Provincial Achievement Tests June 2010 Captain John Palliser School
Provincial Expectations Through Achievement Tests schools are expected to: Demonstrate continuous improvement – comparing results to stated targets and performance over time
Grade 3 – Language Arts Participation 27 Students Wrote the Tests 19 Students were considered Regular 6 Students were English as a Second Language 2 Students were Special Education 1 Student was absent 2 Students were excused 0 Students wrote only one part of the exam
Grade 3 Language Arts – Total Test
Grade 3 – Language Arts Writing
Grade 3 – Language Arts Reading
Grade 3 and 6 -Math Since CJP opted to follow the new Mathematics curriculum for the school year, the June 2010 Provincial Achievement Test was a pilot exam and formal results were not gathered.
Grade 3 Math No gender difference No gender difference Did equally well on each strand Number, Patterns/Relations, Shape & Space, Statistics & Probability Did equally well on each strand Number, Patterns/Relations, Shape & Space, Statistics & Probability All questions, but 1 were above or equal to provincial standard All questions, but 1 were above or equal to provincial standard Equally strong with low and moderate complexity questions Equally strong with low and moderate complexity questions
Grade 6 Math All questions above or meeting provincial standard Strongest with moderate complexity questions, than low complexity, weaker with high complexity No gender differences Slightly stronger on pattern/relations and shape & space than on statistics & probability
Grade 6 – Language Arts Participation 65 Students Wrote the Tests 39 Students were considered Regular 15 Students were English as a Second Language 12 Students were Special Education 0 Students were absent 1 Students was excused 2 Students wrote only one part of the exam
Grade 6 – Language Arts Total Test
Grade 6 – Language Arts Writing
Grade 6 – Language Arts Reading
Grade 6 – Science Participation 65 Students Wrote the Tests 39 Students were considered Regular 15 Students were English as a Second Language 12 Students were Special Education 1 Students was absent 2 Students were excused
Grade – Science Total Test
Grade 6 – Science Knowledge
Grade 6 – Science Skills
Grade 6 Social Studies Participation 66 Students Wrote the Tests 39 Students were considered Regular 15 Students were English as a Second Language 12 Students were Special Education 2 Students were excused
Grade 6 – Social Studies Total Test
Next Steps…. Using Universal Design for Learning, our Professional Learning Communities will focus on representation, assessment and engagement in various curricular areas.
Reflections/Questions What can we learn from the excellent reading results for both Grades 3 and 6 that will help our students excel in writing? (Gr % excellence in reading; 18.5% excellence in writing – Grade % excellence in reading; 16.7% excellence in writing) What can we do learn from the PAT assessment rubrics that will help our students become better writers?
Future Directions Continued focus upon building an understanding of “Personalized Learning” Focus on using the Universal Design for Learning model for planning for all students.