S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.
Advertisements

G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
LIGO Data Quality Monitoring Keith Riles University of Michigan.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M DMT Monitors: Beyond the FOM John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LLO August 18, 2006.
LIGO-G W Summary of S1 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab 9 September 02.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Software Tools Keith.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
THE EVENT DISPLAY TOOL Shantanu Desai Penn. State University Scimon Camp, Livingston, LA August 18, 2006.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 1 “Data quality studies for burst analysis of Virgo data acquired during.
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.
G Z 1 New Glitches seen/studied in Block-Normal Shantanu Desai Pennsylvania State University for Glitch Working Group and many others Detchar.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Jan 12, 2009LIGO-G Z1 DMT and NDS2 John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Ligo PAC, Caltech, Jan 12, 2009.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
1 LIGO-G Z Glitch and veto studies in LIGO’s S5 search for gravitational wave bursts Erik Katsavounidis MIT for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 SixtyHertzMon Update Junyi Zhang & Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
Proposing a DMT monitor for studying micro- seismic noise and up-conversions S. Mukherjee & R. Grosso UTB & U. Erlangen, Germany LSC Det Char Telecon,
LIGO-G Z Data Quality Segments Repository K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Data Quality Segments Repository Keith Riles (University.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech. Contents ● Segment Database ● Automatically generated segments ● Other segments ● Segment summary.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
LSC meeting – Mar05 Livingston, LA A. Di Credico Syracuse University Glitch investigations with kleineWelle Reporting on work done by several people: L.
DAQ Errors John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC Analysis Meeting Tufts June 6, 2004.
LIGO-G050197LSC Collab. Mtg, LHO, August 16,20051 S4 Data Quality & S5 Preview John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO Livingston Observatory Commissioning Status and Proposed Commissioning Activities Prior to S1 Mark Coles May 13, 2002.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
Online DQ Segments and Triggers John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
LIGO-G W Interferometer and modecleaner transients during the E2 run Rauha Rahkola and Ray Frey University of Oregon Rick Savage LIGO Hanford.
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
LIGO-G Z March 21, 2007 March 2007 LIGO/Virgo Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Cataloguing Keith Thorne for the Spectral Line Working Group.
Data Quality Investigation LIGO-G E John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO Liivingston, March 18, 2003.
LIGO-G E S2/S3 Data Quality Flagging John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Hanover, October 25, 2007.
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
S2/S3 Glitch Investigation Update
Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Presentation transcript:

S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007

Segment overview ● Segments continue to be generated both online and offline ● Analysis groups should remember that flags should be chosen carefully after considering the requirements of the specific analysis. ● Keith Riles maintains the definitive list of segment descriptions at:

Recent Additions/Changes ● SEVERE_LSC_OVERFLOW (clarification) ● ASC_Overflow (clarification) ● POWERMAG, POWERMAINS_GLITCH, POWERMAINS_DISRUPTION ● TCS_GLITCH_LOUD ● TRAIN_LIKELY ● AS_TRIGGER (update) ● SEISMIC_EY_99PCTL_3_10Hz ● more?

LSC ADC Overflows ● PD_Overflow, MASTER_OVERFLOW_LSC – derived from Xn:LSC-MASTER_OVERFLOW – includes overflows not considered dangerous (e.g. Xn:LSC-SPOB) ● SEVERE_LSC_OVERFLOW – only “important” ADCs: ASPD, REFLPD1, POB – V2 generate offline retroactive to start of S5. ● LSC_OVERFLOW: overflows not expected to impact analysis

ASC ADC Overflows ● ASC_Overflow, MASTER_OVERFLOW_ASC – derived from Xn:ASC-MASTER_OVERFLOW – ASC_Overflow generated online - recommended ● We are planning to make a “severe” analog (SEVERE_ASC_OVERFLOW) with e.g. the WFS PDs and any other critical ASC ADC.

Power Mains & Magnetometers ● Evidence has emerged that sever power fluctuations show up in DARM_ERR: magnetic coupling. ● POWERMAG: Laura tabulated segments with multiple LHO magnetometer glitches with kleinewelle significance > 1000 ● Robert got a list of power line disturbances from BPA including 28/31 events from Laura's list. – POWERMAINS_GLITCH: Capacitor charging events, higher frequency, less impact. – POWERMAINS_DISRUPTION: greater impact on LIGO

TCS Glitching (new) ● TCS Lasers skip mode occasionally causing glitches in DARM_ERR ● Shantanu tabulated loud TCS kleineWelle glitches to form the TCS_GLITCH_LOUD segments

SEISMIC_EY_99PCTL_3_10Hz ● Masahiro tabulated segments – High LHO EY 3-10 Hz seismic blrms – Threshold set for ~1% dead-time in each of 4 epochs – Local truck traffic?

Train Likely ● Passage of trains flagged by Jacob Slutsky et al. ● EY Seismic blrms greater than ~3mm/s. ● ±8m time window tuned to inspiral triggers.

AS_TRIGGER ● IFO switches to “Triggered” mode (AS port uses AS_PD5 only) after various PD saturations. – Robust running, maintains lock – Noise floor, calibration unusable ● Still(?) no interlock against science mode during triggered running -> occasional screwup. ● I tabulated AS_TRIGGER segments – Xn:LSC-AS_TRIGL≠0 during science mode – Tabulated from second frames – H1:4s, H2:415s, L1:3792s through ~2/8/2007

● Segment types: – CALIB_DROPOUT_1SAMPLE – CALIB_DROPOUT_1SEC – CALIB_DROPOUT_AWG_STUCK – CALIB_DROPOUT_BN – CALIB_GLITCH_ZG ● Differ in size, length ● Frequency reduced significantly since ~June, 2006 Calibration Line dropouts

Potential New Segments ● Severe ASC – WFS Overflow++ ● Dewar glitches ● Coil overflows ● Enhanced Seismic? ● IFO not Locked – conlog broken ● AutoBurt ● Autoburt – Hourly glitch ● Tidal Servo

Segment Source Classes ● Category A: data that don't exist or are not taken during normal locked Science mode running ● Category B: transients in channels with direct coupling to LSC ● Category C: Noisy IFO auxillary channels ● Category D: Noisy periods based on PEM and other data. ● Category E: Informational and statistical.

Class A Segment Dead Times

Class B Dead Times + = online

Class C Segment Dead Times + = online

Class D Segment Dead Times + = online

Class E Segment Dead Times