“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
California Community Corrections Performance Incentive Act Overview SB 678 Briefing San Francisco Regional AOC Office November 29, 2010 SB 678.
1 10% Appropriation Reduction for Fiscal Year December 17, 2008 Senate Criminal & Civil Justice Appropriations Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Criminal Justice, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Reinvestment Grant
1 Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) These materials were developed by The Moss Group, Inc.under cooperative agreement #03P21G1Y4.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
TREATMENT, NOT JAIL: Investing in Rational System Change Florida’s New Reinvestment Act Presented by: Michele Saunders, LCSW Judge Mark Speiser.
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.
Presentation to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission April 13, 2015 Judy Clarke, Executive Director, Virginia Center For Restorative Justice Mark.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
Transition from Prison to the Community/Transition Model Initiative ARC Presentation May 14, 2015 Presenters: Dan Chesnut, DOC Gordon Swensen, USOR.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
Crime and Criminal Justice 3/20/2012. Learning Objectives Use knowledge and analyses of social problems to evaluate public policy, and to suggest policy.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Grant Review Committee OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 21, 2013.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Summit County Probation Services
Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presented by: Charlie Granville CEO, Capita Technologies Chris Baird
C H A P T E R F I V E.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
General Counsel Andrew Bailey
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1

South Carolina’s Traditional Approach to Criminal Justice South Carolina has had a “tough on crime,” not necessarily “smart on crime,” attitude. South Carolina has taken a “lock ‘em up and throw away the key” approach. 2

3 “We build prisons for people we’re afraid of. Yet South Carolina has filled them with people we’re just mad at.” - Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, and Pat Nolan, Vice President of Prison Fellowship

South Carolina’s Climate for Change South Carolina was experiencing a record number of violent and repeat criminal offenses. South Carolina’s court system was experiencing a record number of criminal cases. South Carolina’s prison system was experiencing a record number of inmates. South Carolina was experiencing a record recession, and a record low in resources. 4

South Carolina’s Sentencing Reform Commission The South Carolina Legislature established the South Carolina Sentencing Reform Commission. The Commission partnered with the Pew Center on the States, the Crime and Justice Institute, and Applied Research Services, in analyzing South Carolina’s sentencing data and generating policy options to reduce recidivism, hold offenders accountable, and maximize limited financial resources. The Commission utilized “evidence-based practices.” Such practices would only work in South Carolina after obtaining critical data and determining the actual drivers in the criminal justice system. The Commission made recommendations to the South Carolina Legislature based on consensus of the stakeholders and the Commission members. 5

“Omnibus Crime Reduction and Sentencing Reform Act of 2010” Among the recommendations, the Commission recommended and the South Carolina Legislature passed the “Omnibus Crime Reduction and Sentencing Reform Act of 2010”. The Act demonstrated that legislators could be “tough on crime” and also be “smart on crime.” The Act also demonstrated that evidence-based practices can increase public safety and save money at the same time. 6

South Carolina’s Sentencing Reform Successes Since implementation of the “Omnibus Crime Reduction and Sentencing Reform Act of 2010”: South Carolina’s prison population has been reduced from approximately 24,600 inmates to 23,200 inmates, and continues to decrease. This population reduction has resulted in South Carolina’s ability to close at least one prison; Parole and probation compliance revocations have been reduced approximately 36%, and continue to decrease. The reduction in revocations has resulted in an approximately 39% decrease in the number of persons on parole or probation being re-incarcerated for technical violations; South Carolina’s violent crime rate has decreased approximately 9.8%, and continues to decrease. 7

South Carolina’s Sentencing Reform Successes Since implementation of the “Omnibus Crime Reduction and Sentencing Reform Act of 2010”: Total State Expenditure Savings = $4,229,456. Marginal State Expenditure Savings = $1,067,630. (A marginal rate is used to account for the variable costs averted such as food, medical expenses, and fixed expenditures.) 8

South Carolina’s Sentencing Reform Reinvestment The South Carolina Sentencing Reform Oversight Committee recommended that the $1,067,630 marginal state expenditure savings be appropriated for reinvestment in sentencing reform measures as required by the “Omnibus Crime Reduction and Sentencing Reform Act of 2010.” These measures include: (1) implementation of evidence ‑ based sentencing practices not previously funded; (2) increasing the availability of risk reduction programs and interventions, including substance abuse treatment programs, for supervised offenders; and (3) grants to nonprofit victim services organizations to partner with the State agencies and the courts to assist victims and increase the amount of restitution collected from offenders. The South Carolina Department of Corrections and the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services have begun implementing these measures in

Sentencing Reform in South Carolina If you are interested in learning more about sentencing reform in South Carolina, or you would like to view documents referred to in this presentation, go to the following website: 10