PPKE JÁK Budapest Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence Environmental Democracy Conference 19th October, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Advertisements

Agrobiodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Selected Issues under the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Joint Aarhus Convention/Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety workshop on public awareness, access to information and public participation regarding living modified.
Domestic Import Regulations for GMOs and their Compatibility with WTO Rules: Some Key Issues Heike Baumüller ICTSD Trade and Development Symposium
Access to the European Court of Justice: is the door unbolted? Access to the European Court of Justice: is the door unbolted? Carol Hatton SolicitorWWF-UK.
Model Act: Proposed Provisions for a Transparent, Effective and Workable Biosafety Regulatory Framework Stanley H. Abramson, Esq. Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Suzanne Davis Senior Research Officer – Jamaica Clearing-House Mechanism Natural History Division Institute of Jamaica.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19.
Public access to environmental information in water supply and sanitation: sharing good practices, identifying gaps and overcoming challenges Ilya Trombitsky.
Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology
Current Status of Food Traceability in European Union Willy De Greef IBRS.
DEPARTMENT: AGRICULTURE Genetically Modified Organisms Act, 1997 (Act No. 15 of 1997) By Shadrack R. Moephuli (Dr.) Registrar: GMO Act 14 April 2003.
Biosecurity Laws and Regulations in Turkey Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Avni Öktem Nanobiotechnology R&D Group, Department of Biological Sciences Middle East Technical.
“PRECAUTION AND THE REGULATION OF LIVING MODIFIED ORGANISMS (LMOs)” EMMA ISSATT.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Drew L. Kershen University of Oklahoma College of Law Earl Sneed Centennial Professor of Law Copyright 2005, all rights.
Consistency of SEC assessment under the Cartagena Protocol with other international obligations Karinne Ludlow, Monash University, Australia
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Cartagena protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the International debates (COP- MOP) Stakeholders’ workshop on the Biosafety.
The Aarhus Convention and Access to Justice in Ireland Where are we now? Michael Ewing Coordinator of the Environmental Pillar
Model diagram to consider infrastructure projects in Serbia Aleksandar Kovacevic.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Confronting Contamination: Biosafety Lim Li Lin, Third World Network.
Training Workshop for Regional Advisors Bangkok, Thailand 15 – 27 May 2006.
EPHA EGM 2/12/2002 A definition of health A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
Cooperation between the African Union (AU) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Co-operation and Development (BMZ) in biosafety issues.
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORK IN SLOVENIA - PUBLIC PARTCIPATION- Martin Batič and Ruth Rupreht Republic of Slovenia Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning.
An Introduction to CPB and Importance of BCH to CPB Obligations.
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
1 Proposal To Extend the Application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Biosafety Protocol to the Hong Kong SAR.
Capacity building workshop on environment and health Public participation and the right to know: Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol Monica Guarinoni Sofia,
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY NDA- DEAT BILATERAL MEETING 1 August 2003 Presenter : M. Mbengashe.
Update on electricity market Baltic Mini Forum 1 October, 2010.
PPSD in specific sectors in Bulgaria - Regional Plans for Development National Programme for Ports Development (2006 – 2015) Vania Grigorova, Jacquelina.
The Principles Governing EU Environmental Law. 2 The importance of EU Environmental Law at the European and globallevel The importance of EU Environmental.
EU legislation on GMOs: Overview and challenges Euro Coop Sustainability Working Group 27 October 2010 Sébastien Goux Unit Biotechnologies.
Guatemala: An evaluation of Biosafety Regulations Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor Univ. of Oklahoma, College of Law Copyright 2007, all.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety And India’s Obligations By Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and.
Protocol on Water and Health: added value and challenges for public participation Tsvietkova Anna MAMA-86’s Water and Sanitation Program Workshop on Water.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop date place.
Aarhus Convention Promoting Transparency in Land Administration Aphrodite Smagadi Legal Affairs Officer Aarhus Convention Secretariat Environment, Housing.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
IMPLEMENTING MEASURES GM FOOD – FEED REGULATION (EC) N° 1829/2003 -Articles 5 and 17 concerning the presentation and preparation of the application -Articles.
1 This project is supported by the European Union 3 rd MEDREG-IMME Seminar Reform and Opening of Maghreb Electricity Markets September 2013 MRA (Malta)
Participatory Environmental Governance : Role of Communities in Europe and Asia Jona Razzaque Reader in Law Bristol Law School, UWE, Bristol, UK Bristol.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Romanian framework concerning GMOs Dr. Valeria GAGIU Institute of Food Bioresources 6 Dinu Vintila Street, , 2 nd district, Bucharest ROMANIA Tel.
SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.
LMO RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER THE IPPC AND THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY Velia Arriagada Rios Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and climate change.
Priority Agricultural Policies and Standards to Advance Agricultural Trade and Access to Inputs Regional Feed the Future and Trade Africa Meeting
UNECE Aarhus Convention Secretariat
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Data Protection: EU & International
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
The Aarhus Convention and Biosafety
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
Presentation transcript:

PPKE JÁK Budapest Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence Environmental Democracy Conference 19th October, 2012

Public Participation Biotechnology and Agriculture Tahyné dr Kovács Ágnes PPKE JÁK

WHAT IS GMO? Article 2 (2) Definition Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs "genetically modified organism (GMO)" means an organism, with the exception of human beings, in which the genetic material has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination;

Use of GMOs Agriculture Food industry Pharmaceutical industry Military Industrial: the living machine sewage system

Why is pp important? The public should have a strong voice, because it is the public as consumers who will eat GMOs, and there is evidence of support for the view that regulation should impose at least a labeling obligation.

Aspects of public participation (in the light of participation rights) Informing and educating the public Consult the public in the decision-making process (& make the results of the decisions available to the public) Demonstrations (the role of NGOs – public protests)

Informing the public: dual interests

CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Article 23 PUBLIC AWARENESS AND PARTICIPATION 1. The Parties shall: (a) Promote and facilitate public awareness, education and participation concerning the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms in relation to the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health. In doing so, the Parties shall cooperate, as appropriate, with other States and international bodies; (b) Endeavour to ensure that public awareness and education encompass access to information on living modified organisms identified in accordance with this Protocol that may be imported. 2. The Parties shall, in accordance with their respective laws and regulations, consult the public in the decisionmaking process regarding living modified organisms and shall make the results of such decisions available to the public, while respecting confidential information in accordance with Article Each Party shall endeavour to inform its public about the means of public access to the Biosafety Clearing- House.

REGULATION (EC) No 1830/2003 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC This Regulation provides a framework for the traceability of products consisting of or containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and food and feed produced from GMOs, with the objectives of facilitating accurate labelling, monitoring the effects on the environment and, where appropriate, on health, and the implementation of the appropriate risk management measures including, if necessary, withdrawal of products. This Regulation shall apply, at all stages of the placing on the market, to: (a) products consisting of, or containing, GMOs, (b) food produced from GMOs, (c) feed produced from GMOs, = placed on the market in accordance with Community legislation.

LABELLING For products consisting of or containing GMOs, operators shall ensure that: (a) for pre-packaged products consisting of, or containing GMOs, the words ‘This product contains genetically modified organisms’ or ‘This product contains genetically modified [name of organism(s)]’ appear on a label; (b) for non-pre-packaged products offered to the final consumer the words ‘This product contains genetically modified organisms’ or ‘This product contains genetically modified [name of organism(s)]’ shall appear on, or in connection with, the display of the product.

Precise labeling is rare

Demonstrations The rule of NGOs: public protests all over the world 6bis Aarchus Convention

The judicial view on public protests against GMOs Protests started in the US and eventually spread to Europe Initially, courts viewed these actions as economic crimes (Greenpeace violations of private property: occupying factories; “correct” re-labeling of product in retail stores…etc.) Over time, courts have begun to adjust their view, taking the environmental and health-related aspects into consideration

The effect of public participation would seem to be blunted by a combination of factors: not all the measures = prescriptive the effectiveness of consultation procedure public participation is dependent on access to information

Thank you for your attention!