1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Hamilton County Department of Education NCLB Results 2009.
The Evolution of the Virginia School Report Card Board of Education School & Division Accountability Committee February 25, 2015.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS) and State and Federal Accountability Elementary and Middle School Principals November 5, 2009.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:
Building on Success. Agenda  Welcome and Introductions: Cascade Elementary – Old Forge Elementary – Smithsburg Elementary - Smithsburg Middle – Smithsburg.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
Using School Climate Surveys to Categorize Schools and Examine Relationships with School Achievement Christine DiStefano, Diane M. Monrad, R.J. May, Patricia.
Friday, February 7 th 8:30am. Conversation 8:30-9:30 1. Welcome 2. Where is Georgia in comparison to other states? 3. What is making the difference? 4.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
Charter Goals BECKIE DAVIS & COURTNEY MILLS. Is the goal S.M.A.R.T.? S pecific M easurable A mbitious & A ttainable R elevant & R esults-oriented T ime-bound.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2009 MILLSAP ISD Prepared by Lois Johnson in compliance with Texas Education Code
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Adequate Yearly Progress
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
We are a Title I school What does this mean?. We are Title I because… Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
11/5/2015 Michigan’s School Accreditation System : From Education YES to MI-SAS.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Annual Public Meeting Data Presentation October 19, 2009 Cabe Student Center 6:00 p.m.
School Report Cards Grades 3 through 12 Missy Wagner Curriculum Coordinator Theresa Gray School Improvement Program Coordinator Data retrieved/prepared.
February 2016 Our School Report Cards and Accountability Determinations South Lewis Central School District.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
PARCC Results Summary Report.
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Indiana Area School District
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
OFFICE OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Michigan School Report Card Update
CCSSO Education Leaders Conference Using Data to Improve Instruction in Ohio Dr. Susan T. Zelman Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent

2 Overview  Brief Explanation of Federal and State Accountability  Brief Explanation of PACT Data  Brief Explanation of High School Data  Factors Affecting Student Achievement  Review of Strategic Plan Data and Strategies to Address Student Achievement  Benchmark Results  Questions

3 Federal Accountability- AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)- based on: 1.Overall Attendance through grade 8/Graduation rate Student subgroup performance: % scoring Proficient or Advanced on PACT and HSAP % scoring Proficient or Advanced on PACT and HSAP ELA and Math ELA and Math Note: Must have 40 students in a subgroup before counted (50 for disability subgroup) Note: Must have 40 students in a subgroup before counted (50 for disability subgroup) % required to score Proficient or Advanced increases every few years

4 AYP is all or nothing….. If ONE subgroup does not meet the guidelines, the school does not make AYP……more importance to look at school’s COMPLIANCE index.

5 State Accountability- District Report Card District Report Card based on:  60% PACT performance  30% Graduation Rate  5% 1 st Attempt HSAP  5% End of Course

6 State Accountability K-8 School Report Cards- all based on PACT Performance Elementary:  ELA 30%  MATH 30%  Science 20%  Social Studies 20% Middle Grades:  ELA 25%  MATH 25%  Science 25%  Social Studies 25%

7 Phase-In of PACT Science and Social Studies Elementary (3-5) Year Science S Studies % 10% % 15% % 20% Middle Grades (6-8) Year Science S Studies % 15% % 20% % 25%

8 State Accountability School Report Card- High School High School Report Card based on:  Longitudinal Exit Exam 30%  1 st Attempt HSAP 20%  End of Course- % scoring 70 or higher 20%  On-time graduation rate 30%

9

10

11 PACT Summaries & Highlights  PACT Comparisons Across the District  PACT Comparisons Among Selected Districts  Achievement Gap data  UCSD Highlights  Disability Data Status (includes HSAP)  GT Data Status

12

13

14

15

16 8 th (65.3)

17 District Highlights for PACT Continued

18 District Highlights for PACT Continued

19

20

21

22 High School Report Card Data

23

24

25 Union County School District Dual Credit Participation

26 Factors Impacting Student Achievement

27 Factors 06/07 Data  Poverty – 74.21% –Measured by Percentage of Students Using Free and Reduced Meals  Prime Instructional Time: 79.7% in 2007; down from 86% in 2006  Student Attendance: 95.0% in 2007; up from 94.9% in 2006  Teacher Attendance: 88.7% in 2007; down from 93.8% in 2006  Dropout Rate: 2.7% in 2007; up from 1.4% in 2006  Graduation Rates: 73.9% in 2007; down from 81.2% in 2006  Achievement Academy – See Chart  School Climate Data – See chart  Professional Development Days: 24.2 in 2007; up from 21.1 in 2006  SACS Accreditation: 10 schools in 2007; up from 9 schools in 2006  Students with disabilities taking off-grade level PACT: 0% in 2007; down from 7.2% in  Disabilities other than speech: 12.5% in 2007; down from 13.0% in 2006  Eligible for GT: 13.5% in 2007; up from 12.8% in 2006

28

29 Strategic Plan Data and Strategies to Address Student Achievement

30

31

32

33

34

35 Questions Questions