1 LEADING BARYON PRODUCTION at HERA Lorenzo Rinaldi On behalf of H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
Advertisements

Measurement of F 2 and F L at low Q 2 in ep Interactions at HERA  H1 and ZEUS analyses at low Q 2  Extraction of F L  Summary and Outlook Tomáš Laštovička.
ZEUS high Q 2 e + p NC measurements and high-x cross sections A.Caldwell Max Planck Institute for Physics On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration Allen Caldwell.
Low x meeting, Sinai Alice Valkárová on behalf of H1 collaboration LOW x meeting 2005, Sinaia H1 measurements of the structure of diffraction.
The Hadronic Final State at HERA Rainer Mankel DESY for the ZEUS & H1 collaborations C2CR Conference Prague 9-Sep Sep-2005 (Some Highlights from)
CERN March 2004HERA and the LHC: Diffractive Gap Probability K. Goulianos1 HERA and the LHC K. Goulianos, The Rockefeller University CERN March.
ISDM 2005, Kromeriz Kamil Sedlak, Jets in photoproduction at HERA 1 Jets in Photoproduction & at low Q 2 at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
Discussion session : What can HERA still provide ? 9 April 2008 (based on works with A. Kaidalov, A. Martin and M. Ryskin ) V.A. Khoze (IPPP, Durham &
1 Pierre Marage Univ. Libre de Bruxelles On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Diffraction at HERA CIPANP 2006 Puerto-Rico 29/5-4/6/2006.
Brazil 31 Mar – 2 Apr 2004 Diffraction: from HERA & Tevatron to LHC K. Goulianos1 Diffraction: from HERA & Tevatron to LHC K. Goulianos, The Rockefeller.
Diffractive x-sections and event final states at the LHC Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University / Diffraction Day.
Forward Jet Production at HERA, Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin EPS2005, July 21, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the H1 and.
Manchester Dec 2003 Diffraction from HERA and Tevatron to LHCK. Goulianos1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Workshop on physics with.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
September 17-20, 2003.Kenichi Hatakeyama1 Soft Double Pomeron Exchange in CDF Run I Kenichi Hatakeyama The Rockefeller University for the CDF Collaboration.
PION STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND MORE. Pion signature in experiment: Forward neutrons in DIS Gottfried Sum rule.
Diffractive W/Z & Exclusive CDF II DIS 2008, 7-11 April 2008, University College London XVI International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and.
Diffraction at CDF and Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
Recent Results on Diffraction and Exclusive Production from CDF Christina Mesropian The Rockefeller University.
25 th of October 2007Meeting on Diffraction and Forward Physics at HERA and the LHC, Antwerpen 1 Factorization breaking in diffraction at HERA? Alice Valkárová.
Diffractive and total pp cross sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
Interjet Energy Flow at ZEUS. Patrick Ryan. Univ. of Wisconsin DPF, Aug. 27, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Aug. 27, 2004 Interjet Energy.
Diffractive Higgs Production at the Tevatron and LHC Do we all disagree, and, if so, why? How sensitive are the predictions to the.
Ursula Bassler, LPNHE-Paris, RUN II MC workshop 1 Monte Carlo Tuning: The HERA Experience Monte Carlo Models for DIS events Description of inclusive hadronic.
Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Diffraction at CDF and at the LHC LOW X MEETING: HOTEL VILLA SORRISO, ISCHIA ISLAND, ITALY, September 8-13.
M.KapishinDiffraction using Proton Spectrometers at HERA 1 Results on Diffraction using Proton Spectrometers at HERA Low-x Meeting: Paphos, Cyprus, June.
Paul Laycock University of Liverpool BLOIS 2007 Diffractive PDFs.
M.KapishinDiffraction and precise QCD measurements at HERA 1 Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2012 M.Kapishin, JINR on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
Luca Stanco - PadovaQCD at HERA, LISHEP pQCD  JETS Luca Stanco – INFN Padova LISHEP 2006 Workshop Rio de Janeiro, April 3-7, 2006 on behalf of.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
1 Jets in diffraction and factorization at HERA Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations.
News on ZEUS Leading Baryon analyses Roberto Sacchi Università di Torino and INFN DIS2004 Workshop Slovakia, April 14-18, 2004 Introduction Study of the.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University (Representing the CDF Collaboration) DIS April – 1 May Madison, Wisconsin Update on CDF Results on Diffraction.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Factorization Breaking in Diffractive Photoproduction of Dijets Motivation Diffractive parton densities Multipomeron exchanges Direct and resolved photoproduction.
Heuijin LimICHEP04, Beijing, Aug. 1 Leading Baryons at HERA Introduction Diffractive structure function measured in events with a leading proton.
A review of diffraction at HERA
LISHEP Rio de Janeiro1 Factorization in diffraction Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
Inclusive Diffraction at HERA Marcella Capua – INFN and Calabria University Small X and Diffraction FNAL Chicago (USA) 17 – 20 September 2003 on behalf.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Analysis Hardeep Bansil Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 10/04/2014.
Marta Ruspa, "Inclusive diffraction", DIS Inclusive diffraction Diffractive cross section and diffractive structure function Comparison with colour.
Hadron Structure 2009 Factorisation in diffraction Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague Representing H1 and ZEUS experiments Hadron structure.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann Photon 2005, Diffractive interactions in ep collisions Diffractive interactions in ep collisions Isabell-Alissandra.
1 Diffractive dijets at HERA Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague Representing H1 and ZEUS experiments.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Exclusive electroproduction of two pions at HERA V. Aushev (on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration) April 11-15, 2011 Newport News Marriott at City Center.
Results on Inclusive Diffraction From The ZEUS Experiment Data from the running period The last period with the ZEUS Forward Plug Calorimeter.
K 0 S and  production at ZEUS, A. Savin, University of Wisconsin DIS 2006, April 22, K 0 S and  production at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann DIS 2007 Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Isabell-Alissandra.
1 Diffractive heavy quark production in AA collisions at the LHC at NLO* Mairon Melo Machado GFPAE – IF – UFRGS
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Analysis Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD / Diffraction WG Meeting 31/03/2014.
1 Forward Jet/  0 Production in DIS at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations ICHEP August 2004, Beijing Didar Dobur, University of Freiburg.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Collaboration Meeting, Oct. 21st Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Outline Motivation DDIS kinematics Introduction of different diffractive data sets Global fit procedure Results and conclusion Sara Taheri Monfared (Semnan.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Low x workshop, Ischia Representing H1 and ZEUS experiments Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague Inclusive diffraction and leading.
New Results on Diffractive and Exclusive Production from CDF Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University (for the CDF Collaboration) DIS-2013, Marseille.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Diffraction in ep collisions
K0S and L production at ZEUS
Diffraction at HERA Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Diffractive PDF fits and factorisation tests at HERA
Presentation transcript:

1 LEADING BARYON PRODUCTION at HERA Lorenzo Rinaldi On behalf of H1 and ZEUS Collaborations

2Motivations  Large fraction of events with a Leading Baryon (LB)  LB produced at small angle in forward direction: difficult detection  Production mechanism still not clear: soft scale, alternative approach needed  Interest in LB study for next LHC  absorptive corrections related to gap survival probability  absorptive corrections related to gap survival probability (diffractive Higgs, pile-up background...) (diffractive Higgs, pile-up background...) Results discussed in this talk:  Leading Proton (LP) spectra in DIS  NEW  Leading Neutron (LN) spectra in DIS and  p  Dijet  p with a LN  NEW  Latest developments in theory  Comparison with models

3 Leading baryon production in ep collisions Standard fragmentation LB from hadronization of p remnant Implemented in MC models (Cluster, Lund strings...) Virtual particle exchange , IR, IP, ,.. LB also from p fragmentation in double dissociative diffraction LB variables: p T 2, x L =E LB /E p t=(p-p’) 2 ,IR,IP p p, n LB cross sections vs structure functions: (QCD-based approach) Lepton variables Q 2, W, x, y

4 Leading baryon detectors ZEUS Leading Proton Spectrometer (LPS) 6 stations each made by 6 Silicon-detector planes  6 stations each made by 6 Silicon-detector planes  Stations inserted at 10  beam from the proton beam during data taking   x L < 1%  p T 2 ~ few MeV 2 (better than p-beam spread ~ MeV) ZEUS Forward Neutron Tracker (FNT)  Scint. 1λint, σ x,y =0.23cm, σ θ =22μrad H1 Forward Neutron Calorimeter (FNC)  Lead-scintillator 107m from I.P. + veto hodoscopes   (E)/E≈20%, neutron detection eff. 93±5% ZEUS Forward Neutron Calorimeter (FNC)  10 lead-scintillator sandwich  σ/E =0.65/√E, Energy scale=2%  Acceptance  n <0.8 mrad, azimuthal coverage 30% H1 Forward proton spectrometer (FPS)  2 stations each made by 4 scintillating fibres hodoscopes planes   x =  5  rad  y =100  rad, Energy resolution 8 GeV  Acceptance 500<E p’ <780 GeV

5 Leading Proton: cross section vs x L Flat below diffractive peak Cross section at low p T 2 Agreement with photoproduction NEW NEW LP results: LPS stations full set used

6 LP: cross section vs p T 2 and b-slopes Exponential behaviour Fit to A*exp(-b*p T 2 ) shown with stat. error No strong dependence of b on x L NEW

7 Structure function ratio Information on LP production as a function of DIS variables Test of vertex factorization LP: ratio to inclusive DIS NEW

% of DIS events have a LP with 0.5<x L <0.92, almost independently of x and Q 2 No strong dependence on x and Q 2 when integrating over 0.5<x L <0.92 No clear evidence of vertex factorization violation NEW Ratios to inclusive DIS - 2

9 LP structure functions F 2 LP =r LP *F 2 (ZEUS-S parametrization used) F 2 LP : same dependence on x and Q 2 as F 2 NEW

10 Comparisons to Reggeon exchange model Szczurek et al., Phys Lett B428, 383 (1998) Pomeron Reggeon   N Predictions good in shape but: x L slighty underestimated b-slope slightly overestimated

11 O.P.E. partially explains the LN production  (t) and form factor F 2 (x L,t) model dependent Longitudinal momentum spectrum and p T 2 slopes discriminate between different parametrizations of fluxes Leading Neutron: One-Pion-Exchange model

12 Rescattering model and absorption D’Alesio and Pirner (EPJ A7(2000) 109) Neutron rescatters on  hadronic component. Absorption enhanced when  -n system size larger  low x L  -n system size larger  low x L  size larger  photoproduction  size larger  photoproduction pp DIS Nikolaev,Speth and Zakharov (hep-ph/ ) Re-scattering processes via additional Pomeron exchanges (Optical Theorem) Kaidalov, Khoze, Martin, Ryskin (KKMR) (hep-ph/ , hep-ph/ ) Enhanced absorptive corrections (  exclusive LHC), calculation of migrations, include also  and a 2 exchange (different x L & p T dependences)

13 LN: longitudinal momentum spectrum LN yield increases with x L due to increase in phase space: p T 2 < x L 2LN yield increases with x L due to increase in phase space: p T 2 < x L 2 LN yield decreases for x L  1 due to kinematic limitLN yield decreases for x L  1 due to kinematic limit DIS Phase space coverage

14 LN: ratio  p/DIS  p DIS W dependence:  ~W ,  (   p )   (   *p ) W  2 =(1-x L )W p 2  (1-x L ) absorption rate rescaled Models in agreement with data LN yield in PHP < yield in DISLN yield in PHP < yield in DIS  factorization violation  factorization violation Data compared to OPE with absorption. Qualitatively similar to D’Alesio and Pirner (loss through absorption) Qualitatively similar to D’Alesio and Pirner (loss through absorption) Nikolaev,Speth and Zakharov model also shown: similar trend but weaker x L dependence Nikolaev,Speth and Zakharov model also shown: similar trend but weaker x L dependence

15 LN: KKMR absorption model Kaidalov, Khoze, Martin, Ryskin: Pure  exchange (not shown) too highPure  exchange (not shown) too high Absorption and migration effects reduce the LN yield and fit the data betterAbsorption and migration effects reduce the LN yield and fit the data better Additional  and a 2 exchanges enhance the LN yieldAdditional  and a 2 exchanges enhance the LN yield pppp

16 LN: DIS cross section vs p T 2 in x L bins p T 2 distributions well described by an exponentialp T 2 distributions well described by an exponential Intercept a(x L ) and slopes b(x L ) fully characterize the x L -p T 2 spectraIntercept a(x L ) and slopes b(x L ) fully characterize the x L -p T 2 spectra

17 LN: intercepts and slopes in DIS b consistent with 0 for x L <0.3

18 LN b-slopes: DIS & photoproduction comparison Fit to exponential pp DIS slopes different in  p and DIS in general agreement with expectation from absorption models

19 LN b-slopes: comparison to models OPE models:  Dominant at 0.6<x L <0.9  (non-) Reggeized flux, different form factors with different parameters  none of the models seem to decribe the data well KKMR model: good description of the data considering absorption effects and ,a 2 exchange contributions

20 LN spectrum: Q 2 dependence LN yield increases monotonically with Q 2 LN yield increases monotonically with Q 2 consistent with absorption (larger Q 2  smaller  consistent with absorption (larger Q 2  smaller  3 Q 2 bins +  p

21 Comparisons LP - LN data Very similar behaviour x L <0.85 LP cross section almost twice LN In particle exchange model: expected from isospin-1: LP=1/2LN Other exchanges needed (isoscalars) Slopes comparable 0.7<x L <0.8 where  exchange dominates

22 LN production compared to MC predictions Compare LN DIS distribution to MC models: Compare LN DIS distribution to MC models: – RAPGAP standard fragmentation – RAPGAP OPE – LEPTO standard fragmentation – LEPTO soft color interaction Both standard fragmentation fail Both standard fragmentation fail – Too few n, too few x L – b-slopes too low RAPGAP-OPE: close to data in shape but not in magnitude RAPGAP-OPE: close to data in shape but not in magnitude LEPTO-SCI: reasonable description of x L spectrum and intercepts, bad slopes LEPTO-SCI: reasonable description of x L spectrum and intercepts, bad slopes Other models also fail (ARIADNE, CASCADE,PYTHIA,PHOJET)

23 Dijet  p with a LN Presence of jets hard-scale Naively, rescattering effects expected in resolved photoproduction:  low x , photon acts like a hadron H1 data: ratios (jj+LN)/jj reasonably well described by photoproduction MC

24 Dijet with a LN Ratios (LN+jj)/jj Model by Klasen and Kramer based on OPE Ratios well described by NLO predictions x L spectrum: Reasonable shape, NLO too high NEW

25 Dijet production with a LN ep  ejjnX vs ep  enX Suppression observed in dijet+LN: Kinematic or absorption/rescattering? Look at x BP =1-(E+p Z )/2E p  Fraction of proton beam energy available for particle production in the forward beampipe Kinematic constraint: x L <x BP The lower x BP values in dijet-  p constrain the neutrons to lower x L than DIS NEW

26 Dijet with a LN After reweighting x BP, the x L distributions of the two processes ep  ejjnX and ep  enX agree: Mainly kinematic effect, no clear evidences of absorption b-slopes No significant difference within errors NEW

27Summary LP spectra in DIS; well described by Reggeon-exchange modelLP spectra in DIS; well described by Reggeon-exchange model LP production as a function of DIS variables: no dependence observedLP production as a function of DIS variables: no dependence observed LN production measured in DIS and  pLN production measured in DIS and  p LN characterized by rescattering and absorption effects: well reproduced by some modelsLN characterized by rescattering and absorption effects: well reproduced by some models MC generators in general fail to reproduce the measured quantities  need to tune the generatorsMC generators in general fail to reproduce the measured quantities  need to tune the generators Dijet-  p with LN: suppression most probably due to kinematic effects.Dijet-  p with LN: suppression most probably due to kinematic effects. HERA provided high precision measurements of leading baryon production. Now it’s time to work together with theory people and apply our knowledge to the next future physics

28

29 Rescattering model and absorption 1 Model 1: One pion exchange in the framework of triple-Regge formalism Nikolaev,Speth & Zakharov Re-scattering processes via additional pomeron exchanges (Optical Theorem) (hep-ph/ ) ( Kaidalov,) Khoze, Martin, Ryskin (KKMR) Enhanced absorptive corrections (  exclusive LHC), calculation of migrations, include also  and a 2 exchange (different x L & p T dependences) (hep-ph/ , hep-ph/ )

30 Rescattering model and absorption 2 Model 2: calculations from D’Alesio and Pirner in the framework of target fragmentation (EPJ A7(2000) 109)  more absorption when photon size larger (small Q 2 )  less neutrons detected in photoproduction  more absorption when mean  -n system size ( ‹ r n  › smaller at low x L  less neutrons detected at low x L  more absorption when mean  -n system size ( ‹ r n  › ) smaller at low x L  less neutrons detected at low x L  more absorption  fewer neutrons detected with higher p T 2  larger b- slope expected in photoproduction pp DIS