Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Advertisements

Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the. Regulatory Requirements IDEA Statue 2004 December 3, USC 1400 Part B Regulations August 14, 2006.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Megan Vinh, Sara Doutre, and Anne Lucas. Presentation adapted from presentation developed by Sharon Walsh for the IDEA Infant Toddler Coordinators Association.
Produced by NICHCY, 2013 D evelopment of the Transition Plan.
Legal and Ethical Issues
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Produced by NICHCY, 2014 Procedures for the of the IFSP D evelopment R eview, E valuation & Module 5.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
Presented by the Part C- Kristie Musick, Part C Coordinator Dr. Lesly Wilson, Part C Data Manager Part B- Lori James, Part B Data Manager Part C & B March.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
MSDS Report: Student Count by Primary Ed Setting Sample Report Center for Educational Performance and Information - Michigan Student Data System Student.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Supporting Early Childhood Transition: State of the Evidence and Implications for Policy and Practice Beth Rous Caroline Gooden.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Kansas Department of Health and Environment – Infant Toddler Services Kansas Inservice Training System – KITS – KU.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND NATIONAL TRENDS IN SERVICE DELIVERY GETTING INTO THE SYSTEM.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
2005 B. Mullins, D. Scheler 1 Movin’ On Up Effective Transition from Early Intervention into Preschool (Revised May 2005)
Transition from PSEI to Kindergarten or First Grade November 17, 2011.
REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBINAR: MARCH 27, 2012.
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
Legal Basis for Assessment Procedures. Public Law Education for all handicapped children act Mandated provision of services for all school.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Federal Statute, Federal Regulations, State Policies, and State Procedures What’s the Difference? Mississippi Department of Education Office.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS GETTING INTO THE SYSTEM.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
What Parents Need to Know: The New Part C Federal Regulations and National Trends in Service Delivery Lynda Cook Pletcher May 10, 2012 Region 6 Parent.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
TA Call CCBs and Child Find June 12, Welcome ! Purpose: EI Colorado and CDE Preschool Special Education Child Find staff will review changes in.
Are you smarter than the person who developed this lame quiz?
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012

2 Session Goals and Organization Provide an overview for the basis of legal requirements and federal policy Provide an overview of the early childhood transition requirements within the context of the SPP/APR requirements Highlight key provisions addressed in the 2009 OSEP FAQ (FAQ to be updated in 2012 to reflect new Part C regulations) Share resources on quality practices and legal requirements

Regulatory Requirements Part C Regulations September 28, CFR Part 303 Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities IDEA 2004 December 3, USC 1400 Part B Regulations August 14, CFR Parts 300 and 301 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities Unique State Rule and Policy 3

OSEP Policy Letters and FAQs Policy Letter to Elder February 11, 2004 Policy Letter to Hirsch August 9, 2005 OSEP Early Childhood Transition FAQs – SPP/APR Indicators C-8 and B-12 December 12, 2009 Policy Letter to ITCA and NASDSE February 9, 2011 Available at: 4

Context for Accountability Government Performance and Results Modernization Act (GPRA) of 2010 which amended the GPRA of 1993, driving accountability in all federal programs by focusing on performance measurement publ352.pdf Programs funded by the Federal government evaluated by Program Assessment and Rating Tool (PART) to measure performance. 5

IDEA 2004 & SPP/APR Requirements IDEA 2004 designated the use of a State Performance Plan (SPP) requiring Annual Performance Reports (APR) on performance and compliance targets Compliance Indicators for Part C and Part B (C8, B11 and B12) 6

Indicator C8 Requirements Percent of all children exiting Part C who received timely transition planning to support the child’s transition to preschool and other appropriate community services by their third birthday including:  A. IFSPs with transition steps and services;  B. Notification to LEA, if child potentially eligible for Part B; and  C. Transition conference, if child potentially eligible for Part B. 7

C8 Measurement Requirements C-8C Transition Conference Exceptional Family Circumstances States are not required to include in their calculation the number of children delayed due to exceptional family circumstances. If included in report, put in numerator and denominator. Report on the number of delays separately in discussion Do not include, children whose family did not provide approval to conduct the transition conference. 8

Indicator B11 Requirements Initial Evaluation Percent of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation or other state time frame. Exception to Timeframe for Initial Evaluation ( (d))  Parent repeatedly fails or refuses to produce child for evaluation  Child enrolls in another school after timeframe begins but before eligibility determination 9

Indicator B12 - IEP by Age Three Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday. 10

Indicator B12 Measurement Requirements a. # of children who have been served in Part C and referred to Part B for eligibility determination b. # of those referred determined to be NOT eligible and whose eligibility was determined prior to their third birthdays c. # of those found eligible who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. d. # of children for whom parent refusal to provide consent caused delays in evaluation or initial services. e. # of children who were referred to Part C less than 90 days before their third birthday. (NEW) 11

12 Transition Plan (§ (d)) IDEA and APR requirement (C8A) IFSP includes a transition plan for all infants and toddlers with a disability exiting from Part C Reviews program options for toddler from third birthday through the remainder of school year Families included in transition plan development as required under (§ (d)) and (§ (h)) Establishes in IFSP not fewer than 90 days and not more than 9 months before third birthday

Service coordination services includes facilitating the development of a transition plan. (§303.34(b)(10)) Developed at either the transition conference or the IFSP meeting Transition conference and IFSP meeting may be combined Must include steps to exit and services identified as needed to support smooth transition (§ (d)(3)) and consistent with (§ (h)) 13 Transition Plan (§ (d))

Procedures for Transition Plans § (d)(3) Services identified as needed Child find information is transmitted to the LEA or other relevant agency. Transmission of additional information, such as the most recent evaluation, assessments and IFSP (with parental consent). Will vary depending on the program to which the child is transitioning. Support transition of the child. Identified by the IFSP team. Needed by the toddler and his or her family. Discussions with and training of parents regarding future placements and other matters related to transition of their child (inc. Head Start or other preschool options). 14 Steps to exit from Part C

15 Transition Notification (§ (b)(1)) Prior to a toddler exiting the Part C early intervention program, if that toddler is potentially eligible for services under Part B of the IDEA, the lead agency must notify the SEA and the LEA where the toddler resides that the toddler on his or her third birthday will reach the age of eligibility for services under Part B. (§ (b)(1))

Transition Notification SPP and APR Indicator C8B Only reported in C8B for children who are considered potentially eligible Notification must occur no fewer than 90 days before the toddler’s third birthday IFSP team makes the determination 16

Transition Notification (§ (b)(1)) Status of Toddler Who is Potentially Eligible for Part B Lead Agency Notifies LEA / SEA Exiting Part C by age three (§ (b)(1)(i)) At least 90 days prior to toddler’s third birthday. Determined eligible for Part C 45 – 90 days prior to turning age three (§ (b)(1)(ii)) As soon as possible after the eligibility determination. Referred to lead agency less than 45 days prior to turning age three (§ (b)(1)(iii)) No evaluation / assessment / IFSP required, but MUST notify the SEA & LEA if the child may be eligible for Part B (with parental consent, if applicable, under § ).

Transition Notification Content of the SEA and LEA notification must include information to assist Part B in their child find responsibilities Must include:  Child’s name  Child’s date of birth  Parent contact information May additionally include:  Service Coordinator’s name and contact information  Language(s) spoken by the child and family 18

Notification in Utah - Terminology  Notification is the same as sending “demographic information” and the “Disclosure of Directory Information”  The data systems of the two agencies handle this exchange of information (ETOTS to TEDI) 19

Transition Notification Children individually determined by IFSP team based on states’ definition of potentially eligible Lead Agency responsibility to establish policy Reported in C8-B Considered an initial referral to Part B Part B provides procedural safeguards to parents and attends transition conference with parental approval (34CFR (a)(1) 20

Transition Conference For a child exiting Part C and potentially eligible for Part B services, the transition conference must be held, with family approval, at least 90 days and not more than 9 months prior to the toddler’s third birthday. Required participants include the lead agency, the LEA and the family. (§ (c)(1)) 21

Transition Conference For a child exiting Part C and not potentially eligible for Part B, the lead agency (with family approval) makes reasonable efforts to convene the transition conference. Required participants include the lead agency, providers of other appropriate services the toddler may receive and the family. (§ (c)(2)) 22

23 Transition Conference Part C is required to invite the LEA with parent approval If parent does not approve of convening transition conference, LEA notification must be provided (C8B),unless OSEP-approved opt-out policy in place LEA is required to participate in the transition conference (IDEA 612(a)(9) & Part B Regulations (c)) LEA may participate via phone if agreeable to the parent

Transition Conference What if the LEA does not participate?  Part C must still hold the conference at least 90 days and up to nine months prior to the child’s third birthday  Develop or revise the transition plan  Must provide parents with information about Part B preschool services consistent with IDEA section 635(a)(6) 24

What about late referrals to Part C or Part B that might affect timeline requirements? 25

26 Late Referral to Part C – Part C Responsibilities

27 Late Referral to Part C – Part B Responsibilities For children referred to Part C ≤ 90 days from child’s 3 rd birthday and “served” by Part C, Part B: Conducts initial evaluation within 60 days or other state timelines (even if timeline expires after 3 rd birthday) Conducts IEP Meeting (30 days from eligibility determination) Reports in B-11 and in B-12e (subtract B-12e from B12-a in FFY 2010 APR due 2/1/12)

28 Late Referrals from Part C to B - Part B Responsibilities Defined as: Children referred to Part C ≥ 90 days (and served by Part C) BUT referred to Part B ≤ 90 days from child’s 3 rd birthday

29 Late Referrals from Part C to B - Part B Responsibilities Conduct initial evaluation Develop IEP by 3 rd birthday Report all in B-12a but if eligible for Part B and no IEP by 3 rd birthday:  Do NOT report in 12b, c, d, or e (unless parent refusal to consent for evaluation caused delay)  Indicate reason for delay and range of days beyond 3 rd birthday

30 Part B Initial Evaluation & Eligibility Determination IEP team and other qualified individuals must review existing evaluation data, including evaluations and information provided by parents Based on that review and input by family, team determines what additional data are needed to determine if child is child with disability (Part B Regulations ) Part C assessments may be used to determine child eligibility (Letter to Hirsch)

IEP Team & Parent Participation An invitation must, at the request of parents be sent to Part C service coordinator or other representative of Part C System (Part B Regulations (f)) Must inform parent of this provision (Part B regulations (a)(2)(b)(ii)) Conditions for conducting a meeting without parent in attendance (Part B Regulation (a)(2)(B)(ii)(d)) 31

When Must IEPs Be In Effect Conducted within 30 days of eligibility determination IEP Team must consider IFSP content Special education and related services as soon as possible after IEP development ( Part B Regulations ) 32

FAPE Beginning at Age Three Obligation to make FAPE available to each eligible child no later than the child’s third birthday and an IEP is in effect IEP is in effect and includes the projected date for beginning services Third birthday occurs in summer, IEP team determines date when services begin (Part B Regulation (b)) 33

34 Children NOT included in B-12 are: Those who have not been evaluated or determined eligible for Part C and have not received any Part C services These children should be included in B-11 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C

Extended School Year (ESY) Each public agency must ensure that ESY services are available as necessary to provide FAPE.  Determined by IEP Team  Individualized basis in accordance with the IEP requirements  At no cost to the family  May not limit to specific disability categories  May not unilaterally limit type, duration or amount of those services (Part B Regulation ) 35

Extended School Year and FAPE From the Analysis of Comments: Section (a) clearly states that FAPE must be available to all children aged 3 through 21….. The right of an individual child with disabilities to ESY Services is based on a child’s entitlement to FAPE. (p ) 36

37 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C Indicator B-12 = Number of children referred by Part C, found eligible for Part B and have an IEP developed by age three “Referral to Part B” for reporting in B-12a occurs when LEA has been notified that child served in Part C is potentially eligible for services under Part B

38 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C Children reported in B-12a include those: For whom LEA has received LEA Notification prior to child’s third birthday that child will shortly reach the age of eligibility for Part B services AND that child is potentially eligible for services under Part B For whom the LEA has received invitation to the transition conference Served in Part C and referred to Part B even if child was referred to Part C ≤ 90 days before child’s 3 rd birthday

39 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C B-12 reporting for “late referrals to Part C” (referred to Part C ≤ 90 days before 3rd Birthday): These children are subtracted out of B-12a per measurement B-12e when calculating percentage of children who have an IEP developed and implemented by their 3 rd birthdays even if :  No transition conference held at least 90 days before the third birthday  Part C completed an evaluation but IFSP was not developed

40 Existing Early Childhood Transition Training and TA Resources The National Early Childhood Transition Initiative Website

41 Additional Transition Resources US Department of Education – Building the IDEA Legacy NECTAC Part C to Part B Transition Resource Collection National Early Childhood Transition Center