Exercising our Data Analysis and Student Targeting Muscles Principal Meeting: February 2009 Using Data to Make Informed Decisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 PTA Process Task Force January Task Force Participants Alan Gellman Beth Rhine Elizabeth Moyle LaShawn Route-Chatmon Lisa Hobbs Lisa Puntillo.
Current Comfort Level with Learning Targets
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Single Plans for Student Achievement Cambrian School District May 2012.
GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
The CEP as a Living Document: Determining the Effectiveness of the Plan 1.
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Documenting Current Practice and Defining Key Dimensions Ann-Marie Faria, Ph.D. & Jessica Heppen, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
TIMBERLANE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ACTION PLANS Timberlane Regional Middle School Timberlane Regional High School Timberlane Regional Music Department.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Strategies for School-wide Achievement
Data Teams. Which comes first – the data or the team?
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
PLCs – Review from the DuFours PLCs must be a part of what we do – its that important! If supervision is mandatory, then teacher time to learn & share.
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Leadership In Support of English Learners Merle Price January 18, 2005.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Silvia C. Dorta-Duque de Reyes San Diego County Office of Education
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
WELCOME! DATA TEAM COACH TRAINING  Review the PLC Process, Roles and Expectations  Provide an opportunity for questions and possible responses.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Smarter School Spending Community of Practice
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Single Plan For Student Achievement
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
Presentation transcript:

Exercising our Data Analysis and Student Targeting Muscles Principal Meeting: February 2009 Using Data to Make Informed Decisions

AiS & Data Tools Board Theory of Action Plan and Target Student Achievement as Measured by the Data Dashboard Indicators Target Students for Immediate Improvement on the CST Cycle of Continuous Improvement Thought Process Cycle of Continuous Improvement Thought Process 2

Mastery Objectives:  To strengthen the culture of continuous improvement  To use data to make informed decisions  To target students for immediate impact Ground Level 10,000 feet 40,000 feet 3

Who’s Struggling? R-FEP Students still at “Basic” on the CST in ELA FBB/BB to Basic A Student Group that typically slides that you want to hold ground? Project 980: Students who are at proficient/advanced but with a low GPA? Project “089”: Students who are at FBB or BB, but with a high GPA? What Student Group? EL, R-FEP, an Ethnic group, 9 th graders, 10 th graders What subject area? CST Tested Areas: Algebra, Geometry, ELA, Biology, Life Science, MHW You want to help kids and move the achievement dials (% Proficient, Data Dashboard, AYP, API)... Think big splash items 4

Universal Academic Support What is the universal support 7-12? (what touches every students and every teacher?) What is the universal support at your site? Targeted Academic Intervention for Students Project 980/340 CAHSEE Jump Start (HHS, MHS, FHS, RHS) Transcript Analysis – Grad Rate Efforts Immediate Targeted Academic Interventions on CSTs What other targeted interventions do you have at your site? Intensive Academic Support What intensive support services exist at your site? 5

Building Context for Academic Support  List some of the Grade 7-12 “universal academic support” activities in place for all secondary schools  Name some “universal academic support” activities that are engaged in school-wide at my school  Identify some “targeted intervention” groups and practices at my school  List any “intensive support” projects at my school 6

Cycle of Continuous Improvement Reflection Analysis Planning of Instruction Assessment Instructional Strategies 7

Cycle of Continuous Improvement and Project 980/340  Planned activities  Conducted some activities  1 st Semester student outcomes  43% HS improvement  32% MS improvement 8

Lucky Good results with no understanding of the reasons. Replication of success not probable. Leading Good results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication quite probable. Losing Poor results, with no understanding of the reasons. Learning Poor results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication of mistakes not probable. The Leadership and Learning Matrix Conditions for Excellence 9

Cycle of Continuous Improvement Reflection Analysis Planning of Instruction Assessment Instructional Strategies 10

Cycle of Continuous Improvement  What was our plan?  What was implemented?  What assessment was used?  Analyze the entries for student contacts for your school–  What can we learn about the action plan implementation process? Quality?  How do the actions match with results?  Reflect on what continuing needs this group of students has for the remainder of the year? How will you adjust the plan for the remainder of the year? 11

Project 980/340 Examination 12  We had a plan to work with a particular group of students to improve GPAs.  Were there any other goals?  What did we actually end up doing?  Did we all do the same thing? (Pair-Share)  Did we document everything we did?  What holes did we have to fill in as we went along?  What modifications to our plan did we have to make?

Project 980/340 Examination 13 theory In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. practice In practice, there is. - Yogi Berra

Project 980/340 Examination 14  How many contacts did each student receive?  How many caring adults did each student come in contact with?  What types of contacts do we see?  What would we say, based on our evidence, about the quality of the contacts?  Did we make all our?

Project 980/340 Examination 15  How are our efforts through this program connected with the outcomes we see?  What conclusions would we use in our next planning cycle?  What practices should we continue? Do more of? Stop doing? Start doing? Change?

16 Planning What will I do (differently) to ensure that every student achieves the goal Goal : Create a plan to bring up GPAs Resources : Counselors, VPs, Teachers, etc. Implementation Implement planned interventions activities before re-assessing progress Assessment: Did they get it now? Goal : Administer common “assessment” (e.g., GPA). Analyzed at a pre- determined time Analysis Did we actually implement our plan? What helped our students? What are the outcomes? Any “side-effects” or benefits? Goal : Identify at least one common successful practice Resources : Assessment results; analysis of log entries Reflection How successful was our effort? What should we do more of? What should we stop doing? Why? Goal: Determine why students may/may not have made progress Cycle of Continuous Improvement

Purpose: Target a specific group of students to increase their achievement at least one performance level on one or more areas of the CST Steps to Success: 1. Use AiS to identify students for immediate intervention 2. Develop a proposal for intervention (enlist others in this work) Submit proposal to Chris Evans for review Submit purchasing exception to Chris Evans Approval or invitation to “rework it” If approved, Chris will submit it to the CAO 3. Initiate action plan Monitor and adjust implementation Prepare “current reality” assessment of the level of implementation and interim impactPurpose: Target a specific group of students to increase their achievement at least one performance level on one or more areas of the CST Steps to Success: 1. Use AiS to identify students for immediate intervention 2. Develop a proposal for intervention (enlist others in this work) Submit proposal to Chris Evans for review Submit purchasing exception to Chris Evans Approval or invitation to “rework it” If approved, Chris will submit it to the CAO 3. Initiate action plan Monitor and adjust implementation Prepare “current reality” assessment of the level of implementation and interim impact Immediate Targeted Academic Intervention 17

Lucky Good results with no understanding of the reasons. Replication of success not probable. Leading Good results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication quite probable. Losing Poor results, with no understanding of the reasons. Learning Poor results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication of mistakes not probable. The Leadership and Learning Matrix Conditions for Excellence 18

Conditions for Excellence  Between now and June, we have the opportunity to identify where practices and interventions are fitting on the matrix on the “conditions for excellence” dimension  Did we engage the targeted group of students  Did we follow through on the action plan steps  What is the level of use (level of quality) of the practice(s) within the action plan  What interim student outcomes did we employ to assess and tweak the program 19

Lucky Good results with no understanding of the reasons. Replication of success not probable. Leading Good results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication quite probable. Losing Poor results, with no understanding of the reasons. Learning Poor results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication of mistakes not probable. The Leadership and Learning Matrix Conditions for Excellence Did we engage the targeted group of students Did we follow through on the action plan steps What is the level of use (level of quality) of the practice(s) within the action plan What interim student outcomes did we employ to assess and tweak the program 20

Lucky Good results with no understanding of the reasons. Replication of success not probable. Leading Good results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication quite probable. Losing Poor results, with no understanding of the reasons. Learning Poor results with clear understanding of the reasons. Replication of mistakes not probable. The Leadership and Learning Matrix Conditions for Excellence 21

Today’s Task 1.Examine a student group and subject that can be positively impacted with a Spring 2009 immediate impact intervention (you may want to stick with the R-FEP example from last meeting)  Discuss with a partner the academic need for this group. What specific content can make a difference this Spring?  Discuss with a partner a “best practices” structure and activities to use with this group 2.Complete an Action Plan Budget proposal (if needed) Resources needed Action steps Monitoring plan Submit Budget Request to Chris 22

Data Explorations Subgroup/Subject Examined Findings 23

24 Action Plan for Immediate Impact on CSTs District Improvement Actions Data Dashboard Performance Targets Identified Areas of Need Student Performance Data Analysis Actions to Improve Student Achievement & Close Achievement Gap by Subgroup Funding Source (Title I, EIA-SCE, EIA- LEP, ELAP, SLIBG, GATE, Art/Music, High Priority, QEIA,Prop 10, etc.)

25 Action Plan for Immediate Impact on CSTs District Improvement Actions Data Dashboard Performance Targets Identified Areas of Need Student Performance Data Analysis Actions to Improve Student Achievement & Close Achievement Gap by Subgroup Funding Source (Title I, EIA-SCE, EIA- LEP, ELAP, SLIBG, GATE, Art/Music, High Priority, QEIA,Prop 10, etc.)