Antitrust Does Google have monopoly power? Microsoft? On what? Why? Why Not? Is that bad? Why? Can you name monopolies in other industries? Is Monopoly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
Advertisements

2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Panama City, Panama, Thursday, October 4 th, 2012 Lisa M. Phelan Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section (NCES) United.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2007 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Antitrust Law-Restraints of Trade.
Darren A. Craig COOPERATION, COLLABORATION, OR COLLUSION? ENHANCED ANTI-TRUST SCRUTINY January 9, 2014.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office
Antitrust Law Chapter 10. Purposes of Antitrust Law Promote competition and efficiency in the marketplace Promote competition and efficiency in the marketplace.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Domestic Antitrust Laws and Exemptions Regarding International Membership Donald A. Frederick USDA Rural Development Cooperatives Program
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Legal Background.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Antitrust Law.
 Section 1 of Sherman Act regulates “horizontal” and “vertical” restraints.  Per Se vs. Rule of Reason.  Per Se violations are blatant and substantially.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Monopoly pricing policy File: monopoly8... n Added slide 24&25 (Antitrust laws and enforcement, Germany) before “Equilibria and comparative statics”
Miller Cross 4 th Ed. © 2005 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Antitrust Kim C. Stanger Compliance Bootcamp (5/15)
Criminal Antitrust Practice Donald C. Klawiter J. Clayton Everett, Jr. Jennifer M. Driscoll.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
1 What is antitrust/competition law? What is its purpose?
Managing Competition Cases: Cartels & Agreements Yee Wah Chin Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti David A. Clanton Baker & McKenzie J. Mark Gidley.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
3. Criminal Price-Fixing Prosecutions Antitrust Law Fall 2014 Yale Law School Dale Collins SLIDES FOR CLASS.
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
Trade Practices Common law –Covenant not to compete –Must be reasonable –Society demands laws against predatory business practices Legislation –Laws are.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
U.S. vs. Standard Oil 1911 “…The combination of the defendants in this case is an unreasonable and undue restraint of trade in petroleum and its products.
Antitrust OBE 118, Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey In the course of doing business, companies, businesses and individuals can easily run afoul of the Antitrust.
Antitrust. Fundamental Assumptions Competition is good Big is not bad Monopoly practices are bad People should be allowed to buy whatever quality they.
Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. B U S I N E S S MARIANNE M. JENNINGS Copyright ©2003.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
 TRUST  A group or collection of firms who agree to coordinate efforts for the purpose of restricting output and raising prices/profits  Also known.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Laws and Unfair Trade Practices
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Monopoly and Antitrust Policy. Imperfect Competition and Market Power An imperfectly competitive industry is an industry in which single firms have some.
Chapter 23 Promoting Competition. 2 Chapter Objectives 1. Explain the purpose of antitrust laws, and identify the major federal antitrust statutes. 2.
Ch THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices Twomey Jennings.
1 Chapter 13 Practice Quiz Tutorial Antitrust and Regulation ©2000 South-Western College Publishing.
Chapter 10 Antitrust Law. Chapter Objectives After reading this chapter, you will know the following: The federal antitrust laws and how they apply to.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 8: Pure Monopoly Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Standard 10.3 Students analyze the effects of the Industrial Revolution in England, France, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Part 4. Trace the evolution.
Antitrust Law Chapter 10.
CHAPTER 42: ANTITRUST LAW
New York State Attorney General’s Office Antitrust Bureau
Chapter 16 Business Competition: Antitrust
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 27: Antitrust and Monopoly
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND ONLINE COMMERCE LAW 1st Edition by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 21 Antitrust Law Slides developed.
What is the Sherman Anti-Trust Act?
Customized by Professor Ludlum December 1, 2016
Chapter 17 Trade Practices: Antitrust
THE RULES OF THE GAME: Intro to Antitrust Law Robbyn Wysocki
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Presentation transcript:

Antitrust Does Google have monopoly power? Microsoft? On what? Why? Why Not? Is that bad? Why? Can you name monopolies in other industries? Is Monopoly Power Necessarily Harmful to Society?

Why Do We Have Antitrust Laws? Standard Oil Trust Created the 7 Sisters (Made Rockefeller even richer)

Section 2 of the Sherman Act Section 2 condemns “every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize.” There are two distinct types of behavior that are subject to sanction under Section 2: Monopolization Attempts to Monopolize Section 2: “Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or person, to monopolize any part of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony.”

Sherman Antitrust Act “Unreasonable Restraints.” U.S. Supreme Court added “unreasonable” – Restraint is greater than needed to protect legitimate business interest – Restraint poses an undue hardship on the promisor or likely injury to the general public Contracts in Restraint of Trade. Contract or combination in restraint of trade is illegal. Monopoly or Attempt to Monopolize. Monopolies or attempts to monopolize are illegal. Interstate Commerce. The Sherman Act applies only to activities that have a “significant” impact on interstate commerce. – Interstate Commerce (commerce clause). Section 1: “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal…”

Current Antitrust Example: JACOBI INDUSTRIES PLEADS GUILTY TO BID RIGGING (July 2007) Bid Rigging. The president and owner of Jacobi Industries Inc., a Medford, N.Y. company, pleaded guilty to conspiring to rig bids on U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) contracts for military tiedown equipment and cargo securing systems. $20,000 Fine – 6 Months Prison. Jacobi has agreed to pay a criminal fine of $20,000, and to cooperate with the Department's ongoing investigation. Jacobi could also serve up to six months in prison. The terms of the plea agreement are subject to court approval. Maximum 10 years of prison and $1million fine (or twice the gain or twice the loss). Conspiracy. Jacobi participated in the bid-rigging conspiracy from November 2001 to January 2005, during which time he and co-conspirators discussed and agreed among themselves not to compete by agreeing not to submit prices or bids against each other on certain contracts. – Attending meetings and engaging in discussions regarding the sale of military tiedown equipment and cargo securing systems; – Agreeing during those meetings and discussions not to compete on certain contracts with the DOD by not submitting prices or bids on those contracts; – Submitting bids in accordance with the agreements reached; – Selling military tiedown equipment and cargo securing systems to the DOD under those agreements at collusive and non- competitive prices; and

Restraints of Trade – Overview Price Fixing – OPEC – School Milk Scam – NCAA Cap of assistant coach salaries – Any agreement among competitors to fix prices is a per se violation. Horizontal Market Division – Trade Associations Joint Ventures Resale Price Maintenance Agreements (rule of reason) Territorial Restrictions – Free Rider Problem Horizontal Vertical

Vertical versus Horizontal VerticalHorizontal