1 Views expressed in this presentation are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conference of Western Attorneys General Annual Meeting Sun Valley, ID August 4, 2009 State Attorneys General, Federal Consumer Product Safety Law, and.
Advertisements

How to Determine a Children’s Product Haley Will and Jennifer Buoniconti UL / PPAI Product Safety Consultants.
Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories
The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) Gary Jones Director of Environmental, Health and Safety Affairs.
Helmets – Standards, Certification and Regulations Ian Brodie, MSc. Project Manager September 19, 2006 Smart Risk Learning Series.
Assures that feed… –has the identity and strength, which it purports –meets the quality, purity, and safety requirements, which it is represented to possess.
Harnessing the power of the sun: SHAMCI (Solar Heating Arab Mark and Certification Initiative) Presentation by: Rim Boukhchina Technical expert - RCREEE.
An Overview of the Responsible Party’s Responsibility Following Part 68 Privatization.
Recall Effectiveness ICPHSO Symposium 2010 Recall Effectiveness ICPHSO Symposium This presentation has not been reviewed or approved by the Commission.
Third Party Certification & The Q-Mark Scheme. What is third party certification? Independent process of certifying that a manufacturer continues to comply.
ICPHSO 2011 Annual Meeting & Training Symposium ABA Law Seminar: Analysis of Recall Law and Procedures Presented by Georgia C. Ravitz, Esq. Arent Fox LLP.
1 Views expressed in this presentation are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission.
Definition of “Children’s Product” Jonathan D. Midgett, PhD Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction ICPHSO, Seoul, Republic of Korea November 2011.
© Copyright AAFA. All rights reserved CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY IMPROVEMENT ACT February 17, 2009.
Satellite Notification and Acceptance Program (SNAP)
Deborah Bonardi Import Surveillance Division U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission This presentation has not been reviewed or approved by the Commission.
CPSIA: Focus On Apparel Decoration Wednesday, April 18, 2012 Mark Bailey, SanMar Bruce Perryman, MAS, Embroidery Unlimited Anne Lardner-Stone, PPAI.
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
ASME Nuclear Conformity Assessment
ASTM F963 – A Unique Government / Industry / Public Interest Partnership Alan P. Kaufman Senior Vice-President, Technical Affairs Toy Industry Association.
Selling Compliant Toys in The United States U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Dennis Blasius Director, Field Investigation This presentation was.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology The U.S. Conformity Assessment System and the Role of NIST Ileana M. Martinez National.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Views expressed in this presentation are those of the staff and do not.
Third Party Testing of Children’s Apparel V IEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS PRESENTATION ARE THOSE OF THE STAFF AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Joseph P. Mohorovic Director IPIA IMPORTANT NOTE: The comments or views expressed are my own and they have not.
Toys / Juvenile Products Workshop Is it a Children’s Product?
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 Diane M. Meyers Perkins Coie, LLP 1201 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington
WELCOME TO UNDERSTANDING THE CPSIA, PART 2 The Webinar will begin at 2:00 p.m. (MST)
The National Injury Prevention Program of the Hospital for Sick Children Safe Kids Canada; Product Safety and Child and Youth Injury Prevention ICPHSO.
DRAFT 4/21/2017 Hank Tapy, Director, Western Region Import Surveillance U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission This presentation has not been reviewed.
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 December 4, 2008 Alan R. Klestadt, Esq. Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP 399 Park.
2013 PMANC Showcase/Professional Development May 10, 2013, Monterrey, CA Best Practices to Protect your Clients, your Business, and the Industry Product.
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
BMC Self-Certification Proposal NAFTA Solution for Management of Friction Material Restricted Substances June 3, 2011.
CPSC Lead Program: Regulations, Guidance, and Outreach Frank J. Nava U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission January 26, 2006 These comments are those.
1 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission This presentation has not been reviewed or approved by the Commission.
Certification Approaches EAC Meeting Miami, FL August 2008 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland Security National Institute of Standards.
1 ICPHSO February, Toy Safety Certification Program SM.
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
What Testing Is Required As a Basis for Certification?  Certification must be based on “a test of each product or upon a reasonable testing program” 
CPSC Testing and Certification Requirements Applicable to Consumer Fireworks Presented by the American Fireworks Standards Laboratory February 18, 2010.
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Conformity Assessment Overview Nuclear Energy Standards Coordinating Collaborative November 2009 Gordon Gillerman Chief Standards Services Division National.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
ICF MEETING - 10/26/07 LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS CPSC CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS CONEG & ROHS.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs 1.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
CPSC AND THE POISON PREVENTION PACKAGING ACT John W. Boja, Ph.D. These comments are those of the CPSC staff, have not been reviewed or approved by, and.
This presentation was prepared by CPSC staff. It has not been reviewed or approved by, and may not necessarily reflect the views of, the Commission.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION PRODUCT SAFETY UNIT Overview of Toy Standards and Enforcement.
Conformity Assessment Requirements to Access the U.S. Market - An Overview - Steven Bipes Program Manager – Regional & Bilateral Policy.
The Transposition of the Falsified Medicines Directive – the UK story
CPSC Data Bases Tom Schroeder 3/11 *This presentation was prepared by CPSC staff. It has not been reviewed or approved by, and may not necessarily reflect.
Metrology & Accreditation – Their Role in the Global Market Presented at the 2009 NCSLI Conference San Antonio, Texas 30 July 2009 by Roxanne Robinson.
US Standards and Conformity Assessment for Toys Presented by Joan Lawrence Vice President, Standards and Government Affairs Toy Industry Association, Inc.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Conformity Assessment Best Practices and Advancing GRP in EAC: The Value of Public-Private Partnerships EAC Workshop.
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
An Overview of The JPMA Certification Program Frederick Locker, Esq. Locker Greenberg & Brainin PC 420 Fifth Avenue New York, NY
Final Rule Accredited Third-Party Certification 1.
External Provider Control
Toy Safety Certification Program SM
Opportunities and Requirements in CFR 16 – Safety Testing of USA Consumer Goods and Laboratory Accreditation Bill Hirt, Ph.D. ACLASS Sr. Accreditation.
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Human Factors, Age Grading, and Design Evaluations

Premised on a comprise, Part 68 rules mandated that:
Presentation transcript:

1 Views expressed in this presentation are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission

 Requirements for Toys under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA)  Requirements under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA)  Mandatory Toy Standards ASTM F with toy chest provision (previously voluntary) 2

 Small Parts Requirements16 C.F.R. Part 1501  CSPA Labeling Requirements16 C.F.R. § and 16 C.F.R. §  Art Material Requirements16 C.F.R. § (b)(8) 3

 Lead-in-Paint16 C.F.R. Part 1303  Electrically Operated Toys/Children’s Products16 C.F.R. Part 1505  Sharp Points/Edge Requirements16 C.F.R. § § /49 4

 Age grading:  matches the attributes of the toy to the capabilities of the child.  is used to determine the appropriate tests to which your product must comply. 5

 When determining whether the age grade on the product is appropriate the Commission considers:  the manufacturer’s labeling on the product, if it is reasonable;  whether the product is advertised, promoted, and marketed for that age child;  whether the product is commonly recognized by consumers as being intended for that age child; and  Age Determination Guidelines – September

 Section 101Children’s Products Containing Lead; Lead Paint Rule  Section 102Mandatory Third Party Testing for Certain Children’s Products  Section 103Tracking Labels for Children's Products  Section 104Durable Nursery Products/Registration Cards 7

 Section 105Labeling Requirement for Advertising Toys and Games  Section 106 Mandatory Toy Safety Standards (ASTM F963–2008, including toy chests from 2007)  Section 108Phthalate Requirements 8

 Most consumer products that are subject to mandatory standards or bans must be certified as in compliance with each applicable requirement.  Domestic products:manufacturer must certify  Imported products: importer must certify 9

 Children’s products must be certified based on testing performed by an accredited and CPSC-approved third party testing lab (Children’s Product Certificate). 10

 Toys intended for children under three (3) years of age must meet requirements for small parts (as received and after testing).  Toys are subject to use and abuse testing based on the intended “age grade” of the product and not produce small parts. Testing is performed by an accredited and CPSC- approved third party testing lab. 11

 Based on that test, the importer or manufacturer must issue a certificate of conformity that certifies the product complies with small parts requirements.  The certificate must accompany each shipment when it enters U.S. commerce and must be furnished to the retailer or distributor. 12

 Required for all children’s products manufactured after August 14,  Permanent markings are required on the package and on the product, including:  Location and date of production;  Cohort information;  Batch, run number or other identifying characteristics; and  Identifying mark determined by the manufacturer to facilitate ascertaining the source of the product. 13

 Twelve classes are identified by statute.  CPSC must promulgate mandatory standards for all of these (two every six months).  For durable nursery products, the manufacturer also must provide product registration cards and keep records of consumers who register. 14

 Section 104 requires CPSC to issue at least two new standards every six months  Final Safety Standard for Toddler Beds – 4/28/10  Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles – 4/28/10  Final Safety Standard for Infant Walkers – 6/21/10  Final Safety Standard for Infant Bath Seats – 6/4/10  Final Safety Standard for Full-Size and Non-Full Size Cribs – 6/28/10 June

 Required for all categories of durable infant and toddler products  Final rule issued December 29, 2009 with correction on February 22,

 Most provisions of ASTM F became mandatory for toys made after February 10,  Commission accepted most provisions, and ASTM F became mandatory for toys made after August 17, 2009 (did not accept the deletion of toy box provision). 17

 Products subject to ASTM F will need certification based on testing by a CPSC accepted, accredited conformity assessment body after December 31,

 Sound-Producing Toys  Battery-Operated Toys  Small Objects  Stuffed and Beanbag-type Toys  Projections  Marbles and Balls  Folding Mechanisms and Hinges  Hemispheric- Shaped Objects  Cords and Elastics in Toys  Yo-Yo Elastic Tether Toys 19

 Wheels, Tires, and Axles  Magnets  Pacifiers  Balloons  Projectile Toys  Certain Toys with Spherical Ends  Rattles  Teethers and Teething Toys  Squeeze Toys 20

 Commission voted to approve (3-2) new independent third party product testing rules for domestic manufacturers, importers and private labelers.  Required to test and certify that their children’s products comply with U.S. product safety standards as required by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of  To meet this requirement for children’s products, the Commission adopted a framework regarding third party periodic testing to ensure continued compliance. 21

 If there is a material change to the product, such as changes in the product design, manufacturing process, or the source of component parts, firms must re-test and re- certify that the product complies with federal safety standards.  Firms must maintain records on the testing and certification for their children’s products. 22

 The testing and certification rule will go into effect 15 months after it is published in the Federal Register.  Children’s products that comply with the law may use the label, “Meets CPSC Safety Requirements.” Labeling is voluntary. 23

 Firms can use component part and finished product testing conducted by their suppliers in order to meet the testing and certification requirements, effective 30 days after the rule is published.  Firms already required to do testing for certification on some products including among others, those with lead in the paint, those with small parts, full size and non-full size cribs, pacifiers and children’s metal jewelry.  New rules will require firms to go beyond initial testing to ensure that their products continue to meet safety standards. 24

 All domestic manufactures, importers and private labelers of children’s products will be required to test the products periodically to ensure continued compliance with federal safety standards 25