STRATEGIA DE LA LISABONA -2000 OBIECTIVE SCOP Pregătirea tranziţiei la o economie şi o societate a cunoaşterii prin politici mai bune în domeniile societăţii.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
30 May package - « Chapeau » Communication on Action for Stability, Growth and Jobs - 27 Country Specific Recommendations + 1 for Euro-area - 27 analytical.
Advertisements

Title INNOVATION PERFORMANCE. The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs and EU regional policy DG REGIO.
INTOSAI Key challenges to Supreme Audit Institutions as regards the EU- Lisbon Process Ulrike MANDL, ACA The 3rd OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge.
Active employment policies IN EUROPEAN UNION AND GREECE
The Israeli Economy: Maintaining a Thriving Economy in the Shadow of Terror Prof. Zvi Eckstein Deputy Governor, Bank of Israel The Jerusalem Center for.
European Economic Integration – – 2014 X Europe 2020 SMART, SUSTAINABLE + INCLUSIVE GROWTH Prof. Dr. Günter S. Heiduk Smart GrowthSustainable.
The Polish economy in 2002 Frigyes Ferdinand Heinz Research Office (London) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd.
The Irish Economy JUNE IrelandGreeceEU Population4,588,252 (2011)9,903,268 (2011)503,679,730 Area84,420 km2131,990 km2 Gross GDP figure€144 billion€227.
Economic Experience and Crisis in the Euro Zone Carlos Hurtado* The Restructuring and Resolution of External Sovereign Debt World Bank. Annual Law, Justice.
Professor Stefan Collignon 1 The Lisbon Process tomorrow.
Key Policies Improving Business and Investment Climate Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić, MA.
National Employment Strategy as a response to the challenges of the Polish labour market Budapest, 20 October 2005.
Annual Meeting of the Canadian Economics Association Laval University Quebec, Quebec Saturday, May 29, 2010 Productivity Performance and Government Policy.
Proiect finantat prin PHARE - Fondul Europa Caravana Fondurilor Structurale CARAVANA FONDURILOR STRUCTURALE Proiect finantat de Uniunea Europeana prin.
C A U S E S International factors: -Increased Access to Capital at Low Interest Rates -Heavily borrow -Access to artificially cheap credit -Global finance.
1 “European R&D Benchmarking (2002) “European R&D Benchmarking (2002)” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Student Presentations Students: Miguel.
Raising EU R&D Intensity Evidences from the Report for the European Commission by an Independent Research Group Ana Paiva Inês Costa Science and Technology.
Ivan Ivanov Head of “NSRF Implementation and Horizontal Issues” Unit Administration of the Council of Ministers 2012 STRATEGIC REPORT EUROPEAN UNION Bulgaria.
How the European Social Fund can contribute to social enterprises? Workshop 7: Structural funds (ESF, ERDF) for social enterprises Strasbourg, 16 January.
GHANA’S AGENDA FOR SHARED GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT,
Strategic report 2012 Estonia Miryam Vahtra – State Budget Department Coordinator of evaluations
COMPETITIVENESS OF BULGARIA COMPETITIVENESS OF BULGARIA Kamen Kolev, PhD Kamen Kolev, PhD THE EUROPEAN DAY OF THE ENTREPRENEUR Bulgarian Industrial Associationwww.bia-bg.com.
ICT policy and development trends and challenges in Bulgaria
Cleaner Production: the European Commission Perspective Timo Makela Director Sustainable Development & Integration Directorate General Environment, European.
Lisbon strategy, competitiveness and ERA Maja Bucar Centre of International Relations Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana
The fiscal costs of ageing in the euro area: will the young have to pay the bill? Ad van Riet Head of the Fiscal Policies Division European Central Bank.
Afternoon Discussion Topics – Lecture #3 Problems with the EU Economy 1. The EU Banking and Financial Crisis 2. The Current Greek Debt Crisis 3. Declining.
Dr Odysseas Michaelides Auditor General of the Republic June 2014 The role of the SAIs in times of economic crisis Audit Office of the Republic of Cyprus.
Slovenia and the EU at a crossroad – the changes needed to update the economic model Ljubljana, 5 June 2015 Martin Löffler Directorate-General for Economic.
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
ICEG E uropean Center Factors and Impacts in the Information Society: Analysis of the New Member States and Associated Candidate Countries Pál Gáspár.
05 October 2015 Panel Presentation for Industrial Manufacturing Panel Prof. Dr. Gusztáv Báger Budapest International Business Center Conference 2013.
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts 1 An assessment of Belgian NRP macroeconomic objectives in a medium term framework Francis Bossier.
European Social Fund Cohesion Policy EU cohesion policy & social economy Dominique Bé, European Commission Worker ownership: the synthesis between.
EPC EDUCATION AND TRAINING – Applications for Membership of the EU Turkey - April 1987 Cyprus - July 1990 Malta - July 1990 Hungary.
FP7 - April The European Research Area in the Age of Globalisation Henri Delanghe DG RTD, C4 (Economic and Prospective Analysis Conference on Knowledge.
Sándor Richter Fiscal and financial aspects of EU enlargement The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
From crisis to development Athens, 29th of April 2014 José Moisés Martín Carretero.
The innovation policy in Bulgaria: trends and challenges Assoc. Prof. Teodora Georgieva Applied Research and Communication Fund 1.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
1 Making labour market reform deliver more and better jobs: The Spanish case ETUC Brussels March 2006 Jorge Aragón Comisiones Obreras (CC.OO.-Spain)
MAKING EXPORTS A CATALYST FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH Macedonia Competitiveness Assessment Policy Note 1.
Brussels, October 15th 2008 THE BENEFITS OF NATIONAL REFORM IN SUCCESSFUL MODELS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ANDALUSIA.
POINTS COMMUNICATION TO THE SPRING EUROPEAN COUNCIL Working together for growth and jobs A new start for the Lisbon Strategy POINTS
1 Alternatives for stable economic growth: increasing productivity, greater competitiveness and entrepreneurial innovation Jean-Philippe Cotis OECD Chief.
1 Labor taxes and fiscal policy in Croatia Sandra Švaljek, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Conference on Labor Markets, Growth and Powerty Reduction.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
Addressing the Medium- and Long- run Challenges: the Overall Policy Framework Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance Republic of Bulgaria May 2007.
Inga Blaziene Boguslavas Gruzevskis Vilnius-Brussels, 2012 Economic and social situation in Baltic countries: LITHUANIA INSTITUTE OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL.
Europe Youth Unemployment Portugal Youth Unemployment.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005 Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion.
Introduction to the UK Economy. What are the key objectives of macroeconomic policy? Price Stability (CPI Inflation of 2%) Growth of Real GDP (National.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE ECONOMIC STABILITY AND INVESTMENT PLAMEN ORESHARSKI MINISTER OF FINANCE March 11, 2008.
Economic Challenges of Bulgaria Lecture at the Military Academy of Sofia, July 17, 2003 by Piritta Sorsa, IMF representative in Bulgaria.
The European Chemical Industry against global competition : why energy efficiency matters Vassos Efthymiadis Hellenic Association of Chemical Industries.
EUROPE 2020 Seven Flagships
How to increase job creation in Uganda
European Union’s Regional Development Policy
BOSNIA’S REFORM EXPERIENCE TO DATE
Introduction to the UK Economy
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005
Annual Growth Survey and Draft Joint Employment Report 2012
Investment in Human Capital and The revised Lisbon strategy March 2005
BOSNIA’S REFORM EXPERIENCE TO DATE
The long view: scenarios for the world economy to 2060
Indicators for EU policy making
NS4453 Spring Term 2017 WEF Country Stages/Rankings
The European Commission’s Country-Specific Recommendations for Slovenia 2019 Julia Lendvai Head of Unit: Economies of Member States: Finland, Hungary and.
Presentation transcript:

STRATEGIA DE LA LISABONA OBIECTIVE SCOP Pregătirea tranziţiei la o economie şi o societate a cunoaşterii prin politici mai bune în domeniile societăţii informaţionale şi cercetării şi dezvoltării, simultan cu înaintarea în procesul de reforme structurale în scopul obţinerii competitivităţii, inovării şi îmbunătăţirii pieţei interne; Modernizarea modelului social european, investiţii în oameni şi combaterea excluziunii sociale; Susţinerea perspectivelor creşterii economice prin aplicarea unui mix de politici macroeconomice adecvat.

OBIECTIVE ŢINTĂ I.Pregătirea tranziţiei la o economie competitivă, dinamică şi bazată pe cunoaştere: - O societate informaţională pentru toţi; - Stabilirea unei zone europene a cercetării şi inovării; - Crearea unui cadru prietenos pentru pornirea şi dezvoltarea unor afaceri inovative, in special pentru IMM; - Reforme economice pentru o piaţă internă complet funcţională; - Integrarea eficientă a pieţelor financiare; - Cordonarea politicilor macro-economice: consolidarea fiscală, calitatea şi sustenabilitatea politicilor fiscale;

II.Modernizarea modelului social European prin investiţii în oameni şi construirea unui stat al bunăstării Educarea şi formarea pentru a trăi şi munci în societatea cunoaşterii; - Mai multe locuri de muncă pentru Europa: dezvoltarea unei politici de angajare active; - Modernizarea protecţiei sociale; - Promovarea includerii sociale. III. Punerea în practică a deciziilor: o abordare mai coerentă şi mai sistematică: -- Îmbunătăţirea proceselor existente; Implementarea unui model deschis de coordonare (transparenţă);

DOMENII PENTRU CARE S-AU ELABORAT DOCUMENTE ÎN CONFORMITATE CU OBIECTIVELE STRATEGIEI: Biotehnologii; Competiţie; Dezvoltare; Economie şi Finanţe; Educaţie şi Cultură; Angajare; Energie şi Transport; Intreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii; Mediu; Societatea informaţională; Piaţa internă; Cercetare; Protecţie Socială; Indicatori structurali; Taxare

REALIZĂRILE ŞI LIPSURILE SPECIFICE ŢĂRILOR MEMBRE DUPĂ OBIECTIVELE DE LA LISABONA – evaluare 2004 [cele mai bune trei realizări şi lipsuri în acord cu lista celor 14 indicatori structurali şi alte documente de evaluare: Indicator 1 GDP per capita in PPS; Indicator 2 Labour productivity per person employed; Indicator 3 Total employment rate; Indicator 4 Total employment rate of older workers; Indicator 5 GERD (Gross domestic expenditure on R&D); Indicator 6 Youth education attainment level ; Indicator 7 Comparative price levels; Indicator 8 Business investment; Indicator 9 At-risk-of-poverty rate after social transfers; Indicator 10 Dispersion of regional employment rates - total; Indicator 11 Total long-term unemployment rate; Indicator 12 Total greenhouse gas emissions; Indicator 13 Energy intensity of the economy; Indicator 14 Transport - Volume of freight transport relative to GDP.

GERMANY Achievements –Agenda 2010 – extensive restructuring of social security system with profound impact on labour and product markets –Noticeable progress in the implementation of the 2003 labour market recommendations and modernisation of the vocational training system –Reforms to improve entrepreneurship –3rd highest level in the EU of gross domestic expenditure on R&D in 2001 –Among the best performances for Kyoto target and burden sharing indicators Shortcomings –Excessive deficit for several years, with repeated slippages in expenditures compared to theplans of the Stability Pact –Lack of far-reaching reforms of the pension system –High labour market rigidities and high unemployment –Disappointing levels of youth educational attainment –2nd highest transposition deficit for Internal Market directives (more than double the 1.5% target)

GREECE Achievements –Highest growth rate in the EU for labour productivity ( ) –Measures aiming at increasing incentives to work and developing skills of the unemployed, and a significant increase in youth educational attainment ( ) –2nd highest in business investment ( ) with initiatives to promote ICT use and R&D spending and innovation, and efforts to simplify the business environment. Shortcomings –High debt with slow decline, despite high nominal GDP growth in last years –2nd lowest female employment rate in the EU, and 2nd highest long term unemployment –Delayed follow-up on reforms in the social security and pension systems –Effective competition in the energy sector not yet secured –High transposition deficit for Internal Market directives

SPAIN Achievements –Highest growth in the employment rate since 1999, and highest decrease in the long term unemployment rate ( ), with measures taken to increase female employment rates –2nd lowest transposition deficit for Internal Market rules (well below the 1.5% target) –Adoption of ‘España.es ’ –package of measures for promotion and development of information society, with parallel promotion of internet access for citizens and SMEs –Adoption of Limited Company Act, creating a simplified legal framework for establishment of small companies/SMEs Shortcomings –Highest unemployment rate in EU at 11.3% in 2002, female employment rates more than 10 percentage points below EU average in 2002, and excessive use of fixed-term contracts which hamper mobility –No new reforms of the pensions system scheduled in the near future –Decrease in the level of youth educational attainment ( )

FRANCE Achievements –Implementation of comprehensive pension reform –Significant increase in employment rate for older persons ( ) although employment rate for older workers remains amongst the lowest in the EU –Significant decrease in relative price levels between 1999 and 2002 –Well above EU average for youth educational attainment –Good performance on Kyoto targets. Shortcomings –Excessive deficit for several years, with repeated slippages in expenditures compared to the plans of the Stability Pact; long term sustainability of public finances not secured –Labour market reforms likely to be insufficient at this stage –Market openings for gas and electricity remain low –Highest transposition deficit on Internal Market directives combined with a high number of infringement cases

IRELAND Achievements –Medium term growth rate at 5% –High and increasing labour productivity – well above the EU average –Significant decrease in the long term unemployment rate ( ) –Marked increase in youth educational attainment ( ) –Introduction of more competition in telecoms and public transport, and new competition rules for electricity and gas market –Highest reduction of outstanding Internal Market directives since Shortcomings –Among poorest performance in EU for Kyoto target and burden sharing indicators –Largest increase in price levels between 1999 and 2002 –Below EU average for gross domestic expenditure on R&D –Largest decline in business investment ( )

PORTUGAL Achievements –Implementation of actions to promote ICT use and R&D spending and innovation –Significant increase in youth educational attainment ( ) –Significant reduction of Internal Market directives transposition deficit with no directives overdue by more than two years –Quadros Programme’ provides financial compensation to small and micro enterprises Shortcomings –Excessive deficit, with sustainability of public finances questionable on account of projected expenditure on pensions –Poor achievements in education (although recent initiatives have been taken to improve education quality) with highest percentage of early school-leavers in the EU (twice the EU average) –Effective competition in the electricity market not yet secured with prices for gas and electricity among highest in EU –Poor performance for Kyoto target and burden sharing indicators

CONCLUZII 1.Strategia de la Lisabona implică o reformare a politicilor industriale; 2.Firmele vor avea nevoie de consultanţi de integrare penru a rezista pe piaţa unică din punct de vedere al competitivităţii. 3.Finanţările pentru proiecte mari vor avea sprijin comunitar, al Băncii Mondiale şi cofinanţare din partea română; 4.Fondurile structurale şi de coeziune se vor derula sectorial ţinând seama de priorităţile strategiei şi priorităţile statelor beneficiare (mediu, infrastructură, competitivitate, dezvoltare rurală, dezvoltare regională, fondul social); 5.Procedurile de accesare a fondurilor vor evolua implicând modificări în legislaţia naţională;