All Hands Meeting 2005 MRI Calibration Update Morphometry BIRN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UAB, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-proposal committee meeting H. Deshpande, Dec. 7 th, 2007 Comparison of Single-shot Methods for R2* estimation.
Advertisements

BOLD Imaging at 7T Mark Elliott CfN Symposium 4/9/2008.
MRI Acquisition Methods for Brain Morphometry
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Multivendor, Multisite DCE-MRI Phantom Validation Study Edward Jackson 1, Edward Ashton 2, Jeffrey Evelhoch 3, Michael Buonocore 4, Greg Karczmar 5, Mark.
2005 All Hands Meeting Multi-Site Alzheimer’s Disease Project a.k.a. “MAD” Project Leaders: C. Fennema-Notestine, R. Gollub, B. Dickerson.
Introduction to Functional and Anatomical Brain MRI Research Dr. Henk Cremers Dr. Sarah Keedy 1.
Relaxometry & Image Processing Technical Update Clinical Findings/Product Need Competitive Info Recommendations T1 (DESPOT1 and LL) parameter fitting via.
Bruce Fischl MGH ATHINOULA A. MARTINOS CENTER Harvard Medical School MIT CSAIL/HST some open issues in functional MRI (thanks to Larry Wald for almost.
MSmcDESPOT A look at the road behind and ahead October 30, 2009.
ISMRM 2010 Quantitative Imaging and MS. N. D. Gai and J. A. Butman, NIH T1 Error Analysis for Double Angle Technique and Comparison to Inversion Recovery.
Multi-site Investigation of DTI Reproducibility K. G. Helmer 1, M-C. Chou 2, A. Song 3, J. Turner 4, B. Gimi 5, and S. Mori 6 1 Massachusetts General Hospital,
Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 Fieldmaps1 Fieldmaps and distortion What is a fieldmap? How can we predict distortion? How can we correct distortion?
MRI Image Formation Karla Miller FMRIB Physics Group.
Imaging Sequences part II
MNTP Trainee: Georgina Vinyes Junque, Chi Hun Kim Prof. James T. Becker Cyrus Raji, Leonid Teverovskiy, and Robert Tamburo.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN - Overview - Scientific Achievements.
Function BIRN: Quality Assurance Practices Introduction: Conclusion: Function BIRN In developing a common fMRI protocol for a multi-center study of schizophrenia,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Robust Cerebrum and Cerebellum Segmentation for Neuroimage Analysis Jerry L. Prince,
Evaluation of Multi-Center Diffusion Tensor Imaging VA Magnotta 1, GS Bonett 1, J Turner 6, B Mueller 2, A Juhl 1, K Lim 2, S Reading 3, E Aylward 5, M.
2004 NIH Building on the BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Randy Gollub, MD PhD Steve Pieper, PhD Morphometry BIRN.
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
Pulse Sequences Types of Pulse Sequences: Functional Techniques
B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity.
Morphometry BIRN Bruce Rosen, M.D. Ph.D.. Scientific Goal Methods –Multi-site MRI calibration, acquisition –Integrate advanced image analysis and visualization.
Ongoing BIRN-GCRC Collaborations Medical College Wisconsin (non BIRN site) –Functional MRI acquisition calibration University of Texas (non BIRN site)
Contrast Mechanism and Pulse Sequences Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
All Hands Meeting 2004 Title: Planned GCRC-BIRN Collaboration at BWH Jonathan Sacks, PhD.
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN: Milestones for 2005 Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
Morphometry BIRN Lobar analysis and atlas registration to subjects Parallel computing and statistical analysis Anatomical Segmentation Retrospective Data.
Duke NIRL Hosted MIRIAD Data Both XNAT and HID.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing ABC: Atlas-Based Classification Marcel Prastawa and Guido Gerig Scientific Computing.
MRI image validation using MRI simulation Emily Koch CIS II April 10, 2001.
BIRN Advantages in Morphometry  Standards for Data Management / Curation File Formats, Database Interfaces, User Interfaces  Uniform Acquisition and.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN - Overview - Scientific Achievements.
Contrast Mechanism and Pulse Sequences
Neuroinformatics challenges in MRI data integration Hugo Schnack Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience Department of Psychiatry University Medical Centre.
T.T. Liu, fBIRN AHM 2006 Arterial Spin Labeling Update fBIRN AHM, Oct 2006.
T.T. Liu, fBIRN AHM 2006 Status of Arterial Spin Labeling for the fBIRN Thomas T. Liu UCSD Center for Functional MRI.
Morphometry BIRN: Imaging Calibration Analysis Tools Data Sharing.
All Hands Meeting 2005 AVI Update Morphometry BIRN Analysis, Visualization, and Interpretation.
Johns Hopkins DTI Projects Jonathan Farrell Bennett Landman, Hao Huang, Thomas Ng Man Cheuk, Susumu Mori.
FMRI – Week 4 – Contrast Scott Huettel, Duke University MR Contrast FMRI Graduate Course (NBIO 381, PSY 362) Dr. Scott Huettel, Course Director.
Spring Meeting 2006 Tensor Atlas Morphometry BIRN Analysis, Visualization, and Interpretation.
All Hands Meeting 2005 FBIRN Tools: 2005 Subtitle added here.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Core What We Need from Cores 1 & 2 NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing.
Morphometry BIRN Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA) JHU (CIS): M. F. Beg, C. Ceritoglu, A. Kolasny, M. I. Miller, R. Yashinski MGH (NMR): B. Fischl;
Jorge Jovicich, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School Biomedical Informatics Research Network Overview Testbeds Morphometry BIRN.
B0 Distortion Correction in EPI Douglas N Greve MGH Martinos Center.
MR Image Formation FMRI Graduate Course (NBIO 381, PSY 362)
Automatic pipeline for quantitative brain tissue segmentation and parcellation: Experience with a large longitudinal schizophrenia MRI study 1,2 G Gerig,
All Hands Meeting 2005 Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA)
Imaging Capacities The ability to collect imaging data from different sites The ability to share imaging data from different sites The ability to analyze.
Declaration of Relevant Financial Interests or Relationships David Atkinson: I have no relevant financial interest or relationship to disclose with regard.
UCI Progress MBIRN AHM. Progress Tool Development –FIPS and HID: Modifications to store derived data, including morphometric measures from Freesurfer.
Federating Standardized Clinical Brain Images Across Hospitals.
MRI: Contrast Mechanisms and Pulse Sequences
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN Tool Dissemination.
September 16, 2009 NLC INjury and TRaumatic STress Consortium Neuroimaging Leadership Core Lead Investigators: Martha Shenton, BWH Ron Kikinis, BWH Bruce.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Imaging Science 2006 Summary.
DTI Acquisition Guide Donald Brien February 2016.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
All Hands Meeting 2004 Clinician’s Requirements for HID Query and Statistics Interface Christine Fennema-Notestine, Ph.D. David Kennedy, Ph.D.
Parameters which can be “optimized” Functional Contrast Image signal to noise Hemodynamic Specificity Image quality (warping, dropout) Speed Resolution.
MGH Site Summary. MGH Tools Summary New Version of FreeSurfer New features Moving to open source BIRND-UP Improvements Batch processing, license free.
FMRI data acquisition.
AVI Update Morphometry BIRN
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Cognition And Neocortical Volume After Stroke
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Presentation transcript:

All Hands Meeting 2005 MRI Calibration Update Morphometry BIRN

mBIRN: MRI Calibration Goals Overview Optimize reproducibility T1/T2/DTI MRI derived metrics: Quantitative characterization (sequence/vendor/field effects) Develop/test correction methods for improved reproducibility First: work at specific sites (MGH, Duke, JHU, UCSD) Then: human traveling phantoms, multiple mBIRN sites Dissemination of results Acquisition protocol recommendations MRI Calibration data Software tools for distortion correction

Timeline from mBIRN MRI Calibration StagesCore 1 Calibration TasksYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 I Structural MRI Calibration B1 inhomogeneity correction B0 inhomogeneity correction Online motion correction Gradient distortion (new sites, 1.5T and 3T) Calibration of FSE (PD, T2, FLAIR) Healthy and lesion brain tissue modeling Diffusion MRI Calibration Base sequences effects (EPI & Spiral) SNR, spatial resolution and b-factor effects Gradient encoding direction effects Plan calibration for additional imaging methods that support research other than AD/depression II Extension to methods for research other than AD/depression Distribution and support of Stage I methods

Evaluation of distortion correction from gradient non-linearities (MGH, mBIRN) Status: Manuscript in press Evaluation of MRI system upgrade effects (MGH, BWH) Sonata -> Avanto (Siemens 1.5T, MGH) Status: all data acquired, analysis Trio -> Trio TIM (Siemens 3T, MGH) Status: pre-upgrade data acquired A -> B (GE 3T, BWH) Status: pre-upgrade acquisition ongoing Evaluation of T1/PD/T2* multi-contrast sequences for morphometry (MGH) Metrics: image intensity, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes reproducibility Acquisition variables: imaging sequence (MP-RAGE, SEF, MEF), MRI Vendor (GE, Siemens), main field strength (1.5T, 3T), system version Analyses variables: cross-sectional/longitudinal, smoothing effects Status: Data acquired, thickness reproducibility paper submitted, subcortical analyses ongoing Evaluation of lesion reproducibility from T1/T2 multi-contrast sequences (Duke) Acquisition: test-retest (within 6 months), 1.5T, 3T, 4T Subjects: choose from previously scanned elderly subjects with vascular lesions Analysis: automated segmentation pipeline will be used Status: identified pool of 75 subjects, recruited and scanned 3, each at 3T once, one twice at 3T. mBIRN Calibration: Progress Outline Multi-contrast structural MRI Reproducibility Studies

Uncorrected ImagesCorrected Images Siemens Sonata (1.5T) Siemens AC88 (7T) mBIRN Calibration: sample unwarping results

Evaluation of distortion correction from gradient non-linearities (MGH, mBIRN) Status: Paper written, reviewed, now in press Evaluation of MRI system upgrade effects (MGH, BWH) Sonata -> Avanto (Siemens 1.5T, MGH) Status: all data acquired, analysis Trio -> Trio TIM (Siemens 3T, MGH) Status: pre-upgrade data acquired A -> B (GE 3T, BWH) Status: pre-upgrade acquisition ongoing Evaluation of T1/PD/T2* multi-contrast sequences for morphometry (MGH) Metrics: image intensity, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes reproducibility Acquisition variables: imaging sequence (MP-RAGE, SEF, MEF), MRI Vendor (GE, Siemens), main field strength (1.5T, 3T), system version Analyses variables: cross-sectional/longitudinal, smoothing effects Status: Data acquired, thickness reproducibility paper submitted, subcortical analyses ongoing Evaluation of lesion reproducibility from T1/T2 multi-contrast sequences (Duke) Acquisition: test-retest (within 6 months), 1.5T, 3T, 4T Subjects: choose from previously scanned elderly subjects with vascular lesions Analysis: automated segmentation pipeline will be used Status: identified pool of 75 subjects, recruited and scanned 3, each at 3T once, one twice at 3T. mBIRN Calibration: Progress Outline Multi-contrast structural MRI Reproducibility Studies

mBIRN Calibration: sample Sonata-Avanto upgrade results (MP-RAGE) Global Thickness: Group results (lh) Global thickness Sonata-Sonata Sonata-Avanto Avanto-Avanto Thickness variability maps: Group results (lh)

Evaluation of distortion correction from gradient non-linearities (MGH, mBIRN) Status: Paper written, reviewed, now in press Evaluation of MRI system upgrade effects (MGH, BWH) Sonata -> Avanto (Siemens 1.5T, MGH) Status: all data acquired, analysis Trio -> Trio TIM (Siemens 3T, MGH) Status: pre-upgrade data acquired A -> B (GE 3T, BWH) Status: pre-upgrade acquisition ongoing Evaluation of T1/PD/T2* multi-contrast sequences for morphometry (MGH) Metrics: image intensity, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes reproducibility Acquisition variables: imaging sequence (MP-RAGE, SEF, MEF), MRI Vendor (GE, Siemens), main field strength (1.5T, 3T), system version Analyses variables: cross-sectional/longitudinal, smoothing effects Status: Data acquired, thickness reproducibility paper submitted, subcortical analyses ongoing Evaluation of lesion reproducibility from T1/T2 multi-contrast sequences (Duke) Acquisition: test-retest (within 6 months), 1.5T, 3T, 4T Subjects: choose from previously scanned elderly subjects with vascular lesions Analysis: automated segmentation pipeline will be used Status: identified pool of 75 subjects, recruited and scanned 3, each at 3T once, one twice at 3T. mBIRN Calibration: Progress Outline Multi-contrast structural MRI Reproducibility Studies

Advantages: Less B0 distortion and intensity variation than MP-RAGE (due to high bandwidth) Enables estimation of tissue parameters (T1, PD, T2*) (two flip angle acquisitions) CNR subcortical structures better than MP-RAGE (more accurate segmentations) mBIRN Calibration: sample multi-echo FLASH results Disadvantages: Not standard, currently only on a few Siemens sites Gray/white matter CNR lower than MP-RAGE MEF flip 5 0 (PD) MEF flip 30 0 (T1)

Optimal image can be synthesized from original echo images for better visualization of subcortical structures External Pallidum Internal Pallidum Thalamus To help skull-stripping mBIRN Calibration: sample multi-echo FLASH results Enlarged inset

mBIRN Calibration: sample multi-echo FLASH results MEF provides higher CNR for subcortical structures W: White Matter G: Gray Matter H: Hippocampus A: Amygdala T: Thalamus V: Lateral Ventricle I: Inf. Lat. Ventricle C: Caudate P: Pallidum Successive improvements in hippocampus volume reproducibility Cortical thickness reproducibility THE GOOD THE NOT SO GOOD

Evaluation of distortion correction from gradient non-linearities (MGH, mBIRN) Status: Manuscript in press Evaluation of MRI system upgrade effects (MGH, BWH) Sonata -> Avanto (Siemens 1.5T, MGH) Status: all data acquired, analysis Trio -> Trio TIM (Siemens 3T, MGH) Status: pre-upgrade data acquired A -> B (GE 3T, BWH) Status: pre-upgrade acquisition ongoing Evaluation of T1/PD/T2* multi-contrast sequences for morphometry (MGH) Metrics: image intensity, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes reproducibility Acquisition variables: imaging sequence (MP-RAGE, SEF, MEF), MRI Vendor (GE, Siemens), main field strength (1.5T, 3T), system version Analyses variables: cross-sectional/longitudinal, smoothing effects Status: Data acquired, thickness reproducibility paper submitted, subcortical analyses ongoing Evaluation of lesion reproducibility from T1/T2 multi-contrast sequences (Duke) Acquisition: test-retest (within 6 months), 1.5T, 3T, 4T Subjects: choose from previously scanned elderly subjects with vascular lesions Analysis: automated segmentation pipeline will be used Status: identified pool of 75 subjects, recruited and scanned 3, each at 3T once, one twice at 3T mBIRN Calibration: Progress Outline Multi-contrast structural MRI Reproducibility Studies

Evaluation of DTI derived diffusion anisotropy reproducibility (JHU, Duke) Effects of SNR, # of gradient directions, b-value, TE (JHU) Status: Acquisition and preliminary analyses for SNR and number of gradients done. Acquisition for b-value and TE effects on going Distortion correction for DTI, not based on phase-map data (JHU) Status: Manuscript in progress. Ongoing preparation of software tool distribution Direction-dependent distortion correction (phase-map) for multiple platforms (Duke) Status: Manuscript validating the method (GE scanner) in press Method ported to Siemens. Correction code ported to C++. Integration with JHU’s reproducibility work ongoing mBIRN Calibration: Progress Outline Multi-contrast structural MRI Reproducibility Study

mBIRN Calibration: sample DTI results Distortion corrections with phase-maps for each diffusion-encoding direction Fractional anisotropy variability maps: effect of number of diffusion encoding directions

Scanner Upgrade Calibration Protocol: Status: available in Software: i) Gradient non-linearities distortion correction code Status: needs license Ii) Distortion correction code for DTI (Bo and eddy currents effects) Iii) Siemens/GE DTI pulse sequence extensions compatible with (ii) Status: finishing paperwork MRI data: i) multi-site mBIRN calibration study (5 subjects, 5 sites, 2 visits) Status: de-identify and DB Ii) DTI calibration data (2 subjects scanned multiple times) Status: agree on data format Manuscripts: Gradient unwarping (in press) Cortical thickness reproducibility (submitted) Bo and eddy current correction for DTI (in press) mBIRN Calibration: Progress Outline Dissemination ( )

StagesCore 1 Calibration TasksYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 I Structural MRI Calibration B1 inhomogeneity correction B0 inhomogeneity correction Online motion correction Gradient distortion (new sites, 1.5T and 3T) Calibration of FSE (PD, T2, FLAIR) Healthy and lesion brain tissue modeling Gone Diffusion MRI Calibration Base sequences effects (EPI & Spiral) SNR, spatial resolution and b-factor effects Gradient encoding direction effects Gone Traveling human phantom study combining all of above Gone Plan calibration for additional imaging methods that support research other than AD/depression Gone II Extension to methods for research other than AD/depression Distribution and support of Stage I methods mBIRN Calibration: Future Most projects are progressing well Projects in yellow below need added attention Define who will lead the coordination of this effort going forward

mBIRN Calibration: Future Next issues include: Agree on how to put closure on Phase I B1 inhomogeneity correction evaluation Motion correction Start planning traveling phantom study Agree on T1/T2/DTI single-session multi-site protocol Agree on sites that should be included Agree on preliminary protocol tests with local subjects at participating sites Agree on plan for traveling human phantoms Start planning calibration for additional imaging methods E.g., in support for pediatrics, MS, HIV neuroimaging research Define who will lead the coordination of this effort going forward