SATURN and DIADEM Practical Experience Toni Dichev 31 st Oct 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

An efficient solution to toll choices involving multiple toll booths and / or multiple tolling strategies Current approaches to toll road demand forecasting:
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Microsoft ® System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R3 and Forefront ® Endpoint Protection Infrastructure Planning and Design Published: October 2008.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
for Traffic Forecast Analysis, London | TIS.PT – Transportes Inovação e Sistemas, S.A. Slide 1 | 29 Transportes, Inovação e Sistemas,
The Use of Differential Speed-Flow Curves in SATURN.
The role of volume-delay functions in forecast and evaluation of congestion charging schemes Application to Stockholm Leonid Engelson and Dirk van Amelsfort.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
June 13, Introduction to CS II Data Structures Hongwei Xi Comp. Sci. Dept. Boston University.
EE 685 presentation Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence By Steven Low and David Lapsley Asynchronous Distributed Algorithm Proof.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
July 16, Introduction to CS II Data Structures Hongwei Xi Comp. Sci. Dept. Boston University.
13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 11, 2011 Risk Assessment & Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Projections for Toll.
Humber Bridge Review Results from the HUMBER ESTUARY TRANSPORT MODEL.
Bring Back the Tram! Steve Miller Transport for London.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Big picture transport planning When precision fails and approximation succeeds.
Seoul Development Institute Building a TDM Impact Analysis System for the Introduction of a Short-Term Congestion Management Program in Seoul Jin-Ki Eom,
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
Traffic Assignment Convergence and its Effects on Selecting Network Improvements By Chris Blaschuk, City of Calgary and JD Hunt, University of Calgary.
TPB Models Development Status Report Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
1 Validation & Verification Chapter VALIDATION & VERIFICATION Very Difficult Very Important Conceptually distinct, but performed simultaneously.
Forecasting Travel Time Index using a Travel Demand Model to Measure Plan Performance Thomas Williams, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute 2015 TRB.
Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
Utilizing Multi-threading, Parallel Processing, and Memory Management Techniques to Improve Transportation Model Performance Jim Lam Andres Rabinowicz.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Comparing Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approaches for Planning
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Preparing for the 2 nd Hourly. What is an hourly? An hourly is the same thing as an in-class test. How many problems will be on the hourly? There will.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
NCHRP Project Development of Verification and Validation Procedures for Computer Simulation use in Roadside Safety Applications SURVEY OF PRACTITIONERS.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
16 Sep 04Transport Workshop at Queen's1 A numerical comparison of three heuristic methods for path reassignment for dynamic user equilibrium Ying-en Ge.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
June 14th, 2006 Henk Taale Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
EE 685 presentation Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence By Steven Low and David Lapsley.
SATURN User Group Meeting: Epsom, October Presentation by Dirck van Vliet.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
1 He Says vs. She Says Model Validation and Calibration Kevin Chang HNTB Corporation
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
TRB Planning Applications Conference May 2009, Houston,TX A Caveat on O-D Matrix Estimation/Adjustment: Deviations from a seed matrix and Simultaneous.
Evaluation Research Dr. Guerette. Introduction Evaluation Research – Evaluation Research – The purpose is to evaluate the impact of policies The purpose.
Application of Accelerated User Equilibrium Traffic Assignments Howard Slavin Jonathan Brandon Andres Rabinowicz Srinivasan Sundaram Caliper Corporation.
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
15 th October 2007SRMCwww.orhltd.com How are you solving the puzzle? Integrated Risk Management Plans.
MWH IN NEW ZEALAND TMW and Technical Conference - Wellington 2004 Presented to: TMW and Technical Conference - Wellington 2004 Urie Bezuidenhout MSc.(Eng.)
Approaches to quantifying uncertainty-related risk There are three approaches to dealing with financial and economic risk in benefit-cost analysis: = expected.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Network Assignment and Equilibrium for Disaggregate Models
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
2018 Valid Amazon AWS-Solution-Architect-Associate Exam Study Guide - AWS-Solution-Architect-Associate Questions Answers Realexamdumps.com
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Going Backwards In The Procedure and Recapitulation of System Identification By Ali Pekcan 65570B.
Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
After Evans: Working on an Approximation of a Combined Equilibrium Model Based on Precision Assignment May, 2011 TRB Planning Applications Conference,
Introduction to CS II Data Structures
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Presentation transcript:

SATURN and DIADEM Practical Experience Toni Dichev 31 st Oct 2008

 What is DIADEM?  DIADEM Approach  Model Requirements  Realism Tests / Convergence Criteria  Issues & Solutions  Practical Example  Summary: Lessons Learned & Conclusions Overview

 Variable Demand Modelling Advice (VADMA) – WebTAG Guidance  Any change to transport conditions will, in principle, cause a change in demand. The purpose of variable demand modelling is to predict and quantify these changes  Trip Frequency  Trip Distribution  Mode Choice  Time of Day Choice  DIADEM (Dynamic Integrated Assignment, and Demand Modelling) software - allows you to implement variable demand modelling as recommended by WebTAG DIADEM and Variable Demand

Specify Demand Model Structure Select Model Parameters and Realism Test Prepare Forecast Networks and Reference Trip Matrices for Demand Model Assignments Run DIADEM for different Time Periods Identify Best Iteration & Reassign networks with best matrices Demand Modelling Using DIADEM

Model needs to have appropriate split by journey purpose Which Responses to Include? Circumstances and Policy interests of assessment; Availability of Data; Dft Guidance what responses to consider DIADEM Demand Model Structure

Realism Tests - The Essentials Base Year Validated Network Base Year Revised Network Demand Segments Base Year Assigned Model DIADEM RUN Calculate Elasticities Fuel Price Journey Time Ask Questions Realistic? Reasonable? Experience from Past Studies Judgement (subjective) Take advise from the expert Contact the supplier Select Parameters Select/Tweak Sensitivity (Lambda) Parameters Yes Realistic? – Is it in accordance with general experience? Reasonable?- a subjective judgement with which you can “convince” others No Base Validated Matrix

Problems Running times – can be extensive High number of computers (one for each time period/year/scenario) Difficult to reach convergence specifically for future years – unacceptable Gap values (0.2% recommended - new Guidance 0.15%) Mode Choice modelling (can’t cope with the nested Mode Choice, doesn’t pass the changes in speeds etc. to PT)

Help with SATURN Convergence Importance of well converged SATURN assignment (Delta <0.1%) MASL,NITA,NITA_M – convergence parameters MONACO = T – reduces problems with blocking back at single lane junctions (right turners) NUC => 50 – improves accuracy (hence instability) of signals Latest versions of SATURN help greatly in achieving convergence

Help with DIADEM Convergence Change the assignment method Increase the maximum number of iterations Decrease the stopping values for the gap values Decrease the value of the ‘maximum flow change’ parameter Improve your assignment convergence

Help with DIADEM run time Skimming minimum costs within DIADEM (only if SATURN assignment convergence < 0.1%) SAVEIT = F Assignment Method Algorithm 1 tends to converge quicker Use of the best (high spec) machines NITA = 10 MASL = 100 AUTOK = T KOMBI = 0 NITA_M = 5 DIDDLE = T

DIADEM – Future Year Assignments The same convergence criteria is required – can be difficult to achieve The same structure of the files as for the Realism Test Can significantly increased the running times due to assignment and DIADEM convergence Best matrices are reassigned to produce the final assignment

Example – Strategic Motorway Link SATURN assignment Large model with assignment times > 1.5 hours Six journey purposes AM, IP and PM models Three modelled years and 4 scenarios DIADEM – distribution and frequency responses only considered (no mode choice), WebTAG guidance used for the Lamda Values, Method of Successive Averages

Practical Experience IssueSolutionPositive EffectNegative Effect SATURN assignment Delta > 0.15% Increased MASL/NITA etc.  Delta < 0.04%  Potential to use minimum costs  Improved GAP in DIADEM Significantly increased the running time of the SATURN assignment DIADEM GAP > 0.2As above plus increased the number of iterations and change of the DIADEM algorithm Reduce DIADEM GAP < 0.2 Significantly increased the running time of the DIADEM Lamda Values WebTAG recommended not providing sensible results Decrease the Lamda Values Improve the DIADEM convergence and the elasticises Not within WebTAG guidance, however excepted by the client Issues with elasticity (average < -0.3) Indentify local area conditions (make up of the local journey purpose split) Able to demonstrate sensible elasticises for the model area Not within WebTAG guidance, however excepted by the client Run times too highHigher spec computers and Cordon the model Reduce run timesCosts

Summary Lessons Learned Aware of the guidance How to select sensitivity parameters Convergence Criteria Running Times

SATURN and DIADEM Practical Experience Toni Dichev 31 st Oct 2008