8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep. 2004 Daresbury Lab 500 MHz ELETTRA Input Power Coupler B. Baricevic, A. Fabris, C. Pasotti.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

ENE 428 Microwave Engineering
Chapter 13 Transmission Lines
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
30 th September 2004 High Power RF Couplers James Rogers High Power RF Couplers ELSRF Daresbury Laboratory.
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
EKT241 – ELECTROMAGNETICS THEORY
Optical Waveguide and Resonator
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
1 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Advanced Licence Course Murray Niman G6JYB Slide Set 13: v1.1, 10-Nov-2005 (5) Feeders Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society.
Slim crab cavity development Luca Ficcadenti, Joachim Tuckmantel CERN – Geneva LHC-CC11, 5th LHC Crab Cavity Workshop.
8. Wave Reflection & Transmission
MAXWELL’S EQUATIONS AND TRANSMISSION MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS
Antennas Lecture 9.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
DESIGN OF A 7-CELLS, HOM DAMPED, SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY FOR THE STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT AT DANE David Alesini, Caterina Biscari, Roberto Boni, Alessandro.
324MHz FETS RFQ RF measurement and components By Aaron Cheng 18 December 2006.
Prepared by: Ronnie Asuncion
Status of 325MHz coupler S. Kazakov 11/29/ MHz coupler structure.
RFQ Thermal Analysis Scott Lawrie. Vacuum Pump Flange Vacuum Flange Coolant Manifold Cooling Pockets Milled Into Vanes Potentially Bolted Together Tuner.
Lecture 6.
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
RF power & FPC status Eric Montesinos, CERN BE-RF on behalf of all people involved, great thanks to all of them !
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
Transmission Line Theory
CHAPTER 4 TRANSMISSION LINES.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
SPL Seminar 2012 BE-RF-LRF HOM couplers for SPL cavities Kai Papke 1 Comparison of different design approaches.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session HOM measurement and analysis S. Weathersby, A. Novokhatski HOMs in LER region 4: overview, history Collimator wake fields.
Yi HUANG Department of Electrical Engineering & Electronics
1.3GHz Input Coupler for ILC
Lecture 5.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
1 ENE 428 Microwave Engineering Lecture 11 Excitation of Waveguides and Microwave Resonator.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
1 Al Moretti, APC, Fermilab MAP- Winter Meeting February 28 - March 4, 2011 TJNAF Newport News, VA.
ENE 428 Microwave Engineering
Microwave Devices.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
Chapter 5 : Digital Communication System BENG 2413 Communication Principles Faculty of Electrical Engineering 1 Chapter 6 : Metallic Transmission Lines.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Vector Control Algorithm for Efficient Fan-out RF Power Distribution Yoon W. Kang SNS/ORNL Fifth CW.
Power couplers Timergali Khabiboulline (FNAL) FNAL-LBNL meeting on NGLS April 13, 2012.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
HiLumi-LHC/LARP Crab Cavity System External Review 5-6 May 2014, BNL SPS - RF Power and Coupler status Erk Jensen, Eric Montesinos, CERN BE-RF.
Engineering of the power prototype of the ESRF HOM damped cavity* V. Serrière, J. Jacob, A. Triantafyllou, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, L. Goirand, B. Ogier * This.
325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Cavity Coupler status. T. Khabiboulline Power Coupler design for Superconducting Spoke cavities. Originally.
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
XFEL beamline loads and HOM coupler for CW
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Microwave Engineering by David M. Pozar Ch. 4.1 ~ 4 / 4.6
MICE RF Cavity Simulations and Multipactor
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
SNS Fundamental Power Coupler History
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
ENE 428 Microwave Engineering
CEPC Input Coupler Discuss 6th IHEP-KEK SCRF Collaboration Meeting
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
DQW HOM Update and Recent Developments
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
V. Veshcherevich Cornell University
4th Week Seminar Sunryul Kim Antennas & RF Devices Lab.
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Higher power couplers at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
Presentation transcript:

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab 500 MHz ELETTRA Input Power Coupler B. Baricevic, A. Fabris, C. Pasotti

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab IPC is a coaxial device: connected to the transition to 6 1/8” transmission line non uniform longitudinal section (from Ø 84 mm to line 6 1/8” Ø 154 mm) ceramic window for air to vacuum separation water cooled, cooling pipes brazed in the UHV side coupling range : 1 to 3.6

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The system “IPC & connection element” had some troubles: two failures at SLS, similar events happened also at ELETTRA. The IPC has been tested at more that 200 KW of forward power. Those events happened at lower input power.

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The electromagnetic parameters of the IPC coupled to the connection element (CE) to the 6 1/8” transmission line has been studied with the Ansoft HFSS v 9.1 Aims: Try to understand the IPC + CE power limit at 500 MHz for the working condition: from the ideal coupling to the maximum mismatch. Forward power is fed in continuous wave to the IPC: power limitation comes from the maximum operating temperature the device, but mainly the insulating supports, can safely sustain Know the EM response at signal stored into the cavity at any frequency different from the 500 MHz, that is in the HOMs frequency range: from 700 MHz up to 2.1 GHz. Other (and unwanted) signals coming from the cavity could build up a field pattern that overlaps the forward 500 MHz signal: the thermal and electric breakdown discharge threshold can be suddenly reached.

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab Mode frequency [MHz] R/Q 0  2 Q 0 Coupling factor  Filling time [  s] L0499,681, ,08,8 L1946,731, ,97,8 L21057,60, ,51,9 L31419,45, ,61,1 L41511,64, ,47,4 L51606,39, ,19,9 L61874,30, ,02,9 L71945,61, ,74,9 L92122,77, ,14,5 The “Elettra” cavities are not equipped with HOMs dampers. What’s happen if the beam looses some energy that resonates in the cavity? Does this signal propagate through the IPC?

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The first three modes of propagation of the transmission line have been investigated TEM, TE 11 and TE 21. Only the TEM-like mode plays a significant role in the investigated frequency range. Cut-Off Frequencies 6 1/8” Port TE 11 = 876 MHz TE 21 = 1.75 GHz TM 11 = 3.49 GHz Cavity Port TE 11 = 2 GHz

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab 50 , 6 1/8” coaxial port, toward the generator. Reflection coefficient  i 50  coaxial port, outer diameter equal to the cavity equatorial port diameter. Reflection coeffcient  c

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The coupling with the cavity and beam has been taken into account in the numerical result post-processing, imposing the reflection less condition for the maximum beam current (  i =0 ). At the maximum current, the reflection coefficient  c due to the cavity and beam load is :

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The total IPC power dissipation at 500 MHz, and  i =0, is distributed according to the following: 62.4 % on the inner conductor 24.0 % on the outer conductor 13.6 % on the alumina ceramic window. The copper inner and outer conductor are water-cooled. The main limiting element is the ceramic window. Taking into account the maximum alumina dissipation of 15 Watts, the IPC average power limits roughly are 220 kWin the reflection less condition  i = kWwith highest reflection, no beam

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The CE power dissipation at 500 MHz, and  i =0, is distributed according to the following: 7.9 % on the inner conductor, silver plated. 1.4 % on the outer conductor, aluminum part % on the steatite support disk. At the maximum mismatch the CE dissipation does not differ from the previous values. The largest dissipation occurs on the insulating disk. With no external cooling, this element can tolerate 95 kW of input power. To raise this limit the steatite disk MUST BE COOLED!

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The IPC+ CE reflection coefficient exhibits two minima in the HOMs frequency range. The EM-field has a stationary behavior near to the ceramic window for the 1 st minimum and near to the steatite disk for the 2 nd one. At the IPC cavity port the following power causes a dissipation equivalent to that of MHz from the generator: GHz on the inner conductor (vacuum part) GHz on the alumina window GHz on the inner conductor (air part) GHz on the steatite disk.

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab For all the frequency range the maximum E-field is reached in two zones shown with red circles, in the “air part”. The connection element is very critical: it experiences the mismatching due to the IPC external conductor step! Pt 1Pt 2

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The electric field at the HOM frequency can add to that at 500 MHz if the phases are the correct ones. The net result, in the worst scenario, is a local increase of the E-field and an increasing risk of electric breakdown. Few Watts picked up by the GHz MHz = the breakdown threshold is reached in point 2!!!

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab There is a huge stationary phenomena around 1.5GHz near the alumina ceramic window: the E-field is 20 times greater respect to the E-field at 500MHz The IPC outer conductor step generates evanescent TM xx -like modes. The E-field is not purely transverse as the frequency increases. During this “transition”, a standing wave zone appears with a huge raise of the local E-field.

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The CE is the bottle weakest part of the device. A new profile has been designed. Original shapeNew profile

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab E-field at different frequencies. Scale color is the same of the previous E-plots

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab  The reflection coefficient of this new profile is s 11 = at 500 MHz (the original shape had s 11 = 0.24). The device is more close to the ideal matched element.  The power wasted on the alumina window is increased (from the 13.9% to 25.4 %). This limits the maximum average power to 190 kW.  The power wasted on the steatite window is little bit decreased, thus the maximum average power for the connection element without cooling is 100 kW. The IPC+ CE parameters at 500 MHz are almost unchanged:

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab In the HOM frequency range the power dissipation has been lowered:

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The peak E-field values have been lowered in the zone near by the alumina window at any frequency. E-field peak value in point 2 (normalized) Frequency Original Shape New Profile 500MHz GHz GHz GHz The new profile can tolerate with an input power or 195 kW before any power coming from the beam at 2.1 GHz could cause any electric - thermal breakdown!!!

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab Coaxial to waveguide transition The IPC itself can sustain the RF input power of 150 kW (ELETTRA RF upgrade project). In view of this project the development of new IPC will not be necessary and – more important - the cavity port will not be modified. The new CE seems less sensitive to the HOM’s field. The development of a prototype for this device requires further thermal analysis to verify the proper cooling down of the insulating disk. A wave guide (WG) transmission lines will be used for RF power of 150 kW. (SLS already adopts this standard). The original and the modified “IPC+CE” shapes are then coupled to the standard WG transition to check the EM characteristic of the whole system.

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab Investigation on the 6 1/8” to WR 1800 (457.2 x mm) standard transition. The stub used to fix the inner conductor allows to gain the access to the inner conductor of the coaxial line from the outside. This access could be useful for the installation of cooling pipes.

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab The IPC is actually cooled down by means of water circulating into pipes brazed in the under-vacuum side of the device. The IPC cooling pipes lay-outThe investigated new cooling pipes lay-out

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab For the proposed cooling system, the transition stub has been modified in order to have enough space for the installation of the cooling pipes. The EM characteristic of the transition shall remain unchanged ! SWR of the original (pink) and modified transition (yellow). Available space 76.2 x 35 mm

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab Power dissipation in the Steatite Disk [Watts] Frequency [GHz] Power dissipation in the Alumina window [Watts] Frequency [GHz] Power dissipation for 5 kW coming from the cavity port in the TEM-like mode: “IPC + original CE + commercial WG transition” “IPC + new CE + commercial WG transition”

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab Power dissipation in the Steatite Disk [Watts] Frequency [GHz] Power dissipation in the Alumina Window [Watts] Frequency [GHz] Power dissipation for 5 kW coming from the cavity port in the TEM-like mode: “IPC + new CE + commercial WG transition” “IPC + new CE + new WG transition” ( new cooling system!!!)

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab There is another degree of freedom to check: the distance between the CE and the WG transition. In fact an additional coaxial line could introduce a phase shift. A proper line length is useful to decrease the stationary effects of the coupling to the WG transition in the “ IPC + CE ” element. Power dissipation in the Steatite Disk [Watts] Frequency [GHz] “IPC + CE + new WG transition” “IPC + CE + line length of x=217 mm +new WG transition”

8 th ESLS RF Meeting 29 th – 30 th Sep Daresbury Lab Conclusion: IPC + CE power limits: they depend on the electric properties of materials. Used  r  and tan  that are valid at 200 ºC, but how do they decrease as the frequency increases ? Same for the dielectric strength: available data sheet at 1 MHz, 20 ºC. Thermal analysis are required to verify the CE required cooling. Results show the high sensitivity of the IPC upstream elements to the HOMs signals. The commercial WG transition stresses this sensitivity. New CE and WG transition profiles are given. The HOMs sensitivity decreases and the remaining “peaks” could be avoided with a proper choice of a simple phasing coaxial line.