EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn QUALITY CONNECTIONS Presentation at the Board Meeting August 31,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2010 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child and Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Advertisements

Quality Rating & Improvement Systems Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and Education Anne Mitchell Early Childhood Policy Research.
Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales
Quality in Early Years: Key Features of Quality Practice: The Research Perspective Larry Schweinhart, President, HighScope 3,4,5 Children Thrive Conference.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Wisconsin Department of Children and Families Building the Future By Investing Early Minimum Point Requirements for YoungStar by Star Level.
1) KNOW that I must be highly educated for economic success and high quality of life; 2) KNOW that a higher education is achievable by me, my family,
Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminar
A training on how scoring works and ways to easily increase scores
EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn 1 a look back a look ahead GSOD 1.0 GSOD 2.0 Presentation at the.
Early Literacy Learning Model: Everyday Literacy Activities
1 Virginia Head Start Annual Conference The Wonderful World of Transitioning: Home to Center.
Accountability: Alignment and Assessment of Three thru Five Early Learning Standards and Early Childhood Special Education in Arkansas.
Making the ITERS-R come to LIFE
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
1 Using Research to Assess, Build and Collaborate with Partners in Child Development Friday, January 28, 2011 Southern Early Childhood Association Savannah,
What is the Value of the Assessment Process? How does it benefit my program?
Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars ECERS-R Early Childhood Environment.
Child Care Quality and Children’s Development in Indiana Low Income Working Families James Elicker, Carolyn Clawson, & Soo-Young Hong Purdue University.
Family Child Care Quality: Implications for Children with Disabilities Michael Gamel-McCormick Center for Disabilities Studies University of Delaware Annual.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Childcare Quality and Early Learning Gail E. Joseph, Ph. D
Proposed Childcare Licensing Regulations District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education Division of Early Learning September 2014.
Is your child’s center…. Cabinet for Health and Family Services 2 What is STARS for KIDS NOW? Kentucky’s voluntary quality rating system for licensed.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars SACERS: School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale (Used with permission of the authors and the.
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Preschool Classrooms 2014 NJ Division of Early Childhood Education.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
Planning for Future Ministry. Focus on Early Childhood.
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
National Head Start Association Leadership Institute January 29, 2009 Presentation by Joan Lombardi, Ph.D. Early Childhood Development: At the dawn of.
1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!
The Duval County Pilot Early Learning Quality Rating System: Cost Assessment Prepared by Ann Collins Frederic Glantz Jeremy Luallen August 30, 2006 Abt.
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
1 Quality of Play: Progress and Challenges. 2 Introduction Key Sure Start objective: Improving the ability to learn Core Sure Start service: Support for.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Preschool Classrooms 2009 NJ Office of Preschool Education.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
Standards, Assessment and Accountability: Administration of Environmental Rating Scales by EEC Regional Staff Board of Early Education and Care December.
Karen Peifer PhD, MPH, RN Roopa Iyer PhD Ann Kaskel RN Does Place Matter For Healthy Early Child Care Environments?
Early Childhood Advisory Council. “ “ “ “ “ “ CECC Brief History … a vehicle for bringing together many community members to support issues of importance.
1 Regulation Reform Update Highlights from EEC’s Proposed Regulations.
EEC Board Preliminary Recommendations Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
Whitefish Bay Recreation and Community Education Status Update: October 7, 2015.
Participation, Pathways, and Supports for Infants and Toddlers.
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Abbott Preschool Classrooms 2006 NJ DOE Office of Early Childhood Education Rutgers University The College of New Jersey.
 Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars ECERS-R Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale – Revised Edition.
Jim O’Brien Head Start Bureau Health and Disabilities Services Branch 330 C Street, SW Washington, DC Phone: (202)
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat July 30,
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
Mano a Mano 3 Phase II Week Four Topic Three Early Childhood Program Structure Drs. Ellen Marshall and Cathy McAuliffe.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
Cost & Quality in Massachusetts What is the quality What is the cost? What is the relationship of quality to cost Full-day, year round programs in 2000.
Topic IV: Classroom Environments Ellen Marshall, Ph.D. & Cathy McAuliffe- Dickerson, Ph.D.
Prepared for the Office of Head Start by ICF International School Readiness Goals: Using Data to Support Child Outcomes.
Exploring the Future Needs of Child Care in North Dakota Dr. Richard Rathge Professor North Dakota State University Child Care Solutions Summit Bismarck,
Susan Main Executive Director Early Learning Coalition of Duval EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn Presentation.
Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Presentation of Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Cynthia K. Buettner, Ph.D. July 25, 2006.
THE ECERS DEFINITION OF QUALITY AND ITS INTERNATIONAL USE DEBBY CRYER, PH.D. ENVIRONMENT RATING SCALES INSTITUTE, CHAPEL HILL, NC, USA.
from the Trinity Day Care, Inc Annual Report.
Scoring the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale -3 (ECERS-3)
Dr. Amber Reed, School of Educational Leadership
Session V: Environment Rating Scales
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
Session V: Environment Rating Scales
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Preschool Snapshot New Jersey Department of Education
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Beaufort County Preschool Program
Session V: Environment Rating Scales
Presentation transcript:

EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn QUALITY CONNECTIONS Presentation at the Board Meeting August 31, 2011 QUALITY CONNECTIONS Presentation at the Board Meeting August 31,

All Jacksonville Early Learning Programs will provide high quality care and early learning services that result in demonstrated positive school readiness outcomes for all children. COALITION VISION STATEMENT 2

SUPPORT TRACKS – QUALITY INITIATIVES 3 QUALITY CONNECTIONS – ITERS & ECERS GUIDING STARS SUPPORT – JCC & ECS GUIDING STARS SUPPORT - JOURNEY

QUALITY CONNECTIONS - PROGRAM OBJECTIVE To empower school readiness providers to offer quality early learning experiences To use the environment rating scales to help with quality improvement and provide an entry into Guiding Stars of Duval 4

MEASURABLE OUTCOME – FY  Number of classrooms assessed - 2 classrooms per center – RANDOM selection  Measured using the Infant Toddler Rating Scale- Revised (ITERS-R) for infant / toddler classrooms & the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale- Revised (ECERS-R) for preschool classrooms.  Overall AVERAGE score of 3.0 or above (new centers), and 3.50 or above (support for more than 2 years) on ITERS + ECERS 5

ITERS-R / ECERS-R SUBSCALES ITERS-R – Birth to 30 months 1. Space and Furnishings 2. Personal Care Routines 3. Listening and Talking 4. Activities 5. Interaction 6. Program Structure 7. Parents and Staff In the first 6 subscales, there are 32 items and over 350 indicators which are scored. ECERS-R – 31 months to 5 yrs 1. Space and Furnishings 2. Personal Care Routines 3. Language and reasoning 4. Activities 5. Interaction 6. Program Structure 7. Parents and Staff In the first 6 subscales, there are 37 items and over 400 indicators which are scored. 1-2 INADEQUATE MINIMAL GOOD 7 - EXCELLENT 6

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE – ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT  Introductory meeting – Director & Specialist  Center staff meeting to discuss expectations with the teachers  Support strictly anchored to ITERS and ECERS  Learning materials purchased for supported classrooms  Average caseload per Specialist – between 17 to 22 centers  Differentiated support – 100 centers / 275 to 300 classrooms  Average number of TA visits to each center – 12 to 14  Unit Cost per Quality Connections center - $10,000  Balance between TA & provider accountability 7

“It is the average total score that is related to positive child development, but not any of the single requirements by themselves.” (All About the ECERS-R, xii) 8

QUALITY CONNECTIONS AVERAGE ITERS SCORE

10 QUALITY CONNECTIONS AVERAGE ECERS SCORE

QUALITY METRIC – RESULTS BASED ACCOUNTABILITY 11 HOW MUCH DID WE DO?  Approx 100 child care centers  Worked in 275 classrooms 127 Infant / toddler classrooms 148 preschool classrooms  Serving 800 infants / toddlers + 1,200 preschool children (estimated)  Expenditures - $1,000,000 HOW WELL DID WE DO IT?  5 Specialists provided support  Caseload of 17 to 22 centers each  Bi-weekly (or monthly) differentiated system of support to teachers and directors in the classrooms  Support based on ITERS / ECERS moving from intensive support to a hybrid of support and accountability / ownership IS ANYONE BETTER OFF? Quantity of Effect  BENCHMARK: All QC centers made the benchmark of 3.0 or 3.50 average in ITERS + ECERS* combined OVERALL ITERS SCORE – 4.00 OVERALL ECERS SCORE – 4.18 *- ITERS – Infant Toddler Environment Rating Scale - ECERS – Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale - Score 1-2 – Inadequate Care; 3-4 Minimal Care; 5-6 – Good Care; 7- Excellent Quality of Effect  BENCHMARK: 100% of the centers’ sample classrooms made the benchmark

12 Average Environment Rating Score – 4 years – to Moving from intensive support to a hybrid of intensive & maintenance support

13 Thank you to all the Directors, Teachers, and Specialists for their dedication and diligent work, as we continue to raise the quality of early learning in this community.