Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Advertisements

1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Early On® Michigan Child Outcomes
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Lynne Kahn Christina Kasprzak Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes.
Orientation for New Staff Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center Early Childhood Outcomes Center September 2011.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
State Activities in Measuring Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn, Donna Spiker, Melissa Raspa, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center Presented at: International Society.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.
Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes in South Carolina Columbia, SC October 2006.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems What Practitioners Need to Know about Measuring EI and ECSE Outcomes Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Measuring Progress: Improved Outcomes for Children and Families Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes Center SRI.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &
Module 5 Understanding the Age-Expected Child Development, Developmental Trajectories and Progress Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress 2007.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
Measuring Child Outcomes Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney (ECO) Early Childhood Outcomes (NECTAC) National Early Childhood TA Center Delaware COSF Training,
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Embedding Child and Family Outcomes into Practice – Part 2 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Early Childhood Outcomes Center Webinar for the Massachusetts.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 2 Orientation to Training Modules Modules Introduction/basic information Determining child status Documentation of child status Case study/videotape demonstration Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Documents and Resources Instructions, forms, tools, resources and references

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 3 Module One Objectives Participants will: Have a basic knowledge of Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP) Understand why this system is being put in place Know how the information will be used Know the requirements for implementation including how and when to determine child’s status for each of the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) indicators

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 4 What is VSDCP? Mechanism to determine the amount of progress infants and toddlers made during the time they received supports and services through the Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 5 What is Measured? Functional status in relation to same age peers at the time of the Initial Family Service Plan (IFSP) compared to Functional status in relation to same aged peers at the time of exit from the Part C System

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 6 Outcomes/Indicators Each child’s functional status in relation to same age peers is assessed in three broad areas These three areas are referred to as indicators or child outcomes These outcomes/indicators are the same for every child in the Part C System in Virginia and throughout the nation

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 7 Indicators/Child Outcomes Positive social emotional skills (including positive social relationships) Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/ communication [and early literacy]) Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 8 Child Indicators/Outcomes Developed through an extensive stakeholder process Consistent with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and legislative intent Compatible with best practice (transdisciplinary service models, functional behaviors) Incorporate universal design Reflect functional skills rather than domains

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 9 A Point of Clarification: “Indicators” vs. “Outcomes” The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center uses the word “outcomes” to refer to both these global child outcomes as well as the individualized child outcomes In Virginia, the word “indicator” refers to the 3 broad OSEP outcomes to distinguish them from individualized IFSP outcomes

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 10 Functional …. Refers to things that are meaningful to the child in the context of everyday living Refers to an integrated series of behaviors or skills that allow the child to function in their daily life Functional skills are not single behaviors, nor are they the sum of a series of discrete behaviors

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 11 Functional Skills are About.. What the child typically does throughout his/her day Actual performance across settings and situations How child uses his/her skills to accomplish tasks They are Not the child’s capacity to function under unusual or ideal circumstances

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 12 Overarching Purpose The ultimate goal is for young children to be active and successful participants now and in the future in a variety of settings– in their homes, in their child care, preschool or school programs, and in the community. Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress provides a mechanism to see how successful the state and local systems are in helping children reach this goal.

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 13 Benefits of Measuring Child Progress Improve outcomes for children and families Provide data for program evaluation and improvement Meet Federal requirements Provide data to support continued Federal funding for Part C

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 14 Why Was the System Developed? Expectation of Accountability Accountability increasingly means looking at results – not just process Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) has been under increasing pressure to produce progress data on children participating in early intervention programs in order to retain early intervention funding

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 15 Critical Events in Early Intervention Accountability 1993 – GPRA (Government Performance and Results Act) was passed 2002 – PART (Program Assessment Rating Tool) found there was no data on outcomes for Part C 2003 – OSEP began to ask states for early intervention child outcome data (and funded the ECO Center) 2005, 2006 – OSEP released revisions to the Part C reporting requirements for states

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 16 “Results Not Demonstrated” Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) review findings for Part C (2002) “ While the program has met its goal relating to the number of children served, it has not collected information on how well the program is doing to improve the educational and development outcomes of infants and toddlers served” Read more at ExpectMore.gov

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 17 OSEP’s Response to PART Findings OSEP required states to develop a state performance plan (by December 2005) that included indicators of child progress. OSEP requires states to submit child progress data in their Annual Performance Report (APR) Feb. 1 each year

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 18 State Requirements Prior to 2004, states were already required to report on indicators such as service settings (natural environments), number of children served and compliance with the 45-day timeline. Specific child and family indicators were added after the 2004 reauthorization of IDEA

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 19 How Will This Information be Used? Evaluation of effectiveness of early intervention (national, state and local levels) Determination of compliance with federal indicators Program improvement Public Reporting

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 20 How Will The Data Be Reported? The data will aggregated before reporting. The number and percentage of children who made progress in each of 5 categories will be reported. OSEP will compile the percentage of children in each of five progress categories with the information from other states to report to Congress

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 21 Progress Categories Reported to OSEP Number and Percentage of children who: a.Did not improve functioning b.Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-age peers c.Improved functioning to a level nearer to same-age peers but did not reach it d.Improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-age peers e.Maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-age peers 3 outcomes x 5 “measures” = 15 numbers

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 22 Program Evaluation and Improvement Child Outcome/indicator data provides: A means to assess the effectiveness of the early intervention system A mechanism to assess the effectiveness of changes in practices/ policies/ procedures designed to improve the effectiveness of the system.

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 23 Requirements for Implementation Assessment of each child’s status on the three indicators Functional assessment team process, including family multiple sources of information use of developmental tool Comparison to same aged peers Entry and Exit Assessment/Rating Data entry into ITOTS

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 24 Reporting on the Child Indicators Ratings on the 3 indicators must be reported for every child enrolled. Ratings are needed in all areas even if: No one has concerns about a child’s development in some areas A child has delays in one or two indicators, but not in all three indicators

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 25 For More Information Click on Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress Note: Many of the slides and handouts were developed from information on this Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Center Website.