PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uPractical Application of the PEER Limit State Checking Methodolgy uAllin Cornell uwith F. Jalayer,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.
Advertisements

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Seismic Simulation: Advances with OpenSees
Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings SPEAR International Workshop Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 4 th -5 th April 2005.
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Limit States and Design Parameters for Flexurally Dominated RC Columns uMarc O. Eberhard uMyles Parrish, Mike Berry uUniversity.
Y.P. Wang 1, W.H. Liao 2 and C.L. Lee 2 1 Professor of Civil Engineering 2 Research Assistant Professor of NHMRC National Chiao-Tung University Y.P. Wang.
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uHelmut Krawinkler Seismic Demand Analysis.
PEER Relating Structural Response to Damage Eduardo Miranda Hesaam Aslani Shahram Taghavi Stanford University PEER 2002 Annual Meeting.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
1 Holmes IRCC Workshop October 18, 2006 Motivation and Development of PBEE for Existing and New Buildings William T. Holmes Structural Engineer Rutherford.
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
Presentation on Software Development
Utilizing Steel Plate Shear Walls for Seismic Hazard Mitigation
ATC 58 Performance Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT)
Stability Degradation and Redundancy in Damaged Structures Benjamin W. Schafer Puneet Bajpai Department of Civil Engineering Johns Hopkins University.
by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky
PEER Van Nuys Testbed Simulation Laura N. Lowes - University of Washington #setAnalysisParameters.tcl #
Structural models Christine Goulet, Presenter
Panel Discussion: PBEE Practice and Needs Paul Somerville, URS Joe Maffei, R&C Ron Hamburger, SGH Lloyd Cluff, PG&E Tom Shantz, Caltrans Jim Malley, Degenkolb.
Behavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns
PBEE Practice and Needs Panel Discussion Lloyd Cluff, PG&E Paul Somerville, URS Joe Maffei, R&C Ron Hamburger, SGH Tom Shantz, Caltrans Jim Malley, Degenkolb.
H. Krawinkler, 2/22/07 P-Delta and Minimum Base Shear.
Quantifying risk by performance- based earthquake engineering, Cont’d Greg Deierlein Stanford University …with contributions by many 2006 IRCC Workshop.
The use of risk in design: ATC 58 performance assessment procedure Craig D. Comartin.
Demand and Capacity Factor Design: A Performance-based Analytic Approach to Design and Assessment Sharif University of Technology, 25 April 2011 Demand.
1 Workshop on GMSM for Nonlinear Analysis, Berkeley CA, October 26, 2006 Structural Models: OpenSees and Drain RC Frames and Walls Curt B. Haselton - PhD.
Code Minimum Base Shear Requirements February 2007 Joe Maffei RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE.
Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford U. PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF A CONCRETE BUILDING California State University at Los Angeles Belen Valencia Art Chianello Marlon Calderon Faculty Advisor: Rupa Purasinghe.
Section 2.1 Overview Types of NL Models Inelastic Model Attributes
Nonlinear response- history analysis in design practice RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE November 2007 Joe Maffei.
Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.
Thoughts on minimum strength & stiffness requirements for seismic design Greg Deierlein Stanford University PEER/SF-AB Tall Building Discussion Feb. 23,
S a (T 1 ) Scaling Nilesh Shome ABS Consulting. Methodology Developed in 1997 (Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. (1998), “Earthquake,
Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 8414 – Structural Dynamics Northridge Earthquake 1 Northridge Earthquake - Concrete.
Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.
Incremental Dynamic Analyses on Bridges on various Shallow Foundations Lijun Deng PI’s: Bruce Kutter, Sashi Kunnath University of California, Davis NEES.
Earthquakes and Modeling Chris Van Horn and Kyle Eli.
PEER EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE-ENGINEERING INTERFACE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE Allin Cornell Stanford University SCEC WORKSHOP Oakland, CA.
NEESR: Near-Collapse Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures Presented by Justin Murray Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Static Pushover Analysis
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
Performance-based Earthquake Engineering – A Very Short Introduction (why taking Dynamics of Structures) Dr. ZhiQiang Chen UMKC Spring,2011.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
University of Palestine
Team UCDSESM Yihai Bao, YeongAe Heo, Zhiyu Zong University of California, Davis April 4 th, 2008 Prediction for Progressive Collapse Resistance of a 2D.
1 Building Collapse Fragilities Considering Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences Using Publicly Available NEEShub Data Yue Li and Ruiqaing Song Michigan Technological.
Tall Building Initiative Response Evaluation Helmut Krawinkler Professor Emeritus Stanford University On behalf of the Guidelines writers: Y. Bozorgnia,
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Progress towards Structural Design for Unforeseen Catastrophic Events ASME Congress Puneet Bajpai and Ben Schafer The Johns Hopkins University.
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
Kenneth O’Neill Experimental Investigation of Circular Concrete Filled Steel Tube Geometry on Seismic Performance.
Preliminary Design Ron Klemencic, P.E., S.E. President, Magnusson Klemencic Associates Presented by: John Hooper, P.E., S.E. Director of Earthquake Engineering,
Characterization of Irregularities in Existing Tall Buildings in San Francisco using GIS Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering MSc.
Seismic Performance of New and Older CBFs Dawn Lehman and Charles Roeder (PIs) Po-Chien Hsiao (GSRs) University of Washington.
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
Proposed Balanced Design Procedure
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
(PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN)
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
A Brief Idea on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
Update of ASCE 41 Concrete Provisions
فصل اول 1- پیشگفتار 2- کلیات خوشا پیشگفتار: از دستاورد های امروزه مهندسی زلزله و سازه ، می توان طراحی سازه ها بر مبنای عملکرد را بر شمرد که اولا.
Quantitative Risk Assessment
Evaluation of RC building strengthened with column jacketing method with consideration of soft-story Hendrik Wijaya Department of Civil and Construction.
Presentation transcript:

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uPractical Application of the PEER Limit State Checking Methodolgy uAllin Cornell uwith F. Jalayer, M. Motahari, uD. Vamvatsikos, and P. Bazzurro uStanford University uBased on Results from a PEER Core Project and PEER/PG&E Lifelines Project

PBEE Limit State Options Current (FEMA 273): Several Performance Levels and Tolerable Ground Motion Probabilities Current (FEMA 273): Several Performance Levels and Tolerable Ground Motion Probabilities Several Performance Levels and Tolerable Performance State Probabilities in “LRFD-like” Form PEER PROPOSAL

Components of Drift-Based Assessment,  max S a (s a a > s a ]  = aS a b 0 S 0  max   | s a P LS C Maximum Interstory drift Angle ) = Pr [S P a P max 

The Safety Checking Equation Median Capacity Median Demand under records with Sa at hazard level Pfo

Example: PG&E 3-Story Pre- Northridge SMRF 32’6’’ 28’ 14’ W 24x76 Box 18x18x 3/4 W 33x118 PG&E Substation Frame 15’6” W 24x162

Tolerable Probability Check: 2% in 50 Years 2% in 50 years = / year 1.7g

DS1 DS2 Static Pushover: Capacity Intact SPO and Damage States Roof Drift Base Shear ( Kips ) DS3 DS4 Focus here: Damage State 4: Local Collapse: First loss of shear tab It occurs at local rotation of 0.07 or Roof Drift of 0.048

Demand: Static (SPO) to Dynamic (IDA) “SPO2IDA” - an instantaneous web-site tool See Poster by D. Vamvatsikos

Roof Drift ( % ) Median 2.7% 84th %-tile 4.0% BetaD = ln (4/2.7)= 0.39 Dynamic Demand Results for This Structure Sa ( g ) 1.7 Intact SPO Median IDA 84% IDA Sa = 1.7 g

Limit State Safety Check

Beam Column Model with Stiffness and Strength Degradation in Shear and Flexure (but no axial column failure modes!) using DRAIN2D-UW by J. Pincheira et al.Beam Column Model with Stiffness and Strength Degradation in Shear and Flexure (but no axial column failure modes!) using DRAIN2D-UW by J. Pincheira et al. Seismic Design Assessment of RC Structures. (Holiday Inn Hotel in Van Nuys)

Tolerable Probability: 0.03 per year 0.4g 0.03 / year

Capacity: Onset of Story Mechanism 0.75%

Van Nuys: Drift Demand (via NLD Analysis) O.4g Median: 0.46% Dispersion; 0.39

Limit State Safety Check Note addition of epistemic uncertainty in demand estimation

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Probability-Based Assessment Basis Safe if:

Notes For Codified Versions Some of These Demand and Capacity Betas Might be Tabulated The Estimation of Epistemic Uncertainties Demands Good Judgement In the PEER/PG&E Buildings Fragility Project we are Taking a Slightly Different Tact Based on the Same Methods. The Objective is to Establish the Likelihoods of the Building Being Yellow or Red Tagged