1 Dimension matching in Facebook and LinkedIn networks Anthony Bonato Ryerson University Seminar on Social Networks, Big Data, Influence, and Decision-Making University of Toronto
Friendship networks network of on- and off-line friends form a large web of interconnected links 2Dimension matching in OSNs
6 degrees of separation 3 (Stanley Milgram, 67): famous chain letter experiment Dimension matching in OSNs
6 Degrees in Facebook? 1.31 billion users (Backstrom et al., 2012) –4 degrees of separation in Facebook –when considering another person in the world, a friend of your friend knows a friend of their friend, on average similar results for Twitter and other OSNs 4Dimension matching in OSNs
5 Complex networks in the era of Big Data web graph, social networks, biological networks, internet networks, … Dimension matching in OSNs
What is a complex network? no precise definition however, there is general consensus on the following observed properties 1.large scale 2.evolving over time 3.power law degree distributions 4.small world properties 6Dimension matching in OSNs
Examples of complex networks technological/informational: web graph, router graph, AS graph, call graph, graph social: on-line social networks (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn,…), collaboration graphs, co- actor graph biological networks: protein interaction networks, gene regulatory networks, food networks 7Dimension matching in OSNs
Properties of complex networks 1.Large scale: relative to order and size web graph: order > trillion –some sense infinite: number of strings entered into Google Facebook: > 1 billion nodes; Twitter: > 270 million nodes –much denser (ie higher average degree) than the web graph protein interaction networks: order in thousands 8Dimension matching in OSNs
Properties of complex networks 2.Evolving: networks change over time web graph: billions of nodes and links appear and disappear each day Facebook: grew to 1 billion users –denser than the web graph protein interaction networks: order in the thousands –evolves much more slowly 9Dimension matching in OSNs
10 Properties of Complex Networks 3.Power law degree distribution for a graph G of order n and i a positive integer, let N i,n denote the number of nodes of degree i in G we say that G follows a power law degree distribution if for some range of i and some b > 2, b is called the exponent of the power law Dimension matching in OSNs
Power laws in OSNs 11Dimension matching in OSNs
12 Graph parameters average distance: clustering coefficient: Dimension matching in OSNs
13 Properties of Complex Networks 4.Small world property introduced by Watts & Strogatz in 1998: –low distances diam(G) = O(log n) L(G) = O(loglog n) –higher clustering coefficient than random graph with same expected degree Dimension matching in OSNs
14 Sample data: Flickr, YouTube, LiveJournal, Orkut (Mislove et al,07): short average distances and high clustering coefficients Dimension matching in OSNs
15 Other properties of complex networks many complex networks (including on-line social networks) obey two additional laws: Densification power law (Leskovec, Kleinberg, Faloutsos,05): –networks are becoming more dense over time; i.e. average degree is increasing |(E(G t )| ≈ |V(G t )| a where 1 < a ≤ 2: densification exponent Dimension matching in OSNs
16 Decreasing distances (Leskovec, Kleinberg, Faloutsos,05): –distances (diameter and/or average distances) decrease with time (Kumar et al,06): Dimension matching in OSNs
Other properties Connected component structure: emergence of components; giant components Spectral properties: adjacency matrix and Laplacian matrices, spectral gap, eigenvalue distribution Small community phenomenon: most nodes belong to small communities (ie subgraphs with more internal than external links) … 17Dimension matching in OSNs
Blau space OSNs live in social space or Blau space: –each user identified with a point in a multi-dimensional space –coordinates correspond to socio- demographic variables/attributes homophily principle: the flow of information between users is a declining function of distance in Blau space 18Dimension matching in OSNs
Underlying geometry Feature space thesis: every complex network is naturally associated with an underlying feature space. For eg: –web graph: topic space –OSNs: Blau space –PPIs: biochemical space 19Dimension matching in OSNs
Dimensionality Question: What is the dimension of the Blau space of OSNs? what is a credible mathematical formula for the dimension of an OSN? 20Dimension matching in OSNs
Six dimensions of separation21
22 Why model complex networks? uncover and explain the generative mechanisms underlying complex networks predict the future nice mathematical challenges models can uncover the hidden reality of networks Dimension matching in OSNs
Networks - Bonato23
24 “All models are wrong, but some are more useful.” – G.P.E. Box Dimension matching in OSNs
25 Random geometric graphs n nodes are randomly placed in the unit square each node has a constant sphere of influence, radius r nodes are joined if their Euclidean distance is at most r G(n,r), r = r(n) Dimension matching in OSNs
Some properties of G(n,r) Theorem (Penrose,97) Let μ = nexp(-πr 2 n). 1.If μ = o(1), then asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s.) G is connected. 2.If μ = Θ(1), then a.a.s. G has a component of order Θ(n). 3.If μ →∞, then a.a.s. G is disconnected. many other properties studied of G(n,r): chromatic number, clique number, Hamiltonicity, random walks, … 26Dimension matching in OSNs
Spatially Preferred Attachment (SPA) model (Aiello, Bonato, Cooper, Janssen, Prałat,08), (Cooper, Frieze, Prałat,12) 27 volume of sphere of influence proportional to in- degree nodes are added and spheres of influence shrink over time a.a.s. leads to power laws graphs, low directed diameter, and small separators Dimension matching in OSNs
Ranking models (Fortunato, Flammini, Menczer,06), (Łuczak, Prałat, 06), (Janssen, Prałat,09) parameter: α in (0,1) each node is ranked 1,2, …, n by some function r –1 is best, n is worst at each time-step, one new node is born, one randomly node chosen dies (and ranking is updated) link probability r -α many ranking schemes a.a.s. lead to power law graphs: random initial ranking, degree, age, etc. 28Dimension matching in OSNs
Geometric model for OSNs we consider a geometric model of OSNs, where –nodes are in m- dimensional Euclidean space –volume of spheres of influence variable: a function of ranking of nodes 29Dimension matching in OSNs
Geometric Protean (GEO-P) Model (Bonato, Janssen, Prałat, 12) parameters: α, β in (0,1), α+β < 1; positive integer m nodes live in an m-dimensional hypercube each node is ranked 1,2, …, n by some function r –1 is best, n is worst –we use random initial ranking at each time-step, one new node v is born, one randomly node chosen dies (and ranking is updated) each existing node u has a region of influence with volume add edge uv if v is in the region of influence of u 30Dimension matching in OSNs
Notes on GEO-P model models uses both geometry and ranking number of nodes is static: fixed at n –order of OSNs at most number of people (roughly…) top ranked nodes have larger regions of influence 31Dimension matching in OSNs
Simulation with 5000 nodes 32Dimension matching in OSNs
Simulation with 5000 nodes 33 random geometric GEO-P Dimension matching in OSNs
Properties of the GEO-P model (Bonato, Janssen, Prałat, 2012) a.a.s. the GEO-P model generates graphs with the following properties: –power law degree distribution with exponent b = 1+1/α –average degree d = (1+o(1))n (1-α-β) /2 1-α densification –diameter D = n Θ(1/m) small world: constant order if m = Clog n –bad spectral expansion and high clustering coefficient 34Dimension matching in OSNs
Dimension of OSNs given the order of the network n and diameter D, we can calculate m gives formula for dimension of OSN: 35Dimension matching in OSNs
Logarithmic Dimension Hypothesis In an OSN of order n and diameter D, the dimension of its Blau space is posed independently by (Leskovec,Kim,11), (Frieze, Tsourakakis,11) 36Dimension matching in OSNs
Uncovering the hidden reality reverse engineering approach –given network data (n, D), dimension of an OSN gives smallest number of attributes needed to identify users that is, given the graph structure, we can (theoretically) recover the social space 37Dimension matching in OSNs
6 Dimensions of Separation OSNDimension Facebook7 YouTube6 Twitter4 Flickr4 Cyworld7 38Dimension matching in OSNs
MITACS team, UBC L to R: Amanda Tian, David Gleich, Myughwan Kim, Me, Stephen Young, Dieter Mitsche Dimension matching in OSNs
40
MGEO-P (Bonato, Gleich, Mitsche, Prałat, Tian, Young,14) time-steps in GEO-P form a computational bottleneck consider a GEO-P where we forget the history of ranks –memoryless GEO-P (MGEO-P) place n points u.a.r. in the hypercube assign ranks from via a random permutation σ for each pair i > j, ij is an edge if j is in the ball of volume σ(i) –α n -β 41Dimension matching in OSNs
Contrasting the models by considering the evolution of ranks in GEO-P, the probability that an edge is present in GEO-P and not in MGEO-P is: intuitively, the models generate similar graphs many a.a.s properties hold in MGEO-P with similar parameters 42Dimension matching in OSNs
Properties of the MGEO-P model (BGMPTY,14) a.a.s. the MGEO-P model generates graphs with the following properties: –power law degree distribution with exponent b = 1+1/α –average degree d = (1+o(1))n (1-α-β) /2 1-α densification –diameter D = n Θ(1/m) 43Dimension matching in OSNs
Proof sketch: diameter eminent node: –highly ranked: ranking greater than some fixed R partition hypercube into small hypercubes choose size of hypercubes and R so that –each hypercube contains at least log 2 n eminent nodes –sphere of influence of each eminent node covers each hypercube and all neighbouring hypercubes choose eminent node in each hypercube: backbone show all nodes in hypercube distance at most 2 from backbone 44Dimension matching in OSNs
Back to question… How would we measure the dimensionality of Blau space? 45Dimension matching in OSNs
Aside: machine learning machine learning is a branch of AI where computers make decisions and answer questions based on data sets examples: –spam filters –Netflix recommender systems especially useful when the data or number of decisions are too large for humans to process 46Dimension matching in OSNs
Facebook100 Dimension matching in OSNs47
Validating the LDH we tested the dimensionality of large-scale samples from real OSN data –Facebook100 and LinkedIn (sampled over time) IDEA: use machine learning (SVM) to predict dimensions –features: small subgraph counts (3- and 4- vertex subgraphs) –compared sampled data vs simulations of MGEO-P with dimensions 1 through 12 48Dimension matching in OSNs
Graphlets Dimension matching in OSNs49
Experimental design Dimension matching in OSNs50
Sample: Michigan Dimension matching in OSNs51
52 Stanford3: n: edges: avgdeg: plexp: GeoP parameters alphabeta: alpha: beta: python geop_dim_experiment.py --logcount -s 50 -t 0 --mmax 12 --prob Stanford M-GeoP dimensions: LADTree: 2 J48: 3 Logistic: 5 SVM: 5 Dimension matching in OSNs
FB and LinkedIn - SVM Dimension matching in OSNs53
FB and LinkedIn - Eigenvalues 54Dimension matching in OSNs
Figure 6. For three of the Facebook networks, we show the eigenvalue histogram in red, the eigenvalue histogram from the best fit MGEO-P network in blue, and the eigenvalue histograms for samples from the other dimensions in grey. Bonato A, Gleich DF, Kim M, Mitsche D, et al. (2014) Dimensionality of Social Networks Using Motifs and Eigenvalues. PLoS ONE 9(9): e doi: /journal.pone
Future directions Other data sets Fractal dimension What are the attributes? What implications does LDH have for OSNs or social networks in general? 56Dimension matching in OSNs