Growth Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Charles R. Greenwood, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas DEC, Boston, December, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The BRIGANCE® Screens-II
Advertisements

Benchmark: Improved Maternal and Newborn Health Construct: Prenatal care Parental use of alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs Preconception care Inter-birth.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Understanding the Three Child Outcomes.
Infant Assessments PSY 417. Types of Assessment Norm Referenced: designed to determine ability relative to normative group. Validity is always dependent.
 Provide some background on use of Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Continuous Progress Monitoring  Show an example of one IGDI: Early.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Does anyone have concerns about the child’s functioning with regard to the outcome area? D OES THE CHILD EVER FUNCTION IN WAYS THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED.
Early On® Michigan Child Outcomes
V v Motor Skills and Young Children with Autism Olivia Paradis & Megan MacDonald, PhD Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND.
Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Using Progress Monitoring to Support RTI Services for Infants and.
CPM M R EC Continuous Progress Monitoring Measures for Intervention Research and Accountability in Early Childhood Charles R. Greenwood, Dale Walker, Jay.
Using the Online Data System for Infant and Toddler IGDIs Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project,
Indicator of Parent Child Interaction Kathleen M. Baggett, Ph.D. & Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas Society.
Early Communication Indicators: Monitoring the Progress of Infants and Toddlers Dale Walker, Judith J. Carta, and Charles R. Greenwood Dale Walker, Judith.
Background of the Early Communication Indicator for Infants and Toddlers Dale Walker, Judith Carta, and Charles Greenwood.
What Are IGDIs and Why Use Them? Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, University of Kansas.
Using ECI Data for Decision- Making about Individual Children Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project,
NEW ECI Website and Individualization Workshop September 22-23, 2005 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project Presenters: Jay Buzhardt & Charlie Greenwood.
Chapter 9 Instructional Assessment © Taylor & Francis 2015.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Positive Discipline with Young Children An Overview of How to Encourage Positive Behavior.
WestEd.org Infant/Toddler Group Care Supporting Cognitive Development.
Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
Resources to Support the Use of DEC’s Recommended Practices This presentation and handout were developed by Camille Catlett.
Module 2: Child Growth and Development
IPCI! Indicator of Parent-Child Interaction A Practitioner-Friendly Tool for Monitoring Progress in Parent- Child Interaction
LifeSpan. Function Natural, required, or expected activity of a person based on stage of development Ability to exist with in environment Related to a.
Coaching Caregivers to Implement Joint Attention Interventions in the Natural Environment Heather Brownfield Kent State University Early Childhood Special.
Delaware Birth to Three Early Intervention System Evaluation: Child Outcomes July 15, 2004 Conference Call Series: Measuring Child Outcomes “Examples of.
1 Quality of Play: Progress and Challenges. 2 Introduction Key Sure Start objective: Improving the ability to learn Core Sure Start service: Support for.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Early Intervention Mock Evaluation. The following is a mock evaluation of a 15 month year old boy. The boy in this evaluation will be named “Tom” and.
The Creative Curriculum for Infants, Toddlers, & Twos
Orientation Ron Lally Center for Child and Family Studies, WestEd.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
Activity Planning and Assessment
Developmental Domains. A child care professional who is knowledgeable of the typical behaviors and abilities of children can support new learning and.
WestEd.org California’s Infant/Toddler Learning & Development Foundations.
Chapter 16 Early Childhood Assessment. Assessment of Young Children Establish family priorities Familiar environments Assessments should Provide information.
Observation and Assessment in Early Childhood Feel free to chat with each other. We will start class at 9:00 PM ET! Seminar Two: Using Standardized Tests.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHILD OUTCOMES SUMMARY RATING PROCESS 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
An Ecological Approach to Family Intervention in Early Childhood: Embedding Services in WIC Thomas J. Dishion University of Oregon & Child and Family Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Using ECI Data to Make Individual and Program Level Decisions Judy Carta, Ph.D & Dale Walker Ph.D. Part 2: ECI Workshop Juniper Gardens Children’s Project.
Cognitive Evaluations. Factors Important in Assessments 1. Developmental History 2. Cultural Uniqueness 3. Impact of Disability.
Early Childhood Special Education. Dunst model interest engagement competence mastery.
Progress Monitoring, FBA, and BIP. Demonstrate physical independence to meet needs Demonstrate acquisition of skills in early language, early literacy,
Approaches to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories Jim J Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education
PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP Seminar Unit 3 Identification and Early Intervention.
1 Outcomes review and use of the 7-point scale. 2 Outcomes Jeopardy Jeopardy score sheet Jeopardy score sheet Pointing to the cabinet for cereal Reading.
Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 1 Minnesota Child Development Inventory Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 6, 2013.
CE300-Observation and Assessment in Early Childhood Unit 2 Using Standardized Tests and Authentic Assessments Feel free to chat with each other. We will.
Using the Web to Support Data-based Decision Making Jay Buzhardt, Dale Walker, Charles Greenwood Juniper Gardens Children’s Project Division of Early Childhood.
How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
Early Childhood Development Holly Delgado, M.A.. Goals:  Explore the 4 primary domains of development  Identify reasons for developmental differences.
1 A Comparison of Motor Delays in Young Children: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Delay, and Developmental Concerns Beth Provost, Brian R. Lopez,
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
CHAPTER 7: Developmental Assessment
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Vermont’s Child and Family Outcomes
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Demonstration Site Presented By: Chelsea Saganich Rojas Lead Implementation Coach North Central Early Steps.
Presentation transcript:

Growth Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Charles R. Greenwood, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas DEC, Boston, December, 2001

Rationale Assessment that early interventionists can use: To identify early To monitor growth and progress To make intervention decisions

Unique Features Appropriate for infants/toddlers Economical to employ Efficient to learn to use Repeatable Directly represents rate of growth Sensitive to age and interventions

Completed or Nearly Completed Expressive Communication Luze et al., School Psychology Review, 2001, 30(3), Greenwood et al., Best Practices in School Psychology (Vol. IV), in press, NASP Social Interaction In preparation

Infant/Toddler Expressive Communication General Outcome: The child uses gestures, sounds, words, or sentences to convey wants and needs or to express meaning to others. Constructs: Prelinguistic Linguistic CommunicationCommunication Key Skill: Single Multiple Elements: Gestures Vocalizations Words Words Time to Bench Mark: Months of Age

Infant/Toddler GOM Summary Expressive Communication Social Interaction Movement Problem Solving Self Help

Today’s Topics Movement (Gross Motor) Problem Solving (Cognitive)

Infant/Toddler Movement General Outcome: The child moves in a fluent and coordinated manner to play and participate in home, school, and community settings. Constructs: Transitional Object Movements Locomotion Control Key Skill: Change in Roll/ Trap/ Elements: Position Grounded Vertical Throw Catch Time to Bench Mark: Months of Age

Movement Sample 39 Children: Gender 17 (43.6%) male 22 (56.4%) female Race 33 African American (84.6%) 2 Hispanic/Latino (5.1%) 2 mixed races (5.1%) 2 European-American (5.1%) Disability 5 with IFSP’s 2 Child care centers serving teen moms

Study Design Nine repeated GOM measurements (each 3 weeks apart) Criterion Tests (Beginning & Ending) Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2 Caregiver Movement Report (Researcher Developed) GOM growth curve modeling (Bryk & Raudenbusch, 1992)

GOM Movement Assessment Protocol Common Toy Set: Testing Play-Like But Standarized Situations Common Toy Set: Testing Play-Like But Standarized Situations Assessor's Behavior Observational Recording Form Observational Recording Form

Sensitivity to Growth Key Skill Elements

Sensitivity to Growth Total Movement Rate = (Change in Position + Grounded + Vertical Locomotion + Roll & Throw + Trap & Catch)/Time Observed) Growth by Age Cohort , intercept = 5.26, slope = , intercept = 9.95, slope = , intercept = 14.65, slope = 0.05

Rate of Growth Across 9 Measurement Occasions for Three Age Cohorts (Each Occasion = 3 Weeks)

Total Movement Rate Growth Curve Over Age at Measurement

Individual Children’s Growth Trajectories

Children with IFSP’s Child with hydrocephaly

Technical Features GOM Odd/Even Reliability Correlations r = 0.88 M = 8.8 odd vs. M = 8.2 even movements/minute GOM Alternate Toy Forms Reliability r = 0.85 (BB versus WH) r = 0.84 (WH versus SC) r = 0.91 (BB versus SC) Note: BB=Blocks & balls, WH = Window house, SC = Shopping carat

Technical Features (Contin.) GOM Criterion Validity Correlations Total Movement Rate vs. Peabody Locomotion Sub-Scale r (Mean Level [intercept]) = r (Mean Slope [growth rate]) = Parent/Caregiver Report Total Score r (Mean Level [intercept]) = r (Mean Slope [growth rate]) =

Summary/Implications Infant/Toddler Movement GOM Considerable Progress Reliable Valid Sensitive to Age Limitations/Future Research Single, small sample age children at benchmark Treatment validity yet to be investigated

General Outcome: Child solves problems that require reasoning about objects, concepts, situations, and people. Construct: Visual Object Problem Exploration Exploration Solving Key Skill Looking Touch/Mouth/Manip. Toy Performs Persistence/ Elements: Its Function Sustained/ Attention Time to Bench Mark: Months of Age Infant/Toddler Problem Solving (Cognitive)

Shopping Cart Blocks/Balls WindowWindow House Standard Toy Set

Assessor's Behavior Clean Room/Set up toys-situation Engage child in active play/movement

Recording Form

General Outcome: Child engages in a range of basic self- help skills including eating, toileting/hygiene, dressing, and safety/identification Construct: Self Help (Dependence/Independence) Key SkillEating Toileting Undress/Dressing Elements:Amount/ Guided vs. Guided vs. Fuss Independent Independent Cooperating, Complying, Expected Behaviors Time to Bench Mark: Months of Age Infant/Toddler Self-Help (Adaptive)