genetic Change
The Evolution of Populations
The Evolution of Populations
Chapter 21 - Population genetics (part 2):
I. Population Evolution
The Evolution of Populations
The Evolution of Populations
The Evolution of Populations
Chapter 15 – Mechanisms of Evolution
The Evolution of Populations
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 21 - Population genetics (part 2): Forces that change gene frequencies Balance between mutation, drift, selection, and migration Mutation-Drift Mutation-selection Migration-selection Inbreeding & inbreeding depression

Forces that change gene frequencies: Natural populations harbor enormous amounts of genetic variation. If population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (large, random mating, free from mutation, migration, and natural selection) allele frequencies remain constant. Many, if not most populations, do not meet Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium conditions, allele frequencies change, and the population’s gene pool evolves. Four main evolutionary processes responsible for such changes: 1.Mutation 1.Genetic drift 1.Selection 1.Migration

Mutation: Heritable changes within DNA. Source of all new genetic variation. Raw material for evolution. Mutation rate varies between loci and among species: ~10 -4 to mutations/gene/generation. Mutation rate is abbreviated . Some mutations are selectively neutral (no effect on reproductive fitness). Others are detrimental or lethal, or beneficial (depends on environment). If population size is large, effects of neutral mutation act slowly (i.e., compared to selection) because new mutations are by definition initially rare.

Mutation: Irreversible mutation: Allele A is fixed (p =1.0) and mutates A  a at rate of  = : Hartl & Clark (1997) Principles of Population Genetics

Mutation: Reversible mutation: Allele A is fixed (p =1.0) and mutates A  a at rate of  = ; but allele a mutates a  A at a rate of = Hartl & Clark (1997) Principles of Population Genetics

Effects of genetic drift on fate of neutral mutations: Neutral theory of molecular evolution: Motoo Kimura ( ) Genetic drift causes allele frequencies to change over time and wander randomly: 1.Some alleles may go extinct: p  0 2.Other alleles may become fixed: p  1 Probability of fixation increases with time. Which allele becomes fixed is strictly random. 3.Rare alleles are more likely to be lost (p  0). 4.Time to fixation/loss varies with effective population size (N e ) and initial allele frequency.

Effective population size (N e ): The population census size N is distinct from N e. Not all individuals contribute gametes to the next generation. Effective population size (N e ) = equivalent number of adults contributing gametes to the next generation. If sexes are equal in number and all individuals have an equal probability of reproducing, N e = N. Otherwise: N e = (4 x N f x N m )/ (N f + N m ) N f and N m = numbers of breeding females and males (N e = ~8 for a population with 70 breeding females and 2 males). Sampling variance: s p 2 = pq/2N e Standard error: s p = √(pq/2N e ) 95% confidence limit = p  2s p Variance in N e is large for small populations, and small for large populations.

Fluctuations in effective population size: Population sizes change over time. Average effective population size (N e ) is a harmonic mean: 1/N e = 1/t (1/N 0 + 1/N 1 + … 1/N t-1 ) Harmonic mean = reciprocal of the average of the reciprocals. Important consequence---one short period of of small population size (i.e., bottleneck) can dramatically reduce Ne, and it takes a long time for Ne to recover. Other factors that influence N e : Differential production of offspring Overlapping generations Population structure Natural selection

Fig , Effect of drift on four populations with initial allele frequencies q = 0.5. Fig , Average time to fixation/loss as a function of population size and initial allele frequency.

Fisher-Wright model of genetic drift: Hartl & Clark (1997) Principles of Population Genetics 2N = 18 2N = 100

Fisher-Wright model of genetic drift: Simulated using the software: DRIFT An interactive program for teaching the concepts of genetic drift by Mark Young (Lincoln University, New Zealand). The program runs under DOS or WINDOWS 3.x on an IBM PC, with or without a mouse.

Probability of fixation of a new neutral mutation depends on the population size: = 1/2N e N e = effective population size Requires average of 4N generations. Time between successive fixations = 1/  generations. Hartl & Clark (1997) Principles of Population Genetics

Take home message - genetic drift has important consequences for small populations: Island population of 10 individuals; 5 with brown eyes (BB) and 5 with green eyes (bb); f(B) = 0.5, f(b) = 0.5. Typhoon devastates the island; 5 people with brown eyes (BB) die. Allelic frequency of b, f(b) = 1.0; chance events have radically changed the allele frequencies and the population evolves. Now imagine the same scenario for an island of 10,000 inhabitants. This type of “sampling” occurs naturally: Which gametes fertilizes the egg? What proportion of offspring survive? What proportion of offspring contribute gametes to the next generation?

Genetic drift acting through founder events, bottlenecks, and geographic isolation can lead to rapid changes in gene frequency and phenotype. Effects of Genetic drift can be pronounced when population size remains small over many generations, especially when subpopulations are isolated. Founder effect = a population is initially established by a small number of breeding individuals. Chance plays a significant role in determining which genes are present among the founders, can lead to rapid evolutionary changes. Bottleneck effect = effects of genetic drift when a population is dramatically reduced in size. Migration and gene flow in populations increase N e and reduce effects of genetic drift. Fluctuating population size through time may results in complex patterns, as will interaction of drift and selection.

Fig. 21.9, P. Buri’s study of genetic drift in Drosophila. 107 experimental populations. Randomly selected 8 males and 8 females from each population for the next generation for 20 generations.

Heterozygosity for eight populations of Song Sparrows (Pruett & Winker 2005)

Natural selection: 1.Populations growth occurs exponentially; more individuals are produced than can be supported by available resources resulting in a struggle for existence (e.g., Malthus). 2.No two individuals are the same, natural populations display enormous variation, and variation is heritable. 3.Survival is not random, but depends in part on the hereditary makeup of offspring. Over generations, this process leads to gradual change of populations and evolution of new species.

Natural selection (and adaptation): 1.Natural selection equates to the differential survival of genotypes. 2.Darwinian fitness (W) = relative reproductive ability of a genotype Calculate the # of viable offspring relative to other genotypes. 3.Selection coefficient (s) = 1 - W 4.Contribution of each genotype to the next generation: AAAaaa Initial genotypic frequencies p2p2 2pqq2q2 FitnessW AA W Aa W aa Frequency after selection p 2 W AA 2pq W Aa q 2 W aa Relative frequency after selection p 2 W AA /W MEAN 2pq W Aa /W MEAN q 2 W aa /W MEAN

Natural selection (and adaptation): Some conclusions: 1.W AA = W Aa = W aa : no natural selection 2.W AA = W Aa < 1.0 and W aa = 1.0: natural selection and complete dominance operate against a dominant allele. 3.W AA = W Aa = 1.0 and W aa < 1.0: natural selection and complete dominance operate against a recessive allele. 4.W AA < W Aa < 1.0 and W aa = 1.0: heterozygote shows intermediate fitness; natural selection operates without effects of complete dominance. 5.W AA and W aa < 1.0 and W Aa = 1.0: heterozygote has the highest fitness; natural selection/codominance favor the heterozygote (also called overdominance or heterosis). 6.W Aa < W AA and W aa = 1.0: heterozygote has lowest fitness; natural selection favors either homozygote.

Natural selection: Selection against recessive alleles: Recessive traits often result in reduced fitness. If so, there is selection against homozygous recessives, thus reducing the frequency of the recessive allele. However, the recessive allele is not usually eliminated; rare, lethal recessive alleles occur in the heterozygote (protected polymorphism). Fig , Selection against a recessive lethal genotype.

Heterozygote superiority: If a heterozygote has higher fitness than the homozygotes, both alleles are maintained in the population because both are favored by the heterozygote genotype (e.g., sickle cell trait). Also known as: heterosis or overdominance Fig , Distribution of malaria and Hb-S allele.

Effects of selection can override genetic drift: Fixation of a new favorable mutation: Fixation of a new favorable mutation may occur very rapidly, depending on the strength of selection and effective population size. When N e is large, the effects of genetic drift are always small, but the effects of selection can be large (directly proportional to N e ). Selective sweep = process by which a favorable mutation becomes fixed in a population due to force of positive selection. Closely-linked neutral alleles can hitchhike during a selective sweep (i.e., genetic draft, which is distinct from genetic drift). Linked regions of DNA around the favorable allele become overrepresented in the population; leads to excess of rare alleles at linked loci. Effects of selection become apparent not only at the selected locus but also in the flanking DNA sequences.

Migration equates to gene flow - movement of genes from one population to another. Three major effects: 1.Introduces and spreads unique alleles to new populations. 2.If allelic frequencies differ between two populations, gene flow changes allele frequencies of the recipient population. 3.By increasing the effective population size, migration reduces the effects of genetic drift. Fig , Effect of migration on a recipient gene pool.

Hartl & Clark (1997) Principles of Population Genetics Change in allele frequency with one-way migration (m = 0.01)

Migration (cont.): Increases the effective size of a population. Prevents allelic fixation. If migration rate (m) >> mutation rate rate of (  ), effects of genetic drift that tend to cause populations to diverge in allelic frequencies will be offset. Measure migration scaled to the mutation rate (m/  ). Important to conservation biology because habitat fragmentation can prevent gene flow, and thus reduce effective population size of isolated populations, increasing the effects of genetic drift. Maintaining natural corridors between populations is essential.

Balance between evolutionary forces – equilibrium models: Balance between mutation & genetic drift Balance between mutation & selection Balance between migration & selection

Balance between mutation and genetic drift: Mutation adds genetic variation/genetic drift removes variation. Infinite alleles model predicts that mutation and drift balance each other to result in a steady state of heterozygosity. Assumptions of the infinite alleles model: 1.Each mutation is assumed to generate a novel allele never observed (and the probability that two mutations will generate the same mutation is infinitely small). 2.Genetic drift operates as normal, affecting smaller populations disproportionately. 3.Heterozygosity: H = (4 N e ) / (1 + 4 N e  ) 4.Neutral parameter  = 4 N e  *describes balance between mutation and drift (if N e doubles and  is halved  H remains the same).

Fig , Relationship between  = 4 N e  and expected heterozygosity.

Hartl & Clark (1997) Principles of Population Genetics

Balance between mutation and selection: When an allele becomes rare, changes in frequency due to natural selection are small. Mutation occurs at the same time and produces new rare alleles. Balance between mutation and selection results in evolution. For a complete recessive allele at equilibrium: q = √ (  /s) If homozygote is lethal (s = 1) then q = √ 

Balance between migration (gene flow) and selection: High levels of gene flow (>2 effective migrants per generation) will counter the tendency for isolated populations to differentiate or speciate. High rates of gene flow (>10 effective migrants per generation) will typically result in low Fst values between two populations for most loci in genome. Populations might generally be indistinguishable (cryptic). But that doesn’t mean that individual populations don’t evolve and adapt to their local environment. If the effects of selection are stronger than migration (s >> m), specific alleles that are well-suited (beneficial) to their environment can still become disproportionally represented. Gene flow is locus-specific and a function of “migration/selection balance”.

Safran, R. J. & Nosil, P. (2012) Speciation: The Origin of New Species. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):17 Genic View of Speciation

Safran, R. J. & Nosil, P. (2012) Speciation: The Origin of New Species. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):17 Leads to heterogeneity creating “genomic islands of divergence” against a neutral background

Yellow-billed pintail LocusF ST mtDNA0.00 OCD10.01 ENO10.01 FGB0.00 GRIN10.02* PCK10.03* HBA20.01 * = significant P-value

A subunit 4 amino acid substitutions  ST = 0.65 Cause a beneficial increase in Hb-O2 affinity in the presence of phosphate and chloride.

Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Etter PD, Stiffler N, Johnson EA, et al Population Genomics of Parallel Adaptation in Threespine Stickleback using Sequenced RAD Tags. PLoS Genet 6(2): e doi: /journal.pgen Threespine Stickleback

Finally, one more important and related topic: Assortative mating Individuals do not mate randomly but prefer one phenotype to another. Affects allele frequencies. Assortative mating may be positive or negative. Inbreeding Preferential mating of close relatives. Small populations may show this effect even with no tendency to select close relatives. Acts on allele frequencies like genetic drift by decreasing Ne. Heterozygosity decreases and homozygosity increases. Self-fertilization is the most extreme example.

Effects of inbreeding: Effects of inbreeding are generally thought to be maladaptive. Outbreeding is usually beneficial. But interestingly, inbred population do not always show evidence of inbreeding depression (harmful effects). Repeated cycles or persistent periods of small population size are thought to purge populations of deleterious alleles.

Review Slide - Summary of effects of evolutionary forces: Mutation Occurs at low rate, creates small changes, and increases genetic variation; balanced with natural selection and drift. Genetic drift Decreases variation due to loss of alleles, produces divergence and substantial changes in small populations through bottlenecks, founder events and geographic isolation; balanced with mutation. Migration Rates and types of migration vary, increases effective population size and decreases divergence by encouraging gene flow (and reduces drift), but also creates major changes in allele frequencies; balanced with selection. Natural selection Increases or decreases genetic variation depending on the environment, continues to act after equilibrium has been achieved; balanced with other forces, e.g., mutation and migration. Non-random mating Inbreeding decreases variation and in some cases fitness (but not always), and contributes to the effects of other processes by decreasing effective population size.