Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Disaster Management to Resilient Communities.
Advertisements

Volunteer Orientation Buchanan County Emergency Management.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Organization w A Small Independent Federal Agency w Headquartered in Washington, D.C. w 10 Regions, Caribbean.
Detail actions necessary to implement the interim housing mission in the post-disaster environment Identify command and control structures at all levels.
Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Situational Awareness & Assessment James R. Kish, Director Technological Hazards Division National Preparedness Directorate.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 2—Community Recovery What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
@TxSchoolSafety Continuity of Operations Planning Workshop Devolution & Reconstitution.
The role of Public Health Nurse Leaders during the Post Recovery Phase of Hurricane Katrina Adriene Jones-Gill, RN, MN Charlotte M. Parent, RN, MHCM.
For Discussion Purposes Only
Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Catastrophic Preparedness Incorporating Whole Community Philosophy  We must plan for the real, not the manageable  Plan.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Ty Brumfield (LNO to FEMA –RSF-IS National Coordinator Office of Homeland Security Directorate of Contingency.
All-hazards readiness in the United States Learning to communicate and build a culture of preparedness David Passey Senior Representative U.S. Federal.
RADM Ali S. Khan, MD, MPH Director, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness.
National Disaster Recovery Framework Overview Presented By: Ken Rathje Federal Disaster Recovery Coordinator FEMA Region III.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
Disaster Drills, Testing, and Evaluation  A part of any management program, testing, and evaluation is critical.  The purpose of an organized drill is.
Understanding Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Understanding Multiagency Coordination.
North Carolina Healthcare Preparedness Response and Recovery Program Healthcare System Preparedness Capabilities Mary Beth Skarote Healthcare Preparedness.
National Response Framework
An Orientation to the National Mass Care Strategy A Whole of Community Approach to Mass Care.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
Spring Directors’ Conference Presented By: Andrew Velasquez III
Part of a Broader Strategy
LEE MAYFIELD PLANNING CHIEF LEE COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Public-Private Partnerships in Disaster Preparedness.
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Emergent Disease Annex Briefing.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Alberta-A Province Prepared Alberta Emergency Management Agency- Provincial Services.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
National Earthquake Program Managers Meeting 1 May 2013 Region X Cascadia Subduction Zone Planning Effort.
Fostering a ‘Whole Community’ Approach to Emergency Management David J. Kaufman Director, Office of Policy and Program Analysis 8 June 2011.
Planning for Resiliency. Primary Reference Emergency Management Principles and Practices for Healthcare Systems, The Institute for Crisis, Disaster and.
Association of Defense Communities June 23, 2015
FOCUS GROUP #3 How do we create and ensure maximum utilization of Private Sector Support and Donations to Volunteer Organizations prior to and during a.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
ESF #3 – Public Works and Engineering IS-803 – February 2009 Visual 1 Public Works and Engineering ESF #3.
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop February 26, 2013 Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
Texas Emergency Management Conference San Antonio April 3, 2012.
Rehabilitation in agriculture What can we learn from recent experiences? Laurent Thomas, Director FAO Emergency Operations and Rehabilitation Division.
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
Module 2: Recovery Analysis Overview. July 2009Recovery Analysis 2 What is Recovery Analysis? A collection of methods, tools, and resources for anticipating.
S/L/T Version 1 National Response Framework Overview for Local, Tribal and State Audiences January 22, 2008.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication in a Pandemic: A Model for Building Capacity and Resilience of Minority Communities SOPHE/Health Promotion Practice.
PS Version 1 National Response Framework Overview for Private Sector Audiences January 22, 2008.
What is the Prevalence of Preparedness in the U.S.? Andrew Garrett MD MPH Columbia University National Center for Disaster Preparedness.
BIOTERRORISM AND LEGAL ISSUES: THE TEXAS EXPERIENCE NGA REGIONAL BIOTERRORISM WORKSHOP March 15, 2004 Susan K. Steeg General Counsel Texas Department of.
International Recovery Forum 2014 ~ The Role of Private Sector in Disaster Recovery ~ 21 January 2014 Kobe, Japan Dr Janet L. Asherson THE LINK BETWEEN.
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Planning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects March 23, 2011.
State Emergency Management
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
Recreation & Security HPR 413. General Security Must encompass all operations of the organization Should be written into management plans – Plans include.
A Leader’s Guide to Resiliency Case Examples Roadmap Dashboard.
2016 THIRA & State Homeland Security Grant. Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) National Preparedness Goal driven Annual Assessment.
Business Continuity Management Business Continuity Management (BCM) is a holistic management process that identifies potential impacts that threaten an.
Citizen Corps Volunteer for America “Engaging Citizens In Homeland Security”
Healthcare Coalitions. John Heywood English Writer
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
April 21, 2017 Workshop Overview
Emergency Operations Planning
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Enhancing Medical Surge Capacity
John M. Felker Director, NCCIC.
An Introduction To VDEM VDEM Director of External Affairs
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
Presentation transcript:

Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate Planning for a “Whole Community” Response to a Catastrophic Event March 22, 2011

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Whole Community Principles ■Leverage the whole community vice a “government-centric” approach – community self-aid/self-help will be decisive  View public as an asset, not a liability  Think bigger – engage “atypical partners and collaborators” and train and exercise to reduce impediments to cooperation ■Think outside of the box in terms of resources, concepts of operations, etc.  Regulatory waivers, alternative standards of care, and policy changes may be necessary ■Focus on outcomes, with acute emphasis on increasing the number of people who survive ■Response is a push event; recovery is a pull event Both Community & National Resilience are Outcomes of Success

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Catastrophic Preparedness & Planning Incorporating the Whole Community Approach ■Improving the Nation’s preparedness for catastrophic events in continuous collaboration with ALL members of the community ■Plan for the “Maximum of the Maximums” catastrophic event : the real, not the manageable ■Consistent with and expands upon existing emergency preparedness and response systems and doctrine ■Focus: Stabilize catastrophic effects with emphasis on the first 72 hours ■Requires a new planning framework and targeted preparedness campaign. Phase 2a: Immediate Response E to 24 Hours Phase 2b: Deployment 24 hours to 72 hours Phase 2c: Employment, sustained response 72 + hours E Stabilize in 72 hrs

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 The Meta-Scenario The Design Basis Threat for this “Maximum of Maximum” Meta- Scenario Was Derived from 3 Different Meta-Disasters (Earthquake, Hurricane and IND Detonation)  No-Notice Event - Affecting 7 million people, across 25,000 square miles and several states and FEMA regions  Significant Casualties - 190,000 fatalities in initial hours; 265,000 require emergency medical attention  Extreme Damage - Severe damage to critical infrastructure and to key resources and essential transportation The ongoing Japanese Earthquake-Tsunami-Nuclear Release 3 Part meta-disaster confirms the value of this scenario approach In order to anticipate catastrophic requirements and to avoid narrow focus on a limited number of specific scenarios, the Whole Community methodology is built upon a foundation of a meta-scenario consisting of the maximum of maximum challenges across a range of scenarios

Core Capabilities These critical capabilities represent the highest priority essential functions necessary for both saving and sustaining lives, and stabilizing the site and the situation within 72 hours. The first six “enable” a rapid and effective response, while the remainder explicitly address the needs and priorities of the people and communities impacted by the catastrophic event. Enables Response ■Situational Assessment ■Public Messaging ■Command, Control, & Coordination ■Critical Communications ■Environmental Health & Safety ■Critical Transportation Survivor Needs ■On-Scene Security and Protection ■Mass Search and Rescue Operations ■Health and Medical Treatment ■Mass Care Services ■Public & Private Services & Resources ■Stabilize and Repair Essential Infrastructure ■Fatality Management Services

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Potential Solutions/Courses of Action  New partners  New concepts of operation  Authorities: More effective use of existing authorities, or identification of new requirements  Necessary waivers and/or declarations  New or enhanced pre-scripted mission assignments  Pre-incident preparedness programs  Implications for academic, R&D, and other communities  Implications for physical, programmatic and effective communications accessibility New ways of thinking and/or conducting business will need to be explored in order to recover from catastrophic disaster events. Working groups will examine:

Planning Timeline

Short/Long-Term Goals Short-Term Goals Long-Term Goals