EYES WIDE OPEN Recent Developments in Tanker Voyage Chartering Singapore, March 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHARTERERS DEFAULT - LIEN OVER CARGO BY IAN GOULSON.
Advertisements

Let’s Study Legal English Together!
Conference Practice of Maritime Business & NOVO2010 Broker’s Role in negotiating and fixing charterparties Alberto Batini BB & Partners.
Assignment and Delegation The Freedom to Assign a Creditor’s Right and its Limitation The Delegation for Contractual Duty and Security Interest.
Article XXXVI – Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession 1. – This Protocol shall be open for signature in Berlin on 9 March 2012 by.
IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY BY INSTALLING OR USING THE SOFTWARE, FILES OR OTHER ELECTRONIC.
22 Lloyd’s Salvage Agreement LOF
 Fulfillment of Contractual obligations within the stipulated time frame is the essence of any contract.  LIQUIDATED DAMAGES (LD) are charged as a compensation.
REMEDIAL MEASURES.
SCOPE OF AGREEMENT IN THE U.s.a. The parties agree that this Agreement in all respects supplants all particular provisions. It is acknowledged during the.
1 LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE RECENT CASES HOUSTON March 29, 2007 William J. Honan Holland & Knight LLP.
CALCULATING DAMAGES – Recent developments in English Law by CLIVE ASTON LMAA Arbitrator.
INTERTANKO SEMINAR, DALIAN Session 5 Tanker Charterparties – recent cases and model clauses John C. Fawcett-Ellis.
Completion Outstanding work and Remedying Defects In order that the Works and Contractor's Documents, and each Section, shall be in the condition required.
Please note: This is a PowerPoint 2003 file. Do not work on this file in PowerPoint 2007 or It will distort the template settings in this file (EVEN.
Virtual Arrival an Initiative by Shipping to reduce GHG emission Singapore 8 may 2012 Senior Manager Research & Projects INTERTANKO.
Texas Real Estate Contracts 4 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning.
1 NEW ISSUES AND RECENT CASES IN CHARTERING Tokyo May 12, 2009 William J. Honan Holland & Knight LLP.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF OIL MAJOR APPROVALS IN TANKER CHARTERPARTIES DAVID MCINNES PARTNER.
WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK? Singapore March 27, 2006 William J. Honan Holland & Knight LLP.
York Antwerp Rules 2004 Progress or problems for Underwriters and Shipowners? Tim Madge FAAA - Partner Mediterranean Average Adjusting Company Marine Law.
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 20. Claim, Disputes and Arbitration [Construction Contract Administration]
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Defects Liability [Construction Contract Administration] Chapter 11.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
CAn For the aspiring Chartered Accountants. COMPANIES ACT, 2013 Sections relevant to Board of Directors.
MARITIME TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS. Bill of Lading (B/L) Master B/L House B/L Non-Negotiable B/L Clean B/L Charter Party (C/P) Shipping/Booking.
SESSION 3 Key points Module 6 covers the newly introduced powers in relation to issuing of PINs and ceasing or directing workers to cease unsafe work.
1 I. General Rules and Definition Article 1 Application of UCP Article 2 Definitions Article 3 Interpretations Article 4 Credits v. Contracts Article 5.
TALK TO THE CYPRUS ICS Chris Hilton and Jessica Pollock, Eversheds LLP 14 May 2008.
Contract Review.  1. The final step in the vendor contracting process should be getting the vendor’s standard written contract and signing the contract.
CHAPTER 16 Continuity of employment and transfers of undertakings.
III. Standard for Examination of Documents
MODE OF DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTS
S10 CONS5Q25 Lara Tookey. Review of estimators workings Decision on what margin to apply Bid submission details Submit your Tender.
Richard E. Thompson II, Esq.
1 Analyisis application Incoterms EXW – Ex Works General notes  The seller delivers the goods at the moment that he places the goods at the disposal.
1 VETTING CLAUSES: A REVIEW HOUSTON March 29, 2007 William J. Honan Holland & Knight LLP New York.
MARINE INSURANCE.
General Condition THE EMPLOYER Construction Law Supervised By : Dr. Kamalain Shaath Prepared By : Eng. Fawzy El.farra.
Compensation for EPs Taken from the XPP (March 2014)
Charterparties oProfessor Erik Røsæg owww.folk.uio.no/erikro.
7 Plant, Materials and Workmanship. 7.1Manner of Execution The Contractor shall carry out the manufacture of Plant, the production and manufacture of.
Prepared by: Ms. norazimah mazlan
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
Conditions Of Contract For Construction Conditions Of Contract For Construction Presented BY : Arch. INA’AM J. El TAWIL FIDIC 1999Conditions of Contract.
BELL QUIZ ON CHAPTER 18 Name one thing an agent can negotiate.
1 VETTING CLAUSES: A REVIEW MUMBAI October 3, 2006 William J. Honan Holland & Knight LLP New York.
SHELLVOY 6 Patrick Shaw, Ince & Co 14 April 2005 INTERTANKO Athens.
Contract Performance In Traditional and E-Contracts; Breach of Contract and Remedies Chapter 18 & 19.
IMPLIED & EXPRESS TERMS UNDER CHARTERPARTY. IMPLIED DUTIES UNDER CHARTERPARTY ON THE PART OF SHIPOWNER To provide a seaworthy ship. Obligation of reasonable.
-CHARTERPARTIES- INTRODUCTION
1. 2 Charter Party A contract whereby a shipowner agrees to place his ship, or part of it at a disposal of a person ( the charterer) for the carriage.
TERRORISM, SECURITY & THE ALLOCATION OF CONTRACTUAL RISK Rajeev Philip Athens, April 2005.
Chapter 18.  A fiduciary relationship “which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act in his behalf.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Chapter 20 Performance and Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts
Project Ⅱ Task 6 Bill of lading. Section 2 III. Bill of lading A bill of lading (sometimes referred to as a B/L) is a transport document issued by a carrier.
Professor Alkis John Corres Ship Sale and Purchase.
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Commencement Date to + 28 Days -
INTERTANKO’s International Chartering Forum
Lesson: Maritime Commercial Management Week: 4 ITU Maritime Faculty
Carriage of Goods by Sea Contracts
تأجير السفن Chartering Leq(6)
Anatomy of shipping Norhaida binti Aziz Nur Fatin Nadhrah binti Asri
Commercial Shipping Unit 3 - Laytime.
Find the Problems with the Provisions May 11, 2016 Presented By:
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
Presentation transcript:

EYES WIDE OPEN Recent Developments in Tanker Voyage Chartering Singapore, March 2006

MOVING THE GOALPOSTS The development of house charterparties: The development of house charterparties: –Early loading clause Shellvoy 5 v. Shellvoy 6 London Arbitration 27/04

Shellvoy 5, Cl. 4 of the 1999 Additional Clauses: Shellvoy 5, Cl. 4 of the 1999 Additional Clauses: “If, with Charterers prior consent and agreement, the vessel loads earlier than commencement of laydays then charterers shall have the benefit of such time saved when calculating laytime and/or demurrage at subsequent ports… ” MOVING THE GOALPOSTS

Loading completes two days before the commencement of laydays. Owners: Only time spent loading should be credited to the charterers. Charterers: All time up to the commencement of laydays should be credited to the Charterers MOVING THE GOALPOSTS

HELD: –The time between the completion of loading and the commencement of the original laydays could not be credited to the charterers as it would not have counted as laytime under normal circumstances MOVING THE GOALPOSTS

The Shellvoy 6 effectively overturns this arbitration. The Shellvoy 6 effectively overturns this arbitration. Cl. 12 (2): “Charterer shall have the benefit of such time saved by way of offset from any demurrage incurred. Such benefit shall be the time between the commencement of loading until the commencement of the original laydays”. MOVING THE GOALPOSTS

NOTICES Part I (B) of the Shellvoy 6: the owners undertake not to “negotiate or enter into any business or give the current Charterers any further options that may affect or alter the programme of the vessel as given in this clause“ unless it is “with Charterers’ prior consent”

Shell’s Explanatory Note: “New wording inserted to ensure the Owner keeps Charterers informed of the schedule of the vessel prior to loading”. And so much more… NOTICES

Preceding voyages… Obligations under preceding charterparties: e.g. Asbatankvoy option to renegotiate. (No such provision under the Exxonmobilvoy 2005) NOTICES

Part II Cl. 11: “As soon as Owners become aware that the vessel will not be ready to load by noon on the terminating date, Owners will give notice to Charterers declaring a new readiness date and ask Charterers to elect whether or not to terminate this Charter. Within 4 days after such notice, Charterers shall either : (i) declare this charter terminated or (ii) confirm a revised set of laydays which shall be amended such that the new readiness date stated shall be the commencement date and the second day thereafter shall be the termination date or (iii) agree a new set of laydays or an extension to the laydays mutually acceptable to Owners and Charterers.” CANCELLATION

And if the charterer does not exercise its options under Cl. 11??? –Breach? –Waiver of right to cancel? CANCELLATION

Obligation to notify charterers: Shellvoy 5: “If Owners reasonably conclude that, despite the exercise of due diligence, the vessel will not be ready to load by noon on the termination date, Owners may, as soon as they are able to state with reasonable certainty a new date when the vessel will be ready, give notice to Charterers declaring the new readiness date and asking Charterers to elect whether or not to terminate the charter Shellvoy 6: “As soon as Owners become aware that the vessel will not be ready to load by noon on the terminating date, Owners will give notice to Charterers declaring a new readiness date and ask Charterers to elect whether or not to terminate this Charter.” CANCELLATION

Exxonmobilvoy 2005: “laytime shall commence no earlier than 48 hours after the tender of NOR or on the commencement of loading, whichever occurs first ” CANCELLATION

NOTICE OF READINESS Shellvoy 6, Cl. 13(1)(a)(ii): “If owners fail… to obtain free pratique unless this is not customary prior to berthing… …then the original notice of readiness shall not be valid.”

Shellvoy 6, Cl. 13(1)(a)(iii): The owners have on board “all papers/certificates required to perform this Charter, either within 6 hours after notice of readiness or when time would otherwise normally commence under this Charter” failing which the original NOR becomes invalid. NOTICE OF READINESS

Shellvoy 6, Cl. 13(1)(a)(iii): Valid documentation a condition subsequent to the tender of a valid NOR London Arbitration 6/84 – Gas free certificates Shellvoy 6, Cl. 13(3) - “THE HAPPY DAY” NOTICE OF READINESS

Exxonmobilvoy 2005, Cl. 11: “At each load port or place, the Vessel shall be fully bunkered for the intended voyage and the Notice of Readiness shall, without limitation, confirm such bunkering.” –Practical difficulties NOTICE OF READINESS

CHANGE OF ORDERS Cl. 26 Shellvoy 6 v. Shellvoy 5: “If after loading and/or discharging ports have been nominated, Charterers wish to vary such ports or thei rotation, Charterers may give revised orders… as the case may be. Charterers shall reimburse Owners at the demurrage rate for any deviation or delay which may result therefrom and shall pay at replacement cost for any bunkers consumed. Charterers shall not be liable for any other loss or expense which is caused by such variation unless promptly on receipt of the revised orders Owners notify Charterers of the expectation of such loss or expense in which case unless Charterers promptly revoke such orders, Charterers shall be liable to reimburse Owners for any such loss or expense proven.” cf. Exxonmobilvoy 2000/2005

PUMPING WARRANTIES Part I (A)(I)(vii) of the Shellvoy 6: “Owners warrant that the vessel (vii) Can discharge a full cargo (whether homogenous or multi grade) either within 24 hours, or can maintain a back pressure of 100 PSI at the vessel’s manifold and Owners warrant such minimum performance provided receiving facilities permit and subject always to the obligation of utmost despatch...”

Exxonmobilvoy 2005: “Owner warrants that the vessel shall discharge entire cargo (be it one or more grade) within 24 hours pumping time or maintain the maximum safe pressure at the vessel’s rail that the vessel can discharge at, but always at a minimum of 100psi…” PUMPING WARRANTIES

LAYTIME & DEMURRAGE Little Change

CONCLUSION